Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

You're welcome to go back and see her two posts in this topic, and if you don't see Inq as her chronic white knight then you aren't paying attention. 

 The real question is why does this bother you?

 TC is the type to place good for bad and bad for good. 

TC and Inq don't seem to talk

Are you kidding, we talk multiple times a week. Inq and I are cool, and I feel safe saying that my beef with Misscomm is entirely independent of my relationship with him. We even have many of the same Steam games. 😊

To attempt to relate why I respond to her in this way with him further implies how shallow and boring she is through how someone of more flavor must have made it happen by association. It doesn't grant MC any merits of her own for why she'd have negative attention from those who want more than an easy listener. 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

The best bit tho is that he'll probably continue because he sees her teasing as being malicious and that hurts him while missc will probably continue to ignore him, tc continues to show his dislike while using the "others" wording to reinforce the bullshit he's peddling

Care to explain how it's bullshit, or are you going to spout things you don't actually know even when comparative references are starting to be dropped? 

Like usual, you're stuck defending people who you think need the help to the point of overreaching your position. You have nothing more than "Misscomm's nice, lets ignore her and focus on the guy saying negative things". 

Bullshit as in the thing you do when you want others to feel the way you think they ought to feel.

How is me citing past events me steering? 

You'd rather remain in ignorance so that you can maintain an immature opinion, and that's not on me. 

You've been steering, like the entire time by bringing up past events that's a thing you do when you steer.

I don't think my opinion is immature. I think you times this badly and really expected others not to disagree with you 

 

It's usually when you start dropping phrases like "the others" "social climate" "backroom/background shenanigans", you know, that thing you do a lot? 

I literally cited a case and names, and if it really matters that much to you there's more than enough other examples. At this point you're telling me that you must be right by the merit of how you refuse to believe it rather than by the merit of facts, and as long as it's just about feelings then it isn't over anything otherwise objective. 

It's not up to me to convince you, it's up to you to give ideas outside of your comfort zone the room to breathe. 

Ahahahahahahahahahaha

and I'm currently focusing on you, not really legga. I stopped focusing on legga a bit ago because he's got nothing more to offer other than "tell me why I should even try to get to know her" he's not even worth focusing on tbh

You've been literally italicizing "It's Legga". 

---

TLDR: TPG's right, and he captured it in far less words. 

 It's Legga

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

You're welcome to go back and see her two posts in this topic, and if you don't see Inq as her chronic white knight then you aren't paying attention. 

 The real question is why does this bother you?

 TC is the type to place good for bad and bad for good. 

TC and Inq don't seem to talk

Are you kidding, we talk multiple times a week. Inq and I are cool, and I feel safe saying that my beef with Misscomm is entirely independent of my relationship with him. We even have many of the same Steam games. 😊

To attempt to relate why I respond to her in this way with him further implies how shallow and boring she is through how someone of more flavor must have made it happen by association. It doesn't grant MC any merits of her own for why she'd have negative attention from those who want more than an easy listener. 

 Just sounds like you're jealous 🤭

Whorechata said: 

You've been steering, like the entire time by bringing up past events that's a thing you do when you steer.

Making a case isn't steering beyond it's room to make a case, and just because you disagree doesn't immediately turn it into an agenda-based narrative. 

Just sounds like you're jealous 🤭

Jealousy is such a safe accusation to make in that either I agree sarcastically and it's accused as a dodge or that I disagree and you claim denial. 

How does one talk themselves out of the jealousy accusation, other than by not taking it seriously thematically? It's how one fights dirty whether they intend to or not. 

Nah TC. Lena is all about bullying the vulnerable (like med) and licking the strong's asses, to make her feel better about herself.

Cavalier said: 

Nah TC. Lena is all about bullying the vulnerable (like med) and licking the strong's asses, to make her feel better about herself.

They have to challenge her first. 

Turncoat said: 

MartinLooterKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

So we should just leave them be if they're otherwise perceived well by the herd? 

You are free to attack her as hard as you want as long as it's not about people loving her more than they love you haha

That's fair. 

A lot of the members here who are bitter at people who hurt them in the past and developed being aggressive as a coping mechanism must understand that being friendly and relaxed is all it takes to be liked by people

Does that make it right, authentic, or otherwise denote depth? 

I don't know about you, but I like the people I talk to to have more going on. Why would you choose to accept someone empty other than to hear yourself talk? 

 What is a complex deep personality good for me if the person is a pain in the ass to me or boring? Also alot of people who attempt depth here are very obvious about it, attempting to display depth for the sake of depth appearance causes the opposite reaction in me.

For example, the majority of people I met here have no hobbies that are non-conductive to material or social gains. Their days are spent arguing on the internet and creating squabbles to scratch that emptiness itch where I think there should have been a pursuit like learning or doing something that makes them happy and is also creative in some form. Even the most autistic things like collecting rocks set a person aside in my eyes as it's coming from the id rather than ego dare I say (and I feel like a faggot saying that). Instead the pursuits of the majority of people are social games and drama, in an eternal chase for narc supply to not fall into emptiness.

People who are friendly and opaque come across as mysterious and also self-fulfilled. No need for drama, no jealous behavior towards other members, no seeking e-popularity catch my eye.

 It contrasts with people who are constantly trying to challenge and battle others who betray a feeling of not feeling safe and looking for their spot on the pecking order due to insecurity. They also give prey signals but don't get it I think.

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Nah TC. Lena is all about bullying the vulnerable (like med) and licking the strong's asses, to make her feel better about herself.

They have to challenge her first. 

 More often than not it's Lena barging into other peoples' drama and taking a side.

MartinLooterKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

MartinLooterKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

So we should just leave them be if they're otherwise perceived well by the herd? 

You are free to attack her as hard as you want as long as it's not about people loving her more than they love you haha

That's fair. 

A lot of the members here who are bitter at people who hurt them in the past and developed being aggressive as a coping mechanism must understand that being friendly and relaxed is all it takes to be liked by people

Does that make it right, authentic, or otherwise denote depth? 

I don't know about you, but I like the people I talk to to have more going on. Why would you choose to accept someone empty other than to hear yourself talk? 

What is a complex deep personality good for me if the person is a pain in the ass to me or boring?

A challenge. 

I've seen what happens if both parties are handling it simply: complacency. 

Also alot of people who attempt depth here are very obvious about it, attempting to display depth for the sake of depth appearance causes the opposite reaction in me.

So you find the lack thereof refreshing? 

For example, the majority of people I met here have no hobbies that are non-conductive to material or social gains. Their days are spent arguing on the internet and creating squabbles to scratch that emptiness itch where I think there should have been a pursuit like learning or doing something that makes them happy and is also creative in some form.

If they feel a sense of fulfillment that to their minds is equal to that of a person who otherwise makes something of themselves, does their success in the collective world really matter? What if arguing ('debate') on the internet is their hobby? 

I otherwise agree when it comes to the more blatantly trapped cases, like Blanc. 

Instead the pursuits of the majority of people are social games and drama, in an eternal chase for narc supply to not fall into emptiness.

Have you become ascetic or something since we last spoke? 

I don't really see the problem with indulging in socializing, the appetite for it contributing to the illusion of it meaning something. Why rebuff it? 

People who are friendly and opaque come across as mysterious and also self-fulfilled. No need for drama, no jealous behavior towards other members, no seeking e-popularity catch my eye.

Bits of who they are show between the lines though, which then has their inauthentic mask become like the buzzing of a fly in the room. Sure I could try to ignore the fly, let it keep buzzing around, or I could do something about it. Once you've seen their motivations it's not like you can just ignore them. 

To say one thing but then display the other, I'm sure you understand the bait of it. 

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

Nah TC. Lena is all about bullying the vulnerable (like med) and licking the strong's asses, to make her feel better about herself.

They have to challenge her first. 

 More often than not it's Lena barging into other peoples' drama and taking a side.

 Listen here you little twat