Sociopath Community

Cain said: 

Some of Ya'll are clearly up to some avoidant bullshit - probably where there is so many fucking threads for such a simple topic. 

Yeah, its TC.

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

who is actually mod is known to all but you cain, it seems

It's not like it's stickied or otherwise listed somewhere on our accounts for people to see without using the search function. Can you blame someone for not knowing, especially when two of the five barely interact with this website these days? 

The one he wants demodded is the one who mods the least here. 

I do not blame him, I am having fun, do you need glasses?

Good said: 

Cain said: 

Some of Ya'll are clearly up to some avoidant bullshit - probably where there is so many fucking threads for such a simple topic. 

Yeah, its TC.

 

Been lookin at you actually.

Cain said: 

Good said: 

Cain said: 

Some of Ya'll are clearly up to some avoidant bullshit - probably where there is so many fucking threads for such a simple topic. 

Yeah, its TC.

 

Been lookin at you actually.

List the things I avoid! I usually avoid bullshit, but I do not even do that right now. Lets play!

Inquirer said: 

Turncoat said: 

Are you really going to say that I imagined all of the old rules lawyering topics on the old site, just so that you don't need to feel wrong? 

If you're to take the word of someone, would you rather go with the person who has actual experience with those old debate topics and is otherwise autistically obsessed with this website philosophy as a passion project, or from people who didn't even read the discussions to the point of forgetting that they existed at all?

And you want us to take the word of someone who is a proven reactionary, was "away" from SC for a long time and argues they know everything about the dox policy yet barely remembers what happened to Cad? ~

Honestly though, you could be right that the old consensus, way back, was closer to your version. I believe that consensus has evolved slightly over the years however, as a response to a new demographic and new events. We're obviously at odds here about the policy so it does nothing to whine about what we think it should be like (or that the mods are trying to change it behind the scenes). Better to focus on building a new consensus.

I propose we type out a neutral tldr background that doesn't confuse people and simply let them vote for their preferred choice.

 LOL Yes! TFW conveniently never saw cad's dox when it works in one's favour. Totally knows about cad's dox when it doesn't.

I seriously have only seen his face and company name as it warranted no further exploration as those two details I didn't even ask for before they were thrown at me, and otherwise argued the rhetoric of how I can't prove the connection to him beyond some supposition and claims from other people without doing the research further myself. 

Why do you figure I cared about Cad like that?