Clickbait titles are great for making points.
I watched a segment where it was pointed out how liberal men tend to smile more. Now I'm not going to comment on their social status which is often the same, but I do reckon we're often happier in the matrix.
Can you link?
That's more likely to be pure correlation though. I doubt the cause of smiling is liberal mindset. Finns tend to be very liberal, but catching a Finn smiling is like trying to catch a 3-winged butterfly. It happens, but very rarely.
People smile for a variety of reasons. Liberals and conservatives form echo chambers and isolated social groups in the US. They have very different lifestyle habits, some of which have nothing to do with being liberal or conservative per se but could still be linked to smiling.
It's a type of smiling I have difficulty describing. You know how Ed always posts the "XD" but the times he uses it makes him out to be like an ass kisser ?
Here's the video. He goes on about these characters, then touches on the smiling thing.
I dont think thats what it means when Ed XD's.
As for the vid got 53 seconds in. Too much bias already.
As I said he touches on it.
Saliva samples included that unveil lower testosterone males tend to smile more. As funny as the guy in the video made it out to be, it is scientific.
As for my personal opinion on left wing men, especially the rowdy types, they are always emotionally immature, are prone to having tantrums, the antifa types are usually scrawny or beta types and easily steamrolled.
The best comedy is based on truth. No offense.
Do you think lower testosterone males are happier than higher testosterone males?
You don't need this research to see how over reactive to fear conservatives are.
Study: Liberals and conservatives have different brain structures
Fear and Anxiety Drive Conservatives' Political Attitudes
one source is literally called "Salon" and the other is some of the most blatant bias I have seen in an article.
Oh and it's right around when trump was elected.
Don't start this shit of dehumanizing stereotyping when it comes to people holding general beliefs. It's the first step in a very scary train of thought that builds momentum very quickly. There's a very wide spectrum of conservatives out there, don't dismiss them all as being fearful driven. It a very easy copout, justification for why you dont like them or their stances.
This is the equivalent of maga bros reading a fox article saying european democrats have the highest ratio of cuckolds
The best comedy is based on truth. No offense.
And the lengths to which some will extend themselves to keep it hidden.
You'd think the truth offended their tender sensibilities.
the study is just as disingenious as the one which claims "atheists are more intelligent than religious people" when all it shows is that due to the left leaning education system religion is always disregarded so the people that do graduate tend not to be religious
Pop science strikes again.
Do all of you think you would recognize pop science bullshit if it supported your own side? I've seen some pretty shit science touted on this website because it was being "opressed by leftists".
It's amazingly easy to create simple caricatures to dismiss anyone with an opposing view, the "other" -- as delusional, frightened, low testosterone males, or w/e floats your boat. It's just a simplistic mental strategy to protect yourself from actually listening to another viewpoint that might make you question your beliefs. Everyone is just reinforcing how their "side" is the right one and the other is delusional.
In a survey asking cons and libs what they value the most, both sides said 'fairness'. They might not be as far apart as both sides are being guided to believe.
How would you describe modern conservatives? You dont seem like the type to have reservations about insulting the character of your ideological opponents.
the study is just as disingenious as the one which claims "atheists are more intelligent than religious people" when all it shows is that due to the left leaning education system religion is always disregarded so the people that do graduate tend not to be religious
Why is religion disregarded in left leaning education systems in the first place?
It's amazingly easy to create simple caricatures to dismiss anyone with an opposing view, the "other" -- as delusional, frightened, low testosterone males, or w/e floats your boat. It's just a simplistic mental strategy to protect yourself from actually listening to another viewpoint that might make you question your beliefs. Everyone is just reinforcing how their "side" is the right one and the other is delusional.
In a survey asking cons and libs what they value the most, both sides said 'fairness'. They might not be as far apart as both sides are being guided to believe.
I don't believe that homosexuals and transsexuals should have special laws that prevents us from addressing them by their real gender.
Like if I address them correctly, I can be charged. People getting arrested over people changing their mind about what they wish to be. This is like outlawing science.
No one will know a self proclaimed zir when they see one, and the whole complying to gender identity thing is idiotic. I'm not just saying it's idiotic either, it really is idiotic.
I'm not just saying this either, but if this kind of nonsense became the way of us all, the population would shrink, our technology would stand still, then the human race's final frontier would be a mad max scene before the last of us dies in a stone age.
.
.
What I think is happening, our consciousness is expanding, and we're learning about our species. The betas are being given their chance, and they can have men compete in female sports and take their gold medals.
One day the world will realize, how liberalism has evolved into policies that are in essence crimes that can wipe us out.
Liberalism only considers those who want to overthrow masculinity. If you're not soy or fruity, then your perspective will cause an uproar. Concepts like "Men's Rights" triggers them and are protested at face value.
Now the kicker.
Interestingly enough, God created conservatives with stronger alloys. I think he wants us to bring order to chaos.
Which laws are you refering to and how would you change them? How do you see liberalism wiping us out? Do you see yourself as "causing an uproar"?
Turncoat said:As per usual with these things, it's time to make a ranking:
Care:1. Faethers: 83
2. Kestrel: 81
3. Inquirer: 78
4. Tryptamine: 61
4. QuietBeef: 61
5. User: 50
6. Good: 47
7. Cawk: 33
8. Turncoat: 31
9. Cain: 14Fair:1. Kestrel: 86
2. Faethers: 75
2. QuietBeef: 75
3. Inquirer: 72
4. Cawk 67
5. Tryptamine: 64
6. Good: 56
7. User: 50
8. Turncoat: 47
9. Cain: 28Purity:1. Faethers: 94 (jeez)
2. Tryptamine: 78
3. Kestrel: 64
4. Turncoat: 47
5. Good 31
6. User: 29
7. Cawk 17
8. QuietBeef: 12
9. Inquirer: 7
10. Cain: 3Loyalty:1. Kestrel: 67
2. Faethers: 50
3. Cawk 50
4. Tryptamine: 47
5. Cain: 44
5. Good: 44
6. Inquirer: 42
6. Quietbeef: 42
7. Turncoat: 39
8. User: 31Authority:1. Cawk 67
2. Kestrel: 61
3. Faethers: 53
4. User: 50
5. Tryptamine: 47
6. Good: 44
7. Cain: 36
8. Inquirer: 33
8. Turncoat: 33
9. Quietbeef: 19Liberty:1. Cain: 100
1. Good: 100
2. Kestrel: 89
3. QuietBeef: 86
4. Tryptamine: 83
5. User: 67
5. Turncoat: 67
6. Inquirer: 61
7. Faethers: 56
8. Cawk 50
Updated.
QuietBeef said:So why did you even take the test?
To inspire others to take it so that I could fulfill my compulsive love of charting.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
6/10/2019 11:40:13 PM
MADE YOUR QUESTIONS AS INVIS FOR WORD COUNT
I need love not religion. God is love. I explain it more in the next question.
I'm in it for the love. To love and be loved for the longest amount of time. I never seen a love like God's anywhere else. God is love and He is eternal. He promised to never leave me. Unlike the created beings He can't die. What purpose is it to love someone who can die? Christ died but He rose again. He has the power to love me forever. Everyone else will fail me or leave me or cease to love me.
I once heard on the news... A man died protecting his girlfriend. The news broadcast said "How sad. Who will compare to him? How will she find a man that meets up to her ex? He actually died for her and now he's gone". Christ actually died for me and then He rose. In the bible it says "nor height or depths, nor anything will be able to separate us from the love of God". He is the only one eternal enough, powerful enough and consistent enough to actually be able to commit to a promise of eternal love.
Everyone else is a failure at love. A love that dies or cannot keep us together is worthless to me. Do not even offer me such pathetic feelings. Love is maximum commitment not maximum emotion.
God is a jealous God. I didn't know that but I was betting on it.
Exodus 34:14 For you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.
I thought bad attention was better than no attention. I'd rather be hated than ignored. It reminds me of a quote from Wuthering Heights.
"[...] May you not rest as long as I am living; you said I killed you - haunt me, then! The murdered do haunt their murderers, I believe. I know that ghosts have wandered on earth. Be with me always - take any form - drive me mad! only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you! Oh, God! it is unutterable! I cannot live without my life! I cannot live without my soul!'
A person can reclaim their soul by the blood of Christ. I was about to sign my name in blood when I learned about the commandments and the bible. I didn't end up making it official on paper.
It is the end of all paths but the singular one of God's, so I'd figure that such freedom would lead to tons of variation in it's subjects. Someone following Satan's path could end up a total softy instead of hardened, murderous jailstone.
They won't be a softie in the right way. They usually don't care about things like justice. But if you're asking if there's "moral atheists" then I guess there can be moral atheists and maybe even satanist.
That's because I was changed after reading the commandments even if I wasn't Christian. I changed again when I finally accepted the gospel.
Being saved sometimes takes two stages. Being stricken by the law and then coming to faith. In other times it can happen all at once. It happens enough that some people ask "must I have Holy Spirit conviction to be saved?". You don't need to but many do before being saved. I was shown my sinful nature before I came to accept the gospel by faith.
I put push pins on the ground for barefoot people to step on, I spat in people's drinks when they weren't looking, I threw books at people's head, I sacked someone, I put a pair of scissors down someone's shirt, I pinched people, filled people's shoes with water, took people's chairs while they tried to sit down, convinced younger kids to hit the daycare workers, and more.
Being vague is good to prolong our conversations.
God can do anything. It's not called being "Born again" for nothing.
Mark 10:27 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man it is impossible, but not with God. For all things are possible with God.”
Ezekiel 36:26 And I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit I will put within you. And I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.
John 3:6-7 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’
Ephesians 2:5-6 Even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.
Yeah so it looked semi-see through, it asked me "Left, left left?" as if asking for directions.
last edit on
6/11/2019 10:44:38 PM
Clickbait titles are great for making points.
You can read the link with the article that explains it.