Edvard stated: source post
The fuck does this even mean. Express yourself more clearly.
i dont feel like it
Yeah you can, open that fucking mind piss-for-brain. You stereotyped my point automatically by thinking of how "tolerance campaign" has been done until now. I don't think instilling values of acceptance and cooperation into people means talking about the differences, but talking about things in common. I see no need for the differences to be pointed out at all.
no you cant
You're the one who needs to listen, bubble schizo. You've lost all credibility about understanding how things work in politics and society after linking grandpa Pat's video.
more prejudice
It's not telling people to be tolerant of other races but telling people to be tolerant about other people, fucktard. The labels of race, religion, sexuality need to be made as meaningless as possible since they carry a huge baggage of prejudice and bias. Simple minds like you need to be taught to look beyond this shit when they look at people, but focus on what really matters: each individual's merits, personality, talents, flaws, deeds. The entire lumping people together based on labels is dumb as hell, how you can't see it amazes me. It needs to be weeded out as much as possible, and ofc it would take centuries of education for that, until it reaches the thick skulls of so many tards in society.
teaching people to tolerate other people by the government is retarded LOL
here, i think you will like these books: https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/marxism
interesting, because anything that involves business lumps people together in risk assessment. and both military and police lump people together based on profiling. probably other fields too.
why? Because there are statistics. and they need to be taken into account.
if i lumped people together i would be so much different you mongoloid. i just do not deny the statistics and i see a problem and i point it out. i have already addressed that not all people are like that(muslims in this case), but you keep insisting i never did it. so fuck you i wont explain again to the crying toddler lol. its annoying as fuck to repeat myself for 1000 time. once we can see there is a problem, it can be addressed in such a way that doesn't fuel racism, respects individuals and doesn't deny problems and their cause. i almost repeated myself here, deleted it, nope. you annoying fuck.
Such bullshit. By this logic, if ISIS starts filling the media with their beliefs and incite people to join their cause we should just fucking ignore them? Because of freedom of speech or not to draw attention to them? What an idiot you are. They are the ones who draw attention to themselves. Racist talk draws attention to racist talk. The Dallas shooter liked a FB page of a group openly encouraging violence and hate towards cops, with fucking pictures of armed black people all over the place. "Take up arms and give them what they deserve" and what do you know, someone acted on this. Why was that group allowed to function and inspire?
Yes, you should ignore them lol. The KKK has been having its rallies and gatherings in America since they have existed. No one cares about them and no one takes them seriously and everyone thinks they are stupid. This is the free market of ideas and how freespeech works.
You really don't like democracy do you?
Now you mix up inciting violence with racism and hate speech. Neat. I wonder what will be your next dishonest statement.
You can incite violence without hate speech and with it.
Hate speech laws and just general thinking that is a legit thing is nothing but a reason to close conversations, fuel hate even more and cause censorship.
Racial hate talk should be more than censored. They should be punished like any crime. Fines, whatever. Your argument could be applied to all the fucking criminals. "Punishing criminals gets them power and gives them talking point for their own crimes." The fuck?
Punishing criminals doesn't give them power not gives them a talking point for their own crimes. You suck lol.
When the right wing says the minorities will take your liberty, then the left gives special rights to the minorities, then the normal people say thats unfair, then the left says thats racist, then the right wing says "told you so" and the normal people become right wing. Fucking magic.
I think it's time for people to take responsibility for what they are saying. They think they are entitled to say anything with 0 consequences, but there are consequences to what they are saying, and they need to understand them. They need to be responsibilized(?) via education and knowledge that they CAN be held responsible by society. Same as with any crime.
When that NRA guy was asked "why do you have loaded rifles in your house?" his answer was simply: "because it's my right". Well, him having that right is what's wrong.
The responsibilities of talking should never be enforced by law. You fucking scum bag.
Why don't you move to fucking China, there the government has created an app that monitors what you post on FB. And if they agree with it, then they get points, if they do not, then you lose points. And if you have friends with low points, you also lose points, so don't associate with those. Right now its not mandatory, but they plan, i think by 2020, to make it mandatory. Right now it has no benefits to your life or punishments. But they plan to give people with higher points more benefits, like discounts, while people with lower points punishments, like slower internet.
Doesn't that sound perfect? Make an app that does the same, but check for hate speech. What could go wrong, right?
Are you insane? Honestly.
