Sociopath Community

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by instead lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

here's some transe athlete energy

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

Men are assholes. Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

You're arguing for the benefit of males and all this does and further solidify my stance that Transwomen will never be women because they will also argue that it's everyone else that should catch up to them rather than understand that there are biological differences. Even without males in their sports womyare already achieving Amazonian greatness. That you think males would be what gives them the motivation to "try harder" or be better is sexist as shit 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

No dude youre making this even worse I don't want to go to the bar and see a bunch of women with chins of steel, no ass

While Estrogen's what makes for bigger milkers more padded biceps and a squishier booty, higher T-counts make them more DTF. 

It's even in Red Pill theory to look for arm hair on women, if this continues we may start to see masculine women trend more. 

Also maybe it's more of a me thing, but women with abs are kind of sexy. Abs look bad on everyone if they go overboard but even Japanese RPGs are starting to understand this more overtime: 

 You realize all women have arm hair right? That you don't have to make men compete in women's sports to have women try harder to emulate them. Also stop being gross.

Testosterone translates to higher body hair in both sexes, and thicker hair has become something Red Pill specifically looks for. 

If you want to avoid those types, wear long sleeves. 

 You're being gross and regressive, imagine telling women to wear longer sleeves because a certain type of incel might look at their arm hair.

I'm not the one going out there looking for women based on their thick arm hair, I'm just reporting what testosterone does to people and how Red Pill has chosen to respond to it. 

Body hair on women is natural.

Yes it is, and with higher Estrogen you see less of it appear, even on men. 

You act like I'm making a shaving argument. 

I swear women can't exist without some dude trying to sexualize her in some form. "Arm hair means she's dtf" shut the fuck up and go meet real people.

What if I said "Arm hair means he's dtf", would that be more palatable to you? 

My point here is moreover how the expectations are changing. Much like how if you choose to walk outside topless and blame everyone else for being stared at, walking outside without your arms covered will get judgy thoughts from Red Pill people. 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

Men are assholes.

You were literally made from a man, how can you say this... 

Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

Women and their transsexual counterparts haven't even been competing for long, and you're already bashing it. Are you worried that women will lose en masse?

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

What if the woman could clearly beat those men? 

Do you not see how you're the one carrying the regressive views? 

Men are assholes. Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

While we're at it we might as well make the military only men too right? 

Come on, the world's growing more progressive than this. 

You're arguing for the benefit of males and all this does and further solidify my stance that Transwomen will never be women because they will also argue that it's everyone else that should catch up to them rather than understand that there are biological differences. Even without males in their sports womyare already achieving Amazonian greatness. That you think males would be what gives them the motivation to "try harder" or be better is sexist as shit 

I'm arguing for the benefit of diversity from the current gender trap people have found themselves in. This need for division furthers the division as a matter of practice, and that lends to what people think is and isn't normal, and attractive, which then lends to what people have children, succeeding through Darwinian standards. 

Change what is desirable and you'll see the next generation of offspring reflect it (or force people to breed like cattle, as we saw during slave times in history). Do this enough times and you can make for deeply embedded cultural trends. Give the US a few more generations of offspring time and we should hopefully see lower T-counts trend more and more overtime. 

Xadem said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

Men are assholes.

You were literally made from a man, how can you say this... 

Considering my father would beat me and slam my goddamn head into the wall i feel like I've got the right to say men are assholes. 

Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

Women and their transsexual counterparts haven't even been competing for long, and you're already bashing it. Are you worried that women will lose en masse?

 Transwomen have a biological advantage and aren't women. They should not be in women's sports, spaces or prisons

Lenalee said: 

Xadem said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

Men are assholes.

You were literally made from a man, how can you say this... 

Considering my father would beat me and slam my goddamn head into the wall i feel like I've got the right to say men are assholes. 

I mean, they are, and I say that knowing my father's a legitimately good person who'd even mirror the sentiment. 

Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

Women and their transsexual counterparts haven't even been competing for long, and you're already bashing it. Are you worried that women will lose en masse?

Transwomen have a biological advantage and aren't women. They should not be in women's sports, spaces or prisons

...and Transmen can't be in Men's spaces? 

Lenalee said: 

Xadem said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

Men are assholes.

You were literally made from a man, how can you say this... 

Considering my father would beat me and slam my goddamn head into the wall i feel like I've got the right to say men are assholes. 

Are you that bittered with age? What about those that don't do that? 

Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

Women and their transsexual counterparts haven't even been competing for long, and you're already bashing it. Are you worried that women will lose en masse?

 Transwomen have a biological advantage and aren't women. They should not be in women's sports, spaces or prisons

 But they have the best of both worlds, both male and female, they represent true unity and a step towards a truly egalitarian society. Change always hurts, and transformations often are met with repression. If everyone were trans then we wouldn't have this issue. That is what we are striving for. 

Xadem said: 

Lenalee said: 

Xadem said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

You don't see women becoming more buff as a good thing for women? 

 I don't see normalizing this as benefiting women at all. "not try as hard"? They can try as hard as they like but when their opponent have a clear biological advantage it's not going to matter much. 

You act like Gregarious Trending wouldn't have an impact on society. To leave things as they were by comparison, women being treated as "weaker" risks neotenizing them further overtime, making the gap become even bigger. You instead end up with people wanting to breed with weak, compliant women, which with that and internalized misogyny then lends to that becoming the next generation of people. 

Even if it doesn't, then we can enter the Transhumanism argument of robot parts and experimental steroids. 

But what you're suggesting only benefits men I can't believe that you would be like "what if we could just have women try harder?" as if the problem doesn't lie with the transgendered dudes not trying harder in their male section. They place last in Mens sports, switch over to womens where they have an advantage and place more favorably but you want women to try harder? Shut up.

Your answer is to treat women as the lesser sex. 

 No what I'm suggesting is that trans women have a separate category for them to compete in.

And transmen, and if I were to continue on with this line of questioning I'm beginning to think you don't think a cis-woman should be allowed to compete against cis-men. 

What you're suggesting is that trans woman should be allowed to play in women's sports and that natal women should be made to catch up or try harder so that they could include these men in their sports. 

I'm suggesting that, rather than allow transwomen to play in women's sports that we remove the antiquated gender divide in sports that serves to further misogynistic interests by lumping all people together, then giving society time to breed people into that model. 

Learned helplessness lends to Neotenizing, and through expecting women to not be big and tough you further the stigma that makes it become worse than it could be. 

 In SPORTS BRO??? yeah i don't think they should. 

Men are assholes.

You were literally made from a man, how can you say this... 

Considering my father would beat me and slam my goddamn head into the wall i feel like I've got the right to say men are assholes. 

Are you that bittered with age? What about those that don't do that? 

Still assholes.

Sex segregated sports should remain as is, there are mixed sex sport they can compete in if they choose to do so. 

Women and their transsexual counterparts haven't even been competing for long, and you're already bashing it. Are you worried that women will lose en masse?

 Transwomen have a biological advantage and aren't women. They should not be in women's sports, spaces or prisons

 But they have the best of both worlds, both male and female, they represent true unity and a step towards a truly egalitarian society. Change always hurts, and transformations often are met with repression. If everyone were trans then we wouldn't have this issue. That is what we are striving for. 

 Shut up xadem.