Inquirer stated: source post
Infinity is 'magical' to us,
Speak for yourself and lay off the plural. 'Not processable' is not synonymous with 'magical' - not for me at least. and before you dismiss it as 'semantics, meh' - we have semantics, language, and definitions not without a reason.
- Inquirer stated: source post
- Can God create a stone so heavy that even he himself couldn't lift it?
Done & dusted, made all the headlines a while back: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/12/science/ligo-gravitational-waves-black-holes-einstein.html?_r=0 - probability was there alright, but it got confirmed.
"A stone so heavy that..." - verges into the territory of negative matter and antimatter (no, i can't comprehend those either), so there.
I should be posting it with my old Mike Hunt account which had a big black hole avi, but all the avatars were obliterated when Luna nuked the site back into the stone age with SCv2, and i couldn't be arsed with reinstating 'em all manually.
Here's a site someone somewhere else linked me to, which i still haven't read (bar two other short entries), due to pathological laziness. (The reason why they did so was my admitted lack of theistic conviction)
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/popular-articles-the-kalam-cosmological-argument
^ mind you, it operates from an admittedly theist bias - that's why i was reluctant to bring it up. I must read it one of these days. Like, 'tomorrow'.
"Magical" - you know what's 'magical'? When i blow a big billowy cloud of vapour by pressing a button instead of rolling up tobacco into paper. Now THAT's magic. One i foolishly resisted to be acquainted with until last October. Saved a shit-ton of cash ever since.