Sociopath Community

I never had a problem with you before this incident.  I would have thought you'd known that, considering that we've both referred to the other as a friend, in the past.

As for Sugar, she can take credit for whatever she likes.  I see the situation differently than she does.

You wanted us to withhold our true opinions about Luna and about what was going on.  And you wanted TC to change what he does outside of this forum just to please her.  That's censoring.  If I have to pretend to be okay with things that I'm not just to stay here, then I'd rather not be here anyways.  Turncoat feels the same.  And the fact that you'd blame him for not setting that aside just to make you happy, is incredibly selfish.  He owes this forum nothing, and he owes you nothing.

TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post

I just want to point out that Inquirer is making the same points that we are about this situation, but Ed "respects his opinion".  Why?  Because Inquirer put it to him softly.  This argument is not about what happened.  It's about Ed's ego. : P

 

Oh, this is fucking rich. I wrote this in my first reply to Turncot on this thread:

"I see your point that you felt the whole deal was a too big compromise for you, but let's agree to disagree on that without any hard feelings. "

Inky also made the point that I did act consistent throughout the years. You and Sugar saying the opposite, that I am inconsistent and a hypocrite, told me that you had a distorted view of my attitude and intentions, How could I respect that?

" 

" I stayed up like a no-lifer until 3 am and talked to Luna for two hours in private, during which I did my best to make her not unmod Turncoat by making her see Turncoat's POV, how much he cared for the community, and that we won't put up with her banning people."

Oh, so in private you'll speak your mind and defend the forum, but in public you shield her from blame right? "

Um...yeah. That's how polite people tell somebody off. It's called constructive criticism.

What you do is called shaming, Syst. And it accomplishes nothing in terms of changing a person's behaviour.

It also gets mixed results even in terms of making the recipient feel shame.

When you attempt to publicly shame somebody, you're just as likely to make that person angry, hostile and vindictive as you are to make them submit.

Edvard stated: source post

"You don't at all see how what you said was supportive or even comforting Luna with her decisions?"

No, not at all. I know all I've said and your theory is completely ridiculous to me.

Thought you weren't talking about this anymore? : P

I see now why you are so scared to death of someone finding out who you really are Edvard. Lol 

You really are a emotional pussy. Maybe if you didn't pretend to be someone you're not online you would be able to move forward in life If this forum were to ever die.

I'm really starting to believe you are some fat handicapped kid who roll plays online. Lol

Only liers fear being discovered. I deleted my Facebook two years ago because I lied about being in the Army.  That is why I deleted it. 

You see ScarEdvard the truth will set u free.

lol

holds rude kitten's naughty neck and pets

Ima feed you to Basement Cat someday :D

See what I mean?

Wrong way to attempt to change a person's behaviour:

• 4:00  Systematic: its not about the claims these kfc people are making
• 4:00  Systematic: its luna fucking the site up
• 4:00  Xena: You can't stand the moderation.
• 4:00  Systematic: half the people banned will not be going to kf, they dont care for that
• 4:00  Xena: Too bad so sad
• 4:00  Xena: That's what she's decided
• 4:01  Systematic: what I cant stand is a delusional, asslicking cunt
• 4:02  Xena: Good. Then we're in agreement.
• 4:03  Xena: Stop dating the submissive whres you're always on about in chat
• 4:03  Xena: :D
• 4:03  Systematic: you have zero grasp on the situation and you keep white knighting thee fuck out of luna
• 4:03  Xena: Go fuck yourself sys.
• 4:04  Systematic: I thought so
• 4:04  Systematic: everytime you've went to defend luna you had to do so with lies
• 4:05  Systematic: while half of our userbase is banned
• 4:05  Xena: w/e.
• 4:05  Xena: This convo is over
• 4:05  Xena: Fuck off now
• 4:06  Systematic: that's a good counter point there~

Send

Right way to discuss a person's behaviour:

• 5:57  Edvard: yeah you've been a judas, but I'm not going to hang you for that XD I had my say about it
• 5:58  Edvard: I think your maternal instincts just kicked in
• 5:58  Edvard: in favor of the retarded girl, as opposed to the group of mean jerks

I hope you have learned your lesson from all of this. Maybe next time you will bite your tongue and follow the herd. There is safety in numbers. ;)

whoameye stated: source post

I hope you have learned your lesson from all of this. Maybe next time you will bite your tongue and follow the herd. There is safety in numbers. ;)

 I totally agree. There's pandering to authority and then there's pandering to the masses.