Maninist said:I'd recommend women should take care of themselves. Don't go sleeping around, or don't put themselves in a dangerous situation.
Lets flip this for a second: Should men be punished for sleeping around?
Maninist said:I'd recommend women should take care of themselves. Don't go sleeping around, or don't put themselves in a dangerous situation.Lets flip this for a second: Should men be punished for sleeping around?
It's not a matter of being punished dude.
There are women who'll hook up with a stranger and get knocked up. Or they'll raw dog it and end up with an unplanned pregnancy.
Some guys do take punishment when they sleep around as a matter of fact, but none of this is about if they deserve it or not.
Some people are smarter than others.
Maninist said:I'd recommend women should take care of themselves. Don't go sleeping around, or don't put themselves in a dangerous situation.Lets flip this for a second: Should men be punished for sleeping around?
It's not a matter of being punished dude.
There are women who'll hook up with a stranger and get knocked up. Or they'll raw dog it and end up with an unplanned pregnancy.
Okay, and why should they keep the child? Birth control rids of the risk, abortions rid of the risk, why should they be saddled with a child if they can't even be trusted to keep it in their pants?
Wouldn't these very people you see in a poor light make equally poor parents? Why would you want to subject children to these people?
If there's two people with very blatant disorders who want to have sex, should they not have sex because it'd produce a fucked up child, or should they opt for birth control so they can still enjoy themselves?
Some guys do take punishment when they sleep around as a matter of fact, but none of this is about if they deserve it or not.
What are your views on Child Support?
Some people are smarter than others.
See, saying it's about intelligence makes it sound like they deserve it for being stupid.
This also promotes said "stupid people" having more children, pushing their genes on to the next generation. Wouldn't you prefer that those who have undesirable traits remove themselves from the gene pool?
What do you stand to gain from having people you principally dislike have children?
Birth control is a better idea.
See, now I'm already glad we had this discussion. I didn't expect this answer. What separates the two, the age of the fetus?
This already strongly splits you apart from many within your political party, they don't tend to like birth control and, honestly, I lumped you in with that bunch presumptively.
There are women who have multiple abortions and I don't think they are very smart. Sorry.
That's fine, you can call them dumb then for having the condom break or having an allergic reaction to birth control, but why should dumb women have dumb children? Isn't that perpetuating the problem?
As a matter of political tactics, I'd think you'd support pro-choice initiatives over how Right Wingers will end up producing more children than the Left. Forcing your political opponents to have children will only perpetuate what you see as "the problem". Wouldn't it make more sense for you to embrace watching your political opponents destroy your future opposition?
As backwards as it seems, only one party supporting abortion is liable to affect the gene pool of future voters. Do you want Left Wing traits being birthed to perpetuate the issue, or would you rather The Left shoot themselves in the foot?
Birth control is a better idea.
See, now I'm already glad we had this discussion. I didn't expect this answer. What separates the two, the age of the fetus?
Women flush out the embryo every cycle. It has no pulse nor is it really a person. A fetus is a person. Unique people have been destroyed before they had a chance.
This already strongly splits you apart from many within your political party, they don't tend to like birth control and, honestly, I lumped you in with that bunch presumptively.
You'll hear the MSM twist things around.
The Democrats created a bill called "The Right to Contraception Act" a bill to ensure contraceptives will forever be legal. The Republicans saw it as some political stunt or some flex ahead of an election. Only 2 Republicans ( both female excuse me for finding that funny ) voted yes and the bill wasn't passed.
Republicans won the House of Representatives yesterday by the way.
I don't see them banning birth control. Some men like a good Ho that won't get pregnant.
People can do what they want but being promiscuous is still a bad idea.
There are women who have multiple abortions and I don't think they are very smart. Sorry.
That's fine, you can call them dumb then for having the condom break or having an allergic reaction to birth control, but why should dumb women have dumb children? Isn't that perpetuating the problem?
I said multiple abortions. No excuses.
Failure to protect oneself again and again is easily narrowed down to reckless stupidity in my book. Don't see this type of thing happening to the sharper ones.
If I were to have children, wouldn't you prefer I had them aborted?
Nope.
I think children would make you into a better person.
If I were to have children, wouldn't you prefer I had them aborted?
Nope.
I think children would make you into a better person.
What about the children though? They'd have to go through all my bullshit and they'd share my genetic distortions.
Doesn't it make more sense to spare them that, even if I might learn something from the experience? Why should a child suffer so I achieve some epiphany?
I give more of a shit over the theoretical child than myself, and not having said child would spare them a lot of pain.
