I have no hatred for Inquirer.
Just yesterday, you told a visiting member and I quote: "Inquirer is the same as always, still scamming people and plotting."
You're "assuming" Inq is still here while trying to find out who he would be, and you're smearing his reputation, from nothing. The only person being scammed is you and you're doing it to yourself, as you can't even prove your false claim to yourself while you're taking shots in the dark under your own disdain filled veil.
You only started expressing these strong views, after 12 years of never saying a thing, right after I implied I'm smarter than you and you started to hound me across topics like a child, trying so hard to get me at every turn. Before this, you had no opinion, for 12 years.
I always expressed my strong views when it came to foolery. When you were claiming to be trans and ready to leave your wife and child to be Steve's little spoon I did the same thing, also when that lady was in the hospital and was asking you not to come but you insisted on visiting her ( without your wife ) cause you wanted to be the one to brighten her day.
This time you can say whatever you want, but once again your lack of sense has lead you trying to attempting to justify falsehood based on hot air, then you're shaken by the truth by how it makes you look. As you are.
Spatial, if I'm being honest, your weakness is that your view of others is heavily skewed toward the negative, and toward thinking everyone is below you. The reason you're so angry at me and so out to get me is that me being smarter, happier, and more successful than you breaks that image. I'm tired of your shenanigans. Grow up and accept your place in the world.
Your act is pitiful. If it weren't an act, you wouldve said something in the 12 years where you had a chance to speak up, as opposed to only after you became obsessed with getting to me.
My vision is accurate in this regard. You want to sell us on the idea that Inq is present, that he was a list of other members, that if any accounts were stolen during SC's transition, that it was most certainly Inq who did it. We see how you constantly attack and belittle Inq, this time you're on some smear campaign but really, the man isn't even here.
Your head is so filled with this idea that you're intellectually supreme, you think your assumptions come correct, but you clearly lack the tools to piece data together and will ignore points that would discredit your false claims.
Here's the truth. You haven't seen Inq in years. Smaring his name, which you do often, comes from a place of hatred. You and MissC's are enemies since she took her boyfriends side when you were debating him. Years later you constantly repeat, I beat Inq in a debate ! I beat Inq ! But dude, a whole bunch of us debated with Inq and won and there's no hard feelings.
It really is pathetic and not worthy of some prize. The ones who'd follow your accusations are people you'd have made fools of for placing faith in your word against him, and while I have no respect for that you're gonna say I'm being weak minded and pitiful. Hot air is the way with you.
