nope, asked meta on discord more than once and got no response, so then i asked tony who was happy to halp me. again how can i give more detail about the issues when the owner refuses to even take me seriously.
tc has foiled my evil plot to slowly move everyone from here to luna's site..he has proven this by pointing out that i went straight to luna's site when THIS SITE WOULDN'T WORK. IT DEFIES ALL LOGIC TO USE ANOTHER SIMILAR SITE WHEN ONE IS NOT WORKING. FOILED AGAIN KIDS
the site works
Actually it wasn't really working this morning, it took about 2 or so minutes before chat could load
so, it does work
sorry but i am not autistic :/
almost as if it's slightly buggy and glitchy at times...almost
and like I said instead of asking her what the glitch was he just went in and called her a liar and afterwards others listed their own issues and glitches or bugs. It's what prompted her to ask why peach wasn't a liar and even then he still took her having an issue with the site as an attack
Consider how she's framing herself and I can see how he'd not be taking her seriously without further elaboration.
I don't think we're going to see eye to eye here as I really didn't find the title of that thread to be trolling
You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye?
No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed
Contributed to which?
To the glitch thread sug made
and like I said instead of asking her what the glitch was he just went in and called her a liar and afterwards others listed their own issues and glitches or bugs. It's what prompted her to ask why peach wasn't a liar and even then he still took her having an issue with the site as an attack
Consider how she's framing herself and I can see how he'd not be taking her seriously without further elaboration.
I don't think we're going to see eye to eye here as I really didn't find the title of that thread to be trolling
You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye?
No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed
Contributed to which?
To the glitch thread sug made
So you're saying that because people had real glitches to report, that her making a series of posts and hosting a series of topics to jab at there being glitches were all made with the aim of being constructive?
Come on.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
10/4/2019 6:40:10 PM
I know the struggle sometimes of remembering exactly what words another person said (or figuring what to search for if it hadn't been seen before), but why not search by username?
Because then it shows everything they posted and it's a fucking lot to go through, I can't even do it by dates all that often because this place has its own separate timezone
But you and I both know she has in the past stated what the issues were, and like I said if it wasn't working for her she just left in frustration of the site not working this once
From what I've seen she's reported a 400 error and there was the typing discussion early on, otherwise it's been her yapping on and on about the forum being dysfunctional, even on the rival platform, with around half of the time having it being directed towards Spatial instead of Meta.
You mean her mobile experience that's been totally validated by others on mobile? And do you think that metas eagerness to dismiss her might have played into her talking to someone else about it?
She started with Spatial and moved on to Meta if her topic history's post dates are something to go by. I'd say that more suggests that Spatial was of no help to her, and that he was her first choice of who to go to instead of who she went to after the fact.
While I do still argue that it's good to be above your own scruples when it comes to website politics, if she actually wanted to help the website be fixed she'd be describing what's wrong with it instead of trying to pry open a wound she believes to have found in him.
She'd rather dig into him than actually fix the problem, and her itch for it is surfacing even as this topic continues along.
I think you're reaching my dude
Sure he has no reason for it but let's not forget she has tried to be civil and offered to bury the hatchet
Offering to stop former animosity doesn't just resolve all blame like some giant "Sorry" spell being cast, the other party in these cases is entitled to their feelings.
Diplomacy happens from catering to both sides, not just throwing out an offer and acting like the other person's immediately the bad guy for turning it down. There has to be some reason why she deserves to be forgiven, otherwise it's just some weird whim of the moment or something.It doesn't take away that she's open to it and has been open to discussing the events to get better understanding.
Her sense of character takes away from it far more than what the gesture serves to add.
She's attempted to have actual conversation but the fact is that he's biased towards her and it it shows even as an admin issue
Her reporting actual symptoms is when the talks have gone the most smoothly.
Is there other topics?, can link pls? Does this one time make it okay to dismiss it then?
Examples of her (almost) doing it right? Sure:
400 bad request (Meta tries to be of assistance, she remains unhelpful, but she did report the 400 error and the talks went fairly smoothly).Good said:I can't help you if i don't get information
no one else seems to have this issue.i can't talk in chat anymore (more drama mongering and pushing for people to go to Luna's, but she does report the 400 once again)
how do i get verified (she was almost kinda normal in this one)
Notice how when he's civil she's civil, notice how he didn't immediately call her a liar and then they even bantered in that first one, the second one they're still pretty chill and again it's not her starting a revolution making a comment about Luna's, and it's not like people have to use this site exclusively so I'm not sure why it would bother you or meta that she asked as much.
And in the how do I get verified she asks a legitimate question and is ignored....
And how this time he just straight up calls her a liar.
Or did you mean examples of other stuff, like her wanting Luna to be in charge instead, or when she's just complaining and digging into people instead of actually working towards solving problems?
I'm not totally sure how that's stuff got anything to do with what we're talking about? Is it related to glitches or issues with the site
She can dig into him all she wants, but she ought to expect that it might at least slow down the process. Past a point she began going on more about the website generally instead of actually pointing out what's going on in more specific ways while otherwise making herself look less like she's looking for assistance and more so like she's looking for attention.
It's about framing, and while he ought to be willing to help out users and degenerates alike, it's like he said above: "I can't help you if i don't get information".
She didn't dig into him in the other thread tho, she digs into him about other things but she hasn't really dug into him about the glitches or issues. Unless you mean pointing these things out to him is mean because he can't handle criticism? Do you think it's fair for him to have just immediately called her a liar because he didn't encounter the same issues as she did? Worse yet she hadn't name the issues exactly so what would he be looking for then? You're talking about framing but somehow miss his response frame
You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye?
No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed
Contributed to which?
To the glitch thread sug made
So you're saying that because people had real glitches to report, that her making a series of posts and hosting a series of topics to jab at there being glitches were all made with the aim of being constructive?
Come on.
Are these series of posts and topics the ones you linked and are currently talking about?
You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye?
No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed
Contributed to which?
To the glitch thread sug made
So you're saying that because people had real glitches to report, that her making a series of posts and hosting a series of topics to jab at there being glitches were all made with the aim of being constructive?
Come on.Are these series of posts and topics the ones you linked and are currently talking about?
No, those were just examples of her kinda getting it right.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
You really don't see her trying to stir the pot, or are you merely turning a blind eye?
No, if others found it that way they wouldn't have contributed
Contributed to which?
To the glitch thread sug made
So you're saying that because people had real glitches to report, that her making a series of posts and hosting a series of topics to jab at there being glitches were all made with the aim of being constructive?
Come on.Are these series of posts and topics the ones you linked and are currently talking about?
No, those were just examples of her kinda getting it right.
Link others pls