Sociopath Community

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

I actually shouldn't do anything I do not want to do. And if we start over just like that, I must have no self-respect lol.

Well alright Luna

She didn't say there was a glitch, she just stirred up bullshit, it was a useless post made to create drama, raised out of her bitterness. I do not entertain such things.

She said it was glitchy in the title, other people confirmed this

She can't get over me and you expect me to be respectful?

She has been nothing but civil, you are right. Just look at the thread here as an example.

 You saying she hasn't at all asked to start over while you started being uncivil yourself because you can't get over some stuff in the past?

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

I actually shouldn't do anything I do not want to do. And if we start over just like that, I must have no self-respect lol.

Well alright Luna

I thought Luna was the one who insisted on starting over continuously. 

She didn't say there was a glitch, she just stirred up bullshit, it was a useless post made to create drama, raised out of her bitterness. I do not entertain such things.

She said it was glitchy in the title, other people confirmed this

Maybe it'd help if she actually stated the symptoms that she's experiencing on this website, much like you and I did in another topic, instead of making a vague stink about "issues" on the website? 

I'm sure you see how this could appear to someone who doesn't know her better like that, especially when she's done it with multiple topics now in the form of rants. 

She can't get over me and you expect me to be respectful?

She has been nothing but civil, you are right. Just look at the thread here as an example.

You saying she hasn't at all asked to start over while you started being uncivil yourself because you can't get over some stuff in the past?

Her tone makes it kinda difficult to see it as her waving a white flag, but yeah for Sugar anyway she's been somewhat softer in this topic (through appearing persecuted instead). 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

If this is her trying, then that's... kinda sad really. 

I didn't say this thread was a particular instance of that, she's calling him out for calling her a liar and dismissing the claims something we've ourselves have also done to Luna in a similar fashion

Confirms this though: 

Turncoat said:

doesn't know how to be a civil enough human being to report it in any helpful way.

It doesn't, as he dismissed her in his first post and then calls her a liar, and she didn't even do anything to warrant it other than state that the site was Buggy, Glitchy and just just generally fucked up

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

If this is her trying, then that's... kinda sad really. 

I didn't say this thread was a particular instance of that

That's true, but what are some instances of her trying to be civil? 

I remember her kinda trying, but memory's making it seem like it was always paired with either something defensive or an insult. 

she's calling him out for calling her a liar and dismissing the claims something we've ourselves have also done to Luna in a similar fashion

What factors make it similar to Luna's cases? 

Not really doubting that you have an idea for how it is, I just don't see it. 

Confirms this though: 

Turncoat said:

doesn't know how to be a civil enough human being to report it in any helpful way.

It doesn't, as he dismissed her in his first post and then calls her a liar, and she didn't even do anything to warrant it other than state that the site was Buggy, Glitchy and just just generally fucked up

Yet he's generally listened to other users talking about it.

What do you figure made that go differently? 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

I actually shouldn't do anything I do not want to do. And if we start over just like that, I must have no self-respect lol.

Well alright Luna

I thought Luna was the one who insisted on starting over continuously. 

Not when she continually claimed they were features and not bugs and that she shouldn't have to do anything she didn't want to do because we were just *test subjects*

She didn't say there was a glitch, she just stirred up bullshit, it was a useless post made to create drama, raised out of her bitterness. I do not entertain such things.

She said it was glitchy in the title, other people confirmed this

Maybe it'd help if she actually stated the symptoms that she's experiencing on this website, much like you and I did in another topic, instead of making a vague stink about "issues" on the website? 

I'm sure you see how this could appear to someone who doesn't know her better like that, especially when she's done it with multiple topics now in the form of rants. 

Maybe it'd help if Meta didn't just automatically dismiss her and call her a liar for issues he himself couldn't find or as he said couldn't be bothered to fix because they aren't high on his list of priorities. Her topic made it possible for others to also post about the issues they're having on mobile and get some understanding on the why it was happening and if there were solutions to it while they wait for the fix.

 

She can't get over me and you expect me to be respectful?

She has been nothing but civil, you are right. Just look at the thread here as an example.

You saying she hasn't at all asked to start over while you started being uncivil yourself because you can't get over some stuff in the past?

Her tone makes it kinda difficult to see it as her waving a white flag, but yeah for Sugar anyway she's been somewhat softer.

 She's asked in chat to start over, having had forgotten what exactly they'd been fighting over until I helpfully chipped in the why. 

I'm Helpful like that 😉

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

I actually shouldn't do anything I do not want to do. And if we start over just like that, I must have no self-respect lol.

Well alright Luna

I thought Luna was the one who insisted on starting over continuously. 

Not when she continually claimed they were features and not bugs and that she shouldn't have to do anything she didn't want to do because we were just *test subjects*

Ahh, classic Luna. 

She didn't say there was a glitch, she just stirred up bullshit, it was a useless post made to create drama, raised out of her bitterness. I do not entertain such things.

She said it was glitchy in the title, other people confirmed this

Maybe it'd help if she actually stated the symptoms that she's experiencing on this website, much like you and I did in another topic, instead of making a vague stink about "issues" on the website? 

I'm sure you see how this could appear to someone who doesn't know her better like that, especially when she's done it with multiple topics now in the form of rants. 

Maybe it'd help if Meta didn't just automatically dismiss her and call her a liar for issues he himself couldn't find or as he said couldn't be bothered to fix because they aren't high on his list of priorities. Her topic made it possible for others to also post about the issues they're having on mobile and get some understanding on the why it was happening and if there were solutions to it while they wait for the fix.

We technically have topics for reporting site issues, and I find it kind of weird that it took Sugar talking about it for others to pipe in their own concerns. 

She can't get over me and you expect me to be respectful?

She has been nothing but civil, you are right. Just look at the thread here as an example.

You saying she hasn't at all asked to start over while you started being uncivil yourself because you can't get over some stuff in the past?

Her tone makes it kinda difficult to see it as her waving a white flag, but yeah for Sugar anyway she's been somewhat softer.

She's asked in chat to start over, having had forgotten what exactly they'd been fighting over until I helpfully chipped in the why. 

I'm Helpful like that 😉

The keepers of history can start wars you know. 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

If this is her trying, then that's... kinda sad really. 

I didn't say this thread was a particular instance of that

That's true, but what are some instances of her trying to be civil? 

I remember her kinda trying, but memory's making it seem like it was always paired with either something defensive or an insult. 

Her in chat being casual and friendly towards him and asking to make up and also in discord(gee thanks tryp).

she's calling him out for calling her a liar and dismissing the claims something we've ourselves have also done to Luna in a similar fashion

What factors make it similar to Luna's cases? 

Not really doubting that you have an idea for how it is, I just don't see it. 

* To put in there btw, not sure if it's the site or my keyboard, whenever I want to go back and edit a misspelled word, it erases the entire word rather than the letter*

In the way that we used to also make topics calling Luna out on her shit when it failed spectacularly. The glitch threads about pms appears in dms comes to mind and Luna calling us liars and she calling her an abortion and so on 

Confirms this though: 

Turncoat said:

doesn't know how to be a civil enough human being to report it in any helpful way.

It doesn't, as he dismissed her in his first post and then calls her a liar, and she didn't even do anything to warrant it other than state that the site was Buggy, Glitchy and just just generally fucked up

Yet he's generally listened to other users talking about it.

What do you figure made that go differently? 

 Wow you're right it's almost as if he biased towards her Everytime even when she's being civil and otherwise neutral towards her.

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

I actually shouldn't do anything I do not want to do. And if we start over just like that, I must have no self-respect lol.

Well alright Luna

I thought Luna was the one who insisted on starting over continuously. 

Not when she continually claimed they were features and not bugs and that she shouldn't have to do anything she didn't want to do because we were just *test subjects*

Ahh, classic Luna. 

She didn't say there was a glitch, she just stirred up bullshit, it was a useless post made to create drama, raised out of her bitterness. I do not entertain such things.

She said it was glitchy in the title, other people confirmed this

Maybe it'd help if she actually stated the symptoms that she's experiencing on this website, much like you and I did in another topic, instead of making a vague stink about "issues" on the website? 

I'm sure you see how this could appear to someone who doesn't know her better like that, especially when she's done it with multiple topics now in the form of rants. 

Maybe it'd help if Meta didn't just automatically dismiss her and call her a liar for issues he himself couldn't find or as he said couldn't be bothered to fix because they aren't high on his list of priorities. Her topic made it possible for others to also post about the issues they're having on mobile and get some understanding on the why it was happening and if there were solutions to it while they wait for the fix.

We technically have topics for reporting site issues, and I find it kind of weird that it took Sugar talking about it for others to pipe in their own concerns. 

I think the issue with that is that they're so far back that 

1.- sug didn't know about those topics as she's recently joined

2.- it's so far back that's a lot of searching if you don't know the exact title

3.- it's just easier to complain when others do

But also because I guess there were slight work around and weren't like a huge security issue 

She can't get over me and you expect me to be respectful?

She has been nothing but civil, you are right. Just look at the thread here as an example.

You saying she hasn't at all asked to start over while you started being uncivil yourself because you can't get over some stuff in the past?

Her tone makes it kinda difficult to see it as her waving a white flag, but yeah for Sugar anyway she's been somewhat softer.

She's asked in chat to start over, having had forgotten what exactly they'd been fighting over until I helpfully chipped in the why. 

I'm Helpful like that 😉

The keepers of history can start wars you know. 

 Well, um.

No, I don't have a comeback for this.

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Gotta say tho, sugs been trying to be civil with meta as she's said before hey let's start over and meta can't seem to let the past go even as admin. If someone tells you there's a glitch you should At least ask what specifically it is instead of just outright calling them a liar.

If this is her trying, then that's... kinda sad really. 

I didn't say this thread was a particular instance of that

That's true, but what are some instances of her trying to be civil? 

I remember her kinda trying, but memory's making it seem like it was always paired with either something defensive or an insult. 

Her in chat being casual and friendly towards him and asking to make up and also in discord(gee thanks tryp).

Any timestamps I can work with?

she's calling him out for calling her a liar and dismissing the claims something we've ourselves have also done to Luna in a similar fashion

What factors make it similar to Luna's cases? 

Not really doubting that you have an idea for how it is, I just don't see it. 

* To put in there btw, not sure if it's the site or my keyboard, whenever I want to go back and edit a misspelled word, it erases the entire word rather than the letter*

In the way that we used to also make topics calling Luna out on her shit when it failed spectacularly. The glitch threads about pms appears in dms comes to mind and Luna calling us liars and she calling her an abortion and so on 

We did actually start out fairly polite with her... but she wore out that welcome on 9/11 (never forget). 

Confirms this though: 

Turncoat said:

doesn't know how to be a civil enough human being to report it in any helpful way.

It doesn't, as he dismissed her in his first post and then calls her a liar, and she didn't even do anything to warrant it other than state that the site was Buggy, Glitchy and just just generally fucked up

Yet he's generally listened to other users talking about it.

What do you figure made that go differently? 

 Wow you're right it's almost as if he biased towards her Everytime even when she's being civil and otherwise neutral towards her.

A lot of the history of her time here's been her trying to get others to go to Luna's site while sympathizing in ways that contradict her former message (in ways that could be construed quite easily as being done out of spiteful convenience). They otherwise have prior history with Discord and Luna's SC, and he's made it more than clearly narrated why he feels no need to respect her (such as figuring his opinions aren't his own through a variety of names, plus her threatening nudes to scare him), and as of now she's been making a vague fuss about website glitches within the present context that's otherwise... iffy. 

I agree that someone making a giant mess of a scene like this isn't reason to not listen to her about website glitches, as that portion ought to be impartial if the person (in this case Sugar) is willing to list the symptoms she's having on this website to the best of her ability... but I'm sure you can also see how the two becoming civil doesn't really... look like something Meta'd have a reason to do, right? 

Them being friendly doesn't have to be any kind of requirement, frankly she hasn't earned that if you ask me, but I feel like in the discussion of website glitches that they may benefit from a mediator, or that the closest to extending an olive branch here'd be Sugar actually trying to mention symptoms beyond: 



It'd really help if she could be more specific. 

i feel like it is appropriate to have a response, so here it is