Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

In Sociopathcommunity what you say and do here is what speaks for you, some will believe you, some won't and with that I'm not convinced you're as smart as you say, and I base that on your shortcomings. It's not important to anyone but you to be seen as the smartest, while actions speak louder than words. 

It's through this that I know Legga is smart. I don't need a list of achievements to recognize the focus and speed of his mind, nor the depth of the things he references. 

If anything, his understanding of things in a textbook sense seems to work against him when it comes to social conventions. 

I don't need a list of achievements to measure one's level of intelligence either. No one really does. 

I'm not referring to when Legga is correct. I'm referring to the same low IQ behavior that makes threads such as this one.  It really doesn't say "smartest person in the room".

Regardless of what Legga does you'll nod along. The man is behaving like a child with a lot to learn. He's genuinely haunted by Inq with little to no reason.

It's been said holding onto hatred is like pouring gasoline on oneself and lighting a match. I can confirm this is very true. What I have to say to Legga, is better than what you have for him when he acts like an ass.  

Why dont you list your own intellectual achievements like you said you would, if nothing else but to keep your own word? We all know it's because your list of achievements pales in front of an idiot, but you can still be a man of your words, instead of being a coward and a liar.

 Ha ha ha. 

Because I don't have to.

True, we know you're an eCoin trader who makes 3D smut as your side hustle. There's not really much more that you need to prove to us than that for how well you're doing. 

We don't use the term e-Coin, as I don't invest in those things. I'm also not a full time trader I follow a 4 year cycle which means taking long positions in safer investments, and buying what I think is good only to sell it off by this time, and I never created 3D porn as a side hustle, though it can yield as much as 30k a month or more. I did it cause its fun to make. I also have an etsy shop and other ventures you never knew about and no one here will ever see. 

I don't need to prove how well I've done or doing either. I really don't. It's a bad idea to even do that in life. If a rich man who flaunted his wealth falls, he'll lose all his Lamborghini friends and all connections he made for having a nice life. Also, when beneficiaries are involved, it's much better that they don't know what they'll get, lest your death will be seen as a life goal or a jackpot but those expecting to become significantly more powerful over your death. 

I'm not anonymous but that has little to do with how I'm seen. It's our output that matters, not our claims and not just in a forum.

If you're not anonymous, why not list your achievements? 

I'm not the one running around saying I'm better than anyone. 

Not the type to take what I have or done and throw it in the faces of people who don't have what I do. 

You want a cock waving contest, cause I don't think you're all that in terms of geneious.

...that spelling alone works against your claims. 

 Well I never really spell genius like that.  And no lol that spelling alone doesn't work against my claims, when you yourself corrected Legga on page 1. I just have more to say about it, cause he has a demon dragging his soul to hell over something so small.  

I don't need a list of achievements to measure one's level of intelligence either. No one really does.

This sums up the entirety of your argument.

Yes, you can evaluate people's investment sawiness without knowing their portfolio or past success. However, dont you think that it matters if someone is a billionaire and made their money with investing?

This is the equivalent of a penniless beggar telling Warren Buffett or Jim Simons that he knows nothing about investing and he can tell how idiotic their advice is, without having anything to show for themselves. In this analogy, you are the penniless beggar, with no intellectual achievements, telling me, with significant intellectual achievements, that you can just tell how stupid I am. You can argue that I'm not the Warren Buffett of the intellectual world, sure, but that's not the point. The point is that I listed significant intellectual contributions when you asked me to, and you didn't. 

I really think that list of intellectual achievements from you would help speed things along, instead of arguing over how much you don't want to, how much my intellectual achievements dont matter, and how much you can just rely on your gut feeling.

...Or you could keep arguing over how much you still dont want to take that Physics competition with me despite allegedly thinking I'm a fraud, while being very strangely resistant to demonstrating any intellectual achievement from yourself. Honestly, people will wonder why you're so vehemently against the idea, and they will likely reach the same conclusion as I do.

But just to give you a chance to explain yourself: Why ARE you so against it? Can you at least tell me if my claimed list of achievements is greater than yours, even if you want to protect your privacy or whatever?

Jada said: 

I don't need a list of achievements to measure one's level of intelligence either. No one really does.

This sums up the entirety of your argument.

Actually it doesn't tbh. Not everyone needs to see a paper detailing how bright someone is. 

Yes, you can evaluate people's investment sawiness without knowing their portfolio or past success. However, dont you think that it matters if someone is a billionaire and made their money with investing?

If you're looking for someone to invest for you, them being rich builds trust, but it won't determine how good they are. Could be a rich conman using money they took to increase their appearance. 

This is the equivalent of a penniless beggar telling Warren Buffett or Jim Simons that he knows nothing about investing and he can tell how idiotic their advice is, without having anything to show for themselves. In this analogy, you are the penniless beggar, with no intellectual achievements, telling me, with significant intellectual achievements, that you can just tell how stupid I am. You can argue that I'm not the Warren Buffett of the intellectual world, sure, but that's not the point. The point is that I listed significant intellectual contributions when you asked me to, and you didn't. 

 You're ignoring the part where I mentioned in here you're measured by your output, not your claims. Based on your output, ( and not just this thread which is no surprise to me ) I have no reason to have faith in you.  

As for your analogy. It's a picture you've painted, as I'm not a penniless beggar, and I do have intellectual achievements. 

Funny thing about Warren Buffett. My investments outperformed each and every one of his. If he did things my way, he would've been able to be a crypto god and sold it off, and it would've went down as his greatest play ever. 

Warren Buffett was a great investor no one can take that away from him, but he fails to invest in tech stocks, and the very tech stocks he ignored, the CEO's turned out richer than him and knocked him down from 2nd, to 10th on the forbes list over the years.

Those who are greater than him are pro crypto too, though even they got into it later than I did. 

Why did Warren Buffett fall back in his greatness ? He's quite negative when it comes to new things so he kept missing the boat again and again.  

I really think that list of intellectual achievements from you would help speed things along, instead of arguing over how much you don't want to, how much my intellectual achievements dont matter, and how much you can just rely on your gut feeling.

A stupid suggestion. I don't even have a Linkedin account where people would be able to gain access to my business contacts, and be able to find and contact colleagues and other key people I built vital relations with. Luna can't do this either, it has to do with associating with too many jackasses online over the years, where they would just love to give you low ratings. Luna has a stalker, and the Kiwis made her into a lolcow. Ed tried to feed me to the Kiwis once, but it backfired. 

Also, I don't measure your intelligence by a gut feeling. I measure it based on your performance, and I'm pretty sure I've mentioned that multiple times already. In this thread you were having yet another moronic episode, and you never had the sense to notice how easy it would be for an average person to see you're making assumptions, and with a passion. 

Do I trust your intellectual achievements ? No. And the reason for that is valid.

Is it important to you that people here acknowledge you for your presumed intellectual achievements ? Absolutely yes, for some reason that has nothing to do with being an intellectual.

Honestly, if you want people to respect you for your intellect, then be of service to them. When you see Med in the chatlog trippin balls, go and talk to her, shoot the shit, give her some bright ideas that will reverse her suffering. With her you need to make the right comments when she says something, she's pretty smart so being simple won't cut it. Or skip my suggestions and help her. 

Go to a Blanc thread and actually read it. Come up with something for her to do or what to mix and match. You don't have to be her savior or the best thing she ever saw, but you'd earn those intellect points.  

Give Delora some ideas on how she can make her parents accept her as a homosexual. Probably not going to happen.

Bully Dexter for being a dumbass, damning his very soul to impress Luna.

Instead you're all. "Oh I agree, people here aren't revealing their true selves and only act in ways they want to be seen" but damn Legga, very few people here are like that including yourself, boasting while anonymous is the way with you, and you insist you're factually the smartest and God forbid anyone who doesn't think so.   

...Or you could keep arguing over how much you still dont want to take that Physics competition with me despite allegedly thinking I'm a fraud, while being very strangely resistant to demonstrating any intellectual achievement from yourself. Honestly, people will wonder why you're so vehemently against the idea, and they will likely reach the same conclusion as I do.

I don't even play chess online anymore, ever since Scarlett destroyed me as though she were a level 10 Ai, and while I can't prove if she cheated, she could've easily. I could've cheated easily.

Now you want to have a physics competition, online and anonymously, meanwhile we have Ai at our fingertips, and I don't trust that you're smart to begin with.  

But just to give you a chance to explain yourself: Why ARE you so against it? Can you at least tell me if my claimed list of achievements is greater than yours, even if you want to protect your privacy or whatever?

Ha ha ha. You're giving me a chance, thank you Legga, I really had no opportunity to explain myself, even though I did that multiple times, and I did explain myself again with this post and even the last. 

As a reminder, I'm not here to appease your demons. I'm here to execute them. Or do you like it whenever you have a dumb episode and start spreading fake shit again and again ? ( Honestly, I would like to hear an answer to this, but you'll only deny what you've done again. )

It's better to be a sore loser than a sore winner, and neither of them are good, but at least a sore loser will have drive and motivation to work and study hard, while a sore winner is a weak minded bitch having meltdowns over miniscule things. 

You didn't answer the question.

If this were a courtroom, you'd be getting the guilty verdict right about now.

Jada said: 

You didn't answer the question.

 I did multiple times on this very page.

What you're doing now is fishing for a desired answer. It's called repetitive questioning. 

But just to give you a chance to explain yourself: Why ARE you so against it? Can you at least tell me if my claimed list of achievements is greater than yours, even if you want to protect your privacy or whatever?

Quote your answer and explain how it answers the question.

Ok I have more time now:

Actually it doesn't tbh. Not everyone needs to see a paper detailing how bright someone is.

Of course not. But if there is a paper, are you not going to look at it?

If you're looking for someone to invest for you, them being rich builds trust, but it won't determine how good they are. Could be a rich conman using money they took to increase their appearance.

Ok so what does determine how good they are then if not evidence?

You're ignoring the part where I mentioned in here you're measured by your output, not your claims. Based on your output, ( and not just this thread which is no surprise to me ) I have no reason to have faith in you.

Your opinion doesnt really matter does it? You're way too biased and invested in showing everyone I shouldn't be taken seriously. I think you're an idiot too, but who gives a shit? Objectively I'm smarter than you, irrespective of how much you want to tell everyone I'm an idiot. The output is the list of achievements, but you want to make being smart about this:

When you see Med in the chatlog trippin balls, go and talk to her, shoot the shit, give her some bright ideas that will reverse her suffering. With her you need to make the right comments when she says something, she's pretty smart so being simple won't cut it. Or skip my suggestions and help her.

Go to a Blanc thread and actually read it. Come up with something for her to do or what to mix and match. You don't have to be her savior or the best thing she ever saw, but you'd earn those intellect points.

Give Delora some ideas on how she can make her parents accept her as a homosexual. Probably not going to happen.

Bully Dexter for being a dumbass, damning his very soul to impress Luna.

Sure, this is all admirable stuff. But you're the one who called me a moron, and I'd say that the correlation between actual tangible intellectual achievements is more direct than.... Empathy. Empathy correlates with wealth too, but you can have a rich heart while having empty pockets. The truth is, you want to make this about things you yourself are good at because you recognize that your intellectual achievements don't reach the level that mine do, and yet you don't want to take back calling me a moron because that'd be embarrassing for you.

You could just take it back, you know. 

Now you want to have a physics competition, online and anonymously, meanwhile we have Ai at our fingertips, and I don't trust that you're smart to begin with.

Then use AI. It's not going to help you. So we're good for a Physics competition then? No rules against AI. 

 Grok, did Spatial answer Jada's question?

No, Spatial did not answer Jada's specific question about posting (or comparing) intellectual achievements.
The core of Jada's repeated challenge is this part:

"Can you at least tell me if my claimed list of achievements is greater than yours, even if you want to protect your privacy or whatever?"

This is a direct, low-bar request: Spatial doesn't have to post his full list or dox himself—he only needs to admit (yes/no or comparatively) whether Jada's previously shared achievements outweigh his own.

Spatial never does this.

He repeatedly explains why he won't post or share a list (privacy risks, LinkedIn issues, no need to prove himself, output > claims, etc.).
He boasts about having intellectual achievements and financial successes (e.g., outperforming Warren Buffett, side ventures).

He attacks the premise (says lists don't matter, calls it a "stupid suggestion," accuses Jada of needing validation).

He refuses the physics competition for separate reasons (potential AI cheating, lack of trust).

But at no point does he address the minimal ask: a simple comparison like

“Yes, your list is greater than mine,”

“No, mine is greater,” or

“They’re comparable.”

Instead, he dodges it entirely and claims he already answered “multiple times” (which he didn't for this specific point).

Jada is correct: Spatial evaded the direct question about the relative merit of their achievement lists. He explained refusal to post his own, but never engaged with the requested comparison.

Jada said: 

I really think that list of intellectual achievements from you would help speed things along, instead of arguing over how much you don't want to, how much my intellectual achievements dont matter, and how much you can just rely on your gut feeling.

For the sake of the topic, I've decided to answer for him.

I decided to comb through the 'Who is smarter' topic, and found he actually did list his idea of achievements: 

Spatial Mind said: 

If I were to boast, I'd go on about my Bitcoin technical analysis graph that I drew in Alice's trading group, and the thing lasted for 2 years into the future hitting my spaced out markers from a 3k price point and up. This isn't something I use in arguments, but I'd argue my graph is better than yours. To others I performed a miracle, but to me this is a late study combined with something I learned in grade 6.

Jada said: 

 Grok, did Spatial answer Jada's question?

No, Spatial did not answer Jada's specific question about posting (or comparing) intellectual achievements.
The core of Jada's repeated challenge is this part:

"Can you at least tell me if my claimed list of achievements is greater than yours, even if you want to protect your privacy or whatever?"

This is a direct, low-bar request: Spatial doesn't have to post his full list or dox himself—he only needs to admit (yes/no or comparatively) whether Jada's previously shared achievements outweigh his own.

Spatial never does this.

He repeatedly explains why he won't post or share a list (privacy risks, LinkedIn issues, no need to prove himself, output > claims, etc.).
He boasts about having intellectual achievements and financial successes (e.g., outperforming Warren Buffett, side ventures).

He attacks the premise (says lists don't matter, calls it a "stupid suggestion," accuses Jada of needing validation).

He refuses the physics competition for separate reasons (potential AI cheating, lack of trust).

But at no point does he address the minimal ask: a simple comparison like

“Yes, your list is greater than mine,”

“No, mine is greater,” or

“They’re comparable.”

Instead, he dodges it entirely and claims he already answered “multiple times” (which he didn't for this specific point).

Jada is correct: Spatial evaded the direct question about the relative merit of their achievement lists. He explained refusal to post his own, but never engaged with the requested comparison.

Paste the URL.