yeah we all know it's me that sugar loves. you never had a chance
Kek, this is just proof that what a child receives in her early years is more important than anything later. It can make em into strong, secure, joyous adults that have fun with everyone and let the little things slide, or can make them into easily poked, emotional and defensive womanchildren that are unable to cope with being proven wrong and getting owned, that are so dull and petty everyone loses interest in them and they have to claim they are the ones that lost interest and are relaxed to save face, only making themselves look even more immature and silly xD
i understand this might be the first time in your whole faggot existence that a 'man' has 'chosen' you over a woman, so with that being said, i'm happy for you
How did this come up? Maybe I should be less skeptic about your hypothesis after all, Jim.
being the only one dumb enough to fight mee's battles for him :P
A clear attempt to separate Jimmee :( Related with the above quote? Also, to be clear, I was not fighting any battles, Jim could have been. I am the uninterested party.
@Motor
​Is there any quick way to tell whether or not praise/criticism is legitimate?
Hear something, compare with your previous knowledge, maybe you have heard it before. If not, consider the decency in retrospect. Still, it is possible that a new feature was developed, so come back to it and retrospect later too.
Is there any unbiased way to tell?
Praise and criticism can not be unbiased, thus it is fine to have some subjectivity.
How does one separate the seemingly truthful statements from the trolling, from the sarcasm even?
By identifying trolling and sarcasm? Sarcastic statements can be truthful too, however.
Going at it deductively seems more painstaking than it's worth, going intuitively in some cases (for me at least) leaves lots of room for air.
Mix of both, deduction and intuition? Also, the more information you have, the easier it is to determine the legitimacy of said praise/criticism. Actually, I would say that a praise or criticism given is probably accurate for one's behavior in the situation the input was given. I would suggest simply collecting heard adjectives without much analysis and review them later, once you have gathered a fair amount, sort, observe contradictions (contradictions can occur because of your different approach in different situations), etc.
For reference, chaotic pile of things, said about me at various points during my stay in SC (I'm sure I could have missed a few as I never wrote them down as soon as they were mentioned. My memory is good, but not perfect):
"Does not care much about himself, others, anything really, in the end (old one, given by Medusa); smart; bitter, boyishly handsome; mischievous; [of looks] hitlerjugend :P; measured; spiteful; overstating his importance; not taking himself too seriously; handling himself; resembling a Swede; intimidating; dull; charismatic; possessive; resentful; charming; passive-aggressive; interesting; foxy; old-looking; impulsive; cultured; childish; schizoid; shady; psychopath; attractive; not psychopath; loser; cute; dominant; cuck (Ken, you dog ;) ); chill vibe; oblivious; serious; creepy; staring; repressing emotions; very INTJ; pushy; inquisitive; having an appealing feminine vibe (Jim <3); shit-stirrer; bad; boring; "Hot. No homo."; reserved; used to be a different person in regard of handling conflicts; cruel; attentive; having dry, wicked humor; receding hairline (must be an impression, given because I suck at shaping hair. have it all cut down now, we will see how it grows back); POOF; tease; introvert; emotionally shallow; aloof; contradicting himself; bad liar; liar; lil pussy."
(left some more private ones unmentioned)
Feel free to use it for practice.
"Praise and criticism are relevant as long as they are legitimate."
​Is there any quick way to tell whether or not praise/criticism is legitimate? Is there any unbiased way to tell? How does one separate the seemingly truthful statements from the trolling, from the sarcasm even? Going at it deductively seems more painstaking than it's worth, going intuitively in some cases (for me at least) leaves lots of room for air.
lol, i can't actually tell if you're referring to mee or me from that desc, and the only reason you could possibly be referring to me is to stroke your little cowards ego :D jimmy my darling boy, i understand this might be the first time in your whole faggot existence that a 'man' has 'chosen' you over a woman, so with that being said, i'm happy for you. this is your vindication, lick up every drop. you deserve something in being the only one dumb enough to fight mee's battles for him :P
Mee stated: source post
i understand this might be the first time in your whole faggot existence that a 'man' has 'chosen' you over a woman, so with that being said, i'm happy for you
How did this come up? Maybe I should be less skeptic about your hypothesis after all, Jim.
you said you told jim i said 'it's me or him' lol. that's where that came from. can't you have a single independent thought without indirectly asking someone else to back you up? why don't you come up with your own hypothesis?
schizoid; shady; psychopath;
who called you a psychopath? :D
Well, it started to seem worth working on some things after multiple divorces and some pretty intense dramas spanning the course of roughly about three decades. At some point, I had to consider how I was contributing to the problems and address my behavior if I ever wanted my life to resemble anything remotely "normal". I'm mandated to therapy anyhow, so why not take advantage and learn how to improve my life via better social relationships?
On another note, I think it's great that Mee wants to do something to improve his social relationships. He's reached a realization that most people never will and is actively attempting to do something about it.
As for Turncoat's point about the practicing expressions, lots of people do it. No one likes resting bitch face.
"For reference, chaotic pile of things, said about me at various points during my stay in SC (I'm sure I could have missed a few as I never wrote them down as soon as they were mentioned. My memory is good, but not perfect)"
You must really value other opinions of you
"(Ken, you dog ;) "
Every dog, has his day.
It's great you didnt bring these insults in our talk in chat, but the subtle post diss was expected it's typical of you to save them for here and avoid direct confrontation.
You must really value other opinions of you
I value opinions in general since they are experience-based and tell a bit about the person as well. But I do not take things for granted. Who would?
It's great you didnt bring these insults in our talk in chat, but the subtle post diss was expected it's typical of you to save them for here and avoid direct confrontation.
I doubt that insults would do any harm to you since you tend to take such things as a learning experience; life lesson. We are quite alike in this regard. So take what you get ;)
Either way, it's an extremely contradictory list.
Different people, different situations, moods and attitude, different opinions. There are lots of traits unmentioned ^_^
Some things seem less relevant than others, such as "resembling a Swede" and "POOF". I'm sure by this point you've taken the time to evaluate whether you feel the descriptions actually apply to you or not. Why not simply work on those you consider to be relevant and disregard the rest?
But they are amusing and have sentimental value. These are the bestest! And I gave the whole list for Motor to work with. Motor is nice. I like Motor. More people should be like Motor.
Oh, Sugar called me a lil pussy two days ago. I simply must add it (: