Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

I can make Luna a mod, lets make an impulsive topic about it to shame TC

Cheery bye!
Posts: 497
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

do it. i will destroy this place :P

Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

She so would

last edit on 10/11/2019 7:04:58 AM
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

Historically speaking demodding TC does come at some kind of price. 

Posts: 33391
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 
Good said: 

Have we agreed upon dox rules? Was anything settled? Do we have something that we all have agreed upon and can reference in out time of doxing?

What did you guys eat today? 

How many birds did you see today?

Didn't realize that the mods decide this when TC overreacted over a discussion(because we disagreed with him) and made a dishonestly named topic about it: I thought SC users with the mods together, as a communist family, will come up a solution, isn't that the premise that TC had for making the topic after all? Hence why no discussion was made in the mod chat, which btw was made only to inform all the mods at the same time about mod tool updates, but ppl are misusing it for chitchat.

Why are you so mad that I brought this discussion to the forum? I mean even now you can see it if you'd look, people claiming "This was always the rule" and just going with what they'd prefer. The rule now is "Mods do what they want" because we are all on different pages, and that is a new rule until it's otherwise discussed towards either what it used to be or where it ought to be. 

If people start acting like the rule was one way but enforce another, then the rule's really another, and thereby changed. This "Nothing to See Here" attitude's not really good for discussing community matters. 

"The rule now is "Mods do what they want""

Oh, there is your answer Alena, TC apparently knew what we settled on, I wasn't aware. I will act on it immediately.


You assume TC that you were always right about what the rule is, have you considered that you are wrong? Which then means that you are changing it, by your own definition and another mod is applying the real rule.

Are you really going to say that I imagined all of the old rules lawyering topics on the old site, just so that you don't need to feel wrong? 

If you're to take the word of someone, would you rather go with the person who has actual experience with those old debate topics and is otherwise autistically obsessed with this website philosophy as a passion project, or from people who didn't even read the discussions to the point of forgetting that they existed at all? 

We could have discussed how to make this topic in a way that would be productive and lead it a solution, or you could impulsively make it and shame everyone you disagree with, to get your way.

Tried it, tons of times. They ignore it if it's not a threat, and in the chat it's like I said: "Mods do what they want" because they aren't following the actual protocol, but rather their believed version. 

You will not get your way. 

What is this line? 

If people do not decide by the time the polls are completed, I will make the topic with a poll and it will be clear what the rules are.

Will the polls list who votes, and will there be discussion as to why they went with their idea? 

All you have done is create a circus and I will enjoy it.

You don't sound like you're enjoying it. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 10/11/2019 7:07:30 AM
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 
Good said: 

Have we agreed upon dox rules? Was anything settled? Do we have something that we all have agreed upon and can reference in out time of doxing?

What did you guys eat today? 

How many birds did you see today?

Didn't realize that the mods decide this when TC overreacted over a discussion(because we disagreed with him) and made a dishonestly named topic about it: I thought SC users with the mods together, as a communist family, will come up a solution, isn't that the premise that TC had for making the topic after all? Hence why no discussion was made in the mod chat, which btw was made only to inform all the mods at the same time about mod tool updates, but ppl are misusing it for chitchat.

Why are you so mad that I brought this discussion to the forum? I mean even now you can see it if you'd look, people claiming "This was always the rule" and just going with what they'd prefer. The rule now is "Mods do what they want" because we are all on different pages, and that is a new rule until it's otherwise discussed towards either what it used to be or where it ought to be. 

If people start acting like the rule was one way but enforce another, then the rule's really another, and thereby changed. This "Nothing to See Here" attitude's not really good for discussing community matters. 

"The rule now is "Mods do what they want""

Oh, there is your answer Alena, TC apparently knew what we settled on, I wasn't aware. I will act on it immediately.


You assume TC that you were always right about what the rule is, have you considered that you are wrong? Which then means that you are changing it, by your own definition and another mod is applying the real rule.

Are you really going to say that I imagined all of the old rules lawyering topics on the old site, just so that you don't need to feel wrong? 

If you're to take the word of someone, would you rather go with the person who has actual experience with those old debate topics and is otherwise autistically obsessed with this website philosophy as a passion project, or from people who didn't even read the discussions to the point of forgetting that they existed at all? 

If you acted more collected, I may have believed you more. You have only your word and your actions betrayed it. I do not remember such topics and i most likely didn't read them either if I saw them. So you can make up anything you want from my point of view. I remember how mods behaved and what I was told occasionally.

We could have discussed how to make this topic in a way that would be productive and lead it a solution, or you could impulsively make it and shame everyone you disagree with, to get your way.

Tried it, tons of times. They ignore it if it's not a threat, and in the chat it's like I said: "Mods do what they want" because they aren't following the actual protocol, but rather their believed version.

'The actual protocol', why should people trust you over Inq for example? You were both mods for the longest time. Why do you decide what the rules are and not SC?

You will not get your way. 

What is this line? 

It is to tease, is it not obvious?

If people do not decide by the time the polls are completed, I will make the topic with a poll and it will be clear what the rules are.

Will the polls list who votes? 

Of course.

All you have done is create a circus and I will enjoy it.

You don't sound like you're enjoying it. 

When I do not enjoy something, I do not participate in it.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 1000
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

wow so not only do you guys appoint a huge number of mods for this super small comunity, but you have a private mod chat too? why are you being so exclusive... giving speical powers and places to the mods.... 

the original intent of SC was to have as few mods as possible... and for those mods to have 0 respect from the community.. they were called janitors... they did not have any additional privalages..... yet here you are giving them their own little "mods lounge" so they can relax and talk about how to rule over their subjects without the subjects having a say in teh discussions...

basicly your entire philosophy on how to run a board is bad, and you have no idea what SC values are... and even if TC still knows SC values, he killed them in exchange for mod power on this board which pretends to be SC

 I agree with this - I just learned tonight we have 5 mods

what the hell? Why 5?

I wanna be a mod;
I want fancy chat privileges;
Are there actually members newer than multiple Nabble members, trying to tell the Nabble members how to go about their forum?

Posted Image

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 33391
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC

wow so not only do you guys appoint a huge number of mods for this super small comunity, but you have a private mod chat too? why are you being so exclusive... giving speical powers and places to the mods.... 

the original intent of SC was to have as few mods as possible... and for those mods to have 0 respect from the community.. they were called janitors... they did not have any additional privalages..... yet here you are giving them their own little "mods lounge" so they can relax and talk about how to rule over their subjects without the subjects having a say in teh discussions...

basicly your entire philosophy on how to run a board is bad, and you have no idea what SC values are... and even if TC still knows SC values, he killed them in exchange for mod power on this board which pretends to be SC

...

How the fuck is Luna starting to sound right? 

 She sounds right to you cause she intends to sabatoge this place, which resonates with your self defeating nature.

Let me guess: 

Where is this foolishness coming from ?

*Skipped* 

 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 1000
1 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Good said: 
Good said: 

Have we agreed upon dox rules? Was anything settled? Do we have something that we all have agreed upon and can reference in out time of doxing?

What did you guys eat today? 

How many birds did you see today?

Didn't realize that the mods decide this when TC overreacted over a discussion(because we disagreed with him) and made a dishonestly named topic about it: I thought SC users with the mods together, as a communist family, will come up a solution, isn't that the premise that TC had for making the topic after all? Hence why no discussion was made in the mod chat, which btw was made only to inform all the mods at the same time about mod tool updates, but ppl are misusing it for chitchat.

Why are you so mad that I brought this discussion to the forum? I mean even now you can see it if you'd look, people claiming "This was always the rule" and just going with what they'd prefer. The rule now is "Mods do what they want" because we are all on different pages, and that is a new rule until it's otherwise discussed towards either what it used to be or where it ought to be. 

If people start acting like the rule was one way but enforce another, then the rule's really another, and thereby changed. This "Nothing to See Here" attitude's not really good for discussing community matters. 

"The rule now is "Mods do what they want""

Oh, there is your answer Alena, TC apparently knew what we settled on, I wasn't aware. I will act on it immediately.


This is ignorant of the point that TC is trying to make- Don't be such a self justified retard, just because it feels good.
"Mods do what they want"

Actually- I'm not gonna explain it. It's too obvious, and if you can't understand simple things- you are a fool.

Some people aren't born to be blessed with tragedy in their blood.
Posts: 33391
0 votes RE: Meta, Sturm, Inq, Tony and TC
Cain said: 

wow so not only do you guys appoint a huge number of mods for this super small comunity, but you have a private mod chat too? why are you being so exclusive... giving speical powers and places to the mods.... 

the original intent of SC was to have as few mods as possible... and for those mods to have 0 respect from the community.. they were called janitors... they did not have any additional privalages..... yet here you are giving them their own little "mods lounge" so they can relax and talk about how to rule over their subjects without the subjects having a say in teh discussions...

basicly your entire philosophy on how to run a board is bad, and you have no idea what SC values are... and even if TC still knows SC values, he killed them in exchange for mod power on this board which pretends to be SC

I agree with this - I just learned tonight we have 5 mods

what the hell? Why 5?

Me, Inq, Spatial, Meta, and Sturm. 

It is indeed five people, although how many of them actually do work here... is dubious. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.