Sociopath Community

MartinLooterKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

MartinLooterKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

MartinLooterKing said: 

I am just making observations, I have no stake in this. Actions speak louder than words.

Her accidently rush-posting the reply she just gave from her puppet first before editing it to repost from her main said a fair amount just now. 

Her adding to the repost "We have no issues with one another and we never have. No matter how hard people try to make issues. " when it wasn't originally there is pretty telling, too. 

Sounds like she's in denial stage. In cases like this it's good to just rip off the band aid and move on. You can't force someone to want you.

Yeah, I'm inclined to agree. She's been giving off some questionable tells in relation to the two's cohesion when pressed about it. 

Misscommunication said:

Nah, Inq doesn't ignore me. Somedays I wish he did but he never has. Sweden/Canada isn't easy.

---

Ask him directly, see what he is willing to tell you. :)

"He doesn't ignore me, in fact sometimes I wish he would!", followed by attempting to redirect the baggage for him to solve for her (again). It doesn't bode well when she's been showing exchanges like: 

Misscommunication said:

Quietbeef said:

Wow, so bitter. lol You really need to get over Inq, to be frank.

Maybe he's the one who needs to get over me.

 Yeah, the pieces of the puzzle fit, it's sad. She wants him to fix things up and is trying to get him to care but he simply has moved on and seems indifferent. It's easier to just find someone who values you instead of waiting around like this on some med shit lol

 lol so tempted to post screen shots right now but I won't. 

Of course you won't. 

Turncoat said: 

Of course you won't. 

 if I was her I would get on Skype Web and edit some messages from him as if he wrote to me and delete the ones he ignored from me but that requires tech savvy xD

I think TPG did a pretty good job summarizing this. Otherwise, it's been kind of entertaining seeing Whorechata and MissComm suffer from cognitive dissonance over TC's questioning.

Whorechata said:

Like I said, you called it out, I'm just pointing out that you failed to do that to the *other* emotional kid. If your thing is to shame inq about his use of emotional language and not legga it makes you seem a bit like a cunt with a particularly missc sized chip on your shoulder and using legga to have at them both. His whole schtick is that she's being mean without "knowing him" while he's not done anything in the way to get to know her either.

Which then makes my light teasing of her completely justified.

MissCommunication throws an emotional outburst at Legga for 20+ pages without knowing him. Legga then lightly teases MissCommunication about it for 2 posts, without knowing her. Former good, latter bad, because you.... don't respect me? Lol, okay.

Whorechata said:

He says in the way that she trash talks someone she doesn't know- but we all know legga- he just tends to hyper focus on Ed, inq and sensy, hyper focus enough that it leads to thoughts of paranoia where he assumes that anyone that agrees with with those he disagrees with must be an alt and/or completely fails to notice others properly. If this whole thread is leggas way of simply dismissing her entirely based on what people here can or cannot put into words then I guess tc is helping along with that, instead of having an actual conversation with the person.

It is impossible for me to make observations of MissCommunication because I have never talked with her, but not only is it possible for you to make observations of me, you *know* me. You've literally never talked with me. Way to practice double standards.

When MissCommunication throws an emotional outburst at me for 20+ pages for Inquirer whilst everyone ignores her, it's fine because she's a cheerful angel, but then I can't lightly tease her about it in this topic, because I'm Legga.

Whorechata said:

and I'm currently focusing on you, not really legga. I stopped focusing on legga a bit ago because he's got nothing more to offer other than "tell me why I should even try to get to know her" he's not even worth focusing on tbh

No, I never said that. Actually, I said `I will get to know her,` but thus far she hasn't wanted to get to know me. No wonder you have such negative opinions of me, it's because it's all make-believe for you and you don't actually read what I say.

Turncoat said:

Does someone else have to host the exact same topic for it to mean something to you, or would it remain incorrect simply because Legga hosted the query first? If Legga said gravity was real, would you just assume you could fly by merrit of how much Legga is not to be trusted?

It's because she doesn't actually listen to what I say now, or what I've said in the past. It's all make-believe.

Whorechata said:

I am literally the stupidest fuck in this forum.

We shouldn't listen to Legga's arguments because of his credentials, basically ad-hominem and reputation heuristics. However, if we go by credentials (which I'm not proposing because I find it arrogant, but you are): You've admitted that you're literally the stupidest person on this forum, while I have a PhD and a faculty position in academia. How do you justify that people should listen to you over me, in your own world-view? You're literally the dumbest person on this forum, even by your own admission.

SpatialMind said:

Legga. Inq will never admit to learning anything from you, hence your endless debates. If you want to beat Inq you have to point out how many questions he asks. He asks a lot of them. Also never let him derail the subject.

SpatialMind is absolutely right; I have become aware of this. He lost the debate, he refused to admit defeat. He challenged me to a `chat duel`, agreed for an impartial judge to settle the winner, after which I was declared the winner. Not only did he refuse to admit defeat even then, he also refused to make a concession speech (explaining why I was right) and refused to supply what we discussed the winner should get.

Now he's warped the whole thing into this fantasy where he was owning me in the debate, everyone was mocking me, and this is why I'm now frustrated about my loss and want to get back at him with insults. I was already declared the winner by an impartial moderator, Inquirer; make the concession speech and give me what you agreed to give me.

MissCommunication said:

This is basically my perspective as well. I was talking to inq about this last night. People who have no life, goals or ability desperately fitter away their days trying to win e-clout and make themselves feel like their empty lives matter while the rest of us just make money, live and thrive, and come here for the lulz and to enjoy the people we like. Who is winning?

Uh, Inquirer used one year of his life to debate whether he made a debating mistake or not, and he still wants round two. He's so above the whole e-clout thing.

You're also so above the whole e-clout thing, posting under `Transcoat.`

Martin the Just said:

A lot of the members here who attempt to be tuff bad bitches are seeing how much influence miss chan is gaining just by being sweet and collaborative and while they are clearly desperate for approval and being liked (yet are hungry for drama and want to fight on some BPD bs) and are collectively lashing out against her. It's like the fat chicks in high school who act cocky and aggressive to compensate who are surprised everyone's gravitating around the skinny nice shy girl and want to beat her up.

You can't be constantly starting arguments with everyone and being combative and beg for popularity and love at the same time,and lashing out at someone for being more e-popular than you? Time to rope. Either be a lone wolf and stay on your own feet or be the puppy you really are inside and beg for love, you can't do both and lash out at someone who's getting the love though.

Simp!

Martin said:

For example, the majority of people I met here have no hobbies that are non-conductive to material or social gains. Their days are spent arguing on the internet and creating squabbles to scratch that emptiness itch where I think there should have been a pursuit like learning or doing something that makes them happy and is also creative in some form. Even the most autistic things like collecting rocks set a person aside in my eyes as it's coming from the id rather than ego dare I say (and I feel like a faggot saying that). Instead the pursuits of the majority of people are social games and drama, in an eternal chase for narc supply to not fall into emptiness.

This is actually surprisingly deep.

Whorechata said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Inquirer said: 

This is pretty pathetic. Did it hurt you this much to get teased by MissC and others during the debate? Is that why you refuse to do part 2?

Apart from whining about the debate there's very little substance in anything you say. It's just a lazy, baseless tirade. I do find it funny to see you call other people "dreary trolls" and that they "nauseatingly mirror and echo other people" though. Is it too presumptuous of me to assume this is not meant as self irony?

Inquirer to the rescue, as usual.  Why is it that you think MissComm is incapable of defending herself?

Why do you dislike inquirer defending her? They've been friends for a long time, is that not a normal response for a friend to have?

That depends on context. She's not the only person here that he's ever been friends with, but she is the only person he defends like this, which begs some questions. And he does it with such a consistency that I'd question it coming from anyone. He shows up pretty much any time someone criticizes her, and his standard response is "you just don't know her" or "she's not taking this seriously, but if she was...", which I think is telling for as much as it's a non-answer. This thread was a barrage of praise for her with pretty much just Legga criticizing her, but he still felt compelled to intervene. A similar example was when Alice wrote a post that was largely praise of MissComm, with only one minor addendum that she "doesn't contribute much to debate", and Inq showed up after about a month of complete absence just to say (paraphrasing) "you don't really know her and if she was taking it seriously she could debate you", and then he disappeared again for weeks. Obviously it's not concrete, but to me this paints a certain picture, especially in conjunction with the fact that he doesn't defend any of his other friends at all, even when it's opportune. It's not in his nature to do so.

This could mean a number of things, but it falls pretty neatly into how I already viewed their dynamic from the peripheral experience of having been friends with Inq through all of it. In general, he's a person who feels compelled to cater to highly emotional people, particularly those who are immature or otherwise can't handle themselves in some way, and is intensified by their entitlement. He's been socially conditioned to respond to that sort of thing, the more overtly emotional and self-absorbed another person is, the more he compulsively panders to them to avoid stress. I've seen this behavior from him in multiple ways, not even just MissComm. And since I'd say that overemotionalism, immaturity, and a sense of entitlement in her feelings are defining characteristics of her, it makes perfect sense to me that her sensitivities are a sort of trigger for him. I've also seen this dynamic between them play out off SC a number of times too, it's become pretty old hat. Her attitude is very demanding of his support and he has a very hard time saying no and letting her stand on her own two feet. Frankly, I think their dynamic is toxic. And as his friend, yes, it absolutely does bother me that it is.

As a minor aside, I think that if he feels the need to arbitrarily validate her every time she's criticized, no matter how or why, he's just an enabler, stunting her from learning from her own behavior and the responses she gets to it.

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

I MissC is a lot of fun and a good person to have a conversation with. I think some of you may have an agenda.

What's the goal? 

 To come between Inq and I of course. Because you will never have it and you can't understand it. 

 What is there to come between?  Do you two even talk anymore?  That hasn't been my impression.

Transcoat said: 

...

 MissComm, are you still going to pretend you're not Transcoat after accidentally posting on it here and then editing it out and copy/pasting the exact same thing with your main?

MissCommunication said: 

MartinLooterKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

You're welcome to go back and see her two posts in this topic, and if you don't see Inq as her chronic white knight then you aren't paying attention. 

 The real question is why does this bother you?

 TC is the type to place good for bad and bad for good. 

TC and Inq don't seem to talk

Are you kidding, we talk multiple times a week. Inq and I are cool, and I feel safe saying that my beef with Misscomm is entirely independent of my relationship with him. We even have many of the same Steam games. 😊

To attempt to relate why I respond to her in this way with him further implies how shallow and boring she is through how someone of more flavor must have made it happen by association. It doesn't grant MC any merits of her own for why she'd have negative attention from those who want more than an easy listener. 

 Just sounds like you're jealous 🤭

 It really does lol

What is there to be jealous of between you and Inq these days? 😏

 I am getting the sense that she got discarded by Inq.

No, this didn't happen. Inq and I have always been private and respectful to one another about our relationship so I will respect that. He's welcome to share whatever he likes to clear the air about us but I'm sure he will be reluctant to do so. We have no issues with one another and we never have. No matter how hard people try to make issues. 

Didn't you say a month ago that Inq needs to "get over you"? lol

 Edit: Nevermind.  Read further and realized this was already brought up.

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

You're welcome to go back and see her two posts in this topic, and if you don't see Inq as her chronic white knight then you aren't paying attention. 

 The real question is why does this bother you?

 TC is the type to place good for bad and bad for good. 

TC and Inq don't seem to talk

Are you kidding, we talk multiple times a week. Inq and I are cool, and I feel safe saying that my beef with Misscomm is entirely independent of my relationship with him. We even have many of the same Steam games. 😊

To attempt to relate why I respond to her in this way with him further implies how shallow and boring she is through how someone of more flavor must have made it happen by association. It doesn't grant MC any merits of her own for why she'd have negative attention from those who want more than an easy listener. 

 Just sounds like you're jealous 🤭

 It really does lol

What is there to be jealous of between you and Inq these days? 😏

 Ask him directly, see what he is willing to tell you. :)

 How would you define your relationship with him, at this point?  I've already heard his version.  I'm curious about yours.

Martin said:

For example, the majority of people I met here have no hobbies that are non-conductive to material or social gains. Their days are spent arguing on the internet and creating squabbles to scratch that emptiness itch where I think there should have been a pursuit like learning or doing something that makes them happy and is also creative in some form. Even the most autistic things like collecting rocks set a person aside in my eyes as it's coming from the id rather than ego dare I say (and I feel like a faggot saying that). Instead the pursuits of the majority of people are social games and drama, in an eternal chase for narc supply to not fall into emptiness.

While I generally agree, I think it's harder and harder for people to have that these days, when their brains are being constantly drugged with superficial and short-lived hits of social dopamine.