Sociopath Community

Sucks to hear about the fight over the cat. I had a legal fight with our previous landlord some years back and it was pretty exhausting, even though we settled before it escalated too far.

Since theres a lot of mudslinging my way from Spafial, let me try to compile what I think the claims are:

"Legga is not as interesting as me"

Yeah sure you can have that title. I'm not as engaging as you. Most people find my content way too intellectual to engage. I'd be much more popular on slatestarcodex or Mensa or something. I don't really care, I'm not really interested in popularity and I'd say you engage with more people than me, sure, and I think it's one of your more positive traits. I don't have that ability to be interested in everyone.

Anyway, Id say I'm pretty interesting.

"Turncoat is not talking to Legga and should apologize for it"

Turncoat knows me better than you do. The reason hes engaging with you is because youre saying things that are wrong and therefore controversial. I dont care if he engages with me on this topic. We've discussed similar themes several times. You dont need to ask him to apologise on my behalf any more than you need to ask me to apologise on BT's behalf.

"Now is not a good time to tell Legga he's smart because we will reinforce foolish behaviour in him. Lets say he's intellectually bankrupt instead."

Lol.

People are responding to you calling me dumb. The reason they're responding is because I'm factually smarter than you are. They're just correcting you because youre wrong.

Think of it like this. If someone said youre a beggar without a penny to your name, and others corrected that statement, do you think it'd be a valid defense to say that now is not the time to tell Spatial hes wealthy? Its a fact that you have at least a penny to your name, irrespective of what behavior we want to reinforce in you. So this is kinda retarded.

...

At any rate, it is a fact that I am smart, and you know it. You even ran away from that topic where we were supposed to compare intellectual achievements, after I posted mine and you promised to post yours but didn't. What you're doing is licking your wounds. If you thought your intellectual achievements would stack up, then you would not deflect the discussion away from the dedicated thread I made specifically for you to make your case. You keep saying that you "just dont see it" (that I'm smart) with your selective vision, but it's unimportant to the facts of the matter.

"I read that 40 page debate and the aftermath and Inquirer destroyed Legga in that debate even though he was declared winner by a mutually agreed upon judge"

Which argument do you agree with specifically, beyond what TC would call social bandwagoning? Youre saying he won, but why do you think so?

Inquirer and I agreed on a judge. He and I agreed the judge was going to declare the winner and we'd both be happy with the decision. We had the debate. I was declared the winner. Even Inquirer would be honor bound to admit I won if I teased it out of him. Although, in his heart, he no doubt couldn't believe it because of his selective vision. 

Jada said: 

 

Since theres a lot of mudslinging my way from Spafial, let me try to compile what I think the claims are:

"Legga is not as interesting as me"

Yeah sure you can have that title. I'm not as engaging as you. Most people find my content way too intellectual to engage. I'd be much more popular on slatestarcodex or Mensa or something. I don't really care, I'm not really interested in popularity and I'd say you engage with more people than me, sure, and I think it's one of your more positive traits. I don't have that ability to be interested in everyone.

Anyway, Id say I'm pretty interesting.

You're quoting yourself. What I said is beside the point while I said...

"Yes Nate, we all know Inq did the big dirty by now, but you'll carry on Ignoring Legga in his own thread and come at me with the same gossip and other nonsense, standing up for Legga while I'm busy ripping him one for being a dingbat. Yes I'm more interesting and stimulating to talk to, and I'm just pointing out how you really don't have anything of substance to say to Legga, while I do."

"Turncoat is not talking to Legga and should apologize for it"

Turncoat knows me better than you do. The reason hes engaging with you is because youre saying things that are wrong and therefore controversial. I dont care if he engages with me on this topic. We've discussed similar themes several times. You dont need to ask him to apologise on my behalf any more than you need to ask me to apologise on BT's behalf.

You're doing that thing again where you make believe without seeming to notice.

- I never said Nathan should apologize to you, that's something you made up. Maybe it helps you refrain from the uncomfortable truth to sprinkle sugar on my assessments about you. In turn what I did say to Nathan is how he has nothing to say to you in this regard. 

- The reason he's engaging with me is for a few reasons, but it isn't because I was wrong. Bloody everyone else in this thread told you how you're wrong about Inq being BT, and Ed, and a list of other Scandinavians who were members here. My responses were more detailed with content you can piece together, along with my feedback on how a high IQ person wouldn't lose their shit in hatred after winning a debate. You are very conflicted and has been for years while your hatred for Inq has you spewing more fake bullshit.

And what did you just say there ?

"Because you're saying things that are wrong, and therefore controversial"

Real vague Legga. 

"Now is not a good time to tell Legga he's smart because we will reinforce foolish behaviour in him. Lets say he's intellectually bankrupt instead."

Lol.

People are responding to you calling me dumb. The reason they're responding is because I'm factually smarter than you are. They're just correcting you because youre wrong.

You say people, but no one is responding to me calling you dumb, except Nate.

Your continued hatred for Inq spans for nearly half a decade. You see red then come charging and start talking shit and expect people you think who are intellectually inferior to adopt your claims.

What you have is behavior issues that aren't synonymous with a high IQ individual. 

Your EQ, Emotional Intelligence is responsible for how you stumbled when creating this thread, while your IQ goes on display from "choice" you've made to pass off you resentful false wishes as reality. 

It's not just me who rejected your depressive episode of bullshit. 

- You claimed BT is Inq. That is false.

- You claimed the multiple members are Inq. That is false.

- You you don't seem to know how to piece together information with timelines. For example, While Inq is with Crow, he must have been that guy who went to Canada and got laid because Inq is BT.  

- Your composure about Inq is on the same level as a preschooler years after you beat him in a debate. But that wasn't enough, now he owes you a soul. 

You do these things while claiming to be the smartest person in the room while you pierce yourself in real time before our very eyes. 

I'm pointing this out and Nate who only had 3 words for you, and those words also rejected your false claim, wants to come out saying your smart. But of course Nate. 

Think of it like this. If someone said youre a beggar without a penny to your name, and others corrected that statement, do you think it'd be a valid defense to say that now is not the time to tell Spatial hes wealthy? Its a fact that you have at least a penny to your name, irrespective of what behavior we want to reinforce in you. So this is kinda retarded.

...

At any rate, it is a fact that I am smart, and you know it. You even ran away from that topic where we were supposed to compare intellectual achievements, after I posted mine and you promised to post yours but didn't. What you're doing is licking your wounds. If you thought your intellectual achievements would stack up, then you would not deflect the discussion away from the dedicated thread I made specifically for you to make your case. You keep saying that you "just dont see it" (that I'm smart) with your selective vision, but it's unimportant to the facts of the matter.

You're also anonymous so none of what you say about holds any value or weight. If someone believes you're some hotshot scientist with nearly 100 published achievements, it'll only be based on their faith in you. 

While Nathan has faith in you, I simply do not. You gave me no reason to see how you're some hotshot when you perform in ways I look down on. This thread being one of many reason why I see you as I do. Everytime your theme comes up "I'm factually smarter than you" it just makes you seem even more foolish to me.

If it looks like shit, and smells like shit, it would taste like shit. It must be real shit. We know shit when we see shit.

Also it's not important to me how smart you are.

I'm calling out the foolery here. What's visible of you, won't encourage some faith in me that you're so good.  

"I read that 40 page debate and the aftermath and Inquirer destroyed Legga in that debate even though he was declared winner by a mutually agreed upon judge"

Which argument do you agree with specifically, beyond what TC would call social bandwagoning? Youre saying he won, but why do you think so?

That misquote is cringe. It's almost as if your questioning yourself at this point.

I did not read the 40 page debate. If I'm even present in that thread, it would've made a pass early and not have followed it for 40 pages. With little information I can see that event happened sometime in 2019 or 2020 when I wasn't even here at all. 

I do not recall saying Inq won the debate. As a matter of fact, I've asked why continue to gun for Inq if you destroyed him in a debate. I go with the narrative that you won the debate. How you carry on about it is weak and pathetic. If at any point I insinuated Inq won the debate, it would be because he doesn't lose any sleep over it, nor does he carry endless harbor hatred and other childish prizes YOUVE picked up from, get this... winning the debate.   

Inquirer and I agreed on a judge. He and I agreed the judge was going to declare the winner and we'd both be happy with the decision. We had the debate. I was declared the winner. Even Inquirer would be honor bound to admit I won if I teased it out of him. Although, in his heart, he no doubt couldn't believe it because of his selective vision. 

 Boo hoo.

I'm so very sorry to hear that Legga. 

Fuck. It sucks to be a sore winner.

Is there anything you'd like us to do ?

Maybe I can write Inq a letter so he can come down and you can carry on with unfinished business, and unload all of your emotions at him.

That time you created a topic to attack Inq's girlfriend for cheering him at the debate.

The community ripped you a new one for being so obtuse.

Inq's response.

Inq called Legga debate performance a lazy baseless tirade. Then Legga exposes himself as a tyrant, so maybe what Inq says is true.  

Included Alice's response to showcase how the smear against MissC backfired. 

Oh and that thread does backfire pretty hard. But only on you and maybe TC. He was helping Crow put a wedge between Inq and MissC before Crow ditched him for Inq. lol, you guys are so much fun. 

Then what ? You carried on. Here you insinuating that Lena is MissC for the sake of argument.

The best part of this thread, is watching How Crow was operating. At this point in time she was with Nate and already cyberfucking Inq. She took your side, and TC took your side like her tool.

Crow wanted to destroy the girlfriend, and now, Crow is with Inq.

Here we see Crow commanding her sub Nate to remain silent, she's talking to the new guy. There's an upvote from Nathan.

Nathan always takes your side Legga, because Crow never redacted her instructions for him to support you.

What I'm pointing out is, irrational people stick together. 

Hm.

Really seems so. It was very useful for Crow that Legga would attacks MissC like that. The thread spans 21 pages of poo flinging, Legga, TC and Crow on one side, and the rest of the community on the other. 

MissC and I talked about you guys for hours.

You're an axis of evil. Not the bad guys, no no, that title is too cool. You are The Disdainful Ones.

Crows accessories. I think it would hurt to reflect on that realization so you carry on as you were programmed. It's not good nor does it display high intelligence.   

Your take on events as usual is strange Spatial. 


Also I wasn't 'cucked', Crow told people different stories from eachother, either based on what'd be convenient to have omitted or based on how intoxicated she was when chatting with people in DMs. She'd sell me the sanitized versions of events in relation to knowing that, in spite of herself, that either of us seeing the other romantic with someone else would drive us mutually and possessively crazy. 

She and I had multiple arguments over if we could or couldn't handle an open relationship, and after enough of them we'd agreed that neither of us were prepared to watch the other be 'open' like that. She would say over and over that her and Inq were 'just friends' who happened to have a mutual crush, but with how she didn't want to lose Inq to Misscomm over this she tried to juggle both without my consent over it. 

The final straw was when she was trying to convince me that they, as 'just friends', should be able to share a bed together. I was like 'uh, no?' over how that made me deeply uncomfortable, which with chat logs others had sent me if not paraphrasing that fit with existing evidence at the time led to a heated discussion and following that her and I's breakup.

Around this timeframe she was also very pushy about trying to have me quit the forum, and... was acting irregularly at points even by the standards of her seasonal affect. Even with obvious clues to their attachment persisting she kept insisting that it wasn't anything more, that she'll never leave me, that I'm worrying over nothing and that there's nothing to worry about, and after all the shit she and I had gone through I was prepared to believe her in spite of obvious facial expressions made and stories full of holes and skew because I needed things to be okay. 

She tried to arrange a way for me to go with to Sweden, even try to learn the language. I'm not sure how she imagined this going before hearing that my SSI situation made it untenable. 

Guys. At least you have each other, right?

The final straw was when she was trying to convince me that they, as 'just friends', should be able to share a bed together.

That's some next level gaslighting. 

I always thought she was over the top flirty in DMs in a way that made me awkward because it wasnt reciprocated. Anyway, what you're telling is a different version of events than what I heard, so it's curious to hear your version.

Spatial, I dont really know what to say. You're defending people who say they don't need to be defended. you said I'm quoting myself when I quoted "I'm more interesting", and right below that you quote yourself verbatim saying just that.

I'm starting to feel tired over your trolls because they're becoming less and less connected with reality as a function of time. You're so delusional, you even dug up the topic where I attacked MissC. I made it after she attacked me nonstop. What you're going on about is so detached from reality. I never attack people out of the blue. It's kind of like how I made that topic to compare which one of us is more intelligent, but only after you wanted to talk about it in every topic, and still do. Because you deserved it. You also didn't talk about "us guys" nonstop with MissC, you talked about "TC" nonstop with MissC.

If you admit I won the debate, then I dont see the problem. I was smarter than Inq. So just say so, instead of insinuating otherwise. End of inq topic then, you're the one droning on about it, not me.

You're also anonymous so none of what you say about holds any value or weight. If someone believes you're some hotshot scientist with nearly 100 published achievements, it'll only be based on their faith in you. 

This rings hollow after you told everyone that the reason you were not listing your intellectual achievements was because I didn't list mine, and then you ate your words when I posted mine.

At least we all can recognize that my list of intellectual achievements is significantly greater than yours if what I've said for years and years, in DMs, in forum posts, and in confidence, since at least 2014, is true. Really I'm already satisfied here because we can all agree that the person you're calling an idiot has miles more intellectual achievements than you do. You have listed... None.

My point is not that I'm a hotshot scientist. My point in that topic is that while you say I'm an idiot, even an idiot has greater intellectual achievements than you do. So your tirade really says more about you than it does about me. Also, what I said is that I'll break the 100 published works barrier in not too far future. It'll still be 1-3 years I reckon. I'll get there. And when I do, you'll sit there in disbelief. This is all very ordinary to me. If anything, I feel I shouldve achieved more. It's very flattering to me that you don't believe me, though.

Why dont you list your own intellectual achievements like you said you would, if nothing else but to keep your own word? We all know it's because your list of achievements pales in front of an idiot, but you can still be a man of your words, instead of being a coward and a liar.

Turncoat said: 

Your take on events as usual is strange Spatial. 


Also I wasn't 'cucked', Crow told people different stories from eachother, either based on what'd be convenient to have omitted or based on how intoxicated she was when chatting with people in DMs. She'd sell me the sanitized versions of events in relation to knowing that, in spite of herself, that either of us seeing the other romantic with someone else would drive us mutually and possessively crazy. 

She and I had multiple arguments over if we could or couldn't handle an open relationship, and after enough of them we'd agreed that neither of us were prepared to watch the other be 'open' like that. She would say over and over that her and Inq were 'just friends' who happened to have a mutual crush, but with how she didn't want to lose Inq to Misscomm over this she tried to juggle both without my consent over it. 

The final straw was when she was trying to convince me that they, as 'just friends', should be able to share a bed together. I was like 'uh, no?' over how that made me deeply uncomfortable, which with chat logs others had sent me if not paraphrasing that fit with existing evidence at the time led to a heated discussion and following that her and I's breakup.

Around this timeframe she was also very pushy about trying to have me quit the forum, and... was acting irregularly at points even by the standards of her seasonal affect. Even with obvious clues to their attachment persisting she kept insisting that it wasn't anything more, that she'll never leave me, that I'm worrying over nothing and that there's nothing to worry about, and after all the shit she and I had gone through I was prepared to believe her in spite of obvious facial expressions made and stories full of holes and skew because I needed things to be okay. 

She tried to arrange a way for me to go with to Sweden, even try to learn the language. I'm not sure how she imagined this going before hearing that my SSI situation made it untenable. 

 

 I'll take your word for it as there's no reason to believe you'd be okay with how that all played out. 

Jada said: 

Spatial, I dont really know what to say. You're defending people who say they don't need to be defended. you said I'm quoting myself when I quoted "I'm more interesting", and right below that you quote yourself verbatim saying just that.

Oh I'm not defending them, I'm pointing out just how much of a sore winner you are. That you even went as far as to attacking Inq's girlfriend cause she was cheering him on in a debate he lost. That sir, is a sick mind.  

And the quotes you made are as you said, your interpretation if what I'm saying. Who else are you quoting if not yourself ?

I'm starting to feel tired over your trolls because they're becoming less and less connected with reality as a function of time.

The reality is that you were wrong yet again. Passionately wrote too which is the worst way to be wrong. Irrational action from irrational mindset consumed with hatred. Just from winning a debate too, that's reality and it's what I'm calling you out on. 

You're so delusional, you even dug up the topic where I attacked MissC. I made it after she attacked me nonstop. What you're going on about is so detached from reality. I never attack people out of the blue. It's kind of like how I made that topic to compare which one of us is more intelligent, but only after you wanted to talk about it in every topic, and still do. Because you deserved it. You also didn't talk about "us guys" nonstop with MissC, you talked about "TC" nonstop with MissC.

Glass ego. No what I'm going on about is how weak your emotional control is, it's pathetic and it guides your conclusions and you literal spiral off in directions based on falsehoods. Lack of sense. It's been years and you're still knee jerked about Inq and how he lost that debate. That kind of hatred would've easily spilled over to MissC.

If you admit I won the debate, then I dont see the problem. I was smarter than Inq. So just say so, instead of insinuating otherwise. End of inq topic then, you're the one droning on about it, not me.

lol I never read your debate, but I'm totally convinced you won it, but that's the thing Legga, you won the debate and you're so sore over it. Years later you're all "Inq is this, inq is that, Inq is horrible, Inq has you all fooled, he's this member and that member". It's pure trash and you're taking issue with me pointing it out.

You remain defensive over it, and that's an example of why pride is one of the 7 deadly sins. 

You're also anonymous so none of what you say about holds any value or weight. If someone believes you're some hotshot scientist with nearly 100 published achievements, it'll only be based on their faith in you. 

This rings hollow after you told everyone that the reason you were not listing your intellectual achievements was because I didn't list mine, and then you ate your words when I posted mine.

I told you earlier on in that thread that I won't do it. It's dumb, and being anonymous you can post whatever you want for argument sake. I also know that you talk a lot of delusional shit like you did when starting this very thread.

Regardless of what I said you insisted. I said you want to do it go ahead, so you did. As for me, I did what I said I was going to do. 

At least we all can recognize that my list of intellectual achievements is significantly greater than yours if what I've said for years and years, in DMs, in forum posts, and in confidence, since at least 2014, is true. Really I'm already satisfied here because we can all agree that the person you're calling an idiot has miles more intellectual achievements than you do. You have listed... None.

No one really cares about your list of intellectual achievements. No one really knows you. Look at Ed. He was supposed to be a complete stud 100 feet tall, shredded kickboxer with a body count of 300. He also had the temperment of a toddler. He's anonymous and all that's believed of him on a forum like this, is in good faith. When asked I'd say Ed could've been a cripple in a wheelchair as he'd simp at anything with a vagina, painting a picture of himself how he'd rather people treat him.

In Sociopathcommunity what you say and do here is what speaks for you, some will believe you, some won't and with that I'm not convinced you're as smart as you say, and I base that on your shortcomings. It's not important to anyone but you to be seen as the smartest, while actions speak louder than words. 

My point is not that I'm a hotshot scientist. My point in that topic is that while you say I'm an idiot, even an idiot has greater intellectual achievements than you do.

When you say and do dumb things, that's what stands out and it's what you did yet again with this thread. 

Hot air, misdirection and hatred, even after winning a debate ( amazing how I even have to mention after winning a debate which shows what I'm dealing with. ), is NOT the way of an intellectual. And it's been years now. 

So your tirade really says more about you than it does about me. Also, what I said is that I'll break the 100 published works barrier in not too far future. It'll still be 1-3 years I reckon. I'll get there. And when I do, you'll sit there in disbelief. This is all very ordinary to me. If anything, I feel I shouldve achieved more. It's very flattering to me that you don't believe me, though.

Again, there's substance in what you do here. You're making false accusations based on hatred for Inq, which is literally smearing shit, then you say "I'm going to break the 100 published works barrier".

My reasons for not thinking you're all that bright are for good reasons. Reasons you dismiss, even in this thread where you fucked up yet again. Even Blanc came out and told you and all she knows about are spas bags and nailpolish. 

Why dont you list your own intellectual achievements like you said you would, if nothing else but to keep your own word? We all know it's because your list of achievements pales in front of an idiot, but you can still be a man of your words, instead of being a coward and a liar.

 Ha ha ha. 

Because I don't have to. And if I don't do it, that doesn't make me a liar cause it's not in my nature to boast about my achievements as a way to convince others I'm better than they are. No sir I don't do that, only insecure weak minds feel that "need" in my opinion. Valid point again. 

I leave it up to others to formulate how I'm seen. Here I'm the zen one. I've been told recently that I'm needed here, as I'm very helpful, that was when I was giving CS instructions on how to get off the street, and get her child back.

These days some members say I'm like Andrew Tate and it has to do with my consistent outlook and takes over a decade of reading what I wrote. I'm not like him though, I probably could shoot the shit and go deep with the Tate Brothers for an hour before they'd try to use my as a resource in their cult.  

I'm not anonymous but that has little to do with how I'm seen. It's our output that matters, not our claims and not just in a forum.

You want a cock waving contest, cause I don't think you're all that in terms of geneious. That isn't the way of someone with a high IQ either as we only worry about what matters. With this my reasons are valid and justified. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Jada said: 

Spatial, I dont really know what to say. You're defending people who say they don't need to be defended. you said I'm quoting myself when I quoted "I'm more interesting", and right below that you quote yourself verbatim saying just that.

Oh I'm not defending them, I'm pointing out just how much of a sore winner you are. That you even went as far as to attacking Inq's girlfriend cause she was cheering him on in a debate he lost. That sir, is a sick mind.  

...she was on Team Legga. 🤣

It wasn't just me trying to convince him that Legga's smart, and we both were on the same page when Legga was winning. 'Let Inquirer Defend Himself' was her saying to let him step over his own feet instead of me putting words in his mouth, she was looking for him to blunder. 

You're so delusional, you even dug up the topic where I attacked MissC. I made it after she attacked me nonstop. What you're going on about is so detached from reality. I never attack people out of the blue. It's kind of like how I made that topic to compare which one of us is more intelligent, but only after you wanted to talk about it in every topic, and still do. Because you deserved it. You also didn't talk about "us guys" nonstop with MissC, you talked about "TC" nonstop with MissC.

Glass ego. No what I'm going on about is how weak your emotional control is, it's pathetic and it guides your conclusions and you literal spiral off in directions based on falsehoods. Lack of sense. It's been years and you're still knee jerked about Inq and how he lost that debate. That kind of hatred would've easily spilled over to MissC.

---

but I'm totally convinced you won it, but that's the thing Legga, you won the debate and you're so sore over it. Years later you're all "Inq is this, inq is that, Inq is horrible, Inq has you all fooled, he's this member and that member". It's pure trash and you're taking issue with me pointing it out.

You remain defensive over it, and that's an example of why pride is one of the 7 deadly sins. 

None of this really denies what is bolded and underlined above. 

Also... imagine winning a debate, but seeing the bandwagon try to gaslight that it doesn't count somehow. He won the bout, and those who didn't take it seriously did so over skipping large portions of the debate with a conclusion already made in their minds. 

It's easy to get a chip on your shoulder over that, in ways I'd say are reasonable to develop when confronted with. It feels weird to see the circus of your peers when you win but they can't understand how, so they instead deny the outcome loudly and brazenly. 

To a smart person, it's like watching cavemen call the person from the year 3000 retarded over having less experience with hunting dinosaurs with clubs. It may even harken back to other experiences with people he knew growing up where his being correct did not otherwise lead to a social victory. 

I still think the bandwagon did Legga dirty in this case, and I can see how that'd have someone develop some level of spite. Still though he tries to debate stuff, and play dress-up with new names to get people to be honest from a different vantage point, rather than give up over becoming jaded. 

If you admit I won the debate, then I dont see the problem. I was smarter than Inq. So just say so, instead of insinuating otherwise. End of inq topic then, you're the one droning on about it, not me.

lol I never read your debate

That was obvious from the getgo, which is why he shit-tested you over the claim. 

This rings hollow after you told everyone that the reason you were not listing your intellectual achievements was because I didn't list mine, and then you ate your words when I posted mine.

I told you earlier on in that thread that I won't do it. It's dumb, and being anonymous you can post whatever you want for argument sake. I also know that you talk a lot of delusional shit like you did when starting this very thread.

Regardless of what I said you insisted. I said you want to do it go ahead, so you did. As for me, I did what I said I was going to do. 

This is why achievements are a stupid way to compare intelligence, and why your having presented it in the first place as something to focus on was foolish. 

This is him playing out your claim, and your calling him doing so foul. Just make something up if you don't have anything worth saying, it'll at least get past this roadblock won't it? 

At least we all can recognize that my list of intellectual achievements is significantly greater than yours if what I've said for years and years, in DMs, in forum posts, and in confidence, since at least 2014, is true. Really I'm already satisfied here because we can all agree that the person you're calling an idiot has miles more intellectual achievements than you do. You have listed... None.

No one really cares about your list of intellectual achievements. No one really knows you. Look at Ed. He was supposed to be a complete stud 100 feet tall, shredded kickboxer with a body count of 300. He also had the temperment of a toddler.

Archetypally speaking, how smart do you expect people being punched in the head often to be? 

You've seen what Football does to people right? Imagine boxing. He may have behaved that way out of a combination of testosterone and brain damage. 

He's anonymous and all that's believed of him on a forum like this, is in good faith. When asked I'd say Ed could've been a cripple in a wheelchair as he'd simp at anything with a vagina, painting a picture of himself how he'd rather people treat him.

...he did get atypical responses out of some people on this forum... 

In Sociopathcommunity what you say and do here is what speaks for you, some will believe you, some won't and with that I'm not convinced you're as smart as you say, and I base that on your shortcomings. It's not important to anyone but you to be seen as the smartest, while actions speak louder than words. 

It's through this that I know Legga is smart. I don't need a list of achievements to recognize the focus and speed of his mind, nor the depth of the things he references. 

If anything, his understanding of things in a textbook sense seems to work against him when it comes to social conventions. 

Why dont you list your own intellectual achievements like you said you would, if nothing else but to keep your own word? We all know it's because your list of achievements pales in front of an idiot, but you can still be a man of your words, instead of being a coward and a liar.

 Ha ha ha. 

Because I don't have to.

True, we know you're an eCoin trader who makes 3D smut as your side hustle. There's not really much more that you need to prove to us than that for how well you're doing. 

I'm not anonymous but that has little to do with how I'm seen. It's our output that matters, not our claims and not just in a forum.

If you're not anonymous, why not list your achievements? 

You want a cock waving contest, cause I don't think you're all that in terms of geneious.

...that spelling alone works against your claims.