"I would suggest you look up the very first post of this thread in which I clearly implied that I am going to be open for penetration."
Open for criticism if anything would mean your responses would be shorter in length, requiring you to actually be receptive, considerate and accepting of it. You've done the exact opposite, why is that so hard for you to understand.
"Also, I typically don't post much in threads, but not in general. Still, I used to do it a lot in the past, so it's not anything new and most certainly not your achievement."
You typically go through these efforts to prove a point? I see why you stick with indirect and passive aggressive remarks, this clearly isn't your thing.
I would like to point it out that you involved yourself just after I mentioned that you were behind one of the traits in the list (though the trait itself is utterly silly)
The entire list is utterly silly and yet you were insisting it was still a good idea to start changing yourself over it. Typically when an insult is issued one gets sent back.
"continued interacting with very noticeable eagerness, as evident by you replying with "get to that" seconds after I mentioned in the main chat that I might as well reply to Ken since I am home. You weren't active at all in the main chat until that point. You bringing up "I'm thinking about Kenny; He can't for real interpret things like that" completely out of nowhere is another example."
I'm damned by my lurking and fast typing~
This really just adds to the joke really, seeing how both times you were mentioning me without my presence.
"Do I need other excuses? I don't think I do."
Simply proclaiming I'm wrong isn't a very sturdy defense, you dont need anything I'm glad you continue to make the denial more evident.
"I'm glad you're pleased with yourself."
Are you implying I forced you into denial : b
"I like how it sounds."
You mean, you like how it makes you sound
"Also, I did think about removing the list shortly after I posted it due to it being fairly personal and, as I've said, quite a few things were left unmentioned for public reading. I mean, however contradictory some things in it were, they were used to describe me, thus the list provides some input about me. Maybe more than I would share myself. I conducted that some people might have made copies at that time, so I just left it there. But it's okay. I mean, it is not a very significant thing after all."
Exactly why should I give a fuck, what correlation is this drawing to any of my points
"And I have said that you are free to think whatever you want about me."
Yes, it's been your main defense
"Lastly, your latest replies were very repetitive, clinging onto the same few very specific and, as stated before, not too meaningful things, so it seems that we ran out of things to discuss. "
This is the funny part really, because as I said this basically in my previous post. My replies are only getting repetitive in response to your same excuses that you still feel hold water. I've said clearly before that any past instances would be brought up if they have relevance, what exactly is your reasoning for bringing up the same defense each time despite it being contradicted? Oh, wait:
Mee: Do I need other excuses? I don't think I do.
Typically when you disagree with someone's point you provide ample reasoning as to why that logic is faulty, you apparently liked to overlook this or just couldn't
"Thank you dearly for your participation. You're dismissed."
This is the funniest thing I've heard you say yet. I'm sure it gets tiring getting hit with the same points and not being able to respond to them adequately despite them being reiterated each time you ignore them with shit excuses. You can take your leave Mee, I proved my points to the users still reading this tl;dr despute