Sociopath Community

All in all to the first part, I would much rather take on the burdens of those I love and try to help them, rather than spill my garbage that is unfixable onto them and complicate things. 

I sometimes leak out my issues and frustrations and they are there for me and I appreciate it, but overall I think the only way to fix who I am is to grow as a person and be able to do more for them. 

If an apocalypse doesn't happen, how do you channel your ambitions and your sense of responsibility for protecting others, building community, gaining power... in a stable, non-perishing world? 

— and how do you decide what’s morally justifiable ?

Melodia77 said: 

If an apocalypse doesn't happen, how do you channel your ambitions and your sense of responsibility for protecting others, building community, gaining power... in a stable, non-perishing world? 

 

— and how do you decide what’s morally justifiable ?

I think I would still strive to obtain power or whatever I could do to better it, or maybe I could relax and just have my friends and find love, and raise a family but the idea of an apocalyptic event not coming is hard to fathom. Maybe it couldn't be as bad as I imagine but some societal breakdown and revolution I see as inevitable. 

I dislike to necessarily speak on morality, sure it's important but it can't be the basis of how you approach material reality. Morality has never stopped the wheel of conflict that is history. If anything it becomes a tool to justify various things. 

While I may be twisted and have a desire for violence and am willing to be the fall guy to commit atrocities I think in my head are necessary, I don't see myself instigating it, and I would try to go with the will of the masses. 

Inevitably the Order will lose its legitimacy and conflict will likely become violent via it trying to maintain its power and attack the masses, thus instigating a revolution. Then a struggle for power in the vacuum between multiple groups of interests. 

The biggest thing is having the support and will of the masses. History will continue to be a battle between those who are considered corrupt and those who are the anti-corruption. No group is safe from this. 

So far we've seen neocolonial tactics that have dissolved the populace into the smallest possible pieces at any cost to the environment deemed necessary. It's desolation they want others to have false hope in.

If there's a revolution it'll be of the bourgeoisie and lumpenproletariat.

Melodia77 said: 

If an apocalypse doesn't happen, how do you channel your ambitions and your sense of responsibility for protecting others, building community, gaining power... in a stable, non-perishing world? 

 

— and how do you decide what’s morally justifiable ?

just make the apocalypse happen 😎