Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

i request to be added to the OP, u have the mod power to make it so

Under what? 

Under what Demon? I do not know them well enough to choose tbh.

Was hoping u have an idea

I haven't really seen you post here over any sorts of ideologies or philosophies that looked to have a heavy grip on your thinking and room for tangents. 

You've shown elements of your character, but you don't really seem fixated or distracted by it. Other than my having put down Orias as a goetian stand in for Astrology I've seen all the ones written down lead to either long posts on the subject and/or it has been sidecar to tons of seemingly unrelated if not semi-related topics (save for Chapo who just brings it up at random when things get weird). 

Well, I would put my philosophy, in a shorter variant like this:

• Life is always at war with you and you need to win
• Suffering is good for the soul, but only if you win the war I mentioned: so you do not give in to despair and even after everything, to still not be bitter: makes you appreciate the little things, harder to break, easier to achieve your goals, never to give up, and to be not afraid of action and confrontation(even embracing it and always go at full speed):
  
• I always strive to be better in anything or at least something. Because otherwise, you are stuck, even if you feel content, it is a delusion of life, to make you stuck. You have to fight it and always achieve, just to fuck life and show who is in control:
  
  (lyrics)
• There is no inherent meaning, you make your own meaning in life. There are no true morals, and no universal values, it's all subjective and that is fine. Make your morals, make your values and make your goals. Then do them:
  
• And I have a lot of goals, quite a few values, and maybe even some morals, but the main goal is to be entertained:
  

So that is in short, I believe. You can skip the videos, they are just nice flavour.

I guess you do bring up Fascism a lot, but half the time it seems like irony these days compared to before. The whole "thinking of humanity like a collective organism" bit is pretty different but it's hard to tell how serious you are about it. 

What you typed above this otherwise still seems vague enough to be more about character, there doesn't seem to be a central figure or core philosophical concept carrying this, but rather general statements about Entertainment and Competition. While that is fundamentally different from my views where I see life more as misunderstood because of our egos, you seem to see that ego as a ship captain against the tides of life. 

I guess it kind of falls a little into the works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, but if lets say you're like me where you first found this stuff in Bioshock before doing real research, it might run laps in your head around that iconography rather than as it's prime form: 

Some data on it's source though: 

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1712 – 1778 CE, was a philosopher of the 18th century who mostly lived and was active in France. His political philosophy influenced western Europe, including aspects of the French Revolution and the development of modern political thought.

Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality and The Social Contract are cornerstones in contemporary political thought.

The Social Contract outlines what ought to be in place for a legitimate and publicly supported  political order. It is possibly the most influential work of political philosophy in the West. The treatise begins with the often heard opening lines, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains. Those who think themselves the masters of others are indeed greater slaves than they.”

Rousseau followed the work of Hobbes and claimed that the state of nature was a human existence that was without law or morality, which humans needed to leave behind in order to truly thrive and survive. As society developed, the human race was required to have institutions of law in order to protect themselves and to ensure that all people in a society or community kept their word to one another. According to Rousseau, by joining together through the concept of a social contract and giving up some of their inborn freedoms, individual people could  both protect themselves and remain basically free to live as they chose. This is because obeying the general will of the people through the laws that are agreed upon by the community guarantees all individuals both physical safety and protection from tyranny because they are, as a whole, the authors of those accepted laws.

https://mlpp.pressbooks.pub/introphil/chapter/jean-jacques-rousseau/

Here's a longer one, if you feel like doing more reading into the name: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/

Rousseau repeatedly claims that a single idea is at the centre of his world view, namely, that human beings are good by nature but are rendered corrupt by society.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/

Vali cause he's a cute twink.

Dragoonkz said: 

Vali cause he's a cute twink.

What can you tell me about Vali? 

Idk if i mentioned this already but- looking into Baal y Kimaris, but still karma i guess 

Lenalee said: 

Idk if i mentioned this already but- looking into Baal y Kimaris, but still karma i guess 

Should be interesting to see if quote themes from it start to jump into your posts. 

Edit: Okay wait are you meaning Kimaris plainly or Baal and Kimaris? 

Nyaya Sutras V1

Parmenides Fragments

Parmenides Philosophy

Platos Parmenides

Plato's Parmenides Philosophy

Anaxagoras Fragments

Anaxagoras Philosophy

Platos Phaedo

Phaedo Philosophy

Aristotle Categories

Categories Philosophy

On the Nature of Things

Lucretius

Turncoat said: 

Dragoonkz said: 

Vali cause he's a cute twink.

What can you tell me about Vali? 

 He's not a demon he's a deity. He killed Hodr for killing Baldr. He grew to adulthood within a day.

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Idk if i mentioned this already but- looking into Baal y Kimaris, but still karma i guess 

Should be interesting to see if quote themes from it start to jump into your posts. 

Edit: Okay wait are you meaning Kimaris plainly or Baal and Kimaris? 

 Yea

Turncoat said: 

Friedrich said: 

Turncoat said: 

Friedrich said: 

Sometimes they come in my dreams. Paimon first and foremost. I dont think they should be revered, I think they should be pitied. Their power is very little next to them being powerless over their own conditions and them burning with kleśas and delusion. I am happy to be human and to not identify with my defilements, working with and through them. I embrace goodness and try to extinguish the bad. 

Their wisdom is leagues beyond ours though, if the texts are to be believed. 

Conventionally they are knowledgeable. But they have no wisdom. They are still within cyclic existence.

I'd figure with having lived leagues longer than ourselves that their wisdom of experience with the knowledge would be superior, especially when they can look over those who carry their works. 

Lucifer was also cited as being quite wise, rather than being without wisdom, but that he took what he knew and twisted it into a different display as an aspect of his vanity and to spit on God's works. If these are the angels that followed him then they too should stand to reflect a similar sense of twisted wisdom. 

 What? Like when Cadaver said that ruling the world would be a grand exercise in Utilitarian Calculus bc as a god emperor he would be doing the Greatest Good for the greatest number?

lol