Sociopath Community

Jada said: 

Spatial says Legga is an idiot who doesn't understand fundamentals of science and follows him around in threads to convince everyone he's an idiot. He cant stand the idea of Legga being smart.

With numerous scientific publications, Legga has contributed to fundamental physics and started research work before reaching adulthood. On this forum, Legga's achievements include sleep graph analysis and dominating Inquirer, an intellectual giant, in a debate:

https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/1039/1/legga-exposed-as-a-liar

Spatial will give an overview of his own intellectual achievements below this post.

Then it's up to you to decide who is smarter between Spatial and Legga. We can also solve some quizzes and shit to make it more objective.

Votes before Spatial lists his own intellectual achievements are disqualified.

 Good Christ!

Jada said: 

Spatial says Legga is an idiot who doesn't understand fundamentals of science and follows him around in threads to convince everyone he's an idiot. He cant stand the idea of Legga being smart.

That's false on the most part. My claim is you're ridiculous and full of shit. I also claimed your inability to formulate a conclusion without scientific consensus. I say that based on our recent conversation about WTC7. Eventually you came to a sensible conclusion but not until I was able to provide an example of numbers of educated people inline with the obvious.

With numerous scientific publications, Legga has contributed to fundamental physics and started research work before reaching adulthood.

The burden of proof is upon you tbh. Otherwise there's no reason to believe you've achieved any of your claims. I DON'T SAY you're ridiculous out of a grudge or anger.  I genuinely find that you are.

Nearly the whole forum thinks so too.

On this forum, Legga's achievements include sleep graph analysis and dominating Inquirer, an intellectual giant, in a debate:

https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/1039/1/legga-exposed-as-a-liar

I read about 19 pages or so of that. I wasn't all that interested in it back then.

Inq has a point where you're only arguing the semantics of the debate. Nathan is like that too, where instead of getting to the point, he'll argue and question how the current interaction is going, thus creating an endless cycle of backward progression and brain rot, without ever addressing the solution to the initial subject.

.

If I were to boast, I'd go on about my Bitcoin technical analysis graph that I drew in Alice's trading group, and the thing lasted for 2 years into the future hitting my spaced out markers from a 3k price point and up. This isn't something I use in arguments, but I'd argue my graph is better than yours. To others I performed a miracle, but to me this is a late study combined with something I learned in grade 6.

This in my opinion is a silly argument and it devalues my intended sentiment of enriching some of you, but there you go. It matters not.

Spatial will give an overview of his own intellectual achievements below this post.

 

 I don't recall anyone consulting me about participating in your charade, so I'll just do what I want instead.

And I just said yesterday in the other thread how it doesn't matter to me if someone is smarter. Yes I find you foolish, and I'm not trying to insult or even compete with someone I find ridiculous. But you think, act and do foolish things. 

This thread is foolish too, though it might work out for you, might not. That link you posted works against you. All you have in there is Nathan who you think is a genius.

I'm not just saying this now, but as I've said on numerous occasion  "I'm unable to respect people who think highly of Nate, for mmmmany many reasons."

Last person I cut off over that quote in the last paragraph was Delora. Nathan convinced her I was siding with BR at the end of their marriage, so she started dismissing my claims and pilled the whole "I thought you were my friend". I ended the discussion by taking BR's side out of spite, while understanding why he beat her ass. And there's Nate tugging on her strings, showing her what to do, how to think and who to trust. 

That's false on the most part. My claim is you're ridiculous and full of shit. I also claimed your inability to formulate a conclusion without scientific consensus.

Ive been pretty consistent about my claims for 8-12 years now or so? But if you want to go with the burden of proof thing then you certainly haven't proven that youre a billionaire.

If I were to boast, I'd go on about my Bitcoin technical analysis graph that I drew in Alice's trading group, and the thing lasted for 2 years into the future hitting my spaced out markers from a 3k price point and up. This isn't something I use in arguments, but I'd argue my graph is better than yours. To others I performed a miracle, but to me this is a late study combined with something I learned in grade 6.

Jada said: 

That's false on the most part. My claim is you're ridiculous and full of shit. I also claimed your inability to formulate a conclusion without scientific consensus.

You said, and I quote, "I dont associate Legga with intellect". I could find about a few hundred other instances where you are offended by my intellect, or lack thereof.

 

 

The burden of proof is upon you tbh. Otherwise there's no reason to believe you've achieved any of your claims.

Ive been pretty consistent about my claims for 8-12 years now or so? But if you want to go with the burden of proof thing then you certainly haven't proven that youre a billionaire.

 

If I were to boast, I'd go on about my Bitcoin technical analysis graph that I drew in Alice's trading group, and the thing lasted for 2 years into the future hitting my spaced out markers from a 3k price point and up. This isn't something I use in arguments, but I'd argue my graph is better than yours. To others I performed a miracle, but to me this is a late study combined with something I learned in grade 6.

So whats this technical graph? Can you share and explain it?

 

All you have in there is Nathan who you think is a genius.

Well actually we had a formal debate after that with a neutral judge, and I was declared the winner.

 

I don't recall anyone consulting me about participating in your charade, so I'll just do what I want instead.

So first you call me dumb and now youre chickening out? Or are you afraid that your intellectual achievements pale in front of even an idiot?

 Oh my word...

Jada said: 

That's false on the most part. My claim is you're ridiculous and full of shit. I also claimed your inability to formulate a conclusion without scientific consensus.

You said, and I quote, "I dont associate Legga with intellect". I could find about a few hundred other instances where you are offended by my intellect, or lack thereof.

The burden of proof is upon you tbh. Otherwise there's no reason to believe you've achieved any of your claims.

Ive been pretty consistent about my claims for 8-12 years now or so? But if you want to go with the burden of proof thing then you certainly haven't proven that youre a billionaire.

LOL I never claimed to be a billionaire. Don't embarrass me please. Though it's possible. I missed the oppoutunity to become a billionaire twice though.

The first time was with Hex. In the group I was like. Hey guys look at this, a platform for investors to lock liquidity ! They said nah, it's looks like shit. I let it go. Then it 10,000x'd.

The 2nd time was with Shiba Inu. Again I'm on it. Bring it to the discord. Hey guys look ! The Dogecoin killer. They said nah looks like trash. From the day I speculated it, (and never bough any) it went up 70 million percent. Some guy dumped 8k and it became $5.2B. Meanwhile I'm here watching it slip through me in real time, making 10-20k investments in the group. I did buy snd sell Shib at some point to make a quick 90k. I did that with chainlink too with Kestrel. Quick 90k. He never moved when I did.

What I've done is documented on that server, for members interested in trading. I'd post screenshots of my moves and the outcome.

You never heard of my wealth from me, but from other members who were in that group. Of all members you talk about it the most and you weren't even there.

In SC every asset I called out has turned to solid gold. Even Tron which at the time was only a penny. I had a member thank me cause he was able to build his house.

Helped another member who lost 800 dollars following me. I simply sent it to him and reminded him not to invest what he can't afford to lose. Especially with high risk trading.

If I were to boast, I'd go on about my Bitcoin technical analysis graph that I drew in Alice's trading group, and the thing lasted for 2 years into the future hitting my spaced out markers from a 3k price point and up. This isn't something I use in arguments, but I'd argue my graph is better than yours. To others I performed a miracle, but to me this is a late study combined with something I learned in grade 6.

So whats this technical graph? Can you share and explain it?

All you have in there is Nathan who you think is a genius.

Well actually we had a formal debate after that with a neutral judge, and I was declared the winner.

That's nice I guess. I don't think of him as genius and think little of people who think highly of him. I have good reasons for that.

I don't recall anyone consulting me about participating in your charade, so I'll just do what I want instead.

So first you call me dumb and now youre chickening out? Or are you afraid that your intellectual achievements pale in front of even an idiot?

 It's adorable seeing you try to manipulate me.

I do find you dim yes.

You're anonymous and can be anyone you make yourself out to be.

Edvard was a self proclaimed alpha male kickboxer. He had a very short fuse over little things. He also banged 300 women cause he's so hot.

I say Ed was a kid in a wheelchair who got to be whatever he wanted on the internet.

Dox yourself. It's safe. Look at all the members you know the identity of. Blanc comes, writes then fucks off. Everyone knows me, Nate got doxed and never got hurt. BR, Delora, Tryptamine, Cain, Matrix. Cavalier is a chinky prettyboy. Quntasia, Jim, Dexter, Lena, Chapo, Med. Almost everyone dude.

Show us what you're so proud of. Show us mainstream science calling you a pioneer. Or remain a coward like Ed, which by the way staying anonymous isn't the cowardly part, it's talking big from your safe space that makes you.

You failed to include what I responded to. I never said you don't understand the fundamentals of science.

You did, but I cant be assed to look up the thread where you did it.

Already this is an argument of semantics, where statements are twisted and will need to be fixed to stay clear of traps and accusations.

Is it? You called me an idiot, and it turns out I'm actually smarter than you. That's why you refuse to post your list of intellectual achievements. Pretty simple.

You never heard of my wealth from me, but from other members who were in that group. Of all members you talk about it the most and you weren't even there.

You could post a screenshot of your bank balance for example. Pretty easy right?

Yes. I can. With discord screenshots with time stamps. Should I though ? Following your instruction would make me seem conceited, as if it's important for me to dunk on you. Even God wouldn't like the whole perversion of such a gift. Not smart.

Of course you should, I'm asking for it, aren't I?

That's nice I guess. I don't think of him as genius and think little of people who think highly of him. I have good reasons for that.

To be clear, I was referring to Inquirer and that thread where you said all I had going for me was TC. There was a follow up debate after that with a neutral judge, and I was declared the winner.

I do find you dim yes.

Yet I'm a distinguished scientist with greater intellectual achievements that yours. Why's that?

Jada said: 

You failed to include what I responded to. I never said you don't understand the fundamentals of science.

You did, but I cant be assed to look up the thread where you did it.

That isn't something I would say. Let alone to someone who relys heavily on scientific consensus, which I say about you often enough.

Already this is an argument of semantics, where statements are twisted and will need to be fixed to stay clear of traps and accusations.

Is it? You called me an idiot, and it turns out I'm actually smarter than you. That's why you refuse to post your list of intellectual achievements. Pretty simple.

It's easy to see the reasoning behind your conclusion. I simply don't think I have to. I also think I'm leading this thing you conjured up.

You never heard of my wealth from me, but from other members who were in that group. Of all members you talk about it the most and you weren't even there.

You could post a screenshot of your bank balance for example. Pretty easy right?

No offence, but that's fucking dumb too. 

It's been said when we play stupid games we win stupid prizes. Fucking no one posts their bank balance Legga, there's a list of issues with that, what idiot would do such a thing on sociopathcommunity.

Feel free to post yours if that's what you wanted to do.

Yes. I can. With discord screenshots with time stamps. Should I though ? Following your instruction would make me seem conceited, as if it's important for me to dunk on you. Even God wouldn't like the whole perversion of such a gift. Not smart.

Of course you should, I'm asking for it, aren't I?

At this point you're telling me. Just like you assumed I'd be compliant and go fetch what you want on demand in the OP. You've mistaken the dynamics between us it seem.

Members were there, and we were there all day during the previous bull run. My best trade was 166k in 10 days. It could've been over 700k but I played it safe on the way up.

I did everything live, and only there. I wasn't obliged to share with Jim.

But yes, my TA is very solid. 

That's nice I guess. I don't think of him as genius and think little of people who think highly of him. I have good reasons for that.

To be clear, I was referring to Inquirer and that thread where you said all I had going for me was TC. There was a follow up debate after that with a neutral judge, and I was declared the winner.

Who was the judge ?

Inq was a nice guy. I never seen him like that. He hasn't been around in 6 years and you have some obsession over beating him down. I doubt he ever did you anything to warrant your unhealthy obsession to crush him.

I'll never debate Inq again but when I did, he was more well composed.

I do find you dim yes.

Yet I'm a distinguished scientist with greater intellectual achievements that yours. Why's that?

 I told you in the other thread why I find you dim, and the reasons are very good.

Now you're on some grandiose episode where you strongly suggest you're smarter and richer than everyone. Complete with a woke celebrity to represent you with cash in hand. All from the same guy that blurts out my success in investing and trading the most.

It doesn't make or break me if someone is smarter than me or not. And I'm sorry I don't believe in you, but it's the truth.

Our output speaks for itself, and I leave it at that as there's no need to speak for it.

Plus Xadem gave his reason as to why he thinks you're a liar, sounds legit with the given reasoning. You probably would've countered my balance 7 fold for all we know.

It's been said when we play stupid games we win stupid prizes. Fucking no one posts their bank balance Legga, there's a list of issues with that, what idiot would do such a thing on sociopathcommunity.

Well youre the one who said we should go with evidence and all that. I said I'm good with your word. So how are you going to prove your 100 million dollar status then? I guess by your own logic nobody should believe you?

At this point you're telling me. Just like you assumed I'd be compliant and go fetch what you want on demand in the OP. You've mistaken the dynamics between us it seem.

Members were there, and we were there all day during the previous bull run. My best trade was 166k in 10 days. It could've been over 700k but I played it safe on the way up.

I did everything live, and only there. I wasn't obliged to share with Jim.

But yes, my TA is very solid.

So, again, no evidence. I guess you yourself dont really like posting evidence either huh? So what are we going to do then -- go back to my suggestion? I guess everyone should trust you as much as my scientist status, which is factually true, then. My point was that I wasnt going to dox myself, but I've been pretty consistent about my research career throughout my 10 or so years of being here, and that should be enough. You seem to hold this view too, given how you're not giving any credible evidence to support your own claims.

Who was the judge ?

Inq was a nice guy. I never seen him like that. He hasn't been around in 6 years and you have some obsession over beating him down. I doubt he ever did you anything to warrant your unhealthy obsession to crush him.

I'll never debate Inq again but when I did, he was more well composed.

I agree he was more well composed than you, and I beat him, so another point for the idiot then.

I told you in the other thread why I find you dim, and the reasons are very good.

Yeah but I have more intellectual achievements than you. So I can't be dim.

What happened was you got annoyed by the fact that I was implying I am smarter than you. Deep down, you know that you're not smarter than me. You know better. You were simply annoyed because you perceived me as proud of my intellect. I'm not. It is what it is. I see people like you every day, I don't feel I'm better than you even if I'm smarter.

Now you're on some grandiose episode where you strongly suggest you're smarter and richer than everyone. Complete with a woke celebrity to represent you with cash in hand. All from the same guy that blurts out my success in investing and trading the most.

I mean, it is what it is. What, should I pretend to be dumb just cause you're offended by my intellect?

I dont know what youre talking about regarding a woke celebrity. I found your investments interesting because it's rare to see that on an SC forum. Im considerably wealthy, yes.

Our output speaks for itself, and I leave it at that as there's no need to speak for it.

Well you're speaking to it in every thread. I made this thread for you since you were so interested. Why are you backing out now?

Jada said: 

It's been said when we play stupid games we win stupid prizes. Fucking no one posts their bank balance Legga, there's a list of issues with that, what idiot would do such a thing on sociopathcommunity.

Well youre the one who said we should go with evidence and all that. I said I'm good with your word.

I don't recall suggesting we should do anything of the sort. This whole cock waving contest is your idea, not mine.

So how are you going to prove your 100 million dollar status then? I guess by your own logic nobody should believe you?

Correct. No one should believe me. But it's not me, it's a reputation that was formed based on my performance in Alice's discord server.

At this point you're telling me. Just like you assumed I'd be compliant and go fetch what you want on demand in the OP. You've mistaken the dynamics between us it seem.

Members were there, and we were there all day during the previous bull run. My best trade was 166k in 10 days. It could've been over 700k but I played it safe on the way up.

I did everything live, and only there. I wasn't obliged to share with Jim.

But yes, my TA is very solid.

So, again, no evidence. I guess you yourself dont really like posting evidence either huh? So what are we going to do then -- go back to my suggestion? I guess everyone should trust you as much as my scientist status, which is factually true, then. My point was that I wasnt going to dox myself, but I've been pretty consistent about my research career throughout my 10 or so years of being here, and that should be enough. You seem to hold this view too, given how you're not giving any credible evidence to support your own claims.

I knew something like this could happen when I shared some of my trades. Again, you talk about it the most. Maybe I'm the cause of this episode your having.

Whatever you do, good for you. When I see foolery, I'll have something to say about it, and I'm not the type to randomly accuse someone of foolery. Plus notably I'm not the only one to call you out.

Do you think it was wise to bump Xadem's thread ?

Who was the judge ?

Inq was a nice guy. I never seen him like that. He hasn't been around in 6 years and you have some obsession over beating him down. I doubt he ever did you anything to warrant your unhealthy obsession to crush him.

I'll never debate Inq again but when I did, he was more well composed.

I agree he was more well composed than you, and I beat him, so another point for the idiot then.

What was the last point you scored ? Is it how I never followed your instructions ?

You're not showcasing good composure btw.

I told you in the other thread why I find you dim, and the reasons are very good.

Yeah but I have more intellectual achievements than you. So I can't be dim.

Even in here you proposed dumb ideas, like posting my bank balance. 

"Oh yeah, so I flexed my balance in a place called sociopathcommunity officer and that's where it all began ! Yeah I know sir... why ?.... Well because Legga told me to do it"

On the bright side I'm amused, Legga.

What happened was you got annoyed by the fact that I was implying I am smarter than you. Deep down, you know that you're not smarter than me. You know better. You were simply annoyed because you perceived me as proud of my intellect. I'm not. It is what it is. I see people like you every day, I don't feel I'm better than you even if I'm smarter.

Copium. 

I think Alice is smarter than me, and I don't feel the need to flex on her about it.

Deep down inside I don't think your smart at all. You dismiss my reasons and invent your own conclusions by dictating your twisted version by saying "what happrned".

I've gotten annoyed with you in the past and it had nothing to do with you claiming to be better than anyone, it was some other foolishness, then some other foolishness, and another. Now there's this foolishness. I just called it out.

Now you're on some grandiose episode where you strongly suggest you're smarter and richer than everyone. Complete with a woke celebrity to represent you with cash in hand. All from the same guy that blurts out my success in investing and trading the most.

I mean, it is what it is. What, should I pretend to be dumb just cause you're offended by my intellect?

I think you're interested in outshining me tbh, and that is how you do it. You are after all that guy who likes to talk about what others claimed of me.

I dont know what youre talking about regarding a woke celebrity. I found your investments interesting because it's rare to see that on an SC forum. Im considerably wealthy, yes.

You actually know little of what I invested in, and you never heard about my success through me.

Our output speaks for itself, and I leave it at that as there's no need to speak for it.

Well you're speaking to it in every thread. I made this thread for you since you were so interested. Why are you backing out now?

 Speaking to what ? Do you mean I'm speaking about being fabulous at what I do in every thread ?

My output did speak for itself already, hence this conversation we're having.