Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 965
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast
Jada said: 

Inquirer posted a photo. The person was holding a note that said "Inquirer". For someone who feels the need to showcase how I dont know enough about SC lore or something, you should know this.

Yes I know about the "kid" with the Inquirer sign, but it falls flat and here's why. 

That wasn't really Inq. It was his cousin or something along those lines. The kid in the image was quite young, too young to be Inq. IF, that image were the real Inq, it would've been confirmed by members who had video net meetings with the guy. 

Did I burst your bubble or do you still think that image is the real Inq ?

Otherwise you wasted time bringing that up, AND I was able to smoke that point with the truth,even you might know.  

.

.

.

When asked, what is it about Inq that has you so shaken, you're answer wasn't an answer, but a question, and I quote you:

"Did you know that Inquirer drove SC2.0 to shut down? He manipulated Luna and then got Good to replace her."

That's fabricated.

Not saying it's you who made that up, maybe you were fooled into thinking that happened, probably not, so I'll ask what I think is a time wasting question. Who told you that or what lead you to think that happened ?

.

.

In the last days of Luna's SC she was having meltdowns over Jim Cawk and TC. None of them deny it and even take credit for Luna's meltdown.

CP was being spammed on the forum. Luna, Michael, Myself, Edvard and Inquirer were combating them with mod tools, until Luna couldn't handle it anymore. 

I had a front row seat, and I had a seat behind the scenes before the supernova. Also Legga, unlike those who were left behind, I was on the Arc.

Now you'll probably say Inq was a part of it, and how he's really Cawk, and you're reasoning which is fake is, you hate Inq cause he manipulated Luna into destroying the forum.... But you're not mad at Jim, and TC who famously take credit for Luna's Meltdown.

Maybe in your deluded world none of what I said happened, and if TC really did that, you won't be mad at him, for he isn't Inq, the man who shook you up, obviously for some other reason.  

.

What also isn't smart is how you're making enemies with Buttered Toast. 

You HATE Inq with a passion, and now you're damn sure based on hot air and nothing else, BT is Inq.

You're all for unmasking BT, so you can trample him, then it would be expected that everyone will be like, wow Legga you fucking brilliant soul. But what you're really doing is a sacrifice. Someone who shares a comradeship with you simply for being a member here, you're labeling him as someone you hate in a bid to appear smart.  I mean really, such accusations puts one's reputation on the line. But dude, it looks dumb.   

Inq's voice on discord came across as shy to me, while BT's voice on Twitch is more chill. Maybe he was even more Garfield than John.

How it looks....

You want to rewrite history so you can appear smart. "Oh thank you Legga, we were so clueless but now we see the light !" But really what you're saying lacks sense, and it lacks the ability to piece together what happened in truthful ways. You really don't understand while thinking you do, so you give yourself the greenlight to show us how you handle people you hate, which isn't the way of a high IQ. 

I always call you out on your shit regularly. So you'd refuse to learn from me. 

TC had something to say to you about it, and I'm not looking to turn you against him or anything, but TC is the exact thing and reason why you "claim" to hate Inq. I mention this cause you'll still continue to kiss up to him.

Xena told you, and now Blanc is telling you, and while I present the most knowledge in these pages, you're more likely to listen to the other 3 members.

Posts: 826
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast

Lol, is this another tirade against my intellect?

Anyway, it was confirmed by other members. So I guess that answers your question, why it wasnt confirmed by other members. It was, by Lenalee, but also others. 

So you are wrong. 

Did I burst your bubble or do you still think that image is the real Inq ?

You can take this back now.

last edit on 12/22/2025 1:58:31 PM
Posts: 17
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast

I always had a feeling. Inq has been behind the scenes fabricating our entire forum’s political intrigues like a real Jew, which is probably who he is. He probably has a really annoying voice now, too. And, with his probable connections with Israel, we may as well assume he’s working for the Mossad.

last edit on 12/22/2025 2:36:04 PM
Posts: 826
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast



When I think about it, I wouldn't be surprised if you're the reason Legga hates Inq so much.

Because everything is always my fault, right? 

 Because you have a better reason to resent Inq than he does, and Legga is a bit of a bootlicker. 

Inquirer was the dominant person in the Inq-TC relationship. You are very ignorant about what Inquirer actually did. It's like you see the play but dont understand the plot. Inquirer was SensitiveSoul, and operated from the sidelines. You really miss a lot Spatial.

He pretended to be a wallflower. The truth however was very different. He's perhaps the only real sociopath here. 

If what you say is true and he got some random kid to post their photos online pretending to be them, on a sociopath community forum, then that's kind of fucked up in itself already isn't it? Sadly, it'd be the least twisted thing hes done. You should see what he did with his alts on other forums. You just dont have the full picture, but youre super confident. It's your weakness. You dont understand when you dont have the full picture.

Ps, you should show some evidence of me being a bootlicker. 

last edit on 12/22/2025 4:50:58 PM
Posts: 965
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast
Jada said: 

Lol, is this another tirade against my intellect?

Everyone telling you BT is BT, is an indication of you spiraling off into delusion. Its not you standing out as the only one who knows the truth. 

 

Anyway, it was confirmed by other members. So I guess that answers your question, why it wasnt confirmed by other members. It was, by Lenalee, but also others. 

So you are wrong. 

Wrong about what ? I simply asked who are the members who confirmed your win.

It's not important if you beat Inq in a debate. What I'm seeing is how you carry yourself while forever celebrating a victory over Inq.  

 

Did I burst your bubble or do you still think that image is the real Inq ?

You can take this back now.

 I'll claim that as a yes with no reason to take it back, since you brought it up and now you're all "if Inq really did that then".  

 lol take it back. Get real. 

Jada said: 



Because everything is always my fault, right? 

 Because you have a better reason to resent Inq than he does, and Legga is a bit of a bootlicker. 

Inquirer was the dominant person in the Inq-TC relationship.

What would that have to do with anything ?

You are very ignorant about what Inquirer actually did. It's like you see the play but dont understand the plot. Inquirer was SensitiveSoul, and operated from the sidelines. You really miss a lot Spatial.

He pretended to be a wallflower. The truth however was very different. He's perhaps the only real sociopath here. 

If what you say is true and he got some random kid to post their photos online pretending to be them, on a sociopath community forum, then that's kind of fucked up in itself already isn't it? Sadly, it'd be the least twisted thing hes done. You should see what he did with his alts on other forums. You just dont have the full picture, but youre super confident. It's your weakness. You dont understand when you dont have the full picture.

You claim Inq is all of those Swedish people. Including Ed.  That SensitiveHomosexual is Inq, and not from London Ontario. 

That Inq, manipulated Luna in some grand scheme for her to meltdown and delete her forum. 

If Inq had anything to do with it, Luna would be the first to know. 

I simply ask....

Who told you these things ? Or why do you think so ? What evidence do you have ?

Yes Inq banged Crow, maybe they're still banging. Maybe she's gone. But Inq never banged Fae, like someone here did.

I think these accusations are derived out of a delusional episode you're experiencing. And whatever contest you and Inq ever had, he beat you. Oh yes he did. I have doubts he wanted you like this, but he really managed to do something to you, with nearly no effort. 

 

Ps, you should show some evidence of me being a bootlicker. 

 All the reasons you claim to hate Inq, is what TC did. But you're always kissing up to him.  Maybe because you're transexuals, though you detransitioned until further notice. ( Like when Steve got what he wanted from you and ditched, you ran back to the wife and child you were going to abandon ), Such is the way of a bootlicker. A false alpha if you act like one in the household. 

Your wife and child don't know your capacity to ditch them. But since you failed to replace them with Steve the Homosexual, you went back to them, silently undeserving of their love. They'll smell something is wrong while you live in a state of guilt and have no choice but to be the beta bootlicker in your own estate. 

.

.

More on topic of how you hate and blame Inq, for what your own allies is guilty of

I used to ban TC multiple times a day on those last days, alongside 2 pedophiles. Luna was losing her shit, and rightfully so. No one wants pedophiles posting image son their screens that can get people in trouble.  In Nathan's case Luna had other issues with him ( Nate is a he/him. So are you. )

Now you claim you hate Inq for manipulating Luna into destroying her forum. Luna eventually created email activation, and would ban accounts and their emails, and Nate created an army of emails just so he can post shit and get banned by 1 of 5 moderators multiple times a day. 

You "want" to say it was Inq, but it isn't the truth.  

.

.

.

You're playing off of guesses and assumptions. And you're very passionate about it.  It's really not working for you around people who know better than you. 

It's revealing to them. Not me though, I call you out all the time, but now you're damaging your own reputation with these passionate calls against Inq, who bent you into shape years ago it seems. 

Posts: 826
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast

 I was referring to Inq picture, not the debate, here:

Anyway, it was confirmed by other members. So I guess that answers your question, why it wasnt confirmed by other members. It was, by Lenalee, but also others.

So you are wrong.
Specifically in response to this:
 
Spatial said:
That wasn't really Inq. It was his cousin or something along those lines. The kid in the image was quite young, too young to be Inq. IF, that image were the real Inq, it would've been confirmed by members who had video net meetings with the guy.
It was confirmed. That answers your question, why it wasnt confirmed by other members. It was, by Lenalee, but also others. 

And I said, you can take back the attempt to diminish my intellect over how I was wrong about the picture. You were wrong, instead. So really if I were you I'd say something along the lines of, "did I burst your bubble?"

 

The rest is a troll, and a personal attack over how you feel diminished by me, so let me know when I meet the adult Spatial again and you want me to actually respond to you. I'll need an adult response though. 

last edit on 12/22/2025 11:04:33 PM
Posts: 965
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast
Jada said: 

 I was referring to Inq picture, not the debate, here:

Anyway, it was confirmed by other members. So I guess that answers your question, why it wasnt confirmed by other members. It was, by Lenalee, but also others.

So you are wrong.
Specifically in response to this:
Spatial said:
That wasn't really Inq. It was his cousin or something along those lines. The kid in the image was quite young, too young to be Inq. IF, that image were the real Inq, it would've been confirmed by members who had video net meetings with the guy.
It was confirmed. That answers your question, why it wasnt confirmed by other members. It was, by Lenalee, but also others. 

And I said, you can take back the attempt to diminish my intellect over how I was wrong about the picture. You were wrong, instead. So really if I were you I'd say something along the lines of, "did I burst your bubble?"

I was there, and I remember different so I doubt it. You'd need more to validate that claim. 

Also if that were the case, TC would've said that was really him in the image, over him seeing Inq on webcam. 

 

The rest is a troll, and a personal attack over how you feel diminished by me, so let me know when I meet the adult Spatial again and you want me to actually respond to you. I'll need an adult response though. That way, perhaps our common friend Alice can be proud of you again.

 You say it's a troll but none of it is made up. It also highlights the type of character I'm dealing with here, and it isn't exhausting. It's simply something to do while I'm here. 

See that puppet there, ButteredLoser. That's a byproduct of your mishandling of you hateful assumptions without validation. The Character is stale and off putting and prone to shrinking the community further. Then if one of the old Swedes come for a visit, you'll be on course to spiral further downward in your delusion that they are all Inq. 

You owe BT an apology. 

Posts: 826
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast
I was there, and I remember different so I doubt it. You'd need more to validate that claim.

The search function sucks. You can try the search function over keyword baby face or something to find the date, on either Lenalee or one of his alts. I think the message was something like "he has a bad case of baby face XD" and "that's him". Good luck.

 

Also if that were the case, TC would've said that was really him in the image, over him seeing Inq on webcam.

If you think that's what TC would have said, then you dont know him too well. You could ask him if that was Inq though. 

 

You owe BT an apology.

BT, do I owe you an apology?

last edit on 12/23/2025 12:19:25 AM
Posts: 4891
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast
Jada said: 
You owe BT an apology.

BT, do I owe you an apology?

 Nah, not really.  Testimony is clear "Buttered Toast is Buttered Toast" (which I appreciate), not that I was bothered by the accusations otherwise, in the first place.  "ButteredLoser" is just a goober, as well, despite their claims to the contrary.  You wouldn't need to apologize on someone else's behalf, either.

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
Posts: 34996
0 votes RE: Buttered toast is not Buttered toast
When I think about it, I wouldn't be surprised if you're the reason Legga hates Inq so much.

Because everything is always my fault, right? 

 Because you have a better reason to resent Inq than he does, and Legga is a bit of a bootlicker. 

She was the one emotionally cheating on her relationship, and his believed version of the story she helped him build could easily be related to whatever bias there was behind his choices. She also is obviously the one wearing the pants so it's clear between the two of them who guided the paths they took. He and I were mostly okay in the sense of a basic friendship, but naturally things got awkward. 

This happening was her doing far more than his, so I don't really resent him so much as accept that if it weren't him it'd easily have been someone else with how often she was hitting on people. His crime is moreover the role he played, and if he were out of the picture that wouldn't have suddenly fixed the problems otherwise present in her and I's relationship, so I find it easier over him to resent the role than the one who found himself there. 

Honestly, I think Legga has stronger opinions on Inq than I do. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.