Beyond calling me stupid and dim, youve given people nothing to take you seriously.
You could've proven yourself by listing your intellectual achievements and demonstrated they are greater than mine. You refused.
You could've both proven your claim that Im a fake physicist and that I'm an idiot by solving some Physics problems and outperformed me. You refused.
Beyond calling me stupid and dim, youve given people nothing to take you seriously.
You could've proven yourself by listing your intellectual achievements. You refused. I accepted.
You could've proven that Im a fake physicist. You refused. I accepted.
Why should anyone take your claims of being smarter than me seriously?
What's stopping you from listing yours ?
Go ahead and do it.
The 'Double It?' topic is also marvelously self demonstrating over him willing to die on the weirdest hill just to feel like he's right.
This was in response to him having noticed that a lot of people found his decision to be a bad one:If this game were confined to SC members, who are eccentric, and I had to go first. I'd pull the lever even if the rules were clear and based on my model.
For those who've only read here but not there, it's a good read on how Spatial's version of deduction works. Dude when he doesn't like an outcome just invents his own rules or rewrites history, anything to get out of feeling like he might be making a mistake.
It's fascinatingly disturbing to see someone who really think they can't be wrong over even trivial things like a hypothetical being reasoned through with basic math.So...
Your argument is "PULL THE LEVER OR SOMEONE WILL" and when I pull the lever for a SC roster, there's a problem ?
Very amusing Nathan.
Uh... damn. You still don't get it, do you? I thought it was simply expressed enough but jeez, fine I'll elaborate so that it can go closer to your speed.
The point is moreover how you will disregard those who disagree with you through ad hominem and claims of manipulation in relation to their suddenly perceived lack of intelligence, rather than factor in why you might be wrong over something once even those you once thought on your side contradict you.
When you risk feeling like you might have gotten it wrong, you without a doubt will always double down on that answer, to your grave, even when it ends up costing you friendships and acquaintances. You clearly become more worked up and stressed over being stuck in it, which gives me the impression that it's both compulsive and lacking in self-awareness.
The 'Double It?' topic is also marvelously self demonstrating over him willing to die on the weirdest hill just to feel like he's right.
This was in response to him having noticed that a lot of people found his decision to be a bad one:For those who've only read here but not there, it's a good read on how Spatial's version of deduction works. Dude when he doesn't like an outcome just invents his own rules or rewrites history, anything to get out of feeling like he might be making a mistake.
It's fascinatingly disturbing to see someone who really think they can't be wrong over even trivial things like a hypothetical being reasoned through with basic math.So...
Your argument is "PULL THE LEVER OR SOMEONE WILL" and when I pull the lever for a SC roster, there's a problem ?
Very amusing Nathan.
Uh... damn. You still don't get it, do you? I thought it was simply expressed enough but jeez, fine I'll elaborate so that it can go closer to your speed.
The point is moreover how you will disregard those who disagree with you through ad hominem and claims of manipulation in relation to their suddenly perceived lack of intelligence, rather than factor in why you might be wrong over something once even those you once thought on your side contradict you.
When you risk feeling like you might have gotten it wrong, you without a doubt will always double down on that answer, to your grave, even when it ends up costing you friendships and acquaintances. You clearly become more worked up and stressed over being stuck in it, which gives me the impression that it's both compulsive and lacking in self-awareness.
You've got it twisted. In your complaint I did not disregard anyone, I did what's best for SC, or else more lives would've died. I gave people who disagreed with me what they wanted. In turn I had no choice but to be compliant or else more people would die.
Yes I like to say things like transexual and homosexual and bisexual. Sometimes I'll say it out of the blue and for no reason. Probably because those terms shouldn't be offensive to begin with lol.
Also, when you say I treat women like dirt, it's that thing you do to turn real women against me. Fake stuff.
My intellectual achievements you mean? Nothing is stopping me. So we doing this then?
Remember what I said earlier on. About getting smoked by a 3 year old in the Dora the Explorer memory card game. And how I also suggested your subject would be the same thing.
The list of achievements is slightly different, but I did include if I do go along with your game on your subjects, it's because I'm being nice.
I don't know what's stopping you.
Beyond calling me stupid and dim, youve given people nothing to take you seriously.
You could've proven yourself by listing your intellectual achievements and demonstrated they are greater than mine. You refused.
I do question what subjects Spatial'd claim mastery in other than greedily gambling with finances and 3D modeling sinfully juicy sluts.
I think he's stuck resorting to insults because he on some level knows when he can't win through reasonable dialogue. Rather than outdo the competition, he'd rather cut down his perception of it once he subconsciously notices himself on the backfoot. It's like how he stated that losing to Scarlett in Chess made him quit playing it online altogether while accusing her of having used an AI to play for her, and I bet he wouldn't even verse Med in chess at this point who I'd trust to be honest when it comes to something like that.
From those he's allowed himself to call intelligent, that's usually because they haven't directly contradicted him in ways he's either noticed or allowed himself to commit to memory. Even among those who give him praise to flatter his ego or avoid conversational complications, once they have contradicted him they are written off increasingly overtime if they don't otherwise silence themselves or placate his ego once he's begun rationalizing aloud why they disagreed with him. It's had me wonder how much his distaste towards The Church relates to personal contradiction as well.
If like a normal person they respond insulted by the shit he's saying to their face, it furthers him saying it's their fault or the fault of their environment in some way rather than noticing his own lack of tact. Instead he acts like a narcissistic 'truther' while even extending his accusations as far as social conspiracy against him by his peers, even accusing herd behavior that doesn't go his way on those he likes the least.
Effectively, intelligence to him is more attributable toward agreeability than talent.
You could've both proven your claim that Im a fake physicist and that I'm an idiot by solving some Physics problems and outperformed me. You refused.
There's been topics in the past where people have successfully discussed complex things well beyond my ken when it comes to subjects like math, science, literature, history, philosophy, etc. Without having to show who they are, that was more than enough for me to be like 'well damn, that must be a sign of intelligence'. Talks here have led to me doing my own passive research on some of it, and overall I've felt that contribute toward some sense of personal growth that I'd have missed out on otherwise.
At that point it's easier to admit to not being knowledgeable in that area, especially if the people talking about it seem particularly engaged in wanting to tell people about it. Spatial however I don't think can do it beyond some form of distancing language at best and through total disregard at his worst.
Here are the idiot's intellectual achievements:
- Started research before 18
- Youngest faculty hire in the University
- Scientific publications is slowly nearing 100, including contributions to fundamental science, and theoretical work
- Professor
- PhD
- Leading multimillion research group with some past students in faculty positions and in Princeton and elsewhere.
- Cumulatively supervised some more than 30 students in a wide range of science topics
- Frequently interviewed for my work
- Organised conferences, schools, workshops
- Helped establish and grow a new research line
- Helped countless young researchers push their work forward
- Helped establish an institute
- Beat my wife in an argument once
I'm curious about nature. I love science, math, physics, psychology, geology, and technology.
Now your turn.
