Sociopath Community

I go thru phases of being confident and terrified. More and more I am becoming primarily confident though. being a leader is more difficult than how easily we make it look, there is a lot of responsibility and pressure to make the right decisions every time

Dr. Winner said: 

Actually, TC, I face all of my issues head on and coming here is what has made that possible.

You redefine what your issues are on the fly so that you always feel as if you're tackling them head on. 

I have otherwise seen you dodge shit for days on here. For days. 

I am a more stable and better person because of this place, so please think before you write stuff.

Aww, did I hurt your feefees with the truth? 

You aren't stable if this is enough to fuck with you. 

Just because you want what you say to be true, doesn’t mean it is true. 

Thank you for self-demonstrating further how you and Spatial are similar as narcs. 

goodgirl said: 

I go thru phases of being confident and terrified. More and more I am becoming primarily confident though. being a leader is more difficult than how easily we make it look, there is a lot of responsibility and pressure to make the right decisions every time

How many people is your leadership in charge of? 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

I was here for some hours having a splendid conversation in the chat log, and I haven't vented at all.

What's your point? 

KluKlan and Jimthepedo ( an actual pedophile eh ? ) were in the chat. Is it really wrong for me to think I have higher standards and produce finer qualities and values than them ?

You don't have higher standards though, that's part of the hypocrisy. 

 Just because you have an agenda to defame me, doesn't mean you're right.

Within your mindset you will make it into any excuse, all so that you won't have to look the problem dead in the eye. 

By your logic, I'm either just as bad or worse than a pedophile, then when I disagree you make me out to be a malignant narcissist. 

CS has the same issue. 

Pass.

I think little of race baiters and pedophiles and apparently you do not, so of course you'd argue my standards aren't higher.

Based on what, my not coming here for the same reasons as you? 

Based on you insisting my standards aren't higher than race baiters and pedophiles. Like damn. I stated my reason for coming here and it's simply out of habit. 

Face it, you come here to enjoy ripping into the "race baiters and pedophiles", over how they "deserve it", which shows more about your nature over how you come here for that rather than that simply being how things end up going.

It's a predatory desire that you've buried in self-righteous justifications, and when you've been hurt you come here to let it all out in the only way you know how: Lashing out and/or posting a long diatribe about how it's never your fault. 

To be honest, I don't even talk to them, and when we do speak it's cordial. 

I'll also add, the whole Transgenderism thing with the removal of your genitals and taking hormones to be something you're physically not is self mutilation and in some cases child abuse. These things contribute to forces that seek to cause our species to degenerate and fall into instinction.

You can never help but fall onto ad hom, especially when you otherwise can't understand the situation. 

You could try to have an actual conversation instead of just rebuking it out of fear, maybe you'll learn something you didn't already know. 

 I understand the situation. You claim that I come here to vent and unload on people I find despicable, and that means I'm no better than them. 

I responded a few times already and you don't accept my response.

I'm saying I a lot.

I see that you won't accept my response as you so arrogantly insist you know me better than anyone including myself, I can't help you there so there's nothing more for me to talk about in that regard, while you're doing the non progressive merry go round thing again which is pointless. So I changed the subject. The truth isn't against you, and if you respect the truth, you won't be prone to regret and other calamities that happen if you snip off your penis.

Did I think this subject might make you feel like you're being attacked ?

Yes of course. But it's for your wellbeing, and when you don't feel violated by this, you'll be healthier.  

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

I was here for some hours having a splendid conversation in the chat log, and I haven't vented at all.

What's your point? 

KluKlan and Jimthepedo ( an actual pedophile eh ? ) were in the chat. Is it really wrong for me to think I have higher standards and produce finer qualities and values than them ?

You don't have higher standards though, that's part of the hypocrisy. 

 Just because you have an agenda to defame me, doesn't mean you're right.

Within your mindset you will make it into any excuse, all so that you won't have to look the problem dead in the eye. 

By your logic, I'm either just as bad or worse than a pedophile, then when I disagree you make me out to be a malignant narcissist. 

I didn't say you were just as bad or worse than a pedophile, I'm saying that you're using the idea of "bad and worse people" to justify your own petty desires and coping mechanisms. 

You keep acting like I'm ranking you on their scale, when really I'm noting how you use scale in the first place as a justification. 

CS has the same issue. 

Pass.

I can see why, that's one area that's blown up in your face. 

When you two are near each other, you two's behaviors become increasingly obvious through the similarities. 

I think little of race baiters and pedophiles and apparently you do not, so of course you'd argue my standards aren't higher.

Based on what, my not coming here for the same reasons as you? 

Based on you insisting my standards aren't higher than race baiters and pedophiles. Like damn. I stated my reason for coming here and it's simply out of habit. 

You use the notion of "standards" to justify your own disgusting behavior, then in order to float that idea better you choose to go to places where "pedophiles" hang out. 

Face it, you need the company of "terrible" people so that you feel less terrible about yourself. It's all pecking order with you like I'd been saying from the start. 

Face it, you come here to enjoy ripping into the "race baiters and pedophiles", over how they "deserve it", which shows more about your nature over how you come here for that rather than that simply being how things end up going.

It's a predatory desire that you've buried in self-righteous justifications, and when you've been hurt you come here to let it all out in the only way you know how: Lashing out and/or posting a long diatribe about how it's never your fault. 

To be honest, I don't even talk to them, and when we do speak it's cordial. 

You'd prefer that reality, but you do talk to them when you need someone to attack in ways that you feel safe. 

You try to pick on people "beneath your standards" so that you don't have to listen to the words of your enemy. You've over the years shown yourself as too weak to learn from another's examples and words, stuck instead in your own echo chamber of copes. 

Spatial Mind said: 

I'll also add, the whole Transgenderism thing with the removal of your genitals and taking hormones to be something you're physically not is self mutilation and in some cases child abuse. These things contribute to forces that seek to cause our species to degenerate and fall into instinction.

You can never help but fall onto ad hom, especially when you otherwise can't understand the situation. 

You could try to have an actual conversation instead of just rebuking it out of fear, maybe you'll learn something you didn't already know. 

I understand the situation. You claim that I come here to vent and unload on people I find despicable, and that means I'm no better than them. 

The words you're putting in my mouth I've colored red. 

You keep making it about ranking, about pecking order, about "being better" than the people you despise. I'm meanwhile pointing out how you use the ranking paradigm as a means of justifying your behavior in a relative fashion.

You can look at these people and have the freedom to do anything, as "at least I'm not Jim". 

I responded a few times already and you don't accept my response.

I'm saying I a lot.

I see that you won't accept my response

I would accept your response if you were actually comprehending what I'm trying to say. 

as you so arrogantly insist you know me better than anyone including myself

People need others to cast a reflection of themselves. If you sit by yourself and insist blindly that you know all there is to you, you will never see anything beyond what you want to. 



"You don't know me" is an absurd defense of the ego, one made more typically than not over denial. I see CS using the same defense often in chat, but have you ever noticed how you two tend to see "truth" within flattery more often than harsh truths? 

I can't help you there so there's nothing more for me to talk about in that regard, while you're doing the non progressive merry go round thing again which is pointless. So I changed the subject.

Translation: "I don't understand your point, but it doesn't sound very nice, so I said mean things back at you." 

The truth isn't against you, and if you respect the truth, you won't be prone to regret and other calamities that happen if you snip off your penis.

The truth is against us all, it goes against the human condition to accept all truths, but what truths we have an easier versus harder time accepting are based on our individual coping mechanisms, the things we go through both consciously and subconsciously to face the day-to-day. 

Considering the variation present between people, others are bound to see things you either can't see or won't see, so doesn't it make sense to have a more open mind, one willing to listen to more than just pats on the back, or are you too weak to hear something that isn't just your praises these days? 

Did I think this subject might make you feel like you're being attacked?

Yes of course. But it's for your wellbeing, and when you don't feel violated by this, you'll be healthier.  

Relevancy tends to sting more than irrelevancy, which is why your ad homs fall flat to all but the most easily triggered. 

If you'd pay better attention in these discussions, you'd be able to use more relivant snark or... who knows, maybe even respond on topic. 

"When using a sword you must first lower your shield." 

So if I have these, as you say, "petty desires" then why haven't I attacked anyone over it ?

If I see foolishness, I might call it out. Most of the time I don't. I might even be amused by the foolish for awhile.

If you feel abused by me, a simple request will take you far. 

In the meantime, I have standards and I think those standards are higher than most of what we see here. I'm aware that I may come across as conceited, here. Not anywhere else, but here for some reason lol. The schizotypal one of all people will make sure to that.

But yes TC, clearly you're the good guy and I'm the bad guy. Just look at history, me denying you over and over again.

And yes I read what you wrote last, but it doesn't resonate with me at all. I know you'll run around saying I don't understand it, while insisting it's me, but really it's not. Others may worry that my kindness will be taken advantage of again, to them I'm too nice, which is different than what you'll ever make me out to be,

Suit yourself, but if you feel ill over it, don't blame me. 

Spatial Mind said: 

So if I have these, as you say, "petty desires" then why haven't I attacked anyone over it ?

You haven't? I've seen you do it, but you usually attack around the problem rather than demanding some sort of showdown.

Do we really need to talk about your "Flying Monkeys" thing as an example? 

If I see foolishness, I might call it out. Most of the time I don't. I might even be amused by the foolish for awhile.

I've mostly seen you as too cowardly to call someone out first, lest you give up your room to justify your own behaviors. You wait for others to present openings for you, and those "beneath you" you see as presenting an opening by default. 

You're intimidated by people who are not heinous because they themselves may be better than you, so rather than improve yourself you choose the company of pedophiles and criminals so that you can pat yourself on the back more readily, more lazily. 

If you feel abused by me, a simple request will take you far. 

Do you assume people will only go at you if they "feel abused"? It's in human nature to challenge people, while it's conditioned regression to hide behind the constraints of your situation to not have to deal with it. 

Do you really think people only fight over some sort of chip on their shoulder? What about sparring? 

In the meantime, I have standards and I think those standards are higher than most of what we see here.

Your standards are only as relevant as why you choose to hang around pedophiles, criminals, deviants, and the mentally ill. 

You come back here to feel better about yourself. It brings out the sins within you, and once you notice you blame the website rather than yourself. You come here because the place by it's very nature enables a side of yourself that needs to feed. 

I'm aware that I may come across as conceited, here.

Just because they aren't telling you about it doesn't mean it's not a problem, or would you presume to say that the things you're too pussy to talk to people about aren't really problems? 

Not anywhere else, but here for some reason lol. The schizotypal one of all people will make sure to that.

If your other communities are places like here, it's no surprise, and if it's over Discord it's over how you don't appear worth their antagonism from how much you don't present of yourself on there. 

You keep your cards much closer to your chest than you used to, you've learned fear. 

But yes TC, clearly you're the good guy and I'm the bad guy. Just look at history, me denying you over and over again.

I'm not making this about "good guy" and "bad guy", this is about your habits. 

This is just more pecking order bullshit, why should which of us is better have any bearing when it comes to your character beyond yet more room for you to excuse yourself from listening? 

And yes I read what you wrote last, but it doesn't resonate with me at all.

Well yeah, you don't understand it.

You try to mirror my words back to me as people tend to do in conversation to show that they understood, and through that I can see how much of it you are and aren't picking up. Naturally as a narc you'd nearly always assume you're always on top of the situation, so someone insulting you will read as insanity, blasphemy, or become directed into being about their Ad Hom characteristics from having nothing else to go on within your state of incomprehension. 



Rather than see where their insults are coming from, you will immediately aim to rebuke them to cope-defend a fragile ego. Rather than aim to relate towards where the notions are coming from you will tear down their character so that you don't have to deem it credible. Your way of not handling the slings and arrows of life is to claim that those who shoot them are baseless, which is completely inhibitive of social growth. 

I know you'll run around saying I don't understand it, while insisting it's me, but really it's not.

As I explained above, you don't, but within your narc construct you can't fathom that someone else understands an idea that you don't while being beneath you on the pecking order. 

Others may worry that my kindness will be taken advantage of again, to them I'm too nice, which is different than what you'll ever make me out to be,

More narc cope, this has nothing to do with what's being discussed. 

It's just you falling riiiiight back onto your moralist ranking cope, using the relativity of the shameful environments you find yourself in to tell yourself you're a star rather than challenge yourself to be better. 

Suit yourself, but if you feel ill over it, don't blame me. 

"It's not my problem, it's your problem, so I'm going to walk away from your problem before you make it into my problem"s a pretty weak cope. 

Your choice of avoidance when things become harder on you is not missed by your more immediate company. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

So if I have these, as you say, "petty desires" then why haven't I attacked anyone over it ?

You haven't? I've seen you do it, but you usually attack around the problem rather than demanding some sort of showdown.

Do we really need to talk about your "Flying Monkeys" thing as an example? 

 We could talk about that if you want. What about it ?

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

So if I have these, as you say, "petty desires" then why haven't I attacked anyone over it ?

You haven't? I've seen you do it, but you usually attack around the problem rather than demanding some sort of showdown.

Do we really need to talk about your "Flying Monkeys" thing as an example? 

 We could talk about that if you want. What about it ?

That was you cope-exploding over feeling denied by "the cool kids", and anyone aware of the drama at that point can easily note the timing. 

Rather than see the mistakes you made, you instead made it about those who hurt you and why it's all on them with a series of exaggerations and excuses where you otherwise chose to call on none of the people by name out of cowardice, rather than for their protection or any sense of civility, and for the sake of preserving your image in a way you yourself can believe rather than contradict the "Spatial is Amazing" narrative you'd sell your soul for the validation of. 

You needed to vent your pain for catharsis after you'd felt wronged, establish for all to see how none of it's your fault so that you can feel like the victim, then not mention them by name to shield your image from looking as petty as the reality. Since they're actually upstanding people, you lack the courage to go at them over how they possess a higher spot on the pecking order, so naturally you came here with your tail between your legs after you'd otherwise spent months acting above SC attendance. 

Attacking the tactics and heuristics you feel were used against you at the same time as being at the receiving end of it still gives them the message that it's about them through it's blatant display as Passive Aggression. It's still a personal jab even if you don't call on them by name, and it can appear as a desperate grab for support from your peers when you don't mention who the antagonist they might otherwise side with is.