Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Turncoat said: 

BohemianRhapsody said:

so I won't play Turncoat and pretend I know why.

I resent that. 

 I mean you do get very psychoanalytical and it isn't always correct at least in my case

That's not 'pretending to know why', that's making mistakes. 

Assuming the area you're focusing on right now isn't still an area of contention between us, of course. 😉

 Yeah I mean, I just tried on this post to leave no room at all for anything like that because I knew this is a post that would get the microscope and a lot of little things would be questioned. I also tried not to pass judgement too much. It's more inquisitive than anything. I wouldn't even say anything pissed me off to trigger making it I was just thinking about how often she's kinda involved in stuff and was like I'm gonna explore this because I'm bored.

Whorechata said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Wait, she wasn't the one who called CSs school about her being a pedo claiming to want to be a lawyer to use it to be a pedo? Well, that's what I thought. Well I retract that if it wasn't her. That sucks because it kinda fucks up my attempt to be objective with this post but alright, substitute some other person in there.

No, people keep saying i did but that wasn't me. I called cps but ultimately unless i can prove the child has some lasting damage on her, SJ cps won't look into it. It was a lot easier to do when I had a title for it.

Topic Title:

Lena, The Keyboard Karen

/thread

Whorechata said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Whorechata said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Wait, she wasn't the one who called CSs school about her being a pedo claiming to want to be a lawyer to use it to be a pedo? Well, that's what I thought. Well I retract that if it wasn't her. That sucks because it kinda fucks up my attempt to be objective with this post but alright, substitute some other person in there.

 No, people keep saying i did but that wasn't me. I called cps but ultimately unless i can prove the child has some lasting damage on her, SJ cps won't look into it. It was a lot easier to do when I had a title for it.

 She arguably deserves it. But then again the foster and orphanage system is notorious for bringing shit situations of its own. I guess the question is, what drives you to do things of this nature?

 1- she's a pedo

2- she's said some concerning shit about her kid

3-shes meeting up with online strangers and bringing her kid along, it was tryp this time, she was planning to meet up with kkk, also a pedo, and would have likely brought her kid. 

4- she likely would have gone to a family relative instead of foster care

 I think Quintasia is a bad example overall because she's incredibly deserving of what happens to her and a lot of people would be motivated to do something not just you. But Quintasia is part of a pattern that isn't always involving people or actions as heinous as her.

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said:

Turncoat said:

Whorechata said:

Turncoat said:

 Wait wait wait, who did i call cps on after they called me names?

That dude on Discord with the drugged up family. 

I think I've already explained to you the why I did it and it wasn't because he called me name but rather because his mom was providing him meth, he had beat his significantly younger sister and had beat his gf on video chat, and then claimed he would rape his little sister. He was violent and i fully thought him capable of hurting her. I've said before I did work in family stuff and i was at the time a mandated reporter, this is stuff i did in a regular basis. At some point he was also distributing nudes, that's called distribution of child pornography. 

This stuff is closer to why you handled it as you did, not why you got involved. You aren't actively scouring the net for these sorts of people, and the fuel that pushed you to get involved wasn't initially over the family. 

I feel like no matter what I say this is the take you'll go with as it fits your idea of my character. Being called names doesn't trigger me the way you think it does. I'll respond back or other time just agree or Ignore it but it doesn't escalate to calling cps. You and I talked about this dude before and you were shocked about the information you didn't know while telling others it was a petty move on my part because he called me names. 

Where in the timeline did you see how shit his family was? 

Right after he told us all in VC that his mom was the one buying him the meth we were all bantering in the server 

 

At this point I don't know if it a smear campaign, you truly don't believe me or if you're just forgetful.

This discussion of it's about your motivation. Sure you can sit there and claim that you only go after 'the bad guys', but why you do is what's being scrutinized. 

I'm otherwise just trying to discuss it, like I have with others over their things that grind my gears. 

I say that because we literally had this conversation about this individual before, i explained exactly what and why but you're still pushing this thing where I called cps because he called me names.

 

 I feel like your opinion over the person precedes the fixation on their 'crimes', which makes it more about the urge to dig and build a dossier on them in the first place. 

In a sense, them being deviants with something about them to report is convenient when it comes to dealing with them, as then it doesn't have to be about feelings anymore. 

No? I didn't even know who this person was until I stumbled across his yt vids where he's actively blackmailing a 13yo into masturbating with a knife or he'd send her nudes to her family. I found out about the suicide of a different girl afterwards.  He and I have spoken to each other once, and that was because I mentioned his full name on a server, i didn't have an opinion of him before finding out what he done.

I thought he was already active and calling you a bitch and stuff before you began outing things and calling on government services to handle it for you, not that you were just browsing random youtube channels and then went out of your way to join a server he's in to enact some form of justice on an otherwise complete stranger. 

....im talking about Rohan in this one, he was the one blackmailing girls and doing shit to them irl. people call me names, that's no reason to set cps on em.

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Wait, she wasn't the one who called CSs school about her being a pedo claiming to want to be a lawyer to use it to be a pedo? Well, that's what I thought. Well I retract that if it wasn't her. That sucks because it kinda fucks up my attempt to be objective with this post but alright, substitute some other person in there.

No, people keep saying i did but that wasn't me. I called cps but ultimately unless i can prove the child has some lasting damage on her, SJ cps won't look into it. It was a lot easier to do when I had a title for it.

Topic Title:

Lena, The Keyboard Karen

/thread

 Yes it was a lot easier when ur a social worker and claims go in and are fully investigated because of mandated reporter status. I also agree i am a keyboard karen a few posts ago.

Whorechata said: 

Right after he told us all in VC that his mom was the one buying him the meth we were all bantering in the server

Was that before or after he became insulting in your direction? 

At this point I don't know if it a smear campaign, you truly don't believe me or if you're just forgetful.

This discussion of it's about your motivation. Sure you can sit there and claim that you only go after 'the bad guys', but why you do is what's being scrutinized. 

I'm otherwise just trying to discuss it, like I have with others over their things that grind my gears. 

I say that because we literally had this conversation about this individual before, i explained exactly what and why but you're still pushing this thing where I called cps because he called me names.

I still kinda see it that way? 

You're surrounded by deviancy on the internet, but you aren't just firing in all directions over it. For the time being I'm under the impression that the idea of them 'having it coming' is secondary in relation towards your having a beef with them, that it's more of an enabling means of how to handle it rather than the primary motivation. 

The waters get muddy once they haven't really done anything criminal, and the parallels between them are enough to form theories over broader patterns, rather than how you handle law breakers solely. 

 I feel like your opinion over the person precedes the fixation on their 'crimes', which makes it more about the urge to dig and build a dossier on them in the first place. 

In a sense, them being deviants with something about them to report is convenient when it comes to dealing with them, as then it doesn't have to be about feelings anymore. 

No? I didn't even know who this person was until I stumbled across his yt vids where he's actively blackmailing a 13yo into masturbating with a knife or he'd send her nudes to her family. I found out about the suicide of a different girl afterwards.  He and I have spoken to each other once, and that was because I mentioned his full name on a server, i didn't have an opinion of him before finding out what he done.

I thought he was already active and calling you a bitch and stuff before you began outing things and calling on government services to handle it for you, not that you were just browsing random youtube channels and then went out of your way to join a server he's in to enact some form of justice on an otherwise complete stranger. 

....im talking about Rohan in this one, he was the one blackmailing girls and doing shit to them irl.

Pretty sure I don't know anything about the Rohan stuff. 

people call me names, that's no reason to set cps on em.

Your strikes versus them tend to still be more retributive in nature than merely justice seeking solely, yes? Don't they usually do something to invite your ire, giving the room for you to respond to them with an "Oh yeah!?" as you challenge their audacity back? 

It reads to me as reactionary. 

 Because someone mentioned you and wanted to do something and i felt maybe I should say something.

Ahh.

I figured you were just like, browsing the names of people you knew, felt like maybe that might be weird, then followed that with mentioning your doing so as a proactive warning over what 'others' could do. 

I don't spend most of my days browsing people I know. While I enjoy putting together pieces like a puzzle i don't particularly have time over it unless I've suddenly gotten obsessed with someone like i did blanc.

So you only do it if they're interesting? 

Why would you obsess over someone dull?

I know, and you don't need to apologize to me in particular for that shit now it's literally years old info at this point. When this stuff surfaces about others though it conjures that like... cross-referencing addiction I have. 

I just wish you could leave more things alone when you get triggered sometimes. It doesn't have to be about me for me to like, empathize, especially when it has the room to call upon my own experiences as a comparative model. 

If it's about children especially, i don't plan to leave it alone. I don't think I could if I tried, honestly. 

It's about whatever you can get your hands on to enable acting on the pettier desire. 

Nah, you have this thing where you don't believe things are uh, morally wrong or right? Is that moral nihilism? But most people would take action when it come to children being hurt or abused in whatever way. 

I'd argue that I do have a moral compass, but I don't (typically) use it as an excuse to act out. 

Yeah you're more bystander observer

I don't think it's petty at all so again I feel like this is just you thinking this fits my character and so far you think i am a petty person with a power complex. 

Only when crossed.

To your credit you do otherwise try to keep it under control, but there's areas where it's been able to flourish fairly unimpeded. It's more about finding justifications to feed a destructive, retribution appetite when situations have otherwise made you hungry for it, as without that you otherwise have to just sit on what was said, sit on what life's thrown at you, without a direct sense of closure over it. 

You're a quiet bottler, and convenient targets have a way of honing into your sights during those times. It's an outlet that also feels powerful when you otherwise feel small and meek, appealing to larger bodies of authority to do the work you feel unable to accomplish yourself. Seriously, just hit a heavy bag or something, you don't need to be compiling and compacting all this bile until it explodes. 

This is an interesting view of me, unchanging in some ways but alright.

Are you fine with her choice of attack? It's not like everyone when crossed goes towards doxing and social media for a quip. 

 I don't think I've done that and if I have I'd like to know who?

I guess the phrase's closer to 'info gathering' than outright 'doxing'. 

 Info gathering? 

'Scouring the 'net for deets'? 

Is it that my choice of attack? 

Or defense, it's the go-to strategy. 

I mean with blanc she does have her stuff ou-

I mean about potentially anyone on this forum who has a paper trail on the internet. 

 Oh, just people that claim certain things. Like psychopath Dave, reaper, blanc, shifty and scarlet.

Are Blanc, Delora, and Med on the same tier? 

 Yes

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Right after he told us all in VC that his mom was the one buying him the meth we were all bantering in the server

Was that before or after he became insulting in your direction? 

Why do you insist on making it about pettiness?

At this point I don't know if it a smear campaign, you truly don't believe me or if you're just forgetful.

This discussion of it's about your motivation. Sure you can sit there and claim that you only go after 'the bad guys', but why you do is what's being scrutinized. 

I'm otherwise just trying to discuss it, like I have with others over their things that grind my gears. 

I say that because we literally had this conversation about this individual before, i explained exactly what and why but you're still pushing this thing where I called cps because he called me names.

I still kinda see it that way? 

You're surrounded by deviancy on the internet, but you aren't just firing in all directions over it. For the time being I'm under the impression that the idea of them 'having it coming' is secondary in relation towards your having a beef with them, that it's more of an enabling means of how to handle it rather than the primary motivation. 

The waters get muddy once they haven't really done anything criminal, and the parallels between them are enough to form theories over broader patterns, rather than how you handle law breakers solely. 

Okay, well then I'm wasting my time trying to explain anything about it to as you'll keep your view of it unchanged regardless of the truth and will continue to push i did it because he called me names 

🤷‍♀️

 I feel like your opinion over the person precedes the fixation on their 'crimes', which makes it more about the urge to dig and build a dossier on them in the first place. 

In a sense, them being deviants with something about them to report is convenient when it comes to dealing with them, as then it doesn't have to be about feelings anymore. 

No? I didn't even know who this person was until I stumbled across his yt vids where he's actively blackmailing a 13yo into masturbating with a knife or he'd send her nudes to her family. I found out about the suicide of a different girl afterwards.  He and I have spoken to each other once, and that was because I mentioned his full name on a server, i didn't have an opinion of him before finding out what he done.

I thought he was already active and calling you a bitch and stuff before you began outing things and calling on government services to handle it for you, not that you were just browsing random youtube channels and then went out of your way to join a server he's in to enact some form of justice on an otherwise complete stranger. 

....im talking about Rohan in this one, he was the one blackmailing girls and doing shit to them irl.

Pretty sure I don't know anything about the Rohan stuff. 

Yes, i know that's why I'm clarifying it there because you're confusing them for the same person it seems 

people call me names, that's no reason to set cps on em.

Your strikes versus them tend to still be more retributive in nature than merely justice seeking solely, yes? Don't they usually do something to invite your ire, giving the room for you to respond to them with an "Oh yeah!?" as you challenge their audacity back? 

It reads to me as reactionary. 

 No but if you view it that way there's no possible y for me to change how you view me so there's even less reason for me to argue against it. 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Whorechata said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Whorechata said: 

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Wait, she wasn't the one who called CSs school about her being a pedo claiming to want to be a lawyer to use it to be a pedo? Well, that's what I thought. Well I retract that if it wasn't her. That sucks because it kinda fucks up my attempt to be objective with this post but alright, substitute some other person in there.

 No, people keep saying i did but that wasn't me. I called cps but ultimately unless i can prove the child has some lasting damage on her, SJ cps won't look into it. It was a lot easier to do when I had a title for it.

 She arguably deserves it. But then again the foster and orphanage system is notorious for bringing shit situations of its own. I guess the question is, what drives you to do things of this nature?

 1- she's a pedo

2- she's said some concerning shit about her kid

3-shes meeting up with online strangers and bringing her kid along, it was tryp this time, she was planning to meet up with kkk, also a pedo, and would have likely brought her kid. 

4- she likely would have gone to a family relative instead of foster care

 I think Quintasia is a bad example overall because she's incredibly deserving of what happens to her and a lot of people would be motivated to do something not just you. But Quintasia is part of a pattern that isn't always involving people or actions as heinous as her.

 Sure name another

Whorechata said: 

 Because someone mentioned you and wanted to do something and i felt maybe I should say something.

Ahh.

I figured you were just like, browsing the names of people you knew, felt like maybe that might be weird, then followed that with mentioning your doing so as a proactive warning over what 'others' could do. 

I don't spend most of my days browsing people I know. While I enjoy putting together pieces like a puzzle i don't particularly have time over it unless I've suddenly gotten obsessed with someone like i did blanc.

So you only do it if they're interesting? 

Why would you obsess over someone dull?

Consistency? 

We've both found ourselves orbiting Med at points, you tell me. 

I know, and you don't need to apologize to me in particular for that shit now it's literally years old info at this point. When this stuff surfaces about others though it conjures that like... cross-referencing addiction I have. 

I just wish you could leave more things alone when you get triggered sometimes. It doesn't have to be about me for me to like, empathize, especially when it has the room to call upon my own experiences as a comparative model. 

If it's about children especially, i don't plan to leave it alone. I don't think I could if I tried, honestly. 

It's about whatever you can get your hands on to enable acting on the pettier desire. 

Nah, you have this thing where you don't believe things are uh, morally wrong or right? Is that moral nihilism? But most people would take action when it come to children being hurt or abused in whatever way. 

I'd argue that I do have a moral compass, but I don't (typically) use it as an excuse to act out. 

Yeah you're more bystander observer

It's not my responsibility to impede on other's lives, and intruding like that tends to both put more on my own shoulders while otherwise not really fixing anything once the narrative reaches it's conclusion. The person has to be worth becoming a part of my sphere of influence, there needs to be something for me to gain from it, otherwise why get involved?