Lol, is this another tirade against my intellect?
Everyone telling you BT is BT, is an indication of you spiraling off into delusion. Its not you standing out as the only one who knows the truth.
Or he's using conflict to gather information, while also attempting to force spotlight to sit where he demands it to.
The guy is capable of tongue in cheek.
Because everything is always my fault, right?
Because you have a better reason to resent Inq than he does, and Legga is a bit of a bootlicker.
She was the one emotionally cheating on her relationship, and his believed version of the story she helped him build could easily be related to whatever bias there was behind his choices. She also is obviously the one wearing the pants so it's clear between the two of them who guided the paths they took. He and I were mostly okay in the sense of a basic friendship, but naturally things got awkward.
This happening was her doing far more than his, so I don't really resent him so much as accept that if it weren't him it'd easily have been someone else with how often she was hitting on people. His crime is moreover the role he played, and if he were out of the picture that wouldn't have suddenly fixed the problems otherwise present in her and I's relationship, so I find it easier over him to resent the role than the one who found himself there.
You actually heard his side of the story. She helped him build what though ? Some words of encouragement ?
After all these years she probably already cheated. Though I have no real way of knowing what's going on with them, I say it out of expectation.
Maybe Inq got redpilled hard now and took command of the relationship.
Honestly, I think Legga has stronger opinions on Inq than I do.
That's one of the details that makes Legga's modern take on Inq so questionable. His reasons aren't enough to be up at night taking swings at Inq for years. Fake reasoning.
Honestly, I think Legga has stronger opinions on Inq than I do.That's one of the details that makes Legga's modern take on Inq so questionable. His reasons aren't enough to be up at night taking swings at Inq for years. Fake reasoning.
lol you’re almost there. Can you think of another reason Legga has this weird “obsession” with Inq?
You actually heard his side of the story. She helped him build what though ? Some words of encouragement ?
It'd take a lot of mudslinging to try to explain, and ever since our cat custody battle ended we've cut eachother out of our lives.
I can only imagine what's being said about me at this point, but I'm not going to share in that indulgence. It was years ago at this point and I've put it that much more behind me.
After all these years she probably already cheated. Though I have no real way of knowing what's going on with them, I say it out of expectation.
She wanted to be poly, I didn't, so if she's finding poly partners nowadays then I don't imagine there being much of an issue for her.
Maybe Inq got redpilled hard now and took command of the relationship.
Your fantasies always try to involve him taking charge, when really he was pretty subby. 🤷
To clarify, I'm saying that as a sub myself in case this comment is somehow misconstrued as an insult or something.
Honestly, I think Legga has stronger opinions on Inq than I do.That's one of the details that makes Legga's modern take on Inq so questionable. His reasons aren't enough to be up at night taking swings at Inq for years. Fake reasoning.
Or the guy takes some other aspect of their relationship seriously, they have exchanged quite a lot of words and Inq's tactics in their verbal duel weren't exactly... ones of strict rhetoric in favor of appealing to emotion, leaning heavily on a reputational bandwagon, and ad homming his opponent.
lol you have no idea how many times I had to try to convince the guy that Legga's actually smart.
Cat custody battle ? Seriously ?
I have pictures of that cat. Handsome white cat with layers of brown patches. Just by looking at him I can tell he's a good one. From what I gathered, you adopted the adult cat, and was up for suggestions to name it, though I never knew where you got it from. I assume of images of the cat were taken in your home.
You say it's yours, she says it's hers. While I don't know who the rightful owner is between you, it's pretty insane how she would ditch, then come back and try to take the cat.
Maybe Inq got redpilled hard now and took command of the relationship.
Your fantasies always try to involve him taking charge, when really he was pretty subby. 🤷
To clarify, I'm saying that as a sub myself in case this comment is somehow misconstrued as an insult or something.
While most romantic relationships are temporal, I think if a man is submissive, it will shorten the length of his turn with her. She won't respect him if he's her bitch. I personally called out Inq for being spineless, and I blamed his environment. Sweden has produced a nation of doormats. People who are afraid to push back at controversy and will probably complain when it's too late.
I don't say these things to hurt or insult others. Wisdom served on a cold dish is hotter than stumbling without it.
A bad boy turned nice will always be hotter to women than a nice guy turned bad. Nice guys turned bad will be seen as fakes or jerks, makes her pum even more dry, while the bad boy turned nice harnessed enough respect to soften up.
Honestly, I think Legga has stronger opinions on Inq than I do.That's one of the details that makes Legga's modern take on Inq so questionable. His reasons aren't enough to be up at night taking swings at Inq for years. Fake reasoning.
Or the guy takes some other aspect of their relationship seriously, they have exchanged quite a lot of words and Inq's tactics in their verbal duel weren't exactly... ones of strict rhetoric in favor of appealing to emotion, leaning heavily on a reputational bandwagon, and ad homming his opponent.
That would mean Inq saw Legga as a fool. Just because he choke slammed Legga, doesn't mean Inq's overall scales counter his reputation for being decent 90% of the time.
lol you have no idea how many times I had to try to convince the guy that Legga's actually smart.
lol Enabler. It's mostly what you've done here so far aside from a 3 word post claiming BT is legit. I don't understand why you do it, even here where Legga's OP is motivated by nothing but poor choices over a weak hold on his own emotions.
This very thread doesn't have a smart OP. And it's when Legga isn't being bright is when I have something to say.
In my first post here, I set the record, then called out the same force that causes Legga to intellectly stumble. And it was me calling out his disdain for Inq.
Whatever demons Legga is fencing with has him spiraling downward into the abyss of foolish yet again.
I'm sorry, but Inq did not play us like a piano. He wasn't the bulk of Scandinavians on here. He is not BT. He did not manipulate Luna into destroying her forum. ( You were and have taken credit for that. But don't worry, Legga won't hate on you despite his claim to hate Inq for such a thing ). The reason he claims to hate Inq isn't even the truth in the matter. I wonder if he actually believes that, and IF he manages to pull himself out of that delusion, if he would have the power to let shit slide with Inq, cause HE REALLY NEEDS TO in a bad way, it's showcasing his inability to piece information correctly, while he insists hot air is enough for him to defame others.
I also think it's good for Legga when I call out his bullshit. Look at Dexter and Retard. Especially Dexter. Prideful in his damned ways. I don't recognize their potential. I go soft on lost causes and dismiss them. As for Legga, I'm not going to magically think he's all there, and I'm humored by some of the shit he says, but I know he can do better than smearing shit all over the place.
Golden_Eagle said:Cat custody battle ? Seriously ?
Yes, and we both threw thousands of dollars for months at lawyers because neither of us would back down over it and dug up all sorts of nasty shit on eachother to try to make a case. It's a nasty stressful chapter that is less behind me than the relationship, because no matter how much we humans do... critters don't have the same self-autonomy, they can't self-report the life they'd rather live, and legally they're treated the same in this state as owning a stereo or a car.
I was the 'stay at home' while she did shit by herself for months at a time, the older cat knew me for more than twice of his life that she'd spent with him, and the younger one has always known me with her more like a guest.
...and now the babies have been split up from eachother when they were bestest buddies, and neither of us are ever liable to forgive the other for how all of this went down over mutual entitlement over the babies.
I can sit here and argue endlessly about how 'it should have been meeee' to get both, but I'm thankful for how much time I had with the older one and am thankful the younger one is still with me sleeping on me daily. I gave the older one everything I could and I don't regret it, and I'm glad the younger one is still in my life considering how much her addiction to travel would mean cats being left alone or with strangers babysitting (plus transporting them over a plane and quarantine shit yikes).
I have pictures of that cat. Handsome white cat with layers of brown patches. Just by looking at him I can tell he's a good one. From what I gathered, you adopted the adult cat, and was up for suggestions to name it, though I never knew where you got it from. I assume of images of the cat were taken in your home.
The one you saw on here's the one I got to keep, and he's been so much for me that I don't see it as even a single dollar wasted.
He came up to my door as a lost kitten and loudly demanded he be let in, he is truly a cat brought to me by fate and all who lived here recognized the absurdity of trying to claim him as her own. Even her lawyer made it fairly apparent that the fight for him was absurd.
...I meanwhile lost the older cat because she knew him a few months before I did, even though I could prove so many reasons otherwise that I was more suited. It was fucking messy.
You say it's yours, she says it's hers. While I don't know who the rightful owner is between you, it's pretty insane how she would ditch, then come back and try to take the cat.
She and I both really, really have a powerful love for animals, and both have arguable reason to feel entitled. I however am more motherly over individual critters while she loves all animals somewhat generally.
Naturally within my own bias, I think I was more deserving. FFS I spent more time with the older cat than I did with her, and after a point he became increasingly unfamiliar with and scared of her over how she was never around, or when she was she usually was trying to take me away from him for some trip somewhere.
It spooked her how well the older cat and I got along, he'd rub his head against mine and talk up a storm with me, and she made it more than clear to me when he'd show fear over her that how attached to me he was made her uncomfortable in a competitive way.
...a lot of why she and I worked was that mutual love for animals, but this also became how we turned against eachother. I could handle a surprising amount, but watching my babies suffer and worrying about future potential suffering was too much for me. If I could count on her to take care of them, instead of constantly delegating it to other people while ignoring very real risks, I'd not have fought so hard. She wanted them possessively, I wanted them to be safe, and both are forms of love.
While most romantic relationships are temporal, I think if a man is submissive, it will shorten the length of his turn with her.
And I think that there's many women who, through culturally learned helplessness, end up suppressing their true potential that could otherwise only be unlocked by a sub who gives them the keys to themselves that society had ripped away from them.
It's more about Testosterone vs Estrogen balances, even before accounting for one's nurtured behaviors. It's why some with obviously contrasting traits and behaviors can end up not adapting to culture no matter how much they try to; on a chemical level it is a near-impossibility beyond putting on a costume.
All the women I've been with or otherwise had flirty relations with have had suppressed dominating tendencies with either a high T-count or some sort of adrenaline imbalance.
She won't respect him if he's her bitch.
I feel bad that this is how you construe respect to work, not just because of your views on women but also over your views on men, and yourself within that demographic feeling challenged to do more than what feels natural to you.
There is power, and there is tenacity, and the two do an amazing dance together between two people if given the room to breathe in spite of societal pressures trying to correct them.
Subs aren't weak, they can take a lot of shit, more shit than most people are prepared to face, but that strength comes over how much they can face, not how much they can do. Subs are fucking dark if you get them talking, and that darkness is not so much weakness so much as a profane understanding of things.
I personally called out Inq for being spineless, and I blamed his environment. Sweden has produced a nation of doormats. People who are afraid to push back at controversy and will probably complain when it's too late.
And yet it was what you'd call spinelessness that landed him two powerful women who fought over him.
There is an entirely untapped market of women you're ignoring or misunderstanding over seeing it as them 'doing it wrong', when it's closer to them doing it differently.
I don't say these things to hurt or insult others. Wisdom served on a cold dish is hotter than stumbling without it.
Your wisdom takes averages and applies it to everyone.
Rather than look for what makes people divergent, you try to find how they are the same and apply the template generally. Exceptions exist, and as one stuck on a niche people like me have to cling for dear life to such people over how it's not the norm.
Abnormality however is not incorrect, it's simply uncommon.
A bad boy turned nice will always be hotter to women than a nice guy turned bad.
Uhhhhhhhh...
Agree to disagree, a lot of people in general more enjoy knowing they 'changed' them. If they start off nice and 'go bad', the woman feels strong like a corruptor, while if they start off bad and 'go nice', then they feel like they tamed a beast. I've seen some good guys 'go bad' with the assistance of horny women and the path toward corruption seemed cute to them, like as if the innocent virgin was learning darkness.
It's about the transition, about feeling like their actions had an impact on their mate's lives.
Nice guys turned bad will be seen as fakes or jerks, makes her pum even more dry, while the bad boy turned nice harnessed enough respect to soften up.
Nah dude they maintain that innocence if they were genuinely nice.
'Nice Guys' meanwhile... are not the same as good people. People who adopt that moniker tend to not live up to it, while genuinely nice people beat themselves up for not being nice enough.
That would mean Inq saw Legga as a fool. Just because he choke slammed Legga, doesn't mean Inq's overall scales counter his reputation for being decent 90% of the time.
See even this is showing why Inq can coast on social bandwagoning instead of have a debate as a peer with the guy.
Their reputation should have nothing to do with how those debates went, and even when it'd have been easier to be Team Inquirer I saw that Legga was the only one actually trying to have a legitimate discussion back then.
lol you have no idea how many times I had to try to convince the guy that Legga's actually smart.
lol Enabler. It's mostly what you've done here so far aside from a 3 word post claiming BT is legit. I don't understand why you do it, even here where Legga's OP is motivated by nothing but poor choices over a weak hold on his own emotions.
But Legga is smart, and I've never contradicted that view.
If anything, he has more ability to coast and dance on you all over perceiving him as less than he is, which is why he likes puppets feeling like a fresh start when he garners too much spotlight and then starts talking about how he feels addicted to the forum.
I'm sorry, but Inq did not play us like a piano.
lol trust me I never said he did.
He's a simple person, which comes with it's share of strengths and weaknesses. Him being on this forum is more a reflection of how he feels within his culture, not how he feels in a worldly sense.
He did not manipulate Luna into destroying her forum.
...actually he was instrumental towards it's destruction, with me, MissComm, and Crow in his ear, but whatever dude you do you.
I've been calling it a group effort ever since it began, it's people like you who tend to funnel it down to fewer and fewer antagonists.
I don't recognize their potential.
This is a lot of what separates us; I see potential in those you've discarded.
A lot of the women who find themselves more intimately talking to me usually have more masculine traits if not otherwise aspects that could be construed that way, and while you'd be all like 'you should smile more' and 'that's not ladylike' I'm telling them they can be themselves and that it's not just acceptable, but my preference.
It might be niche when it comes to percentages via sociology, but when two people with atypically synergistic traits find eachother it just works. For all of her and I's issues, we made it seven years somehow, and the 'Seven Year Itch' is totally a thing.
While most romantic relationships are temporal, I think if a man is submissive, it will shorten the length of his turn with her.And I think that there's many women who, through culturally learned helplessness, end up suppressing their true potential that could otherwise only be unlocked by a sub who gives them the keys to themselves that society had ripped away from them.
So by this logic, a woman's helplessness is learned through culture, but unlocked by a submissive man. I'd argue it isn't learned. Nature's way, a woman has instincts to ensure survival though I good catch. Strength, genes, competence, intelligence are paramount for women when selecting a partner to produce offspring securely.
The happiest women in relationships, are submissive. If she's not submissive to her partner, then watch out for the man she's submissive toward.
It's more about Testosterone vs Estrogen balances, even before accounting for one's nurtured behaviors. It's why some with obviously contrasting traits and behaviors can end up not adapting to culture no matter how much they try to; on a chemical level it is a near-impossibility beyond putting on a costume.
All the women I've been with or otherwise had flirty relations with have had suppressed dominating tendencies with either a high T-count or some sort of adrenaline imbalance.
Western women DO NOT suppress dominating tendencies IF they're even in a position to flex that way. Cold truth Karen. This goes for men too, though women being the more emotional of the genders, could use a good scratching post from time to time. Could be her partner. Sometimes it's some guy she keeps as an emotional sponge.
She won't respect him if he's her bitch.
I feel bad that this is how you construe respect to work, not just because of your views on women but also over your views on men, and yourself within that demographic feeling challenged to do more than what feels natural to you.
There are 2 concepts that feel natural to me and they are complete opposites. The more interesting one is how natural it feels to just love a woman, but it's useless without any effort, and these days, the amount of effort it takes to impress a woman in the dating market is pretty insane, as in general women have unrealistic standards like 0.001% odds if scoring.
To a man respect is more important than being loved. A guy can counter than and be all "no it's not". Silence. Loving is a man's job in a relationship. Her's is respect. When relationships get rocky, she'll disrespect him as a form of punishment, while the man will pull back making her feel unloved. God commanded Eve to submit to Adam, as Adam was commanded to love Eve. When a woman pulls back, something inside of him demands respect, and something must be done. When a man pulls back it commands respect. Pride can determine the outcome, but he's still better off pulling back while being disrespected, and that's more attractive to a woman.
There is power, and there is tenacity, and the two do an amazing dance together between two people if given the room to breathe in spite of societal pressures trying to correct them.
Subs aren't weak, they can take a lot of shit, more shit than most people are prepared to face, but that strength comes over how much they can face, not how much they can do. Subs are fucking dark if you get them talking, and that darkness is not so much weakness so much as a profane understanding of things.
Oh I been there. My ex liked to be dominant quite a bit in disrespectful ways, and when she did she was a real bitch. Sex was good cause of me as funny as it sounds. I used to dispense a lot of energy, from making my body stiff, to delivering a lot of power in how I handled her physically, I went hard at all times. That's when she would say and do things I like to hear and see. Aside from that. Not everyone is equipped to dominate in a healthy way. If a woman is acting dominant in pleasing ways, then she's doing what the man wants, but when dominant actions lead to behavioral issues, a weak man will apologize which then gives her the green light to double down. When boundaries are set with consequences and she respects that, then respect is earned simply for having self respect. Tolerance will annoy her then eventually make her bored. Boundaries show how men love women beyond their looks. Beyond objectification.
I personally called out Inq for being spineless, and I blamed his environment. Sweden has produced a nation of doormats. People who are afraid to push back at controversy and will probably complain when it's too late.
And yet it was what you'd call spinelessness that landed him two powerful women who fought over him.
You referring to MissC and Crow ? They totally never fought over Inq. MissC and I talked about that in depth, as a matter of fact, I just took some time to enjoy the past discussion in regard to that, and I was refreshed on even more than I thought I would. They were already cheating on you. MissC said to me "He could've at least had the decency to tell me about it" She also claimed he's weak, cause she saw how Crow took control over him.
MissC totally never fought over him.
There is an entirely untapped market of women you're ignoring or misunderstanding over seeing it as them 'doing it wrong', when it's closer to them doing it differently.
I do ignore most women and it's a good thing. So do you, it's just you tend to worship them kinda like the nice guy, or simp trying to gain female approval by cheering them on as a whole. Honestly, it's impossible not to ignore most of them. There are billions of them. Also, I don't choose who I fall for as the one I love is pretty fucked up, and I have no time and interest in strange women. Plus I have one so I'm good.
I don't say these things to hurt or insult others. Wisdom served on a cold dish is hotter than stumbling without it.
Your wisdom takes averages and applies it to everyone.
Rather than look for what makes people divergent, you try to find how they are the same and apply the template generally. Exceptions exist, and as one stuck on a niche people like me have to cling for dear life to such people over how it's not the norm.
Abnormality however is not incorrect, it's simply uncommon.
Sir. In my humble opinion, the OP in this thread is the way of the jackass. Way off into the clouds, and it's actually a form of self defeat allowing hate to formulate conclusions. It is fucking stupid to do that. Demonic and soul crushing even. Really dumb stuff done with pride. Of course you'll want to misdirect this with the snowflake talk as you are an enabler for such things. Other than that you have nothing to say to Legga as he's swinging in the dark, and while we're all God sent, I'm the favorite today.
A bad boy turned nice will always be hotter to women than a nice guy turned bad.
Uhhhhhhhh...
Agree to disagree, a lot of people in general more enjoy knowing they 'changed' them. If they start off nice and 'go bad', the woman feels strong like a corruptor, while if they start off bad and 'go nice', then they feel like they tamed a beast. I've seen some good guys 'go bad' with the assistance of horny women and the path toward corruption seemed cute to them, like as if the innocent virgin was learning darkness.
It's about the transition, about feeling like their actions had an impact on their mate's lives.
If she causes him to go bad and takes pleasure in such power, she certainly won't want to fuck him. In every case, it's always a beautiful thing when the bad guy has a heart. It could be a villain in real life or some great story. When the bad guy does something good, the observer will perk up. The bad boy will have many women, and he may not care about what she does on the side. Maybe she'll go do her activities, and when her time to shine comes around, and her bad boy shows up unannounced. It'll turn her on a lot more than when Mr. Nice guy is there as usual. When Mr. Nice guy goes bad, he'll appear to be coming from another angle to score with her, and it won't look good.
Nice guys turned bad will be seen as fakes or jerks, makes her pum even more dry, while the bad boy turned nice harnessed enough respect to soften up.
Nah dude they maintain that innocence if they were genuinely nice.
'Nice Guys' meanwhile... are not the same as good people. People who adopt that moniker tend to not live up to it, while genuinely nice people beat themselves up for not being nice enough.
One beating themselves up over not being nice enough is insecurity. Women are put off by insecure men. The genuine or not nice guy will be in her friend category at best and nothing more.
That would mean Inq saw Legga as a fool. Just because he choke slammed Legga, doesn't mean Inq's overall scales counter his reputation for being decent 90% of the time.
See even this is showing why Inq can coast on social bandwagoning instead of have a debate as a peer with the guy.
It's interesting how you only said 3 words to Legga in this thread.
Their reputation should have nothing to do with how those debates went, and even when it'd have been easier to be Team Inquirer I saw that Legga was the only one actually trying to have a legitimate discussion back then.
But that's not a good reason for Legga to go stupid over it and start smearing fake shit to appease his demons for years. Trust me it's not pretty. Especially for someone whos supposed to be smart, though I don't see it, and it's really not time to argue that Legga is smart when he just did something dumb.
One thing you fail to recognize. What I have to say to Legga, isn't for Inq. You may notice Inq isn't even here. You'll distract and the only real substance in regards to the OP, is gossip. Yes Nate, we all know Inq did the big dirty by now, but you'll carry on Ignoring Legga in his own thread and come at me with the same gossip and other nonsense, standing up for Legga while I'm busy ripping him one for being a dingbat. Yes I'm more interesting and stimulating to talk to, and I'm just pointing out how you really don't have anything of substance to say to Legga, while I do.
lol you have no idea how many times I had to try to convince the guy that Legga's actually smart.
lol Enabler. It's mostly what you've done here so far aside from a 3 word post claiming BT is legit. I don't understand why you do it, even here where Legga's OP is motivated by nothing but poor choices over a weak hold on his own emotions.
But Legga is smart, and I've never contradicted that view.
So you'd argue it's good reasoning for Legga to go stupid, and make deluded accusation and start smearing fake shit to appease his demons, for years on end btw. Trust me it's not pretty. Especially for someone whos supposed to be smart, though I don't see it. And it's really not time to argue that Legga is smart when he's melting down over something that happened 4 years ago. I don't respect such weakness. You can make a stand for it like you are now, meanwhile if someone else were infected with the burden of such hatred, it would be a curse.
And yes I'm aware of the "Or maybe Legga is acting to manipulate information yada yada" Nope. I rejected that idea on the first page, because I'm calling out his demons you're now in defence of.
If anything, he has more ability to coast and dance on you all over perceiving him as less than he is, which is why he likes puppets feeling like a fresh start when he garners too much spotlight and then starts talking about how he feels addicted to the forum.I'm sorry, but Inq did not play us like a piano.
lol trust me I never said he did.
He's a simple person, which comes with it's share of strengths and weaknesses. Him being on this forum is more a reflection of how he feels within his culture, not how he feels in a worldly sense.
lol trust me, that wasn't directed at you.
There's no separating the world and culture for us.
He did not manipulate Luna into destroying her forum.
...actually he was instrumental towards it's destruction, with me, MissComm, and Crow in his ear, but whatever dude you do you.
Look at your tone change. Speaks volumes to a self proclaimed super empath.
That's funny, cause MissC says otherwise. She made that clear with her Transcoat sock puppet when you, Legga and Crow were attacked her on that thread Legga made when he was having his meltdown in 2020. That thread is epic and aged well, I was just reading it. It backfired, and Crow was so covert with her words and meanings. From this modern perspective I really enjoyed watching how you'd attack MissC over laughing at you when Luna demodded you. And now "for argument sake" ( that's the kicker) you want me to believe MissC had anything to do with that while Crow was playing you and Inq like tools against someone crow wanted removed from Inq's life before she ditched you ?
Tell me. What did Inq do to Luna ?
I've been calling it a group effort ever since it began, it's people like you who tend to funnel it down to fewer and fewer antagonists.
Gaslighting with that tone. I can validate your dishonesty. It's not a superpower, it just looks like one. I simply have information, and MissC, discord chats, and how it allllll played out that day.
What caused Luna to shut down SC, is you, cawk, and Jim. She was made at everyone. Except me, cause I'm me.
I can ask MissC if her or Inq had anything to do with spamming CP on the forum. Or if they helped you create endless emails so you can bypass bans to launch your assaults, or if they even had the drive you had to create all those emails, just so you can slip in, take a shot and get banned again.
I don't recognize their potential.
This is a lot of what separates us; I see potential in those you've discarded.
Heh. I still talk to Dexter, and as always I still have more to say to him than you do. I just have no motivation to try to fix him. God says "Leave him. He's mine" As for Retard. Don't know him much, not interested in his content, and .... No. They are not Legga. We can at least talk to Legga, argue with him. When the bar must be set, I'm not adjusting it for Retard and Dexter, though I'm probably going to choke out Dexter very soon.
A lot of the women who find themselves more intimately talking to me usually have more masculine traits if not otherwise aspects that could be construed that way, and while you'd be all like 'you should smile more' and 'that's not ladylike' I'm telling them they can be themselves and that it's not just acceptable, but my preference.
lol Fake comparison.
Never in a million years would I say to a woman "Hey, you should smile more. Ohhh now that's not ladylike". Guy, If a woman ain't smiling, especially if she has the triangle upper lip with her mouth open, i'ma just carry on. When I go to Trinidad and my cousin picks me up. We drive through a wonderful world, then up the mountain we go. Rough roads so steep beyond 50 degrees, standing on flat ground and looking at a car claw it's way up is us literally looking at the top of the car. Cousin is driving stick, and I tell her, you drive like a man.
I know a butch. She's fat, used to date a friend of mine.I shook her hand and her hand was made of stone. I never held back, I said those are man hands.
If a woman is manly I'm not going to hate. I'm a man myself. She won't turn me on and I I'm NOT attempting to turn her all cute while she can't give me a boner. ( Yes it's the woman's job to give a man an erection ) If it comes down to who I would bang, it would be a more feminine woman. I like them small, and I like them large. Bit tits, small tits, fat ass, small ass. Booming hips. The woman has a wider pelvis, and it so happens to be sexy. Adds to the curvatures only a woman has.
I also don't like to watch women box, or do martial arts. And it's not because they fight like girls. They kinda look like men to me. Plus I don't like to see a bloody woman even when I'm not attracted to them.
It might be niche when it comes to percentages via sociology, but when two people with atypically synergistic traits find eachother it just works. For all of her and I's issues, we made it seven years somehow, and the 'Seven Year Itch' is totally a thing.
I'm at 8 years in, and this isn't even close to my longest partnership. Not to boast but my favorite ex would respond to my mating call if I so called her. That one I put all that effort into when handling her. I made sure she'll never replace me like I've done with them all. No there aren't many and I'm confident they all have a significantly higher body count than I do.
Somedays I think maybe she's out getting fucked, and I honestly don't care. I wake up and the force has something to say. It's in my gut. Meh. I don't want to care. Then again, hey woman, did you just fuck Dwayne ? No ? You sure ? No really ? Meh.... I don't care...... I watch her act as though I'm being the scarry testosterone man, meanwhile her friends Son told me all about it, and how his Mother gave my girl hell for banding her ex. Oh yes I know. The news comes in some way shape of form. But Meh. Callous is good and I can pull the plug anytime I want.
Is it because there's someone else in which I have a cursed love toward ? I swear she used magic and casted a love spell on me. I cut her off and think about her everyday. It's for the best.
Or is it because I have experience with this ?
Maybe it's because I understand something about the modern woman.
The answer. All of the above.
On another note. Women will shit test a man, endlessly. If you fall for her physical beauty, you'll lose points with her. Her game is endless. She'll go to to ice cream truck, and her serving with be massive. I have a hot friend and there's this one place we pick up food from. We'll wait in the parking lot and send her in. She comes back with extra, complements from some guy who'll never hit it.
Set boundaries and be firm with them. Boundaries being respect. She has more options than a guy.
I sound like a dick to a female activist yet again don't I ? How dare I impose boundaries, when only she should ? It's all a matter of keeping one's composure when boundaries are violated. Legga lacks composure and carries on like a spoiled brat. Such weakness disgusts me cause it doesn't serve. None of my exs would boomerang if I carried on like that
She'll cry and be the victim, but if you scold her in that moment and say it has no effect, the crying stops and it isn't happening again. Constant constant constant, manipulation. It's how she's built take it of leave it, it's how she comes. I'm talking about magnetic women, not those women who give those beauties dirty looks. She transformed when she was young and men looked at her differently. Instant value. She has a power, and she's not looking for a weak man.
Now that's what I call Meninism. ( I invented an existing word )
That girl crow. She'll shit test for sure easy. Just watching her perform today in that thread. Such a display of control. While you're hacking away at Inq's girl, yours was ready to run to him. The rest of the community had MissC's back, while the you Crow and Legga just kept hammering away. The name Quiet Beef makes a lot more sense now. You Nathan, were happily the tail under that trance. She wanted an open relationship, and not even that is left. She's finished with you.
If you got all jacked up, and suited up got famous. And... kicked the sub routine. She'd be shocked and without a doubt like the new version of you, as women are always scanning.
