"First you say that I am insecure for not taking the idea into consideration and elaborating on the matter .Now you say that I am insecure because I elaborated...​."
Now where did I say elaborating on the matter would somehow disprove your insecurity? As much as it'd be convenient for your following excuse, that simply wasn't said. What I did say was that you failed to provide a decent excuse for each of the many instances I brought up, none of those instances had anything to do with your personal life or anything outside this forum for that matter.
So if showing how great your life is wasn't enough, you're desperate mind tells you take a fucking insecurity test and post the results to prove it to me. As I said before, if not for the various instances I listed these drastic attempts to prove your lack of insecurity really make it clear. I think the last time someone took a test to disprove someone's opinion of them was Dexter.
"The insecure person needs to showcase his or her accomplishments.- had to do so because Ken asked me to. Otherwise no."
This is perfect. Because I've never asked you to do anything other than explain yourself of accusations I've gathered from your time on the forum. You took it upon yourself to take an alternate way to disprove your insecurity by listing how great your life is, this is of course added to you showcasing all the compliments you've received from forum members :D So the answer to this one so far, is yes.
"The insecure person drops the “humble brag†far too often.- no."
this little quote from you comes to mind: "I doubt that insults would do any harm to you since you tend to take such things as a learning experience; life lesson. We are quite alike in this regard."
"If you say so... still struggling to accept the observation-based compliment? Look who's insecure now :P"
I'd say you'd have a case if I were anyone else, but this wouldn't be the first time you've greeted me with compliments only to put insults behind my back later.
"Each is a bit too far fetched, but if I did deem it wrong, I would not do it. Besides, it happened quite randomly."
The convicting part is not even that it happened, but that it's still in use. Finding a need to continue says enough in itself
"The reference was to another post. You did proclaim going on me pretty hard whereas I am quite calm about the matter."
This doesn't disprove anything I've said, there's not even a point to this reply. You did in fact say I seemed invested in the matter, while simultaneously bragging you speedily wrote 1000+ character description about yourself to disprove my point.
"Proof of the page will be, if need be. Interested parties are free to PM me for some visual footage (upon my acceptance)."
This won't at all disprove what I was being sarcastic about(you only memorizing a couple of the names) You're eagerness to prove otherwise by taking more desperate measures like this just adds to the insecurity accusation. Publicly declaring you'll share video footage to disprove a point you misunderstood, talk about an oversight.