Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

Have we agreed upon dox rules? Was anything settled? Do we have something that we all have agreed upon and can reference in out time of doxing?

What did you guys eat today? 

How many birds did you see today?

Didn't realize that the mods decide this when TC overreacted over a discussion(because we disagreed with him) and made a dishonestly named topic about it: I thought SC users with the mods together, as a communist family, will come up a solution, isn't that the premise that TC had for making the topic after all? Hence why no discussion was made in the mod chat, which btw was made only to inform all the mods at the same time about mod tool updates, but ppl are misusing it for chitchat.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 1000
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

 See my 2nd post on page 1.

 Thanks Dip.

"Doxxing is allowed and taking down doxes is available upon request by the doxxed. This includes family, friends, school, social media and work that's tied to the individual. The reason for this is because failure to do so can be more of a liability at the expense of the owner, which also ensures a more stable platform. "


""Doxxing is allowed and taking down doxes is available upon request by the doxxed."
That's fucking stupid.


Can we repost images? What's the punishment for doxxing a person? If the doxx is removed, and I just doxx again- and again.... Can we play that game?

I haven't seen any support for your ideas for the forum except from Med obviously.

Just cuz you look like an ugly mug in a picture; doesn't mean we gotta take it down (you look ugly in all of them though by the way med)

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Cain said: 
Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

"Mods can do what they want" is the basic version. Inq seems to have forgotten it all, Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony", and I'm arguing past chapters of SC History and the principles behind keeping it alive. 

 "Mods can do what they want"
Rofl - nice.

"Inq seems to have forgotten it all,"

Good on him.

" Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony""

Oh - I didn't notice the forum being like that at all.

 Do you believe it when TC says "Mods can do what the want"  to be the actual case ?

Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Cain said: 
Cain said: 


"Inq seems to have forgotten it all,"

Good on him.

No I mean forgotten all of the talking we did about rules. 

He's effectively just taking down anything anyone asks for. 

 Sarcasm. innocent

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 497
-1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

i think that the mods should form into a senate and vote on bills.... after all there are 5 mods....... you guys are pretty much an admin-appointed senate without a voting system at this pointr. just sucks you have senators who were enver a part of sc and dont care about its values or past

last edit on 10/11/2019 6:51:28 AM
Posts: 1000
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Cain said: 
Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

"Mods can do what they want" is the basic version. Inq seems to have forgotten it all, Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony", and I'm arguing past chapters of SC History and the principles behind keeping it alive. 

 "Mods can do what they want"
Rofl - nice.

"Inq seems to have forgotten it all,"

Good on him.

" Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony""

Oh - I didn't notice the forum being like that at all.

 Do you believe it when TC says "Mods can do what the want"  to be the actual case ?

 I don't like this post TC- take it down. I think I'm at risk now.

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

i think that the mods should form into a senate and vote on bills.... after all there are 5 mods....... you guys are pretty much a senate without a voting system at this point

 Posted Image

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

i think that the mods should form into a senate and vote on bills.... after all there are 5 mods....... you guys are pretty much a good-appointed senate without a voting system at this point

Cheery bye!
Posts: 33391
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 

Have we agreed upon dox rules? Was anything settled? Do we have something that we all have agreed upon and can reference in out time of doxing?

What did you guys eat today? 

How many birds did you see today?

Didn't realize that the mods decide this when TC overreacted over a discussion(because we disagreed with him) and made a dishonestly named topic about it: I thought SC users with the mods together, as a communist family, will come up a solution, isn't that the premise that TC had for making the topic after all? Hence why no discussion was made in the mod chat, which btw was made only to inform all the mods at the same time about mod tool updates, but ppl are misusing it for chitchat.

Why are you so mad that I brought this discussion to the forum? I mean even now you can see it if you'd look, people claiming "This was always the rule" and just going with what they'd prefer. The rule now is "Mods do what they want" because we are all on different pages, and that is a new rule until it's otherwise discussed towards either what it used to be or where it ought to be. 

If people start acting like the rule was one way but enforce another, then the rule's really another, and thereby changed. This "Nothing to See Here" attitude's not really good for discussing community matters, especially when the community should be a part of policy instead of just some people assuming they know what's going on doing their own agendas. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 10/11/2019 6:52:34 AM
Posts: 1000
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 

Have we agreed upon dox rules? Was anything settled? Do we have something that we all have agreed upon and can reference in out time of doxing?

What did you guys eat today? 

How many birds did you see today?

Didn't realize that the mods decide this when TC overreacted over a discussion(because we disagreed with him) and made a dishonestly named topic about it: I thought SC users with the mods together, as a communist family, will come up a solution, isn't that the premise that TC had for making the topic after all? Hence why no discussion was made in the mod chat, which btw was made only to inform all the mods at the same time about mod tool updates, but ppl are misusing it for chitchat.

Why are you so mad that I brought this discussion to the forum? I mean even now you can see it if you'd look, people claiming "This was always the rule" and just going with what they'd prefer. The rule now is "Mods do what they want" because we are all on different pages, and that is a new rule until it's otherwise discussed towards either what it used to be or where it ought to be. 

If people start acting like the rule was one way but enforce another, then the rule's really another, and thereby changed. This "Nothing to See Here" attitude's not really good for discussing community matters. 

 It kinda seems like all the mods are doing "whatever".

As a user idk what the fuck ya'll are up to.

Also- inb4 labeled a TC goon or something.

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.