Sociopath Community

puppygirl said: 

if anyone would like to dox someone, and they are not aloud here on SC for whatever reason, they are welcome to post the dox on https://antisocial.boards.zone, if anyone comes across meta or sturm's dox, i might even offer a reward to see it!

What's your dox policy now Luna? I don't see a senate bill talking about it. 

@tc im not debating

Well yeah, you don't really know how to and I've never fully expected that much out of you. 

If anything I've always had to work around how much you never want to debate something. 

just saying you lost influence.. its tragic considering its all you ever cared about

And I just replied with: "Luna, you can't even notice when I'm still browsing your website, how are you supposed to gauge how influence works?"

You don't have to address the debate and can otherwise just leave my question rhetorical, as rhetorical was the goal. 

Let's keep it Nabble ;)

Again. What's fake news TC. Is when you said the mods want to change the doxxing rules. That was never the case.

The only one who wants to change any rules is you.

The members have spoken and the removal of persinal data from the site will remain optional.

Spatial Mind said: 

Again. What's fake news TC. Is when you said the mods want to change the doxxing rules. That was never the case.

The only one who wants to change any rules is you.

The members have spoken and the removal of persinal data from the site will remain optional.

 What persinal data? 

What members have spoken? Where is the poll?

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

@Cain Personal* data.

Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

 See my 2nd post on page 1.

Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

"Mods can do what they want" is the basic version. Inq seems to have forgotten it all, Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony", and I'm arguing past chapters of SC History and the principles behind keeping it alive. 

Turncoat said: 

Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

"Mods can do what they want" is the basic version. Inq seems to have forgotten it all, Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony", and I'm arguing past chapters of SC History and the principles behind keeping it alive. 

 "Mods can do what they want"
Rofl - nice.

"Inq seems to have forgotten it all,"

Good on him.

" Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony""

Oh - I didn't notice the forum being like that at all.

Cain said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cain said: 

Can we just get a "in conclusion" thread from mod team with detailed final results?

"Mods can do what they want" is the basic version. Inq seems to have forgotten it all, Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony", and I'm arguing past chapters of SC History and the principles behind keeping it alive. 

 "Mods can do what they want"
Rofl - nice.

"Inq seems to have forgotten it all,"

Good on him.

No I mean forgotten all of the talking we did about rules. 

He's effectively just taking down anything anyone asks for. 

" Spatial's arguing that the forum is "Pro-Tony""

Oh - I didn't notice the forum being like that at all.

Oh... me neither.