Sociopath Community

natasha87 said: 

Chaotik said: 

I have no clue where or what or how or when in this case do I fit, nowhere? everywhere? who knows at this time. 

 you're always looking for people to tell you who are you. dunno if that helps at all

 I appreciate that, and I do look for answers, and obviously in a way that's egocentric since I love talking about the confusing nature of I, but with this in mind. Time to refrain from indulging in it, and distracting shit. Can't know who I is yet, probably won't know. Lots of crazy shit happening right now. 

Chaotik said: 

natasha87 said: 

Chaotik said: 

I have no clue where or what or how or when in this case do I fit, nowhere? everywhere? who knows at this time. 

 you're always looking for people to tell you who are you. dunno if that helps at all

 I appreciate that, and I do look for answers, and obviously in a way that's egocentric since I love talking about the confusing nature of I, but with this in mind. Time to refrain from indulging in it, and distracting shit. Can't know who I is yet, probably won't know. Lots of crazy shit happening right now. 

 there are more helpful ways to get to know yourself better, therapy is a good start.

AliceInWonderland said: 

The closest thing to that are a few essays I wrote on Lucretius De Rerum Natura. 

Wikipedia said:

The poem, written in some 7,400 dactylic hexameters, is divided into six untitled books, and explores Epicurean physics through poetic language and metaphors.

Namely, Lucretius explores the principles of atomism; the nature of the mind and soul; explanations of sensation and thought; the development of the world and its phenomena; and explains a variety of celestial and terrestrial phenomena. The universe described in the poem operates according to these physical principles, guided by fortuna ("chance"), and not the divine intervention of the traditional Roman deities.

This sounds neat and strange, poetic physics that span for multiple books? 

natasha87 said: 

Chaotik said: 

natasha87 said: 

Chaotik said: 

I have no clue where or what or how or when in this case do I fit, nowhere? everywhere? who knows at this time. 

 you're always looking for people to tell you who are you. dunno if that helps at all

 I appreciate that, and I do look for answers, and obviously in a way that's egocentric since I love talking about the confusing nature of I, but with this in mind. Time to refrain from indulging in it, and distracting shit. Can't know who I is yet, probably won't know. Lots of crazy shit happening right now. 

 there are more helpful ways to get to know yourself better, therapy is a good start.

 Unfortunately, I find myself not able to do it, I tried it when you told me a year ago, and then I backed out because I felt like I couldn't be honest, obviously probably a lot of excuses. I'll try to go back eventually maybe when I have my own place and on my own without external forces breathing down my neck, trying to get up in my business. 

Turncoat said: 

AliceInWonderland said: 

The closest thing to that are a few essays I wrote on Lucretius De Rerum Natura. 

Wikipedia said:

The poem, written in some 7,400 dactylic hexameters, is divided into six untitled books, and explores Epicurean physics through poetic language and metaphors.

Namely, Lucretius explores the principles of atomism; the nature of the mind and soul; explanations of sensation and thought; the development of the world and its phenomena; and explains a variety of celestial and terrestrial phenomena. The universe described in the poem operates according to these physical principles, guided by fortuna ("chance"), and not the divine intervention of the traditional Roman deities.

This sounds neat and strange, poetic physics that span for multiple books? 

Very neat and strange, and a large undertaking. 

Parmenides is just as strange given its poetic logic fused with lots of symbolism. 

I thank my experience of that 500 years of literature with making me a bit of a radical thinker compared to other people in academic circles. 

I've been exploring a lot of Dharmic thought recently, they have a huge Logical tradition that is also poetic and highly symbolic. 

Nyaya Sutras

Navya-Nyaya

Catuskoti

Also Lullism is beginning to catch my eye

i request to be added to the OP, u have the mod power to make it so

Good said: 

i request to be added to the OP, u have the mod power to make it so

Under what? 

I revere Paul...  Paul Revere.

All this other stuff is apocryphal at best.  Consumerist versions of truth.  Pop psyche versions in place of really getting the depth of someone.  You might spin this as that launch point of discussion, but it seems more an effort for lazily labeling people, under the guise of explication.

Judging.

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

i request to be added to the OP, u have the mod power to make it so

Under what? 

Under what Demon? I do not know them well enough to choose tbh.

Was hoping u have an idea

Good said: 

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

i request to be added to the OP, u have the mod power to make it so

Under what? 

Under what Demon? I do not know them well enough to choose tbh.

Was hoping u have an idea

I haven't really seen you post here over any sorts of ideologies or philosophies that looked to have a heavy grip on your thinking and room for tangents. 

You've shown elements of your character, but you don't really seem fixated or distracted by it. Other than my having put down Orias as a goetian stand in for Astrology I've seen all the ones written down lead to either long posts on the subject and/or it has been sidecar to tons of seemingly unrelated if not semi-related topics (save for Chapo who just brings it up at random when things get weird).