Moral relativism of evil
As this earth in this world continues to continue with its devolution amongst its human population it seems that all moral standards and judgments are increasingly fluid. 'Whats true for you is true for you and whats true for me is true for me' is now a standard application for every person, especially for those who consider themselves 'enlightened' or 'progressive'. Compassion is deemed to be a psychological fault and mercy is an action committed by the weak and pitiful, unless those things are done for financial gain then it cannot be ever excused. This is the result of the market society where everything and everyone is for sale or at least for rent, this includes ones morals, body and emotions. The value of a life now has a dollar value that anyone will pay for it at any given time.
People now hold contradictory beliefs as being simultaneously true depending on the following;
1. Who they are proclaiming a particular belief to
2. The time or 'moment' when they proclaim that belief
3. The market value of the belief as to the person who they proclaim the belief to and the time of proclaiming that belief.
If you own the moment then you will also own the person and get maximum profit, in order to own the person, moment, or profit you will have to have own the other 2 in order to proclaim the ownership of the 3rd one.
You may ask how this is being applied on this earth in this world, well you also have to add 'at this current time'. If we look at the 'blood money' payments which allows one to murder as long as they are rich enough to pay for the inconveniance that such a murder may cause to the society in which the parties involved reside in. This can be seen in Saudi Arabia today but it is important to note that blood money payments also reigned in European societies during the middle ages. And as the nobility of the middle ages sought to keep others in a lesser position for power and fun, we see the Saudi royalty who seek to keep non royals and especially the shiites. Whether it be official or not what we are seeing is a caste system such as in India, the only difference between previous caste systems of various societies compared to today is the application. For all the violence we see occuring all over the world the fact is that most people submit to other humans of a higher market value and this is their choice.
You are more likely to be enslaved by those of the same race as you than by wahhabis, if a wahhabi wants to enslave you he will come after you with a gun or a sword. However in the west we essentially are turning into the bonded labour society that you usually hear about in India or Pakistan, as debt is encouraged to maintain lifestyles of decreasing value. And as western governments increase taxes to pay debts on which the same governments take further loans on, and as the same governments seek to change the right of inheritance so as to prevent any inheritor to get anything of positive value but instead seek to pass debts off (eg. Children inheriting the debts of their parents etc. As has been known to happen in the Indian caste system). As for eroding anything of positive value one might inherit? Take note that Britain has an inheritance tax and like all taxes will no doubt increase.
Is this not what Karl Marx advocated?
.....And who did Karl Marx serve?
Whats true for me is true for me...... until you pay me to believe otherwise
I suppose a question to ask is 'What is the market value of evil at this current time?'
Looking at this earth in this world (Tebhel and Cheled in Assiah) we should examine the relationship of Tebhel (the inanimate physical aspect of Earth such as rocks, dirt etc) to Cheled (the spiritual aspect which is contained within animate beings). An example question would be 'Why is gold valuable?'. Gold doesnt mean anything to cats, dogs, fish etc. It is only valuable to humans because humans have deemed it to be so, apart from some electrical and jewelery aspects it is not a requirement for physical animation.
So what makes it so valuable? Is it just the oldest yuppie fashion trend of all time? Or was it desired for some other purpose? Whatever its value the fact is that people have murdered for it and continue to do so.
In Kabbalah gold is the metal associated with the Sun and therefore the sephira of Tiphareth, but in practical application it is the colour gold that is required for ritual. From my experience the actual metal of gold is not required as the use of the colour is sufficient because it is a symbolic link between Tebhel and Cheled. The colour gold is made from Tebhel but it has no value until it is applied in Cheled and even then its value is symbolic.
But as the component of Cheled is being discarded by market societies on a collective herdthink basis regardless of the personal beliefs of individuals within that society, we are seeing the purely physical aspect of Tebhel overwhelming Cheled. And we see the result in the behaviour of collective society, Tebhel is inanimate and it has no native or inherant moral behaviour by design or default. Dirt and rocks have no concept of right and wrong or good and evil. Now it seems people are choosing to be the same way in return for personal gain which is gained from Tebhel and facilitated by the 'rebel regime' of Lilith.
What good is it if a man gains the whole world and yet loses his soul?
But as atheism continually infects the world, being propagated by those who gain financial reward from doing so (ever known a poor atheist?). The issue of Cheled has been disregarded, the thing to note is that Cheled is not only made from the souls/spirits of those with a physical presence on earth but also those who have none - that being the demons. As humans increasingly refuse to believe in spirituality and matters of the soul and have no faith in the God of Abraham and rather transfer that faith into the value of money and their personal gain then they by their own actions have sold or more correctly given away their soul for nothing.
As with the colour gold being used to establish a symbolic link between the physical and the spiritual, we now see 'money' being used to establish a symbolic link between the spiritual and the physical. After all is not money symbolic? How is its value calculated or decided? In all reality a dollar note regardless of numerical 'value' is not of higher or lower value at any given time than an Abramelin magic square. The power of both comes from their symbolism.
In this day and age people still continue to live and die by their symbols. If you spray paint the picture of a big dick on a wall people will probably just say 'punk kids' and wont really worry about it. However if you spray paint a big swastika it becomes another matter, a type of herdthink mania erupts with people wailing and screaming for instant action even though the actual physical damage done by the spray can is the same in both pictures. Demons have a moral code regardless of Tebhel, humans seemingly do not.
As people lose their individuality and embrace collective willing stupidity and become a souless monolithic bloc. It can be quite realistic to picture Ha-Satan and company having a celebratory song along the lines of......
"HIP HIP HOORAY FOR MALKUTH IS LOST!"
And indeed it would be for the only spirituality would be Satanic by default..... and if youre still alive if this were ever to come true, then its gonna suck to be you
leon14 stated: source post
Whats true for you is true for you and whats true for me is true for me' is now a standard application for every person, especially for those who consider themselves 'enlightened' or 'progressive'. Compassion is deemed to be a psychological fault and mercy is an action committed by the weak and pitiful, unless those things are done for financial gain then it cannot be ever excused.
I disagree that compassion is on its way out. For example, part of the reason that 'progressives' and liberals do not criticize Islam sufficiently is because they consider it to be offensive, and we don't want that now, do we?
As I see it, relativism or absolutism in any field is not bad per se. It's instead the anti-intellectualism that's harmful.
Inquirer stated: source post
leon14 stated: source post
Whats true for you is true for you and whats true for me is true for me' is now a standard application for every person, especially for those who consider themselves 'enlightened' or 'progressive'. Compassion is deemed to be a psychological fault and mercy is an action committed by the weak and pitiful, unless those things are done for financial gain then it cannot be ever excused.
I disagree that compassion is on its way out. For example, part of the reason that 'progressives' and liberals do not criticize Islam sufficiently is because they consider it to be offensive, and we don't want that now, do we?
As I see it, relativism or absolutism in any field is not bad per se. It's instead the anti-intellectualism that's harmful.
Progressives are typically white, muzzie extremists are typically non white. It is not an issue of compassion but rather alliance by the progressives.
The muzzies, progressives and others of those type of ilks are in an informal alliance to divide and claim the various racial groups.
leon14 stated: source post
Lets see....... poofter marriage, trannies becoming mainstream, abolishment of the death penalty, negotiation with terrorists, priorities of right and wrong being decided by celebrities and the twitterati, leniant sentences for pedos, etc.
Alright, let me rephrase: You need to explain and show why moral relativism is hurtful when it comes to commonly accepted morals. Using gay marriage as an example is pointless unless you can explain why 'we' should consider that to be bad.