Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

You presume something immediately and are stubborn to correct it. I am resistant to coming to conclusions over how I keep seeing that there's more to it. We're not the same, and it shows when you debate people of actual rigor... rather than people like yourself who'd lie to you to make the conversation go smoother. 

What is something ?

When I said he "was" cunty, you question how "is" he cunty.

Now look who's being pedantic. 

Fact remains, the past does not change.

As for what I said, there's no need for me to correct anything, as my earlier experiences with BT were like handling a vagina. It gets irritated easily and needs a gentle approach. 

So in other words you take him less seriously than other people? 

Personally I think it's an insult to BT's intelligence when you try to gaslight him into seeing things your way.

Personally, I appreciate honesty, and my being forward speaking and asking 'rude' questions is a lot of how I got people to find it refreshingly real, opening them to do the same. Most people are tired of fake shit, but there'll always be people like you who find lying easier than telling a hard truth... short of them triggering you enough to say it out of anger. 

Sorry, but what am I lying about ? Thinking BT used to be cunty ? lol I totally thought so. I used to call him out for being a white knight all the time too.

It's a general statement, and you've even admitted recently that you'd rather lie to people. 

I DID NOT admit to rather lying to anyone. That's your deluded perception to belittle what I said to Slay.

I also added Slay is young and handsome, living in the US, it's possible for him. Physically I can see he's a hard worker just by looking at him.

...until he doesn't take your side and then you devalue his opinion, of course. 

You honestly don't know me and never will, cause your conclusions and assumptions are regularly painted to fit your so called "personal truth" which is as real as you being a female. 

Ad hominem attacks to ignore your problems, classic Spatial. 

Well it's true, you have a penis. Even Chapo said you were like a dude when you went over to see him and did some drugs and whatever. He probably doesn't like you all that much and you most likely won't hang out again. For you the absolute truth is Ad hominem. Transexuals are very conflicted people in many ways. 

I honestly don't expect BT to give a shit in all honesty, and it's not a matter of taking sides. That past is the past, and I don't rewrite it. 

BT has opinions, but I guess he doesn't talk to you about them very often. 🤷

Of course he has opinions Nathan. My opinion though, he probably doesn't give a shit. There you are responding for him. 

I think most people around here have a better grasp on what I say. It's always you twisting and perverting what I have to say and no one else really does that. Oh yeah, it's very noticable, though you most likely don't realize how much of a spiteful bitch you seem to be while thinking you're some bekon of sane logic. 

You just don't like how people clearing away the shrouds, omissions, and softenings has you face actual consequences for your mistakes. 

...then you act like I put them all up to it which is literally crazy. 

There's no arguing how I know myself better than you do, so again.... I think most people around here have a better grasp on what I say. It's always you etc.

Golden_Eagle said: 

You have no examples of me flipping my opinion on someone for disagreeing with me. The material behind that accusation comes from an deluded individual, and you agree for the sake of argument. 

You... can't even remember the friends whose bridges you've burnt over this. That's... pretty bizarre, comparatively I tend to remember when I've burnt a bridge over how I don't have the room to talk to them anymore, but you've just... erased the experience entirely. That's such a profane coping mechanism, how are you supposed to improve as a person if you just bury it all?

Has nothing to do with disagreement.

What you referred to as "Flying Monkeys", and issues with multiple women who were once on this website as mild as you being repellant to as blatant as you insulting them for pages while acting confused over their responses to you. Those two alone should be more than enough room for you to remember your blunders.

lol multiple women. Are there no men ?

The Flying Monkeys thing actually happened. The woman in question checked up on me a year ago, but honestly I don't know why. Maybe she wanted to say hi, or maybe she wanted to see how I would react. I still don't like her friends.

With Lena I pointed out "how" she's my enemy. So she flipped out and here came sugar. I was right. I'm not happy about it. Lena asked me "what are we" twice, but really I don't have time for long distance plus I'm already committed, so maybe this was for the best. 

 

 

I point out Nate's fake claims about me all the time.

And now we're back to the senile loop of claiming proof doesn't exist when it's been linked to you repeatedly for years. 

It gets linked, you express narc wounding that has you act bizarre and manic while lending to unrelated tangents as ad hominem strikes to handle the claims less credibly, then you black out that it ever happened later as a cope for your present worldview while spamming the chat and stuff. You then take a small break, claim to be tired, and then return as if nothing ever happened somehow. 

It's this effectively, but a lot louder: 

 I can see that you're losing your composure, getting more aggressive. Plenty of hot air and why ? Cause I called out Legga's bullshit. Yep That's what did it, and you don't even agree with him. *Truth*

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

What is something ?

When I said he "was" cunty, you question how "is" he cunty.

Now look who's being pedantic. 

Fact remains, the past does not change.

So you'd say he is... no longer cunty then? Seeing as you're the one focusing on the past vs present tense so intensely. 

As for what I said, there's no need for me to correct anything, as my earlier experiences with BT were like handling a vagina. It gets irritated easily and needs a gentle approach. 

So in other words you take him less seriously than other people? 

Personally I think it's an insult to BT's intelligence when you try to gaslight him into seeing things your way.

And if he agrees with me then he was dumb enough to be gaslit by me, it's the same story from you time and time again as if they have no autonomy of their own to doubt you with. 

It's a general statement, and you've even admitted recently that you'd rather lie to people. 

I DID NOT admit to rather lying to anyone. That's your deluded perception to belittle what I said to Slay.

I mean anyone else is welcome to click this link and judge for themselves. It looks like what some construe as a 'little white lie', which is still lying regardless of the practicality you perceive in it. 

You honestly don't know me and never will, cause your conclusions and assumptions are regularly painted to fit your so called "personal truth" which is as real as you being a female. 

Ad hominem attacks to ignore your problems, classic Spatial. 

Well it's true, you have a penis. Even Chapo said you were like a dude when you went over to see him and did some drugs and whatever. He probably doesn't like you all that much and you most likely won't hang out again. For you the absolute truth is Ad hominem. Transexuals are very conflicted people in many ways. 

Ad hominem attacks to ignore your problems, classic Spatial. 

BT has opinions, but I guess he doesn't talk to you about them very often. 🤷

Of course he has opinions Nathan. My opinion though, he probably doesn't give a shit. There you are responding for him. 

You always take silence to presume they have no thoughts on the matter, or that they're on your side. You're probably better off not knowing. 😏

Maybe that's what has Legga saying you switched opinions on him so quickly; your dishonesty by omission. Perhaps you always thought poorly of him and chose to not say it, much like how much you won't say to Slay now. 

You just don't like how people clearing away the shrouds, omissions, and softenings has you face actual consequences for your mistakes. 

...then you act like I put them all up to it which is literally crazy. 

There's no arguing how I know myself better than you do, so again.... I think most people around here have a better grasp on what I say. It's always you etc.

There's plenty of arguing it, I actually would go so far as to say that people from this forum, not just myself, know a lot more about you than you do about yourself when it comes to your patterns and character. 

You make for a very unreliable narrator. 

You... can't even remember the friends whose bridges you've burnt over this. That's... pretty bizarre, comparatively I tend to remember when I've burnt a bridge over how I don't have the room to talk to them anymore, but you've just... erased the experience entirely. That's such a profane coping mechanism, how are you supposed to improve as a person if you just bury it all?

Has nothing to do with disagreement.

It's precisely where the bridges burnt...

What you referred to as "Flying Monkeys", and issues with multiple women who were once on this website as mild as you being repellant to as blatant as you insulting them for pages while acting confused over their responses to you. Those two alone should be more than enough room for you to remember your blunders.

lol multiple women. Are there no men ?

You may need to work on your reading comprehension, I said it'd be 'more than enough', not all you've done. 

Super weird how you forget so much shit. 

The Flying Monkeys thing actually happened. The woman in question checked up on me a year ago, but honestly I don't know why. Maybe she wanted to say hi, or maybe she wanted to see how I would react. I still don't like her friends.

How much do you even remember from back then..?

With Lena I pointed out "how" she's my enemy. So she flipped out and here came sugar. I was right. I'm not happy about it. Lena asked me "what are we" twice, but really I don't have time for long distance plus I'm already committed, so maybe this was for the best. 

You were the one being weird, not them, and you prior to that insisted that they and others like them agree with you until they broke their silence. 

And now we're back to the senile loop of claiming proof doesn't exist when it's been linked to you repeatedly for years. 

It gets linked, you express narc wounding that has you act bizarre and manic while lending to unrelated tangents as ad hominem strikes to handle the claims less credibly, then you black out that it ever happened later as a cope for your present worldview while spamming the chat and stuff. You then take a small break, claim to be tired, and then return as if nothing ever happened somehow. 

It's this effectively, but a lot louder: 

 I can see that you're losing your composure, getting more aggressive. Plenty of hot air and why ? Cause I called out Legga's bullshit. Yep That's what did it, and you don't even agree with him. *Truth*

You really need to work on learning how to take a character jab without taking it as baseless insult. 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Now look who's being pedantic. 

Fact remains, the past does not change.

So you'd say he is... no longer cunty then? Seeing as you're the one focusing on the past vs present tense so intensely. 

Very slow Nathan. Here's what I said directly to BT in these pages and I quote myself: "Maybe I first saw you at Lunas. The black cat with the toast with a butter square attached to its side. You were pretty cunty back then too, so any approaches would have to be a gentle one. Now it's as though Fae filled you with the Holy Spirit in the hotel on that good day."  

If I wrote any other recent posts about BT, and I think I did, I would've said something along the lines of how he's a lot more chill than he used to be. 

.

.

.

Something so simply gets dragged out. The reason for that is you're too busy scrounging for something to hit me with while finding conclusions within your misdirected assumptions. For this reason I won't bother reading the rest as I desire communication with someone who can understand and not stall and question things over several posts. That kind of energy gets nothing done and I don't particularly like it. 

Have the last word if you wish.  

Golden_Eagle said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Fact remains, the past does not change.

So you'd say he is... no longer cunty then? Seeing as you're the one focusing on the past vs present tense so intensely. 

Very slow Nathan. Here's what I said directly to BT in these pages and I quote myself: "Maybe I first saw you at Lunas. The black cat with the toast with a butter square attached to its side. You were pretty cunty back then too

See, 'too'. This is why I figured it was both past and present tense, but then you corrected me as if it were not the case. 

Now it's as though Fae filled you with the Holy Spirit in the hotel on that good day.

See, I took that as you trying to further insult the guy. 

If I wrote any other recent posts about BT, and I think I did, I would've said something along the lines of how he's a lot more chill than he used to be. 

I really don't see that much of a difference personally, but then again I guess he and I talk a lot more often than you two do. 🤷

Something so simply gets dragged out.

But... you're the one who got sassy and pedantic about it? I'd just asked you to be clearer. 

The reason for that is you're too busy scrounging for something to hit me with while finding conclusions within your misdirected assumptions. For this reason I won't bother reading the rest as I desire communication with someone who can understand and not stall and question things over several posts. That kind of energy gets nothing done and I don't particularly like it. 

We both know you skip the majority of it anyway, the truth is too much to read. It's too hard for you to stick to it so you choose to forget it ever happened. Sorry dude but it makes your ego look fragile. 

At least Legga will bother, BT too probably. These topics tend to be more educational for others than it ever ends up being for you. 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Jada said: 

You have no examples of me flipping my opinion on someone for disagreeing with me.

Show me a single example of you voicing similar disapproval regarding my relationship with Inquirer like you do now throughout the 12 years I've been here, before you flipped your general stance on me. If you can't, then that's your example.

My opinion on your relationship with Inq hasn't changed, I've always found it irrational, the difference this time is that you're lying about the guy now, and I have something to say. 

So it should be super easy to show some sort of evidence of that then right? So why don't you?

There's the example you were looking for me. Asked for and demonstrated.

(...) you agree for the sake of argument.

Do you understand how this demonstrates what TC and I are saying?

I can see how it's being twisted to suit your narrative, but it's not true.

Or it's true. You wouldn't know.

While you say I haven't in the 12 years when I had the chance, I point out Nate's fake claims about me all the time.

You've hated TC with great passion for I don't know how long. You flipped your opinion regarding my relationship with Inquirer faster than pachycephalosaurus when it prepares to ram its thick skull against an opponent after I said I'm smarter than you.

You're backpedaling now. Your claim was that I never corrected Nathan about myself not once "in the 12 years" when I had the chance, now that's been dispelled and you have no leg to stand on in that false claim, you want to argue how I hated the guy for 12 years. 

What? I never said anything like you never correct Nathan, wtf, that makes no sense, why would I say that. I was referring to your stance about my relationship with Inq, which flipped faster than you could blink when I said I'm smarter than you. Then I asked for an example to the contrary, which you failed to provide, demonstrating my point.

 

I dont understand what the rest of what you said means, I wasnt talking about you doggedly hating everything TC does.

What you've done was cut out what I had to say, dismissing it as something you don't understand. The message is clear and counters your claim of me never correcting Nathan's fake claims about me.

What. Quote me saying you never correct Nathan... Lol. You argue with him all the time. 

 

It's then easy to see how I mentioned the obvious, which is making a stand when Nathan spreads lies about me, cause it happens ALL THE TIME. Dude. That's not even a debate there. 

Yeah it sounds like youre having a debate with yourself because whatever youre talking about I haven't participated in.

As for your endless tension with Inq, I asked about it all the time

Give me a single example where you expressed your current opinion before you started your tirade.

You just said for argument sake my opinion about you and Inq's relationship hasn't changed in years, but I always had something to say. The difference is now you're being dishonest about him now, spreading lies, saying he's here scamming. You crossed a line now. I'd always say over and over how Inq is docile, and questioning your hatred for him.

Except you cant cite a single example where youve shown any sign of the disapproval you show now. Hence why it's a good example for you.

What you call a tirade is really an intervention, and my message to you is, stop lying, you're a proclaimed scientist okay, fucking act like one and stick to finding, not guesses that come from your heart that will lead others astray.

Im referring to the overarching theme where you follow me to a random topic and make the case that I have a low IQ. You do that in almost every topics. This one just happens to be related to Inq, but that's not why you're commenting on it.

That OP, complete trash. Now fencing with me is literally fencing with the truth in the matter. 

Why'd you never say anything like that 12 years prior to you getting angry at me over my intellect though?

What upsets you is how I delivered the truth, and that's pointing out your flimsy scheme to paint a picture of the guy to be a crock of shit. You don't even make clear where you get your information from cause it would only shame you.

I'm not upset. I'm observant. I can't take what you say seriously when it so obviously comes after your general tirade against me started, and you never had an opinion on the matter before. Everything you say is so obviously painted by the context of you actively hating the fact that I'm intelligent. If it's not, then give me an example where within the 12 years up until now, before you started to actively dislike me, you ever expressed similar opinions.

 No your not observant. I'm sticking up for Inq in the face of a spiritually compromised and conflicted man. Spreading lies. It really looks like you've scammed yourself into believing the shit you write WITHOUT any evidence of your accusations. Not even TC agrees with you and finds you lacking in wisdom. Wisdom is the ability to utilize knowledge correctly, which you're failing to do. You honestly cannot say you're observant and be taken seriously at this point while the source of your hatred for Inq can only discredit you, now you want to lay claim that you're observant. Denied.

No, I'm observant. I think that much is evident.

Now you're throwing questions and asking for examples while getting crushed,

You asked for an example. The example is you being unable to cite a single instance where you expressed your current opinion in the past.

I will just stick to my claim how you cannot provide any examples of me flipping my opinion on someone for disagreeing with me.

I mean, did you ever hold your current opinion of my relationship with Inq before you got angry at me? If not, then there you go, your opinion on my relationship with Inq flipped the moment you got offended by my intellect.

 

You and I had disagreements, and you're famous for "Let's just agree to disagree"

No Im not.

I say fine, and shits the same.  On top of that you're guy who often claims "It's lonely up here at the top, I need to find another community, no one understands me" while having the capacity to stir shit about an opponent which is low IQ behavior.

It is lonely at the top. I dont know why it offends you so much. I'm not saying it to brag, its a fact. it is what it is.

 

The question is nothing new, what the hell did Inq actually do for you to spread false witness, to witnesses ?

Is it because he's still more popular than you are ? How when history is brought up his name will pop up from the mouths of others but nothing all that good would be said of you ?

I have nothing against Inquirer. He just has many sockpuppets, and I'm pointing out what he does.

Jada said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

Jada said: 

Show me a single example of you voicing similar disapproval regarding my relationship with Inquirer like you do now throughout the 12 years I've been here, before you flipped your general stance on me. If you can't, then that's your example.

My opinion on your relationship with Inq hasn't changed, I've always found it irrational, the difference this time is that you're lying about the guy now, and I have something to say. 

So it should be super easy to show some sort of evidence of that then right? So why don't you?

There's the example you were looking for me. Asked for and demonstrated.

Funny how you require evidence, when you're you. You'd carry on about Inq, and I'd always ask you what's the fuss ? You being a cry baby over Inq is nothing new. What you start spreading false claims, that leaves a bad taste in my mouth, then I'll have something to say to you on another level. 

Do you understand how this demonstrates what TC and I are saying?

I can see how it's being twisted to suit your narrative, but it's not true.

Or it's true. You wouldn't know.

The "Or" is a guess in that case. It's your way. 

You've hated TC with great passion for I don't know how long. You flipped your opinion regarding my relationship with Inquirer faster than pachycephalosaurus when it prepares to ram its thick skull against an opponent after I said I'm smarter than you.

You're backpedaling now. Your claim was that I never corrected Nathan about myself not once "in the 12 years" when I had the chance, now that's been dispelled and you have no leg to stand on in that false claim, you want to argue how I hated the guy for 12 years. 

What? I never said anything like you never correct Nathan, wtf, that makes no sense, why would I say that. I was referring to your stance about my relationship with Inq, which flipped faster than you could blink when I said I'm smarter than you. Then I asked for an example to the contrary, which you failed to provide, demonstrating my point.

You wrote: "Turncoat might not know everything about you, but he's very on point with this. He's not the only person saying you evaluate arguments, situational context, and intellect based on who, in your mind, is 'opposing' you. As concrete evidence of this, you never had any problems at all with my relationships with Inquirer until you got angry at me. Then everything I did was morally questionable and unintelligent and needed fixing. If TC were not correct, you would've pointed out all of this during the 12 years when you had a chance to do so, and not only after turning. You 100% do exactly what TC says you do. You do it all the time."

I'll give you that one. 

I did address how I never had any reason to flip out over your relationship with Inq, until I saw you spreading lies. I don't like when people spread lies about others and that's what you've been doing as of late. You even told an ex member that Inq is "still plotting and scamming", but in that instance you were the scammer. It deserves no respect believe me. 

I dont understand what the rest of what you said means, I wasnt talking about you doggedly hating everything TC does.

What you've done was cut out what I had to say, dismissing it as something you don't understand. The message is clear and counters your claim of me never correcting Nathan's fake claims about me.

What. Quote me saying you never correct Nathan... Lol. You argue with him all the time. 

It's then easy to see how I mentioned the obvious, which is making a stand when Nathan spreads lies about me, cause it happens ALL THE TIME. Dude. That's not even a debate there. 

Yeah it sounds like youre having a debate with yourself because whatever youre talking about I haven't participated in.

I misinterpreted your claim and carried on, so you can have that too. 

Give me a single example where you expressed your current opinion before you started your tirade.

You just said for argument sake my opinion about you and Inq's relationship hasn't changed in years, but I always had something to say. The difference is now you're being dishonest about him now, spreading lies, saying he's here scamming. You crossed a line now. I'd always say over and over how Inq is docile, and questioning your hatred for him.

Except you cant cite a single example where youve shown any sign of the disapproval you show now. Hence why it's a good example for you.

I don't recall you spreading bullshit about Inq before. This time is different and I had something to say.

Every time I saw you stumble I had something to say. This is nothing new. You just take it as more profound cause you absolutely hate Inq, and whatever you planned to do here backfired, and why ? Because the truth pushed its way to the surface. A shameful position for a scientist I reckon. 

What you call a tirade is really an intervention, and my message to you is, stop lying, you're a proclaimed scientist okay, fucking act like one and stick to finding, not guesses that come from your heart that will lead others astray.

Im referring to the overarching theme where you follow me to a random topic and make the case that I have a low IQ. You do that in almost every topics. This one just happens to be related to Inq, but that's not why you're commenting on it.

lol. I do not follow you. It's not like there are a million people here in SC. But yes, I honestly don't see you as a smart person. Your OP here is misguided by emotions you have no control over, and you made a "choice" to broadcast bullshit you pulled out of literally nowhere ( you did this again the other day in BR's thread claiming what Inq is and what he's up to ), while you preach to be the brightest on here you ended up looking silly yet again Legga. 

That OP, complete trash. Now fencing with me is literally fencing with the truth in the matter. 

Why'd you never say anything like that 12 years prior to you getting angry at me over my intellect though?

Dude, you went downhill with the transitioning, then detransitioning and running back to your wife and child, and how long ago was that now ? 5 years ? Maybe more.

I gave you another cuff in the head when you insisted you'd go see that woman in the hospital when she told you not to. You were too concerned with wanting to be there for some woman, without your wife, so you'd violate her wishes. Maybe you went there and some other guy told you to fuck off, or maybe they escorted you out of the hospital, who knows, but that's the type of shit your lack of sense will get you into. 

Now you're doing it again, and this isn't even your greatest hit. The Transitioning episode was as far as I know.

You may notice there's always peace between us between your foolish episodes. As of late you started boasting about being the smartest, that honestly doesn't bother me, and it's not why I say I don't think so, I genuinely don't find you all that bright. You're not totally dumb in my eyes, but no, I don't see you outclassing in intelligence. Even if someone lacks wisdom a high intelligence can compensate for a lack of sense. 

I'm not upset. I'm observant. I can't take what you say seriously when it so obviously comes after your general tirade against me started, and you never had an opinion on the matter before. Everything you say is so obviously painted by the context of you actively hating the fact that I'm intelligent. If it's not, then give me an example where within the 12 years up until now, before you started to actively dislike me, you ever expressed similar opinions.

 No your not observant. I'm sticking up for Inq in the face of a spiritually compromised and conflicted man. Spreading lies. It really looks like you've scammed yourself into believing the shit you write WITHOUT any evidence of your accusations. Not even TC agrees with you and finds you lacking in wisdom. Wisdom is the ability to utilize knowledge correctly, which you're failing to do. You honestly cannot say you're observant and be taken seriously at this point while the source of your hatred for Inq can only discredit you, now you want to lay claim that you're observant. Denied.

No, I'm observant. I think that much is evident.

Not observant enough from the looks of it. Freakin nobody would say out of the blue Inq is here, plotting and scamming. That's all made up. It's easy to see he isn't here, and it's easy to see he isn't BT or anyone else. Simple stuff. 

Now you're throwing questions and asking for examples while getting crushed,

You asked for an example. The example is you being unable to cite a single instance where you expressed your current opinion in the past.

The Steve, incident. The woman in the hospital incident, and now this. That spans 4-5 years total. 

It bothers you that I don't think your smart. While a smart person wouldn't care what I think and carry on doing what they do, which is smart. 

I think you're a bit of a racist too, cause you like to use black people in your avatar while thinking they aren't as smart as a white person, and you're white, but I don't see any reason to complain about that, cause it doesn't cross any lines such as smearing the reputations of others without any good reason. Or cheating on your wife with the intent to ditch her and your child for a homosexual, then crawling back when he rejected you. Or invading that woman in the hospital. 

I will just stick to my claim how you cannot provide any examples of me flipping my opinion on someone for disagreeing with me.

I mean, did you ever hold your current opinion of my relationship with Inq before you got angry at me? If not, then there you go, your opinion on my relationship with Inq flipped the moment you got offended by my intellect.

Of course I did. I always thought it was brutish and very childish. It also contributed to how I measure your intelligence. Like damn, you beat the guy but that wasn't enough was it. 

You and I had disagreements, and you're famous for "Let's just agree to disagree"

No Im not.

Oh yes you are. "Let's just agree to disagree" is something you've said to me on multiple occasions. 

I say fine, and shits the same.  On top of that you're guy who often claims "It's lonely up here at the top, I need to find another community, no one understands me" while having the capacity to stir shit about an opponent which is low IQ behavior.

It is lonely at the top. I dont know why it offends you so much. I'm not saying it to brag, its a fact. it is what it is.

Probably very lonely at the bottom to be honest. When you blow hot air people will turn away from you.  I don't see your behavior as high IQ. No one will. 

The question is nothing new, what the hell did Inq actually do for you to spread false witness, to witnesses ?

Is it because he's still more popular than you are ? How when history is brought up his name will pop up from the mouths of others but nothing all that good would be said of you ?

I have nothing against Inquirer. He just has many sockpuppets, and I'm pointing out what he does.

 Well we're coming up on SIX years since the man was here. If he did come here it would be spectacular. Maybe he would dress up, punch you in the gut and vanish. If Inq appears and attacks you, it would be your fault. Or maybe he would put on a sock and not bother with you at all, say something than vanish for another half a decade.

Get help.  

Golden_Eagle said: 

Funny how you require evidence, when you're you.

Funny, I could say the same thing to you. 

I don't recall you spreading bullshit about Inq before. This time is different and I had something to say.

...he's literally been doing this for years, it's a running gag. 

That OP, complete trash. Now fencing with me is literally fencing with the truth in the matter. 

Why'd you never say anything like that 12 years prior to you getting angry at me over my intellect though?

Dude, you went downhill with the transitioning, then detransitioning and running back to your wife and child, and how long ago was that now ? 5 years ? Maybe more.

I gave you another cuff in the head when you insisted you'd go see that woman in the hospital when she told you not to. You were too concerned with wanting to be there for some woman, without your wife, so you'd violate her wishes. Maybe you went there and some other guy told you to fuck off, or maybe they escorted you out of the hospital, who knows, but that's the type of shit your lack of sense will get you into. 

Now you're doing it again, and this isn't even your greatest hit. The Transitioning episode was as far as I know.

You may notice there's always peace between us between your foolish episodes. As of late you started boasting about being the smartest, that honestly doesn't bother me, and it's not why I say I don't think so, I genuinely don't find you all that bright. You're not totally dumb in my eyes, but no, I don't see you outclassing in intelligence. Even if someone lacks wisdom a high intelligence can compensate for a lack of sense. 

How would you respond to learning that he never actually tried to transition, and that it was a thought exercise in hypotheticals to see how people like you'd respond to it during a timeframe where the rhetoric was still fairly fresh and new to the modern lexicon? 

I will just stick to my claim how you cannot provide any examples of me flipping my opinion on someone for disagreeing with me.

I mean, did you ever hold your current opinion of my relationship with Inq before you got angry at me? If not, then there you go, your opinion on my relationship with Inq flipped the moment you got offended by my intellect.

Of course I did. I always thought it was brutish and very childish. It also contributed to how I measure your intelligence. Like damn, you beat the guy but that wasn't enough was it. 

So... what's your opinion over Inquirer then, if you find Legga to be so many synonyms for stupidity yet also accept him as the winner of their contest? 

You and I had disagreements, and you're famous for "Let's just agree to disagree"

No Im not.

Oh yes you are. "Let's just agree to disagree" is something you've said to me on multiple occasions. 

I moreso recall him finding you two's discussions hopeless over a lack of common ground, eventually giving up, but I'd need to look again to see the specifics of how he stepped out of the conversations. 

I say fine, and shits the same.  On top of that you're guy who often claims "It's lonely up here at the top, I need to find another community, no one understands me" while having the capacity to stir shit about an opponent which is low IQ behavior.

It is lonely at the top. I dont know why it offends you so much. I'm not saying it to brag, its a fact. it is what it is.

Probably very lonely at the bottom to be honest. When you blow hot air people will turn away from you.  I don't see your behavior as high IQ. No one will. 

High IQ people tend to have a lot of social issues actually, I wouldn't be surprised if his IQ was high. Smart people tend to have problems, especially when it comes to common sense. As per Dunning Kruger, they also tend to express more doubts that lend to a heightened sense of rigor when it comes to proving things, rather than just winging it. 

Actually think about what low IQ posting looks like for a second, the posts tend to be a lot shorter in length and patience. 

The question is nothing new, what the hell did Inq actually do for you to spread false witness, to witnesses ?

Is it because he's still more popular than you are ? How when history is brought up his name will pop up from the mouths of others but nothing all that good would be said of you ?

I have nothing against Inquirer. He just has many sockpuppets, and I'm pointing out what he does.

 Well we're coming up on SIX years since the man was here.

 Four years  Three years*,  he was definitely around still during COVID and even had discussions on here over it. 

 I thought it'd been three, which prompted me to check the search. 


Edit: It was three, from around the 20th of December 2022. My hunch was correct but my sleep-math was janky and rounded up. 

Golden_Eagle said: 

lol multiple women. Are there no men ?

The Flying Monkeys thing actually happened. The woman in question checked up on me a year ago, but honestly I don't know why. Maybe she wanted to say hi, or maybe she wanted to see how I would react. I still don't like her friends.

With Lena I pointed out "how" she's my enemy. So she flipped out and here came sugar. I was right. I'm not happy about it. Lena asked me "what are we" twice, but really I don't have time for long distance plus I'm already committed, so maybe this was for the best. 

Lena asked me "what are we" twice, but really I don't have time for long distance plus I'm already committed, so maybe this was for the best.

Girl, what?

Elaborate??