Sociopath Community

Whorechata said: 

 

and while you claimed she wasn't civil- neither has he been civil with her taking any open opportunity to attack her (when she's tried being casually friendly) but the reporting of glitches had nothing really to do with that and he should be able to separate the two instead of just trying to find a way to antagonize her as well

My point here has been in relation to an under-reporting of actual website symptoms in her complaints in relation to their context. 

If she'd say the symptoms more often she'd be more likely to get more serious replies from Meta, like how the typing speed discussion for chat filters went as a comparison. 

This one instance of her not listing exactly what was the issue has you saying: more often

Do you think this topic is the only time she's been vague about problems with the website? 

 /boots up advanced search

But you and I both know she has in the past stated what the issues were, and like I said if it wasn't working for her she just left in frustration of the site not working this once

From what I've seen she's reported a 400 error and there was the typing discussion early on, otherwise it's been her yapping on and on about the forum being dysfunctional through a series of new topics, even on the rival platform, with around half of the time having it being directed towards Spatial instead of Meta. 

Sure he has no reason for it but let's not forget she has tried to be civil and offered to bury the hatchet

Offering to stop former animosity doesn't just resolve all blame like some giant "Sorry" spell being cast, the other party in these cases is entitled to their feelings. 

Diplomacy happens from catering to both sides, not just throwing out an offer and acting like the other person's immediately the bad guy for turning it down. There has to be some reason why she deserves to be forgiven, otherwise it's just some weird whim of the moment or something. 

It doesn't take away that she's open to it and has been open to discussing the events to get better understanding. 

Her sense of character takes away from it far more than what the gesture serves to add. 

She's attempted to have actual conversation but the fact is that he's biased towards her and it it shows even as an admin issue

Her reporting actual symptoms is when the talks have gone the most smoothly. 

and like I said instead of asking her what the glitch was he just went in and called her a liar and afterwards others listed their own issues and glitches or bugs. It's what prompted her to ask why peach wasn't a liar and even then he still took her having an issue with the site as an attack 

Consider how she's framing herself and I can see how he'd not be taking her seriously without further elaboration. 

I don't think we're going to see eye to eye here as I really didn't find the title of that thread to be trolling

You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye? 

Well she does say "at the moment" in that post meaning it was clearly working for her before she states it's super slow which again she's said chat can get slow, she's mentioned symptoms other times as well as her being timed out for typing too fast in chat- so I dunno about you but I don't think the post was meant to instigate an argument or put him down, it was simply a frustrated post about inability to use the site.

Come on now, you're clearly reaching here. 

You figure she just went to Luna's site just to news report about a happenstance? She's alluded to multiple reasons as to why she'd prefer people be at Luna's website before functionality was even her focus. 

There's been clear agendas attached to her behaviors, even if there's real glitches alongside them. 

I think you're trying to see agendas where there aren't and as someone that takes wording important- I don't think it's reaching because she says "at the moment", she's been having issues here since her first day ever since the no chat For new users unless approved thing can into play. And like I said, wording: plus I heard primal was here! Where is my precious?

You really don't see Sugar stirring the pot? 

If he doesn't want to be civil that's fine, he doesn't have to but there's no way you can say she hasn't been and still defend that he has

I'd argue that, with her deplorable behavior, that she doesn't really deserve civility that he doesn't feel like granting beyond arguable ranges of the bare minimum. 

Like I said, she has been civil towards him

I'll need more than what I've seen to believe it, and even with cherry picked examples we still have sheer ratios to consider. 

I think as an admin he should be less eager to attack when an issue is brought up.

I agree, but again, she could have actually reported symptoms instead of just keeping it up in ways that would resemble her stank strikes. 

Good said: 

natasha87 said: 

tc has foiled my evil plot to slowly move everyone from here to luna's site..he has proven this by pointing out that i went straight to luna's site when THIS SITE WOULDN'T WORK. IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC TO USE ANOTHER SIMILAR SITE WHEN ONE IS NOT WORKING. FOILED AGAIN KIDS

the site works

 Actually it wasn't really working this morning, it took about 2 or so minutes before chat could load 

aub just said it wouldnt work for her either, but obv i made u guys say that, or u just hate tc

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

 

and while you claimed she wasn't civil- neither has he been civil with her taking any open opportunity to attack her (when she's tried being casually friendly) but the reporting of glitches had nothing really to do with that and he should be able to separate the two instead of just trying to find a way to antagonize her as well

My point here has been in relation to an under-reporting of actual website symptoms in her complaints in relation to their context. 

If she'd say the symptoms more often she'd be more likely to get more serious replies from Meta, like how the typing speed discussion for chat filters went as a comparison. 

This one instance of her not listing exactly what was the issue has you saying: more often

Do you think this topic is the only time she's been vague about problems with the website? 

 /boots up advanced search

But you and I both know she has in the past stated what the issues were, and like I said if it wasn't working for her she just left in frustration of the site not working this once

From what I've seen she's reported a 400 error and there was the typing discussion early on, otherwise it's been her yapping on and on about the forum being dysfunctional through a series of new topics, even on the rival platform, with around half of the time having it being directed towards Spatial instead of Meta. 

Sure he has no reason for it but let's not forget she has tried to be civil and offered to bury the hatchet

Offering to stop former animosity doesn't just resolve all blame like some giant "Sorry" spell being cast, the other party in these cases is entitled to their feelings. 

Diplomacy happens from catering to both sides, not just throwing out an offer and acting like the other person's immediately the bad guy for turning it down. There has to be some reason why she deserves to be forgiven, otherwise it's just some weird whim of the moment or something. 

It doesn't take away that she's open to it and has been open to discussing the events to get better understanding. 

Her sense of character takes away from it far more than what the gesture serves to add. 

She's attempted to have actual conversation but the fact is that he's biased towards her and it it shows even as an admin issue

Her reporting actual symptoms is when the talks have gone the most smoothly. 

and like I said instead of asking her what the glitch was he just went in and called her a liar and afterwards others listed their own issues and glitches or bugs. It's what prompted her to ask why peach wasn't a liar and even then he still took her having an issue with the site as an attack 

Consider how she's framing herself and I can see how he'd not be taking her seriously without further elaboration. 

I don't think we're going to see eye to eye here as I really didn't find the title of that thread to be trolling

You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye? 

Well she does say "at the moment" in that post meaning it was clearly working for her before she states it's super slow which again she's said chat can get slow, she's mentioned symptoms other times as well as her being timed out for typing too fast in chat- so I dunno about you but I don't think the post was meant to instigate an argument or put him down, it was simply a frustrated post about inability to use the site.

Come on now, you're clearly reaching here. 

You figure she just went to Luna's site just to news report about a happenstance? She's alluded to multiple reasons as to why she'd prefer people be at Luna's website before functionality was even her focus. 

There's been clear agendas attached to her behaviors, even if there's real glitches alongside them. 

I think you're trying to see agendas where there aren't and as someone that takes wording important- I don't think it's reaching because she says "at the moment", she's been having issues here since her first day ever since the no chat For new users unless approved thing can into play. And like I said, wording: plus I heard primal was here! Where is my precious?

You really don't see Sugar stirring the pot? 

If he doesn't want to be civil that's fine, he doesn't have to but there's no way you can say she hasn't been and still defend that he has

I'd argue that, with her deplorable behavior, that she doesn't really deserve civility that he doesn't feel like granting beyond arguable ranges of the bare minimum. 

Like I said, she has been civil towards him

I'll need more than what I've seen to believe it, and even with cherry picked examples we still have sheer ratios to consider. 

I think as an admin he should be less eager to attack when an issue is brought up.

I agree, but again, she could have actually reported symptoms instead of just keeping it up in ways that would resemble her stank strikes. 

 how can i be more specific about an issue when meta does not respond to me when i do raise the concern? if meta doesn't respond, ofc i go to tony cos he's the only mod that i know of mature enough not to hold grudges even when it comes to usability of the site..and everytime tony responds like an adult, as opposed to meta either not responding, saying he doesn't care or saying that he enjoys the power when i have to ask him things.

i don't have to and will never kiss anyone's ass here, i'm not crow. so if i ask u even once, but twice in this case to move forward and u dont take the opportunity, don't expect me to 'prove that lak i really mean it' when meta is just being a sulky bitch

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

and while you claimed she wasn't civil- neither has he been civil with her taking any open opportunity to attack her (when she's tried being casually friendly) but the reporting of glitches had nothing really to do with that and he should be able to separate the two instead of just trying to find a way to antagonize her as well

My point here has been in relation to an under-reporting of actual website symptoms in her complaints in relation to their context. 

If she'd say the symptoms more often she'd be more likely to get more serious replies from Meta, like how the typing speed discussion for chat filters went as a comparison. 

This one instance of her not listing exactly what was the issue has you saying: more often

Do you think this topic is the only time she's been vague about problems with the website? 

 /boots up advanced search

If you can tell me how you search without it red texting you about needing a keyword instead of just dates that would be great 

But you and I both know she has in the past stated what the issues were, and like I said if it wasn't working for her she just left in frustration of the site not working this once

From what I've seen she's reported a 400 error and there was the typing discussion early on, otherwise it's been her yapping on and on about the forum being dysfunctional, even on the rival platform, with around half of the time having it being directed towards Spatial instead of Meta. 

You mean her mobile experience that's been totally validated by others on mobile? And do you think that metas eagerness to dismiss her might have played into her talking to someone else about it? 

Sure he has no reason for it but let's not forget she has tried to be civil and offered to bury the hatchet

Offering to stop former animosity doesn't just resolve all blame like some giant "Sorry" spell being cast, the other party in these cases is entitled to their feelings. 

Diplomacy happens from catering to both sides, not just throwing out an offer and acting like the other person's immediately the bad guy for turning it down. There has to be some reason why she deserves to be forgiven, otherwise it's just some weird whim of the moment or something. 

It doesn't take away that she's open to it and has been open to discussing the events to get better understanding. 

Her sense of character takes away from it far more than what the gesture serves to add. 

She's attempted to have actual conversation but the fact is that he's biased towards her and it it shows even as an admin issue

Her reporting actual symptoms is when the talks have gone the most smoothly. 

Is there other topics?, can link pls? Does this one time make it okay to dismiss it then? 

and like I said instead of asking her what the glitch was he just went in and called her a liar and afterwards others listed their own issues and glitches or bugs. It's what prompted her to ask why peach wasn't a liar and even then he still took her having an issue with the site as an attack 

Consider how she's framing herself and I can see how he'd not be taking her seriously without further elaboration. 

I don't think we're going to see eye to eye here as I really didn't find the title of that thread to be trolling

You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye? 

No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed

Well she does say "at the moment" in that post meaning it was clearly working for her before she states it's super slow which again she's said chat can get slow, she's mentioned symptoms other times as well as her being timed out for typing too fast in chat- so I dunno about you but I don't think the post was meant to instigate an argument or put him down, it was simply a frustrated post about inability to use the site.

Come on now, you're clearly reaching here. 

You figure she just went to Luna's site just to news report about a happenstance? She's alluded to multiple reasons as to why she'd prefer people be at Luna's website before functionality was even her focus. 

There's been clear agendas attached to her behaviors, even if there's real glitches alongside them. 

I think you're trying to see agendas where there aren't and as someone that takes wording important- I don't think it's reaching because she says "at the moment", she's been having issues here since her first day ever since the no chat For new users unless approved thing can into play. And like I said, wording: plus I heard primal was here! Where is my precious?

You really don't see Sugar stirring the pot? 

I really don't in all honesty

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

natasha87 said: 

tc has foiled my evil plot to slowly move everyone from here to luna's site..he has proven this by pointing out that i went straight to luna's site when THIS SITE WOULDN'T WORK. IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC TO USE ANOTHER SIMILAR SITE WHEN ONE IS NOT WORKING. FOILED AGAIN KIDS

the site works

 Actually it wasn't really working this morning, it took about 2 or so minutes before chat could load 

How long have these hiccups been lasting you? 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

natasha87 said: 

tc has foiled my evil plot to slowly move everyone from here to luna's site..he has proven this by pointing out that i went straight to luna's site when THIS SITE WOULDN'T WORK. IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC TO USE ANOTHER SIMILAR SITE WHEN ONE IS NOT WORKING. FOILED AGAIN KIDS

the site works

 Actually it wasn't really working this morning, it took about 2 or so minutes before chat could load 

How long have these hiccups been lasting you? 

 I showed you the screens...this morning

oh dear this is awkward..

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

and while you claimed she wasn't civil- neither has he been civil with her taking any open opportunity to attack her (when she's tried being casually friendly) but the reporting of glitches had nothing really to do with that and he should be able to separate the two instead of just trying to find a way to antagonize her as well

My point here has been in relation to an under-reporting of actual website symptoms in her complaints in relation to their context. 

If she'd say the symptoms more often she'd be more likely to get more serious replies from Meta, like how the typing speed discussion for chat filters went as a comparison. 

This one instance of her not listing exactly what was the issue has you saying: more often

Do you think this topic is the only time she's been vague about problems with the website? 

 /boots up advanced search

If you can tell me how you search without it red texting you about needing a keyword instead of just dates that would be great 

I know the struggle sometimes of remembering exactly what words another person said (or figuring what to search for if it hadn't been seen before), but why not search by username? 

But you and I both know she has in the past stated what the issues were, and like I said if it wasn't working for her she just left in frustration of the site not working this once

From what I've seen she's reported a 400 error and there was the typing discussion early on, otherwise it's been her yapping on and on about the forum being dysfunctional, even on the rival platform, with around half of the time having it being directed towards Spatial instead of Meta. 

You mean her mobile experience that's been totally validated by others on mobile? And do you think that metas eagerness to dismiss her might have played into her talking to someone else about it? 

She started with Spatial and moved on to Meta if her topic history's post dates are something to go by. I'd say that more suggests that Spatial was of no help to her, and that he was her first choice of who to go to instead of who she went to after the fact. 

While I do still argue that it's good to be above your own scruples when it comes to website politics, if she actually wanted to help the website be fixed she'd be describing what's wrong with it instead of trying to pry open a wound she believes to have found in him. 

She'd rather dig into him than actually fix the problem, and her itch for it is surfacing even as this topic continues along. 

Sure he has no reason for it but let's not forget she has tried to be civil and offered to bury the hatchet

Offering to stop former animosity doesn't just resolve all blame like some giant "Sorry" spell being cast, the other party in these cases is entitled to their feelings. 

Diplomacy happens from catering to both sides, not just throwing out an offer and acting like the other person's immediately the bad guy for turning it down. There has to be some reason why she deserves to be forgiven, otherwise it's just some weird whim of the moment or something. 

It doesn't take away that she's open to it and has been open to discussing the events to get better understanding. 

Her sense of character takes away from it far more than what the gesture serves to add. 

She's attempted to have actual conversation but the fact is that he's biased towards her and it it shows even as an admin issue

Her reporting actual symptoms is when the talks have gone the most smoothly. 

Is there other topics?, can link pls? Does this one time make it okay to dismiss it then? 

Examples of her (almost) doing it right? Sure:

400 bad request (Meta tries to be of assistance, she remains unhelpful, but she did report the 400 error and the talks went fairly smoothly). 

Good said:

I can't help you if i don't get information

no one else seems to have this issue.

i can't talk in chat anymore (more drama mongering and pushing for people to go to Luna's, but she does report the 400 once again) 
how do i get verified (she was almost kinda normal in this one)

Or did you mean examples of other stuff, like her wanting Luna to be in charge instead, or when she's just complaining and digging into people instead of actually working towards solving problems? 

She can dig into him all she wants, but she ought to expect that it might at least slow down the process. Past a point she began going on more about the website generally instead of actually pointing out what's going on in more specific ways while otherwise making herself look less like she's looking for assistance and more so like she's looking for attention. 

It's about framing, and while he ought to be willing to help out users and degenerates alike, it's like he said above: "I can't help you if i don't get information". 

and like I said instead of asking her what the glitch was he just went in and called her a liar and afterwards others listed their own issues and glitches or bugs. It's what prompted her to ask why peach wasn't a liar and even then he still took her having an issue with the site as an attack 

Consider how she's framing herself and I can see how he'd not be taking her seriously without further elaboration. 

I don't think we're going to see eye to eye here as I really didn't find the title of that thread to be trolling

You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye? 

No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed

Contributed to which? 

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

natasha87 said: 

tc has foiled my evil plot to slowly move everyone from here to luna's site..he has proven this by pointing out that i went straight to luna's site when THIS SITE WOULDN'T WORK. IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC TO USE ANOTHER SIMILAR SITE WHEN ONE IS NOT WORKING. FOILED AGAIN KIDS

the site works

 Actually it wasn't really working this morning, it took about 2 or so minutes before chat could load 

so, it does work
sorry but i am not autistic :/