Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 43
Moral relativism of evil

leon14 stated: source post

2. In other words moral are relative (to their personal comfort zone). Not into philosophy, Ive better things to do besides contemplate lint in my belly button.

Looks that way, doesn't it?

Perhaps better questions are:

1. What are absolutes in your opinion?

2. How do you frame them?

3.What is the source?

3. It was to do with their personal interest and fuck over everyone else

That is a common theme is it not? Do you see the parallel  wrt your past actions there, or not? You did not molest any children, but for the "greater cause" you would/ might have?

 

 

Posts: 74
Moral relativism of evil

Inquirer stated: source post

Whether one's morals can be bought or not have nothing to do with moral relativism? 

Moral relativism is an umbrella term for several philosophical positions that deal with morality. They tend to argue that there are no absolute or universal morals, yes, but how they deal with that might differ greatly.

If BBC ignored Savile (I don't know if they did) it was hardly due to moral relativism. They were simply cowards or too greedy to put a stop to it.

 

1. Que?

2. In other words moral are relative (to their personal comfort zone). Not into philosophy, Ive better things to do besides contemplate lint in my belly button.

3. It was to do with their personal interest and fuck over everyone else

Posts: 1259
Moral relativism of evil

leon14 stated: source post

You should consider it bad because ones morals can be bought.

Whether one's morals can be bought or not have nothing to do with moral relativism? 

 

leon14 stated: source post

Moral relativism means that there are no absolutes.

An example of this is the likes of the BBC ignoring the likes of Jimmy Savile even though they knew exactly what he was doing.

Moral relativism is an umbrella term for several philosophical positions that deal with morality. They tend to argue that there are no absolute or universal morals, yes, but how they deal with that might differ greatly.

If BBC ignored Savile (I don't know if they did) it was hardly due to moral relativism. They were simply cowards or too greedy to put a stop to it.

Posts: 2358
Moral relativism of evil

I prefer the "evil of moral relativism."

Posts: 43
Moral relativism of evil

Spatial Mind stated: source post

 

Obviously there is pain. You are a pedophile squirming in a thread about evil and morality. Your questions are indeed simple, but your level of intelligence is making me ill. I'd rather deal with Daniella. You've also yet to answer any of my questions, which is why I cut off your supply of answers, and soon will cut you off, and everyone similar to you.

No. There isn't. That is the second time I am telling you that. Such simple questions, and you cannot answer them simply as they confine you to choice in action. As such, you deflect with an insult and think it says more about me, than yourself.

 

Gold. Symbolic and Metal = Au. You chose to conflate several concepts which are not connected. I choose not to try unravel it because it is warped reasoning with a basis which is full blown from somewhere I don't even want to bother with because of the Delusional aspect which is associated with Fairy Tales.

Oh it might. Well, good luck with the smoke and mirrors thing you have going for you there.

lol nice, or not? You should know it well enough.

 

 

Again. My post was about Gold, and 2 perspectives as to why it has any value. See you cannot give out any reason as to why gold has any value, not without repeating what I wrote, in the secular, and non secular sense.

Been addressed.

As for you bringing up Evil to me. Don't use question marks, it makes you look confused, and your grammar indicates how you're over thinking for the sake of winning debate for sport above higher knowing.

Give it a rest.

As usual, I'll discard all of what you wrote, and simply say, "Evil is based on malicious intent" and not on some blind bullshit such as your....example ? question ?

Good. Now you are getting down to the bottom line, but then you are left with the concept of "malice", and what drives that? What appears as malice to one, may appear completely different to another. So which is the devil to be blamed for that?

In order for evil to be evil, it has to be of the will. There are evil people in this world, pedophile, and they are as spiteful as someone you know.

Does it? Perhaps it is disordered and stupidity full blown? Entitlement? What is Evil, vs an Evil act? They are the same or different? Or is it manipulation of the perception alone? Or , is it evil to expose it for what it is?

When does Evil become Good?

Oh yes, I'm obviously trying to gaslight you. For my next trick, I will stonewall you and everyone like you.

Have your final say. It can be anything you want, and you can make it even uglier. I promise I will read it.

Thank you for your attention.

Yes, stone walling. That is nothing new. Seems you know yourself rather well.

Gaslighting was in the previous post I had responded to. And it was rather clear that you are blaming poor choices of actions on the observer. That isn't going to wash in reality. Sort of like, I punch you in the face. 3rd party witnesses it and then I blame the other party for not really seeing what I did. Which was to punch you in the face, deny it and blame the 3rd party for agreeing with the recipient of the punch. But Instead I am just going to blame the "devil" in me. Because...I need an excuse?

Posts: 46
Moral relativism of evil

Still having nightmares DG? I hope so, not.

Posts: 74
Moral relativism of evil

Inquirer stated: source post

So you start discussions about morality on sociopath forums but consider philosophy to be a waste of your precious time?

 

Well I dont sip Pimms while listening to classical music and contemplating my greatness...

Posts: 74
Moral relativism of evil

Inquirer stated: source post

Moral relativism does not mean you let anything slide, just that you realize there really is no such thing as absolute morality. A person subscribing to absolute morals could also betray them if bought.

It does mean letting things slide if its conveniant to your comfort zone, and if a person betrays their 'absolute' morals for money then those morals were never absolute

Posts: 1259
Moral relativism of evil

leon14 stated: source post

1. Que?

2. In other words moral are relative (to their personal comfort zone). Not into philosophy, Ive better things to do besides contemplate lint in my belly button.

3. It was to do with their personal interest and fuck over everyone else

Moral relativism does not mean you let anything slide, just that you realize there really is no such thing as absolute morality. A person subscribing to absolute morals could also betray them if bought.

So you start discussions about morality on sociopath forums but consider philosophy to be a waste of your precious time?

Posts: 1259
Moral relativism of evil

leon14 stated: source post

It does mean letting things slide if its conveniant to your comfort zone, and if a person betrays their 'absolute' morals for money then those morals were never absolute

Comfort zones have nothing to do with it. I think you have moral relativism mixed up with something else.

 

leon14 stated: source post

Well I dont sip Pimms while listening to classical music and contemplating my greatness...

Oh, awkward. I truly am alone in this world.

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.