Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 427
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa

I'm glad God made men more mighty. It's more sustainable.

Shouldn't you be more worried about how Satan is twisting that into female empowerment, using men's initial advantage to grant feminists more steam against their oppressors? 

If western women were oppressed by men, they would be in a similar situation to women in Afghanistan.

Men give women a leg up all the time, because we love them. Others are damaged.

Satan's been cultivating this across the span of human history, yet you choose to only look at one portion during one timeframe (poorly, at that). So short sighted... 

You're an atheist now arguing that 3rd wave feminism is the work of Satan. That's your effort to bait me into saying something you can't handle.

You say this is the work of Satan, so be it, that'll be on you while I needn't say what you want me to, however I do reckon nothing good comes out of 3rd wave feminism, and that's sufficient. I don't doubt many feminist mean well but they aren't dealing with the truth. Like why argue the gender wage gap, when it's not men who are to blame for that ?

 



If you want to see Satan's game here, you need to look at the bigger picture. Once God had shown increased favor towards Man over Woman, Satan saw his chance to sponsor the other side at the dawn of it all, and has continued to do so throughout our history. It was he who offered Eve the fruit, and following that it has been him at the backbone of history, cultivating pride in men over his might while women were made to become more cunning. 

Men were left out in the sun, to shine for a time but ultimately spoil like milk. Women were meanwhile put into an oppressed, high pressure environment, as their bodies underwent pain every month to toughen them up. The Bible clearly refers to women in conjunction with jewelery metaphor over how they are made into diamonds through these constraints, and you won't see spoiled milk ever break a diamond. 

Yeah.

In the modern world, just because some women have been radicalized, doesn't mean there aren't good women in the world.

 

What was once the curse of Childbirth and Periods done unto them by God has in time translated toward an increased pain tolerance and a chip on their shoulder over the ones who don't have to face the same pain. 

So by your logic, what's supposed to happen ?

Death to Men™

You are without a doubt a degenerate. Your purpose is to spread degeneracy and pit women against men. Low vibrational people will most likely devolve into a lower life form.

Treasonous to your own species. Even treasonous to your own comrades and those who love their parents and children. If the world saw you as you are, you'd bring your parents great shame. 

 


The fact that Testosterone's increases in strength also lends to reduced thinking capacity yields how doomed men were from the start.

False. It's the complete opposite. And get this, you're fruity and I'm not.

You do it to yourself.

Much like Milk turning to Cheese, or Grapes turning to Wine, we're seeing what happens when men become spoiled while women look at the histories in tandem with the struggles that persist to this day for inspiration. Sophistication once you hit the Endgame is stronger than Might. 

 Testosterone rules and that hasn't changed.

If that were the case, then wouldn't world leaders be pumping themselves full of steroids? 

No, the people who tend to be in charge tend to not fall into the patterns that follow T-Poisoning. Testosterone when imbalanced counteracts Estrogen and turns them into muscle-bound idiots, while those within balanced ranges are still allowed to cultivate healthy levels of Estrogen. 

 Testosterone improves many attributes of the brain and increases cognitive functions across the board.

That is real science, but like Legga, you don't do the truth. 

Estrogen for men is dangerous and makes men dangerous. This is one thing Tate points out and it's true. The guys who commit mass shooting, school shooters, men who rape women, suicide... All lack emotional control. That is the mark of high estrogen. 

For a man weakness is uncool.

It's also funny to hear you ask why don't world leaders pump themselves with steroids.

The truth Testosterone is the opposite of what you claim it to be. 

last edit on 12/23/2022 7:45:17 PM
Posts: 2835
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa

Killing men is good and moral and should be made legal. 

Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa
Hawk said: 

I'm glad God made men more mighty. It's more sustainable.

Shouldn't you be more worried about how Satan is twisting that into female empowerment, using men's initial advantage to grant feminists more steam against their oppressors? 

If western women were oppressed by men, they would be in a similar situation to women in Afghanistan.

Men give women a leg up all the time, because we love them. Others are damaged.

Satan's been cultivating this across the span of human history, yet you choose to only look at one portion during one timeframe (poorly, at that). So short sighted... 

You're an atheist now arguing that 3rd wave feminism is the work of Satan. That's your effort to bait me into saying something you can't handle. 

You're the one who made a Feminism topic about God, so I figured I'd play along from the framework of the text when matched next to real world situations and the ramifications that would follow should both hold mutually true to the framework of this world. I wouldn't get anything out of a "God doesn't exist" reply, so this works better. In order to relate it to you in a way that you're more likely to understand, I am aiming to appropriate your book's symbols and metaphors to get the message across. 

To me, this phenomenon would be described very differently. Rather than Biblical symbols I'd probably grab stuff from RPGs. 

If you want to see Satan's game here, you need to look at the bigger picture. Once God had shown increased favor towards Man over Woman, Satan saw his chance to sponsor the other side at the dawn of it all, and has continued to do so throughout our history. It was he who offered Eve the fruit, and following that it has been him at the backbone of history, cultivating pride in men over his might while women were made to become more cunning. 

Men were left out in the sun, to shine for a time but ultimately spoil like milk. Women were meanwhile put into an oppressed, high pressure environment, as their bodies underwent pain every month to toughen them up. The Bible clearly refers to women in conjunction with jewelery metaphor over how they are made into diamonds through these constraints, and you won't see spoiled milk ever break a diamond. 

Yeah.

So you agree that men are akin to that of spoiled milk, left to shine in the sun for so long that it now stinks up entire rooms, while women have undergone enough pressure to now outshine the liquid gleam of man as Diamonds? 

Good, then you'll soon be ready to learn your place in such a world. 

In the modern world, just because some women have been radicalized, doesn't mean there aren't good women in the world.

Radicalization is an independent variable in this case, whether they are "Good" or not has little to nothing to do with it. 

What was once the curse of Childbirth and Periods done unto them by God has in time translated toward an increased pain tolerance and a chip on their shoulder over the ones who don't have to face the same pain. 

So by your logic, what's supposed to happen ?

Death to Men™

You are without a doubt a degenerate. Your purpose is to spread degeneracy and pit women against men. Low vibrational people will most likely devolve into a lower life form.

Treasonous to your own species.

Men aren't a species, they're a gender/sex. 

Even treasonous to your own comrades and those who love their parents and children. If the world saw you as you are, you'd bring your parents great shame. 

My folks take a fair amount of pride in how I turned out when it comes to worldview, our discussions tend to be fairly aligned when it comes to subjects like Feminism. 


The fact that Testosterone's increases in strength also lends to reduced thinking capacity yields how doomed men were from the start.

False. It's the complete opposite. And get this, you're fruity and I'm not.

You do it to yourself.

Much like Milk turning to Cheese, or Grapes turning to Wine, we're seeing what happens when men become spoiled while women look at the histories in tandem with the struggles that persist to this day for inspiration. Sophistication once you hit the Endgame is stronger than Might. 

 Testosterone rules and that hasn't changed.

If that were the case, then wouldn't world leaders be pumping themselves full of steroids? 

No, the people who tend to be in charge tend to not fall into the patterns that follow T-Poisoning. Testosterone when imbalanced counteracts Estrogen and turns them into muscle-bound idiots, while those within balanced ranges are still allowed to cultivate healthy levels of Estrogen. 

Testosterone improves many attributes of the brain and increases cognitive functions across the board.

Within acceptable balances that allow for Estrogen to co-exist with it. Too much or too little Testosterone in anyone and you'll see problems, but in many cases you'll see more cunning come from less muscle mass for multiple reasons. 

Estrogen for men is dangerous and makes men dangerous.

No, it provides the room for empathy, sympathy, and long term thinking. 

Testosterone is dangerous and makes men dangerous. 

This is one thing Tate points out and it's true. The guys who commit mass shooting, school shooters, men who rape women, suicide... All lack emotional control. That is the mark of high estrogen. 

Testosterone is the one prone to shooting themselves while Estrogen is more prone to suicide by pills, you tell me which one is more likely to shoot up a school. 

Do I even need to show you a ratio of male to female school shooters? Here's a chart ranging from 1982 to late 2022: 

Posted Image

TLDR; Death to Men™

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 427
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa

You're the one who made a Feminism topic about God, so I figured I'd play along from the framework of the text when matched next to real world situations and the ramifications that would follow should both hold mutually true to the framework of this world. I wouldn't get anything out of a "God doesn't exist" reply, so this works better. In order to relate it to you in a way that you're more likely to understand, I am aiming to appropriate your book's symbols and metaphors to get the message across. 

What topic is that ? Not this one. You're failing.

 


To me, this phenomenon would be described very differently. Rather than Biblical symbols I'd probably grab stuff from RPGs. 

Do your fictional research and come argue it. Sounds like a plan.

 

If you want to see Satan's game here, you need to look at the bigger picture. Once God had shown increased favor towards Man over Woman, Satan saw his chance to sponsor the other side at the dawn of it all, and has continued to do so throughout our history. It was he who offered Eve the fruit, and following that it has been him at the backbone of history, cultivating pride in men over his might while women were made to become more cunning. 

Men were left out in the sun, to shine for a time but ultimately spoil like milk. Women were meanwhile put into an oppressed, high pressure environment, as their bodies underwent pain every month to toughen them up. The Bible clearly refers to women in conjunction with jewelery metaphor over how they are made into diamonds through these constraints, and you won't see spoiled milk ever break a diamond. 

Yeah.

So you agree that men are akin to that of spoiled milk, left to shine in the sun for so long that it now stinks up entire rooms, while women have undergone enough pressure to now outshine the liquid gleam of man as Diamonds? 

Good, then you'll soon be ready to learn your place in such a world. 

That paragraph and that sentence. You're starting to falsify this conversation.

 

In the modern world, just because some women have been radicalized, doesn't mean there aren't good women in the world.

Radicalization is an independent variable in this case, whether they are "Good" or not has little to nothing to do with it. 

It has everything to do with it, otherwise we wouldn't be here now.

 

What was once the curse of Childbirth and Periods done unto them by God has in time translated toward an increased pain tolerance and a chip on their shoulder over the ones who don't have to face the same pain. 

So by your logic, what's supposed to happen ?

Death to Men™

You are without a doubt a degenerate. Your purpose is to spread degeneracy and pit women against men. Low vibrational people will most likely devolve into a lower life form.

Treasonous to your own species.

Men aren't a species, they're a gender/sex. 

Our species consists of 2 genders.

This is why I often request you approach me with a higher degree of knowledge. No offence but this is elementary stuff.

 

Even treasonous to your own comrades and those who love their parents and children. If the world saw you as you are, you'd bring your parents great shame. 

My folks take a fair amount of pride in how I turned out when it comes to worldview, our discussions tend to be fairly aligned when it comes to subjects like Feminism. 

Bullshit. You would bring them shame. You're a disgrace to the "man" who made you, as you're guilty of treason on humanity. Mostly men.


The fact that Testosterone's increases in strength also lends to reduced thinking capacity yields how doomed men were from the start.

False. It's the complete opposite. And get this, you're fruity and I'm not.

You do it to yourself.

 

 Testosterone rules and that hasn't changed.

If that were the case, then wouldn't world leaders be pumping themselves full of steroids? 

No, the people who tend to be in charge tend to not fall into the patterns that follow T-Poisoning. Testosterone when imbalanced counteracts Estrogen and turns them into muscle-bound idiots, while those within balanced ranges are still allowed to cultivate healthy levels of Estrogen. 

Testosterone improves many attributes of the brain and increases cognitive functions across the board.

Within acceptable balances that allow for Estrogen to co-exist with it. Too much or too little Testosterone in anyone and you'll see problems, but in many cases you'll see more cunning come from less muscle mass for multiple reasons. 

Oh you're starting to backtrack a little ? Testosterone improves cognitive functions. You for one WILL NOT, bring any scientific papers supporting your false claim.

 

Estrogen for men is dangerous and makes men dangerous.

No, it provides the room for empathy, sympathy, and long term thinking. 

Testosterone is dangerous and makes men dangerous. 

Lack of emotional control is what makes men dangerous. Estrogen won't increase a man's emotional control it will make him more emotional. 

Emotions will lead us astray and it is something to be mastered. Otherwise you'll desire personal truths and other weak shit that makes men break down.

 

This is one thing Tate points out and it's true. The guys who commit mass shooting, school shooters, men who rape women, suicide... All lack emotional control. That is the mark of high estrogen. 

Testosterone is the one prone to shooting themselves while Estrogen is more prone to suicide by pills, you tell me which one is more likely to shoot up a school. 

Do I even need to show you a ratio of male to female school shooters? Here's a chart ranging from 1982 to late 2022: 

Posted Image

TLDR; Death to Men™

 I said it myself, a man who lack s testosterone has poor emotional control and is dangerous. All those fuckers were suicidal and broken. Weakness. Estrogen doesn't solve that.

 

Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa
Hawk said: 
Turncoat said:

You're the one who made a Feminism topic about God, so I figured I'd play along from the framework of the text when matched next to real world situations and the ramifications that would follow should both hold mutually true to the framework of this world. I wouldn't get anything out of a "God doesn't exist" reply, so this works better. In order to relate it to you in a way that you're more likely to understand, I am aiming to appropriate your book's symbols and metaphors to get the message across. 

What topic is that ? Not this one. You're failing.

This is a Feminism topic, you called upon God. Ergo, you made the topic become about God and I figured I'd speak within the framework. 

I don't believe in any kind of Christian outcomes, they are ludicris, but if I did it definitely looks like Satan is winning this war through having the pride of Man work against itself against a Sleeping Giant finally roused from her slumber. 

To me, this phenomenon would be described very differently. Rather than Biblical symbols I'd probably grab stuff from RPGs. 

Do your fictional research and come argue it. Sounds like a plan.

Art Imitates Life and Life Imitates Art, both inspire eachother and move us to the next stage. Beyond that it's more of a matter of folklore and nomenclature, different words for many of the same things. 

Radicalization is an independent variable in this case, whether they are "Good" or not has little to nothing to do with it. 

It has everything to do with it, otherwise we wouldn't be here now.

We wouldn't be here if women were radicalized? 

If you mean "We" as in You and I, then only in the causal sense over how it'd change what people got pregnant when at whatever point in the timeline that it were to occur differently, as per The Butterfly Effect. 

Death to Men™

You are without a doubt a degenerate. Your purpose is to spread degeneracy and pit women against men. Low vibrational people will most likely devolve into a lower life form.

Treasonous to your own species.

Men aren't a species, they're a gender/sex. 

Our species consists of 2 genders.

This is why I often request you approach me with a higher degree of knowledge. No offence but this is elementary stuff.

I fail to see how my behavior betrays women, while yours is supporting them. 

That's like saying you need to beat a child for them to learn how to behave in a more civilized manner, there's clear contradiction there. 

Even treasonous to your own comrades and those who love their parents and children. If the world saw you as you are, you'd bring your parents great shame. 

My folks take a fair amount of pride in how I turned out when it comes to worldview, our discussions tend to be fairly aligned when it comes to subjects like Feminism. 

Bullshit. You would bring them shame.

My mother pulled a Murphy Brown while my father was the stay-at-home parent, and we often go on about how women are the superior sex. Between the two of them she was the one more qualified to "Bring Home The Bacon" as you might go about calling it while he took responsibilities at home as the more Motherly figure, and he did so with pride. 

They moved me to California as to have me be exposed to more races of people at a young age, and through the combination of them instilling Feminist values in me in conjunction with having to explain it to countless misogynists pretty much hardened me into this stance. Not all "Breeders" think the same, these ones happen to be quite alternative themselves, and were during a time that it was less common, when people did not understand why "the man" would choose to stay home and raise the kid instead. 

I got to watch them have to deal with it too, which emboldened us further. 

You're a disgrace to the "man" who made you, as you're guilty of treason on humanity. Mostly men.

The apple does not fall far from the tree, he and I even have similarly treasonous ideas over The Bible. I guess one could say I inherited the Sins of the Father. 😈

If that were the case, then wouldn't world leaders be pumping themselves full of steroids? 

No, the people who tend to be in charge tend to not fall into the patterns that follow T-Poisoning. Testosterone when imbalanced counteracts Estrogen and turns them into muscle-bound idiots, while those within balanced ranges are still allowed to cultivate healthy levels of Estrogen. 

Testosterone improves many attributes of the brain and increases cognitive functions across the board.

Within acceptable balances that allow for Estrogen to co-exist with it. Too much or too little Testosterone in anyone and you'll see problems, but in many cases you'll see more cunning come from less muscle mass for multiple reasons. 

Oh you're starting to backtrack a little ?

You can look further up and see I've been talking about balance for the past two posts, there is no backtrack here you're just forgetting what we were talking about in this segment. 

Testosterone improves cognitive functions. You for one WILL NOT, bring any scientific papers supporting your false claim.

Estrogen does as well, and both when working in harmony produce the best result. 

You argue for imbalance, but imbalance produces tiny dicked steroid monsters and sumo wrestlers. Estrogen is not only healthy, it is The Future, and your inability to adapt continues to catch up with you as the world moves on without you. 

Estrogen for men is dangerous and makes men dangerous.

No, it provides the room for empathy, sympathy, and long term thinking. 

Testosterone is dangerous and makes men dangerous. 

Lack of emotional control is what makes men dangerous. Estrogen won't increase a man's emotional control it will make him more emotional. 

It makes them more aware of their emotions and more likely to accept their own shortcomings, while Testosterone is the force that instead rebukes such claims with a baseless "OH YEAH!? WELL I'LL SHOW YOU!". 

Estrogen comes with an understanding of restraint, while Testosterone makes mistakes. 

Emotions will lead us astray and it is something to be mastered. Otherwise you'll desire personal truths and other weak shit that makes men break down.

At most you will see emotional deadening from the excessive T-Poisoned ranges, where anger becomes so quick to access that their other feelings sublimate into it. It is a cruel fate that no man deserves, I've seen so many go that path and it is painful to watch. 

Estrogen is what lends to the exploration of emotion, and with it an understanding of the nuances behind it and their function. This is why women are seen as being more open to talking about their feelings, because generally speaking they actually understand and can see what is going on, and generally speaking that is in relation to Estrogen levels. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 12/23/2022 9:33:35 PM
Posts: 427
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa

Emotions are to be mastered as some of them will break you.

Like having a fit and becoming suicidal. Then emotions will lead one astray. 

Wisdom is key. Emotions can make one deluded. 

Tate again on his 2nd Uncensored Interview

 

 

 

"A man without self-control is like a city broken into and left without walls."

- Proverbs 25-28

.

.

.

When someone's emotions get the best of them. There you are TC. The not so great advisor. 

Posted Image

Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa
Hawk said: 

Emotions are to be mastered as some of them will break you.

Agreed, and with the help of Estrogen they can all be explored, rather than converted into Anger and ignored over the complication it becomes. 

Estrogen has a higher likelihood of yielding surrender from it's host, while Testosterone has a higher likelihood of ignoring the odds. It plays pretty 1-to-1 with the Dunning Kruger model over how those with the least to consider end up being the first to act, and it even plays out for models of Restraint versus a lack thereof. 

Like having a fit and becoming suicidal. Then emotions will lead one astray. 

Testosterone is the force that makes suicide more likely to succeed, while an increased threshold for processing fear through the familiarity ala Estrogen can have fear of the suicide itself circumvent the effort by turning it against itself, then overtime become understood rather than dismissed. Through patience rather than impatience, it gives the room to reconsider it rather than "get it over with". 

T-Poisoning are the sort to admire the idea of either dying in glorious battle or being suicide-by-cop'd, it's a dangerous and unrealistic mindset that has no place in the modern age. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 12/23/2022 10:02:49 PM
Posts: 427
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa

Lower testosterone causes depression. 

Studies indicate that Suicide is associated with lower testosterone.

When Emily was threatening suicide, she sas weak and unstable, that is not the mark of higher testosterone.

Just today we were talking to Matrix, who is in a facility. He is very depressed and they put him on steroids to help increase his mood.

 

Posts: 452
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa
Lenalee said: 

Killing men is good and moral and should be made legal. 

 uhhh lena... im a man

Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Why feminism needs men and vice versa
Hawk said: 

Lower testosterone causes depression. 

Higher testosterone causes anger and inadequacy. 

Everything in moderation. 

Studies indicate that Suicide is associated with lower testosterone.

And yet it's males that succeed at it more, who in general are prone to higher testosterone than women. 

I would still love to see your data, since you have a habit of making shit up without sources. 

When Emily was threatening suicide, she sas weak and unstable, that is not the mark of higher testosterone.

Are you presuming her T-count, over what she has said on this website? 

 
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.