Sociopath Community

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Dragoonback said: 

Dismissing my perspective as 'fabrications' without offering any evidence to the contrary isn't a rebuttal; it's a way to avoid a real debate. If you truly believe the truth dispels my position, you should be able to articulate why. Simply insulting my intelligence suggests you're more interested in posturing than in actual truth.

 Sure.

The post I made, is not an argument. I told a story, and added to the thread in terms of "giving up"

The very paragraph you call an argument. Clearly isn't one. 

This is painfully obvious, is it not ? Yes it is, It's all written here. 

You claim my so called argument is some attempt to validate personal resentment. Meanwhile I'm writing about being at peace with detaching from someone I love unconditionally. The rest of your "perspective" is as deluded. It's certainly without a doubt 100% a fabrication. 

If you'd like to start a debate, you'll have to increase your intelligence. Not just saying that. You're so far off, I'll have to make shit up to entertain your reply. I'd rather not lower my frequency to accommodate shit that has absolutely nothing to do with me. 

You're missing the point. If I'm already at peace and feel validated in my decision, I have no reason to seek validation from an online debate. I shared a story and my own observations; if you perceive those as an argument that requires a rebuttal, that is your projection, not my intent. Dismissing an analysis as delusion or fabrication simply because it doesn't align with your narrative isn't a critique; it is just a refusal to engage. I'm not looking to lower the frequency of this conversation to match insults, so I will leave it at that.

 You "feel validated" but the truth is working against you. 

You magically observed that I was arguing with someone. Nope. 

Like you have to argue with someone for it to be an argument in the first place. 

I told a story, and now you say you told a story. The difference, my story is real, while yours, is for the sake of slandering.

Spatial Mind said: 

 You "feel validated" but the truth is working against you. 

You magically observed that I was arguing with someone. Nope. 

Like you have to argue with someone for it to be an argument in the first place. 

I told a story, and now you say you told a story. The difference, my story is real, while yours, is for the sake of slandering.

Calling an analysis 'slander' is a way to avoid addressing the content of what was written. You shared a story publicly; by doing so, you invite others to interpret, analyze, and discuss the themes within it. That is the nature of a public thread, not an act of slander. I have no personal stake in your story, so there is no motive for me to 'slander' you. We simply see the nature of discussion differently; I view it as an opportunity to exchange perspectives, while you seem to view any outside observation as a personal affront.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

 You "feel validated" but the truth is working against you. 

You magically observed that I was arguing with someone. Nope. 

Like you have to argue with someone for it to be an argument in the first place. 

I told a story, and now you say you told a story. The difference, my story is real, while yours, is for the sake of slandering.

Calling an analysis 'slander' is a way to avoid addressing the content of what was written.

Your "analysis" is incorrect and proceeds to spirals off into the unknown.

Was I arguing ? No. You say I was, then you take it from there wandering around in the dark taking swings. 

Honestly, if I had to handle you another way, I'd be forced to match your bullshit, Start throwing out low energy buzzwords, start crying and saying, "you you you, because this and this" but I prefer being right in the eyes of observers, as I am here. No one feels the need to help me, while if they sided with you at this point they'd... Probably be treated as a lesser person. 

You shared a story publicly; by doing so, you invite others to interpret, analyze, and discuss the themes within it. That is the nature of a public thread, not an act of slander. I have no personal stake in your story, so there is no motive for me to 'slander' you. We simply see the nature of discussion differently; I view it as an opportunity to exchange perspectives, while you seem to view any outside observation as a personal affront.

 Yes, and I also reserve the ability to measure dim people and give them the break down. In the grand scheme I'm the one with any substance.