Sociopath Community

Whorechata said: 

Legga hasn't actually talked to her and is having a sort of tantrum. This is still a forum frequented by people unable to allow themselves to actually describe much in way of feelings, quiet beef made that observation the other day when people took that test. Like it or not people have a positive view of missC, it's more in the majority. 

When you think sc members missc is usually one that's thought of almost immediately with ed, inq, sug, tc, tryp and luna. 

He says in the way that she trash talks someone she doesn't know- but we all know legga- he just tends to hyper focus on Ed, inq and sensy, hyper focus enough that it leads to thoughts of paranoia where he assumes that anyone that agrees with with those he disagrees with must be an alt and/or completely fails to notice others properly. If this whole thread is leggas way of simply dismissing her entirely based on what people here can or cannot put into words then I guess tc is helping along with that, instead of having an actual conversation with the person. 

The best bit tho is that he'll probably continue because he sees her teasing as being malicious and that hurts him while missc will probably continue to ignore him, tc continues to show his dislike while using the "others" wording to reinforce the bullshit he's peddling and crows slight spill out from last topic and now in this one is just a simmer. 

 was this a response to me?

Whorechata said: 

When you think sc members missc is usually one that's thought of almost immediately with ed, inq, sug, tc, tryp and luna. 

Well yeah, she's Inq's sidecar, his tagalong. She rides his coattails as a way to be noticed. 

Personally I don't think it takes much to be an associated name, and she has no history worth talking about with strangers. I've gone on about the epics of many here in discussions with people about human nature, but she hasn't been even remotely anecdotal beyond how others have responded around her. 

He says in the way that she trash talks someone she doesn't know- but we all know legga- he just tends to hyper focus on Ed, inq and sensy, hyper focus enough that it leads to thoughts of paranoia where he assumes that anyone that agrees with with those he disagrees with must be an alt and/or completely fails to notice others properly.

Yes, lets just attack Legga's character to distract people with ad hominems rather than focus on the topic itself. 

He isn't the only one getting on her case, and those who've had... "nice" things to say about her fall within TPG's reply in this topic. 

If this whole thread is leggas way of simply dismissing her entirely based on what people here can or cannot put into words then I guess tc is helping along with that, instead of having an actual conversation with the person. 

With who, Misscomm? 

She's welcome to participate in this discussion, but it looks like she'd rather avoid the subject entirely so that Inq can white knight her with the intelligence she otherwise lacks. 

The best bit tho is that he'll probably continue because he sees her teasing as being malicious and that hurts him while missc will probably continue to ignore him, tc continues to show his dislike while using the "others" wording to reinforce the bullshit he's peddling

Care to explain how it's bullshit, or are you going to spout things you don't actually know even when comparative references are starting to be dropped? 

Like usual, you're stuck defending people who you think need the help to the point of overreaching your position. You have nothing more than "Misscomm's nice, lets ignore her and focus on the guy saying negative things". 

If Legga went after TC instead, no one would have his back. This is true. 

I don't understand how anyone can harbor that much resentment for MissC tbh. She's harmless.

.

Legga. Inq will never admit to learning anything from you, hence your endless debates. If you want to beat Inq you have to point out how many questions he asks. He asks a lot of them. Also never let him derail the subject.

Also keep in mind, the "burden of proof" argument isn't really on you online, when all your opponents need to do is look for themselves. Claim victory and move on when you're blamed for them not researching your word for themselves.

Turncoat said: Should I just be getting on everyone's case who happens to show a little  leg  emotion? 

Getting on Legga's case is largely redundant and he's otherwise not the bandwagon lip service we're seeing here. Someone needs to represent the underdog, and in this case he happens to be mostly correct. 

Like I said, you called it out, I'm just pointing out that you failed to do that to the *other* emotional kid. If your thing is to shame inq about his use of emotional language and not legga it makes you seem a bit like a cunt with a particularly missc sized chip on your shoulder and using legga to have at them both. His whole schtick is that she's being mean without "knowing him" while he's not done anything in the way to get to know her either.

 

your just trying to get a foot in on being a bitch. 

It could be said that your barging in here and being a contrarian towards those you know that can handle it in here is the same thing. 

What

Towards those i know that can handle it? What?

Barging in? It's a forum? How does one barge in?

I can't help but notice how you feel more comfortable going after stronger people, and that your choice of who's worth defending tends to err towards "protecting the weak". You seem to respect those you can have a critical discussion with more, but in an adversarial style, while those who otherwise can't keep up with you you see as childish and pure, in need of your protection. 

Do you figure Misscomm can't defend herself, because I'm otherwise inclined to agree with you, and clearly so is Inquirer based on his rushing to her defense so chronically. 

You think legga is strong

I don't respect legga at all what are you talking about? Those that can't keep..up..with me? 

Tc.

I am literally the stupidest fuck in this forum. What do you mean critical discussion? Keeping up with me? Bro I'm just a cunt. MissC can defend herself quite fine, whether she thinks this thread at all is worth expanding much energy on is a different story. It's legga ffs.

Xadem got on her case more than a fair deal after she demonstrated her... capacity, Alice has mocked her on and off since then, and otherwise the social climate for the most part has accepted the canon that she's blatantly a ditz. 

so just the two, and some wording fix...I don't recall accepting that, did everyone sign some sort of document accepting this? 

I don't think she's bad at direct communication, why do you feel this way? 

This must be a "for the sake of argument" point you're posing, erring towards your usual "girl power" error from assuming women need more defending than men. 

No I'm genuinely curious. I don't think she bad at directly communicating with others at all. What am I missing?

She's very blatantly either been superficially withholding, and when she tries to get her points across without it being just feel-good nonsense she struggles to make it sound convincing. If someone believes her words for more than the merit of being friendly with her, there must be some serious faculties missing if not a blind spot otherwise as she's dull and slower than most others here, even by comparison to some of the more mentally handicapped that attend this place. 

Really? I've been able to understand everything shes said and implied. Sometimes it feels like you're just so invested in this place you only accept essays for answers with the same sort of passion that you apply to your responses.

 It's weird how much you seem to be trying to make her believe she isn't actually liked. It's a little cringe tbh.

It's weirder how much people are willing to support someone who gives them empty backpats. 

Seriously, it's not that far from Fae and Scarlett's angle, the only difference is that MC ditziness is more legitimate. 

 Maybe their experience is much different from their own, or you're missing something that others are getting and instead trying to make it seem like the issue isn't with you.

Spatial Mind said: 

If Legga went after TC instead, no one would have his back. This is true. 

No one? 

I feel like I'd warrant a few "Ackshully"s. 

I don't understand how anyone can harbor that much resentment for MissC tbh. She's harmless.

The title is "Misscommunication is the most boring person on SC", harmlessness (ineffectiveness) is one of many aspects of that. 

Legga. Inq will never admit to learning anything from you, hence your endless debates.

He has more respect for Legga than he once did. His language has evolved from seeing him as a joke to instead seeing him as a threat worth haughty language. 

Legga's making progress, he just needs more time. 

If you want to beat Inq you have to point out how many questions he asks. He asks a lot of them. Also never let him derail the subject.

It's mostly the goal post adjustment issue I've seen get in the way, which is hilarious when the two of you otherwise are surprisingly similar. Watching the two of you debate's like watching a mirror match on Mortal Kombat despite you two having led such different lives and otherwise carry such different opinions. 

Also keep in mind, the "burden of proof" argument isn't really on you online, when all your opponents need to do is look for themselves.

Someone worthy of intellectual integrity would not be afraid of linking their sources. 

Claim victory and move on when you're blamed for them not researching your word for themselves.

In other words, ego compensate when things don't go your way through inner-self congratulations. 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

When you think sc members missc is usually one that's thought of almost immediately with ed, inq, sug, tc, tryp and luna. 

Well yeah, she's Inq's sidecar, his tagalong. She rides his coattails as a way to be noticed. 

Nah. Literally have a forum of people that have interacted with each other and she's been a pretty consistent character. Weird try tho

Personally I don't think it takes much to be an associated name, and she has no history worth talking about with strangers. I've gone on about the epics of many here in discussions with people about human nature, but she hasn't been even remotely anecdotal beyond how others have responded around her. 

 

Does it annoy you that you have to write out epic length responses to be known while she doesn't have to do that?

 

He says in the way that she trash talks someone she doesn't know- but we all know legga- he just tends to hyper focus on Ed, inq and sensy, hyper focus enough that it leads to thoughts of paranoia where he assumes that anyone that agrees with with those he disagrees with must be an alt and/or completely fails to notice others properly.

Yes, lets just attack Legga's character to distract people with ad hominems rather than focus on the topic itself. 

He isn't the only one getting on her case, and those who've had... "nice" things to say about her fall within TPG's reply in this topic. 

Its Legga. The only other ones getting on her case is you(with an obvious dislike towards her), Crow through a really weird need of not wanting inq to defend his friend- which is a very normal thing to do, and legga.

If this whole thread is leggas way of simply dismissing her entirely based on what people here can or cannot put into words then I guess tc is helping along with that, instead of having an actual conversation with the person. 

With who, Misscomm? 

She's welcome to participate in this discussion, but it looks like she'd rather avoid the subject entirely so that Inq can white knight her with the intelligence she otherwise lacks. 

Nice storyline you've got going there.

The best bit tho is that he'll probably continue because he sees her teasing as being malicious and that hurts him while missc will probably continue to ignore him, tc continues to show his dislike while using the "others" wording to reinforce the bullshit he's peddling

Care to explain how it's bullshit, or are you going to spout things you don't actually know even when comparative references are starting to be dropped? 

Like usual, you're stuck defending people who you think need the help to the point of overreaching your position. You have nothing more than "Misscomm's nice, lets ignore her and focus on the guy saying negative things". 

Bullshit as in the thing you do when you want others to feel the way you think they ought to feel. It's usually when you start dropping phrases like "the others" "social climate" "backroom/background shenanigans", you know, that thing you do a lot?  and I'm currently focusing on you, not really legga. I stopped focusing on legga a bit ago because he's got nothing more to offer other than "tell me why I should even try to get to know her" he's not even worth focusing on tbh

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: Should I just be getting on everyone's case who happens to show a little  leg  emotion? 

Getting on Legga's case is largely redundant and he's otherwise not the bandwagon lip service we're seeing here. Someone needs to represent the underdog, and in this case he happens to be mostly correct. 

Like I said, you called it out, I'm just pointing out that you failed to do that to the *other* emotional kid.

That'd be off topic. 

If your thing is to shame inq about his use of emotional language and not legga it makes you seem a bit like a cunt with a particularly missc sized chip on your shoulder and using legga to have at them both.

What do you figure my relationship with Inq is these days? 

His whole schtick is that she's being mean without "knowing him" while he's not done anything in the way to get to know her either. 

She'd have to actually be willing to communicate with him rather than brush off the entire topic. 

He's opened the floor to discuss things with her, she's the one who chose to post two gifs and declare herself the winner. 

your just trying to get a foot in on being a bitch. 

It could be said that your barging in here and being a contrarian towards those you know that can handle it in here is the same thing. 

What

Towards those i know that can handle it? What?

You pick your targets based on how willing they are to face your vitriol. If they appear weak, you go all guardian about them, while if they can handle themselves you enjoy them more thoroughly through how adversarial they are. 

Face it, you try to protect people who you feel can't protect themselves. 

Barging in? It's a forum? How does one barge in?

Semantics, you either know what I mean or choose not to. 

I can't help but notice how you feel more comfortable going after stronger people, and that your choice of who's worth defending tends to err towards "protecting the weak". You seem to respect those you can have a critical discussion with more, but in an adversarial style, while those who otherwise can't keep up with you you see as childish and pure, in need of your protection. 

Do you figure Misscomm can't defend herself, because I'm otherwise inclined to agree with you, and clearly so is Inquirer based on his rushing to her defense so chronically. 

You think legga is strong

You're afraid of him~ 

Tc.

I am literally the stupidest fuck in this forum. What do you mean critical discussion? Keeping up with me? Bro I'm just a cunt. MissC can defend herself quite fine, whether she thinks this thread at all is worth expanding much energy on is a different story. It's legga ffs.

You're just proving my point when you self-flagellate like this to maintain contrarian status. This is all for the sake of argument, and your alliances here are purely emotional. 

Xadem got on her case more than a fair deal after she demonstrated her... capacity, Alice has mocked her on and off since then, and otherwise the social climate for the most part has accepted the canon that she's blatantly a ditz. 

so just the two, and some wording fix...I don't recall accepting that, did everyone sign some sort of document accepting this? 

Who said "everyone"? 

"Zomg it's just two people", bitch how many people do you think log in here at any given time, let alone aren't too pussy to say their real thoughts beyond "[name] seems nice"? 

This has been my complaint about the bandwagon from the beginning, and it is not my fault that you fall prey towards those who are either too afraid or otherwise can't sass you. Unlike you, I don't see "easy listening" as a real person. 

I don't think she's bad at direct communication, why do you feel this way? 

This must be a "for the sake of argument" point you're posing, erring towards your usual "girl power" error from assuming women need more defending than men. 

No I'm genuinely curious. I don't think she bad at directly communicating with others at all. What am I missing?

Pretty sure we've talked about this already. 

She's very blatantly either been superficially withholding, and when she tries to get her points across without it being just feel-good nonsense she struggles to make it sound convincing. If someone believes her words for more than the merit of being friendly with her, there must be some serious faculties missing if not a blind spot otherwise as she's dull and slower than most others here, even by comparison to some of the more mentally handicapped that attend this place. 

Really? I've been able to understand everything shes said and implied.

What does she typically imply other than "I'm above this" without actually contributing reasons to believe her, some copy/paste leftist articles? 

Sometimes it feels like you're just so invested in this place you only accept essays for answers with the same sort of passion that you apply to your responses.

Or it could be that you accept who someone is too readily, that if it feels good that it must be good. 

I choose to be more discerning. 

 It's weird how much you seem to be trying to make her believe she isn't actually liked. It's a little cringe tbh.

It's weirder how much people are willing to support someone who gives them empty backpats. 

Seriously, it's not that far from Fae and Scarlett's angle, the only difference is that MC ditziness is more legitimate. 

Maybe their experience is much different from their own, or you're missing something that others are getting and instead trying to make it seem like the issue isn't with you.

Care to enlighten me on what I'm missing, or are you just going to distract from how you don't have anything better than "she's nice and mean people are easier to talk about"? 

I MissC is a lot of fun and a good person to have a conversation with. I think some of you may have an agenda.

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

When you think sc members missc is usually one that's thought of almost immediately with ed, inq, sug, tc, tryp and luna. 

Well yeah, she's Inq's sidecar, his tagalong. She rides his coattails as a way to be noticed. 

Nah. Literally have a forum of people that have interacted with each other and she's been a pretty consistent character. Weird try tho

Consistent beyond being Inq's sidecar and a leftist shill? 

You're welcome to tell me what makes her not boring, but I'm expecting you to instead point towards how it's my fault for not seeing it. So far the peanut gallery's not been able to show what makes her interesting, but rather how easygoing she's perceived. 

If she's so unique and otherwise interesting, why can't her supporters describe her well enough to paint a real picture? 

Personally I don't think it takes much to be an associated name, and she has no history worth talking about with strangers. I've gone on about the epics of many here in discussions with people about human nature, but she hasn't been even remotely anecdotal beyond how others have responded around her. 

Does it annoy you that you have to write out epic length responses to be known while she doesn't have to do that?

I've seen people be clever with short responses, that's not her M.O. 

Nice attempt at distracting from the point though. As you continue to reply to me, you continue to show me how little you likely actually know about her. 

He says in the way that she trash talks someone she doesn't know- but we all know legga- he just tends to hyper focus on Ed, inq and sensy, hyper focus enough that it leads to thoughts of paranoia where he assumes that anyone that agrees with with those he disagrees with must be an alt and/or completely fails to notice others properly.

Yes, lets just attack Legga's character to distract people with ad hominems rather than focus on the topic itself. 

He isn't the only one getting on her case, and those who've had... "nice" things to say about her fall within TPG's reply in this topic. 

Its Legga.

So just because it's Legga it's immediately invalid? 

I give random puppets and trolls the time of day for at least the sake of discussion, yet you'd say that we should just invalidate this entire topic because of who uttered it? 

Does someone else have to host the exact same topic for it to mean something to you, or would it remain incorrect simply because Legga hosted the query first? If Legga said gravity was real, would you just assume you could fly by merrit of how much Legga is not to be trusted? 

The only other ones getting on her case is you(with an obvious dislike towards her), Crow through a really weird need of not wanting inq to defend his friend- which is a very normal thing to do, and legga.

So I'm just supposed to accept the "she's nice" loop, like you are? 

If this whole thread is leggas way of simply dismissing her entirely based on what people here can or cannot put into words then I guess tc is helping along with that, instead of having an actual conversation with the person. 

With who, Misscomm? 

She's welcome to participate in this discussion, but it looks like she'd rather avoid the subject entirely so that Inq can white knight her with the intelligence she otherwise lacks. 

Nice storyline you've got going there.

You're welcome to go back and see her two posts in this topic, and if you don't see Inq as her chronic white knight then you aren't paying attention. 

Tryptamine said: 

I MissC is a lot of fun and a good person to have a conversation with. I think some of you may have an agenda.

Aw sweetie, you nailed it. This is about a personal agenda a couple of sad people are trying to play out. It's entertaining.