Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 33391
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

All we do is keep the CP at bay, and be of service to all of you. 

We're discussing what "service" we provide right now, thankfully on the forum instead of within a private box. 

Are you drank by the way Cain ? You're more rowdy than usual.

Wow, you're going the ad hom route to discredit someone who disagrees with you, both here and in chat:
Posted Image

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 507
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

Are you really going to say that I imagined all of the old rules lawyering topics on the old site, just so that you don't need to feel wrong? 

If you're to take the word of someone, would you rather go with the person who has actual experience with those old debate topics and is otherwise autistically obsessed with this website philosophy as a passion project, or from people who didn't even read the discussions to the point of forgetting that they existed at all?

And you want us to take the word of someone who is a proven reactionary, was "away" from SC for a long time and argues they know everything about the dox policy yet barely remembers what happened to Cad? ~

Honestly though, you could be right that the old consensus, way back, was closer to your version. I believe that consensus has evolved slightly over the years however, as a response to a new demographic and new events. We're obviously at odds here about the policy so it does nothing to whine about what we think it should be like (or that the mods are trying to change it behind the scenes). Better to focus on building a new consensus.

I propose we type out a neutral tldr background that doesn't confuse people and simply let them vote for their preferred choice.

Posts: 33391
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

the fact that tc, spatial, and inq are mods + meta and sturm is funny

he basicly admited that my choice for mods over the years were all correct-- remodding everyone i had chosen in the past + himself and his e-gf

In his defense he was wise enough to not make Ed a mod. 

...although if he were around he'd likely be arguing for the old ways. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2866
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

Are you really going to say that I imagined all of the old rules lawyering topics on the old site, just so that you don't need to feel wrong? 

If you're to take the word of someone, would you rather go with the person who has actual experience with those old debate topics and is otherwise autistically obsessed with this website philosophy as a passion project, or from people who didn't even read the discussions to the point of forgetting that they existed at all?

And you want us to take the word of someone who is a proven reactionary, was "away" from SC for a long time and argues they know everything about the dox policy yet barely remembers what happened to Cad? ~

Honestly though, you could be right that the old consensus, way back, was closer to your version. I believe that consensus has evolved slightly over the years however, as a response to a new demographic and new events. We're obviously at odds here about the policy so it does nothing to whine about what we think it should be like (or that the mods are trying to change it behind the scenes). Better to focus on building a new consensus.

I propose we type out a neutral tldr background that doesn't confuse people and simply let them vote for their preferred choice.

Only if we did that in the first place, imagine what that would do, right?

It would have gotten SC involved, instead of TC just ranting and making people see ghosts in their confusion.

But then TC might have been proven wrong, we can't have that, now can we.

Posted Image

Cheery bye!
Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 
Cain said: 
Good said: 

This is ignorant of the point that TC is trying to make- Don't be such a self justified retard, just because it feels good.
"Mods do what they want"

Actually- I'm not gonna explain it. It's too obvious, and if you can't understand simple things- you are a fool.

You don't understand the bullshit TC is saying, so "pls kill Cain" ty

I can make sense of the "Mods do what they want" quote because he provided context that was obvious.

The point TC is making is bullshit, he is saying mods do what they want, which is BS. Every mod follows an exact protocol. And all the mods, except TC, agree for the most part on the protocol. Therefore it is TC that is the deviant. TC may have the real rules and the others to be wrong.

I haven't seen you other mods sucking eachother's cocks "Oh yes daddy, we gonna take down any dox information ever for anybody *cums everywhere*"

But he didn't tell you any of this, he told you we do what we want.

Seems that way

 

He also said we are changing the rules behind the scenes, while we were still discussing the issue, that we didn't know even existed previously. (And you gobbled his shit up, your choice.)

 

"secret mod chat"

Now he is pandering to Luna, because he wants to use her. No one has done anything wrong in the face of SC values, therefore I have no reason to feel anything. Since its all bullshit, this is a circus and can't be taken seriously.

 So far from what I've read of Luna's - I like what she has to say.

I still haven't seen any support from the user base for the mod team "decision"

Where's the fuckin' pole?

while we are at this, can we revote mods (fire some?) (Lets' vote on that too)

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

All we do is keep the CP at bay, and be of service to all of you. 

We're discussing what "service" we provide right now, thankfully on the forum instead of within a private box.

Are you drank by the way Cain ? You're more rowdy than usual.

Wow, you're going the ad hom route to discredit someone who disagrees with you, both here and in chat:
Posted Image

 I lol'd - "flimsy" wouldn't be a weak enough word for his avoidance of my repeating questions.

Maybe one day I'll have an E-girl of my own. tongue-out

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

All we do is keep the CP at bay, and be of service to all of you. 

We're discussing what "service" we provide right now, thankfully on the forum instead of within a private box. 

Are you drank by the way Cain ? You're more rowdy than usual.

Wow, you're going the ad hom route to discredit someone who disagrees with you, both here and in chat:
Posted Image

 Um. No.

I'm asking Cain what he's on because he's usually more laid back.

And what does what i said in the chatlog have to do with this ?

I am reminiscent of Cain when he first arrived. He used that grim artpiece as an avatar, and he was in a state of hopelessness. Then came his transformation.

Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 

Are you really going to say that I imagined all of the old rules lawyering topics on the old site, just so that you don't need to feel wrong? 

If you're to take the word of someone, would you rather go with the person who has actual experience with those old debate topics and is otherwise autistically obsessed with this website philosophy as a passion project, or from people who didn't even read the discussions to the point of forgetting that they existed at all?

And you want us to take the word of someone who is a proven reactionary, was "away" from SC for a long time and argues they know everything about the dox policy yet barely remembers what happened to Cad? ~

Honestly though, you could be right that the old consensus, way back, was closer to your version. I believe that consensus has evolved slightly over the years however, as a response to a new demographic and new events. We're obviously at odds here about the policy so it does nothing to whine about what we think it should be like (or that the mods are trying to change it behind the scenes). Better to focus on building a new consensus.

I propose we type out a neutral tldr background that doesn't confuse people and simply let them vote for their preferred choice.

Only if we did that in the first place, imagine what that would do, right?

It would have gotten SC involved, instead of TC just ranting and making people see ghosts in their confusion.

But then TC might have been proven wrong, we can't have that, now can we.

Posted Image

 I'm 100% you are all feels and no rational by now. You seem super butthurt and sad- boo hoo you

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

Didn't realize Cain has his hands tied and cant make polls.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

All we do is keep the CP at bay, and be of service to all of you. 

We're discussing what "service" we provide right now, thankfully on the forum instead of within a private box. 

Are you drank by the way Cain ? You're more rowdy than usual.

Wow, you're going the ad hom route to discredit someone who disagrees with you, both here and in chat:
Posted Image

 Um. No.

I'm asking Cain what he's on because he's usually more laid back.

And what does what i said in the chatlog have to do with this ?

I am reminiscent of Cain when he first arrived. He used that grim artpiece as an avatar, and he was in a state of hopelessness. Then came his transformation.

 It's an obvious slight- you aren't that smooth Space Man

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.