Sociopath Community

If anything I would've said something like I can lose 120k and sleep easy, but I never lost that much.

Well it's what you said, that you lost it.

Anyway, I'm enjoying watching the both of you doing your darndest to belittle me based on good things.

Not to mention this is not the behavior of someone with a high IQ.

My record is 166k in 10 days with an 11k investment. It's not the bulk of what I've made, and I don't recall losing 120k worth of what I would consider house money beyond capital.

I'm damned if I do, and damned if I don't, though less damned if I report my losses to you as if I'm supposed to. It's things like that which has me measuring your level of intelligence, and it's not exactly all that flattering. 

Buttered Toast said:

Still curious as to the trigger leading to the OP in the first place, too.

...I don't think it's as dramatic as Spatial is putting it. Probably just a "light bulb" moment that just came up?

Spatial is just itching to get me. He has been listening to me discussing with Inquirer for 12 years now, and this is the first time he has an issue with it, right after I implied I was smarter than him and he started his relentless tirade to prove to people I'm dim, because he knows I'm a professor and he's insecure about my intelligence. Before he started his tirade, he didn't say a word about Inquirer to me, ever, nor did he ever indicate he had such moral qualms with me that he has now developed in the last 1-2 week. You dont need to take it too seriously.

He is not doing it because he's developed a moral obligation that demands him to action. Instead, this coincides with his overarching attacks at me in every topic with a different reason every time, but with the common theme being how people should not think I'm smarter than him, and should instead shame me and call me dumb.

lol insecure about your intelligence.

.

.

.

Buttered Toast.

Here's that time Legga attacked MissC for cheering on Inq in that debate.

https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/15505/1/misscommunication-the-most-boring-person-on-sc

Irrational thinking is the way with him in many areas. He was so mad that anyone, let along Inq's girlfriend cheered him on. 

The only ones attacking MissC in that thread, are Legga, TC, and Crow who is using the Quietbeef avatar.

The dynamic between Crow and Inq is interesting, because crow wanted to drive a wedge between Inq and MissC, cause at the time they were emotionally cheating, before she ditched TC to move to Sweden to be with Inq. This is why Crow nor Inq no longer attend SC. 

There were civilizations that made it a crime to shrink from controversy. Legga's endless controversy with Inq needs to be fixed, as it causes him to spiral off into the land of bullshit as his accusations are nothing more than hot air and hatred. While some have faith in Legga, he'll only lead them astray sooner or later, though this episode was comprised of something people know to be false. 

It's as dramatic as I say. 

Let the post above me be the evidence for all to see.

Buttered Toast said:

Still curious as to the trigger leading to the OP in the first place, too.

...I don't think it's as dramatic as Spatial is putting it. Probably just a "light bulb" moment that just came up?

You weren't on SC2, but were on SC1 and SC3. There were several fake accounts that were created on SC3, including fake spatial, fake inquirer, fake sensitivesoul, fake daniel birdick, and fake edvard accounts. Had the originals not showed up, they couldve continued the play. If the original BT is not here, then the fake one can continued with nobody to oppose them and nobody to verify their authenticity.

What evidence is there really that youre the original buttered toast? For that matter, maybe youre not Inquirer, but I certainly have no proof that you're not. 

Fake Spatial account on SC3 ?

I done told you, good secured my account and handed it to me in discord when he made this place, and he probably did it for others too.

Up to this day I don't know how to create a username with a space, as my avatar name has. 

EDIT: I also find a fake Inquirer unrealistic, as Inq used to write code for this forum.

Jada said: 

Buttered Toast said:

Still curious as to the trigger leading to the OP in the first place, too.

...I don't think it's as dramatic as Spatial is putting it. Probably just a "light bulb" moment that just came up?

You weren't on SC2, but were on SC1 and SC3. There were several fake accounts that were created on SC3, including fake spatial, fake inquirer, fake sensitivesoul, fake daniel birdick, and fake edvard accounts. Had the originals not showed up, they couldve continued the play. If the original BT is not here, then the fake one can continued with nobody to oppose them and nobody to verify their authenticity.

What evidence is there really that youre the original buttered toast? For that matter, maybe youre not Inquirer, but I certainly have no proof that you're not. 

The same thing could be said about nearly anyone here, even the doxxed to some degree (they'd have the best information available to imitate), so it really goes nowhere.  The testimony to my authenticity comes from three diverse sources: two of which are historically disagreeable with one another (other than my identity), and one unrelated source, as well.  There are probably several others that could verify my voice as well, from various incarnations of SC on Discord and other servers.  In this day and age, of course, you may escape with "but it could all be done with AI" trapdoor at any point and potentially be right.

The only point to all this could be some statement on anonymity and the puerility of making any assertions for accomplishments, identity and prestige without doxxing yourself.  In those terms, you will have to lean more heavily on testimony, while *Tony* has the "benefit" of being doxxed.  (But, as I said, any of this could be faked by someone willing to put in some minimum effort, regardless.)

...Oh, I should add, formally, that I am *not* Inquirer, nor have I ever been.

Spatial, when you say 'smart', you're meaning 'wise' aren't you? 

Obviously Legga is smart, that's not really up for debate. 

That's a ...way to reframe one's stats: in terms of "intelligence".  Agility is "intelligent use of proprioception", Charisma is "social intelligence", Wisdom is "discerning intelligent judgment", etc.