Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

If all a man had to do was be a compliant feminist to get laid, getting laid would be a piece of cake for any dumb bastard.

I'm saying being a feminist helps you get laid.

False. 

Being on the same page as many women over how they deserve equal rights, rather than sitting there telling them they deserve to be second class citizens, indeed is more helpful when it comes to getting laid than not.

No one is telling them they deserve to be second class citizens, that's part of the delusion that comes with modern 3rd wave feminism. 

here you're arguing being a feminist get's men laid. 

Being a feminist won't get Mr. Nice Guy laid. 

This is why it pays to be a Mean Feminist. 😜

 To say the least the odds of scoring would go up. 

Spatial Mind said:

As I mentioned the scientific community is currently debating this.

I have from the start been saying that Testosterone and Estrogen need to be within balanced ranges, and that lower ranges yield better results overall, then you link me stuff over how it behaves when imbalanced in the other direction like it's some sort of Binary problem. 

The levels have to be balanced, and those born with less physical privilege have to make up for it with harder work ethic and more intelligent pursuits. Even women with T-counts below healthy ranges report problems, even as a result of pregnancy adjusting their hormone levels, but again this is you treating it like it's a black and white problem. 

The healthy range is a nice gray area, typically leaning more towards Estrogen than Testosterone. With too much of one it ends up blocking out the other, which is why HRT also prescribes blockers to allow the developments to proceed rather than have them effectively cancel eachother out. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Golden_Eagle said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

If all a man had to do was be a compliant feminist to get laid, getting laid would be a piece of cake for any dumb bastard.

I'm saying being a feminist helps you get laid.

False. 

Being on the same page as many women over how they deserve equal rights, rather than sitting there telling them they deserve to be second class citizens, indeed is more helpful when it comes to getting laid than not.

No one is telling them they deserve to be second class citizens, that's part of the delusion that comes with modern 3rd wave feminism. 

Telling women that they should stay home, barefoot and pregnant, rather than "try to do a man's job", is indeed treating them like second class citizens.

It's putting them to a lower standard, and then becoming offended when they notice it and strive to reach higher than that. 

All men want is sex. Getting along is a bonus.

If she's going to work, she better do that.

Men of value don't give a shit about her money. Though being a power couple is most favorable ngl.

A little something for the thread.

Spatial Mind said: 

All men want is sex. Getting along is a bonus.

Does a man who does not want sex forfeit being a man? 

If she's going to work, she better do that.

There's plenty of sex positive women, ones who have sex with tons of dudes. What's your point? 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

All men want is sex. Getting along is a bonus.

Does a man who does not want sex forfeit being a man? 

Of course not.

To be clear, what men want in relationships is sex. That's how she keeps him.

If she's going to work, she better do that.

There's plenty of sex positive women, ones who have sex with tons of dudes. What's your point? 

 To be clear again. If she's going to work, then she better work, as in it's better she works.

I wouldn't call promiscuity sex positive, those are disease spreaders. Mental illness also comes from that. At best some guy can get his jollies off of it, but that comes with a high risk.

The reason why a woman with a high body count is a bad catch, is because she'll always crave someone elses dick. In turn she'll be a bad investment in terms of time and money. In short she's aids.

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

All men want is sex. Getting along is a bonus.

Does a man who does not want sex forfeit being a man? 

Of course not.

To be clear, what men want in relationships is sex. That's how she keeps him.

Does a man in a relationship who does not want sex forfeit being a man?

I wouldn't call promiscuity sex positive, those are disease spreaders. Mental illness also comes from that. At best some guy can get his jollies off of it, but that comes with a high risk.

By the modern terminology, these "Disease Spreaders" are Sex Positive: 



You ought to stop making up the meaning for words, you have a nasty habit of it. 

The reason why a woman with a high body count is a bad catch, is because she'll always crave someone elses dick. In turn she'll be a bad investment in terms of time and money. In short she's aids.

I prefer experienced women personally, they tend to know what they're doing and what they want. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

All men want is sex. Getting along is a bonus.

Does a man who does not want sex forfeit being a man? 

Of course not.

To be clear, what men want in relationships is sex. That's how she keeps him.

Does a man in a relationship who does not want sex forfeit being a man?

You're retarded.

I wouldn't call promiscuity sex positive, those are disease spreaders. Mental illness also comes from that. At best some guy can get his jollies off of it, but that comes with a high risk.

By the modern terminology, these "Disease Spreaders" are Sex Positive: 



You ought to stop making up the meaning for words, you have a nasty habit of it. 

I heard you. Nor did I, as you say, make up any meaning for the term.

Again. I, wouldn't call promiscuity sex positive. Because in practive it really isn't. It's disease infested degeneracy.

The reason why a woman with a high body count is a bad catch, is because she'll always crave someone elses dick. In turn she'll be a bad investment in terms of time and money. In short she's aids.

I prefer experienced women personally, they tend to know what they're doing and what they want. 

 Yeah Inq has one of those, she's squealing while his nuts are taping against her soaking wet anus. *tap tap tap tap tap*

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

All men want is sex. Getting along is a bonus.

Does a man who does not want sex forfeit being a man? 

Of course not.

To be clear, what men want in relationships is sex. That's how she keeps him.

Does a man in a relationship who does not want sex forfeit being a man?

You're retarded.

Is this you saying a man in a relationship is by design DTF? 

I wouldn't call promiscuity sex positive, those are disease spreaders. Mental illness also comes from that. At best some guy can get his jollies off of it, but that comes with a high risk.

By the modern terminology, these "Disease Spreaders" are Sex Positive: 



You ought to stop making up the meaning for words, you have a nasty habit of it. 

I heard you. Nor did I, as you say, make up any meaning for the term.

You basically did by trying to act like "Disease Spreaders" and "Sex Positive" don't correlate. 

Again. I, wouldn't call promiscuity sex positive. Because in practive it really isn't. It's disease infested degeneracy.

And that would be you redefining what "Sex Positive" means. 

The reason why a woman with a high body count is a bad catch, is because she'll always crave someone elses dick. In turn she'll be a bad investment in terms of time and money. In short she's aids.

I prefer experienced women personally, they tend to know what they're doing and what they want. 

Yeah Inq has one of those, she's squealing while his nuts are taping against her soaking wet anus. *tap tap tap tap tap*

Lets just leave it at "I have my doubts". 

Promiscuity doesn't equate to safe sex TC. 

If a promiscuous person claims to be sex positive, that doesn't make them immune to sexually transmitted diseases.

Sex positive is a broad term at that.

Like a body positive. It can mean too fat or too thin, the subject is fine with it regardless of the health issues.

Being positive about anything doesn't make it a good thing.

.

.

.

You know Nathan, some people can be sex positive about incest, and argue it's great. Opinions vary, don't they ? 

Promiscuity comes with consequences. In the grand scheme it's prone to spreading incurable illness, and it leaves mental scars in it's destructive path. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Promiscuity doesn't equate to safe sex TC. 

If a promiscuous person claims to be sex positive, that doesn't make them immune to sexually transmitted diseases.

Sex positive is a broad term at that.

Like a body positive. It can mean too fat or too thin, the subject is fine with it regardless of the health issues.

Being positive about anything doesn't make it a good thing.

But you as of now accept that it is otherwise sex positive?