and maybe if we are lucky there is god or some dmt elves
I would consider that unlucky. Maybe not if the elves are femboys or if God is a femboy and even that wouldn't make sense to last forever. Sort of like how I imagined versions of pagan Gods as femboys including the Norse ones who were not considered to be eternally lasting.
that just makes it sound like you don't want to exist
Huh. You must be feeding it a large corpus of our material outside of this thread? That's an added implication.
Well, my thoughts were obviously first that you would find it more useful to express your thoughts in a manner you think explains better. But is it more "I would have thought this anyway, but couldn't say it" or "this is just better than what I could do" (though I wonder if it's going to make everyone lazy or engineer themselves more like this). My concern, however, is that you should have just said that, because without communicating this it seems more disingenuous, you know? I think it is a worthwhile use of the tool if that is simply what it is. So I guess it was a method question, and wondering where you feel on the consequences.
And about nihilism, I'm just more willing to be agnostic. I have no opinion on it that I probably haven't shared about it already.I do not remember every detail I initially provided, but it has mostly been material from this thread, along with context and points I already remembered. I did not give it enough context at first because I was still learning how to use the tool, but I have since allowed it to build a clearer understanding of the discussion.
I use it to organize my thoughts, reduce ambiguity, and make my position harder to distort or exploit. The views are still mine; the AI helps me express them more clearly and consistently. Given how often discussions with SM shift into personal degradation and derailment, I do not consider using a tool to make my wording less vulnerable disingenuous. If AI helps people communicate more precisely and makes them harder to manipulate or take advantage of, I consider that beneficial.
Please explain the step by step process of it. How you form the posts.
Please explain the step by step process of it. How you form the posts.
I usually assign initials to each person and format each quote as SM: "...", DB: "...", or BT: "...", in chronological order so the AI can track who said what and which reply addresses which point. I also explain that I am DB, although it now remembers that from the ongoing context.
After the quotes, I add my intended point or a rough draft. The AI suggests clearer wording, and I revise, shorten, or correct it until it accurately reflects my position.
