Wait wait wait, who did i call cps on after they called me names?
That dude on Discord with the drugged up family.
I think I've already explained to you the why I did it and it wasn't because he called me name but rather because his mom was providing him meth, he had beat his significantly younger sister and had beat his gf on video chat, and then claimed he would rape his little sister. He was violent and i fully thought him capable of hurting her. I've said before I did work in family stuff and i was at the time a mandated reporter, this is stuff i did in a regular basis. At some point he was also distributing nudes, that's called distribution of child pornography.
This stuff is closer to why you handled it as you did, not why you got involved. You aren't actively scouring the net for these sorts of people, and the fuel that pushed you to get involved wasn't initially over the family.
I feel like no matter what I say this is the take you'll go with as it fits your idea of my character. Being called names doesn't trigger me the way you think it does. I'll respond back or other time just agree or Ignore it but it doesn't escalate to calling cps. You and I talked about this dude before and you were shocked about the information you didn't know while telling others it was a petty move on my part because he called me names.
Where in the timeline did you see how shit his family was?
At this point I don't know if it a smear campaign, you truly don't believe me or if you're just forgetful.
This discussion of it's about your motivation. Sure you can sit there and claim that you only go after 'the bad guys', but why you do is what's being scrutinized.
I'm otherwise just trying to discuss it, like I have with others over their things that grind my gears.
I feel like your opinion over the person precedes the fixation on their 'crimes', which makes it more about the urge to dig and build a dossier on them in the first place.
In a sense, them being deviants with something about them to report is convenient when it comes to dealing with them, as then it doesn't have to be about feelings anymore.
No? I didn't even know who this person was until I stumbled across his yt vids where he's actively blackmailing a 13yo into masturbating with a knife or he'd send her nudes to her family. I found out about the suicide of a different girl afterwards. He and I have spoken to each other once, and that was because I mentioned his full name on a server, i didn't have an opinion of him before finding out what he done.
I thought he was already active and calling you a bitch and stuff before you began outing things and calling on government services to handle it for you, not that you were just browsing random youtube channels and then went out of your way to join a server he's in to enact some form of justice on an otherwise complete stranger.
Because someone mentioned you and wanted to do something and i felt maybe I should say something.
Ahh.
I figured you were just like, browsing the names of people you knew, felt like maybe that might be weird, then followed that with mentioning your doing so as a proactive warning over what 'others' could do.
I don't spend most of my days browsing people I know. While I enjoy putting together pieces like a puzzle i don't particularly have time over it unless I've suddenly gotten obsessed with someone like i did blanc.
So you only do it if they're interesting?
I know, and you don't need to apologize to me in particular for that shit now it's literally years old info at this point. When this stuff surfaces about others though it conjures that like... cross-referencing addiction I have.
I just wish you could leave more things alone when you get triggered sometimes. It doesn't have to be about me for me to like, empathize, especially when it has the room to call upon my own experiences as a comparative model.
If it's about children especially, i don't plan to leave it alone. I don't think I could if I tried, honestly.
It's about whatever you can get your hands on to enable acting on the pettier desire.
Nah, you have this thing where you don't believe things are uh, morally wrong or right? Is that moral nihilism? But most people would take action when it come to children being hurt or abused in whatever way.
I'd argue that I do have a moral compass, but I don't (typically) use it as an excuse to act out.
I don't think it's petty at all so again I feel like this is just you thinking this fits my character and so far you think i am a petty person with a power complex.
Only when crossed.
To your credit you do otherwise try to keep it under control, but there's areas where it's been able to flourish fairly unimpeded. It's more about finding justifications to feed a destructive, retribution appetite when situations have otherwise made you hungry for it, as without that you otherwise have to just sit on what was said, sit on what life's thrown at you, without a direct sense of closure over it.
You're a quiet bottler, and convenient targets have a way of honing into your sights during those times. It's an outlet that also feels powerful when you otherwise feel small and meek, appealing to larger bodies of authority to do the work you feel unable to accomplish yourself. Seriously, just hit a heavy bag or something, you don't need to be compiling and compacting all this bile until it explodes.
Are you fine with her choice of attack? It's not like everyone when crossed goes towards doxing and social media for a quip.
I don't think I've done that and if I have I'd like to know who?
I guess the phrase's closer to 'info gathering' than outright 'doxing'.
Info gathering?
'Scouring the 'net for deets'?
Is it that my choice of attack?
Or defense, it's the go-to strategy.
I mean with blanc she does have her stuff ou-
I mean about potentially anyone on this forum who has a paper trail on the internet.
Oh, just people that claim certain things. Like psychopath Dave, reaper, blanc, shifty and scarlet.
Are Blanc, Delora, and Med on the same tier?
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔