Sociopath Community

Jada said: 

He addressed this already:

This thread is a tit-for-tat in retaliation to you following me around and insulting me out of the blue and incessantly. - Jada, 2025

Thanks. I wasnt sure if it was that I wasnt clear or if Spatial was being purposefully dense....

Ive felt like a parrot throughout this whole topic, because what I say seems to go in through one ear and out the other.

 Actually. It all started when I said I don't see you as an intellectual. Then you went off the rail. "Oh you're following me around !.... I don't care if people don't think I'm smart"

Is your point that I didn't make this topic in retaliation to your insults...?

Jada said: 

Is your point that I didn't make this topic in retaliation to your insults...?

 No no. You totally did. Except when I say how I don't see you as an intellectual, I'm not actually trying to insulting you. 

When things escalate I'll then call you dim, a dingbat, a moron etc, but not unless you astound me with your low vibrational feedback and bad ideas.  

I mean Legga is clearly way better with words, logic, and tolerance. 

No no. You totally did.

I presume this is you not seeing me as an intellectual, and not trying to offend me:

Y'know Legga, acting like you're hot shit and carrying on like you're better than others is something people with a low IQ would do. It shows you have a strong desire to level the playing field by attempting to envoke envy in others. It's a low standard you're setting there.

People who are truely rich and blessed intellectually don't waste time boasting or dunking on people who are supposedly less fortunate, they just carry on doing what makes them as they are, without the need to be represented by a woke celebrity holding a fat stack.

I say this cause I recognize the type of people who does things like that, and they have a long way to go.

I was pretty chill throughout the exchange until you egged on incessantly.

I think that perhaps you lack awareness. If it's not clear to you why showing up in front of someone for a long rant about how you don't associate them with intellect, and then pressing on incessantly, is going to insult that person, then maybe you're not socially very intelligent. You say that you are not "trying" to insult me. However, if you know the outcome, and you know you will insult me, then you do at least mean to insult me, as a logical necessity. What you are actually trying to say is that you will insult me for my own good, because you think saying what you think is better for me than staying silent. However, I also made this topic for your own good, to teach you a valuable lesson. You are learning your place in the Universe, and how you look like in the mirror. It has been a good lesson for you so far, and I have been an excellent teacher. 

I am truly uniquely qualified to break down your flawed logic and feed it back to you, because unlike many people here, I truly understand you. I am, for all intents and purposes, a superior version of you -- the version you want to be but cannot. Unlike you, I can back up what I say. I am also smarter than you and more successful than you.

Let me therefore courteously tell you that people here dont associate you with intellect. Im not trying to insult you. I'm teaching you a valuable lesson instead.

Dragoonback said: 

I mean Legga is clearly way better with words, logic, and tolerance. 

It did cross my mind to add him to my signature as he did with me except I'd apply genuine data, but that kinda stuff vibrates at a lower frequency so I opted out. 

Jada said: 

Let me therefore courteously tell you that people here dont associate you with intellect. Im not trying to insult you. I'm teaching you a valuable lesson instead.

He's already disregarded the entirety of SC agreeing with your point over a broad ad hominem towards us overall: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Jada said: 

You're the creator of this thread though. Demanding how I acknowledge you're so much smarter than I, while I keep feeding you the truth.

The thread is moreso for others to decide it. I know you will never acknowledge it.

And in doing so you gained support from the same people you're energetically aligned with. 

Not surprised btw. 

Rather than see it as a problem with himself, he'd sooner say even his closest friends and allies are idiots if they'd disagree with him in favor of someone he has no respect for, especially if they happen to be a woman. 

His respect is also contingent on how often he feels like they've contradicted his claims. He'll even go as far as to call them programmed or brainwashed. 

The 'Double It?' topic is also marvelously self demonstrating over him willing to die on the weirdest hill just to feel like he's right. 

This was in response to him having noticed that a lot of people found his decision to be a bad one: 

Spatial Mind said: 

If this game were confined to SC members, who are eccentric, and I had to go first. I'd pull the lever even if the rules were clear and based on my model. 

For those who've only read here but not there, it's a good read on how Spatial's version of deduction works. Dude when he doesn't like an outcome just invents his own rules or rewrites history, anything to get out of feeling like he might be making a mistake. 

It's fascinatingly disturbing to see someone who really think they can't be wrong over even trivial things like a hypothetical being reasoned through with basic math. 

Turncoat said: 

Jada said: 

Let me therefore courteously tell you that people here dont associate you with intellect. Im not trying to insult you. I'm teaching you a valuable lesson instead.

He's already disregarded the entirety of SC agreeing with your point over a broad ad hominem towards us overall: 

The entirety of SC would be a false claim.  

Spatial Mind said: 

Jada said: 

The thread is moreso for others to decide it. I know you will never acknowledge it.

And in doing so you gained support from the same people you're energetically aligned with. 

Not surprised btw. 

Rather than see it as a problem with himself, he'd sooner say even his closest friends and allies are idiots if they'd disagree with him in favor of someone he has no respect for, especially if they happen to be a woman. 

False.

His respect is also contingent on how often he feels like they've contradicted his claims. He'll even go as far as to call them programmed or brainwashed. 

 And false. 

Turncoat said: 

The 'Double It?' topic is also marvelously self demonstrating over him willing to die on the weirdest hill just to feel like he's right. 

This was in response to him having noticed that a lot of people found his decision to be a bad one: 

Spatial Mind said: 

If this game were confined to SC members, who are eccentric, and I had to go first. I'd pull the lever even if the rules were clear and based on my model. 

For those who've only read here but not there, it's a good read on how Spatial's version of deduction works. Dude when he doesn't like an outcome just invents his own rules or rewrites history, anything to get out of feeling like he might be making a mistake. 

It's fascinatingly disturbing to see someone who really think they can't be wrong over even trivial things like a hypothetical being reasoned through with basic math. 

 So...

Your argument is "PULL THE LEVER OR SOMEONE WILL" and when I pull the lever for a SC roster, there's a problem ?

Very amusing Nathan.