Aww guise! I'm seriously touched by all this love. <3 Thanks! So much to say but for now I shall just...
Also, if Legga is completely pulling all this out his ass because he's hurt, why do you figure that I agree with almost every word of it? And I believe TC does as well. I mean, you can think people have the wrong impression for a reason, but it'd be odd if all three of us independently invented almost identical narratives of how we see MissComm purely by coincidence.
I mean, tc has never really liked missC
What about her do you think made for that?
Idunno, I'm not you. I have no way of knowing what particular thing set you this way.
This is pretty pathetic. Did it hurt you this much to get teased by MissC and others during the debate? Is that why you refuse to do part 2?
Apart from whining about the debate there's very little substance in anything you say. It's just a lazy, baseless tirade. I do find it funny to see you call other people "dreary trolls" and that they "nauseatingly mirror and echo other people" though. Is it too presumptuous of me to assume this is not meant as self irony?
Inquirer to the rescue, as usual. Why is it that you think MissComm is incapable of defending herself?
Why do you dislike inquirer defending her? They've been friends for a long time, is that not a normal response for a friend to have?
It'd be more warranted if her responses actually had substance, and the emotional language seems otherwise unbefitting of his usual behavior.
To go beyond that is to simply defend someone because you like them, which is a pretty empty reason when left on it's own.
His response is perfectly reasonable, leggas is using the same sort of emotional language- he's frustrated that she was 'cheerleading' inq on- emotional enough to make a thread of it and then lash out and try to make people explain why they like her.
His only real view of her has been through his interaction with inq. He hasn't taken the time to get to know her at all. You and crow however seem to immediately try to jump on an opportunity where you can talk down on her and while crow initially made a polite comment, her need to demand why inq is defending her is just as emotional.
Also, if Legga is completely pulling all this out his ass because he's hurt, why do you figure that I agree with almost every word of it? And I believe TC does as well. I mean, you can think people have the wrong impression for a reason, but it'd be odd if all three of us independently invented almost identical narratives of how we see MissComm purely by coincidence.
I mean, tc has never really liked missC
What about her do you think made for that?
Idunno, I'm not you. I have no way of knowing what particular thing set you this way.
Weird, with how many times I've said it openly with and without you around I kinda figured you'd have picked up why by now.
This is pretty pathetic. Did it hurt you this much to get teased by MissC and others during the debate? Is that why you refuse to do part 2?
Apart from whining about the debate there's very little substance in anything you say. It's just a lazy, baseless tirade. I do find it funny to see you call other people "dreary trolls" and that they "nauseatingly mirror and echo other people" though. Is it too presumptuous of me to assume this is not meant as self irony?
Inquirer to the rescue, as usual. Why is it that you think MissComm is incapable of defending herself?
Why do you dislike inquirer defending her? They've been friends for a long time, is that not a normal response for a friend to have?
It'd be more warranted if her responses actually had substance, and the emotional language seems otherwise unbefitting of his usual behavior.
To go beyond that is to simply defend someone because you like them, which is a pretty empty reason when left on it's own.His response is perfectly reasonable, leggas is using the same sort of emotional language
So in other words, Legga's response is perfectly reasonable?
His only real view of her has been through his interaction with inq.
Read the debate topic that was otherwise meant to be between Inq and Legga, the two address eachother directly before he began building a case on her otherwise. Multiple people who've read her affect on that topic began seeing her as less intelligent than prior, it's a revealing read.
Just because Misscomm's bad at direct communication doesn't mean the two otherwise never have.
He hasn't taken the time to get to know her at all. You and crow however seem to immediately try to jump on an opportunity where you can talk down on her
You say this like it's otherwise weird to get on her case. I talk down to people I see as otherwise without intelligence and/or substance like this fairly often, and I don't see what makes her otherwise an exception.
Nothing about her has otherwise inspired the dig, save for the days she's otherwise imbalanced.
This is pretty pathetic. Did it hurt you this much to get teased by MissC and others during the debate? Is that why you refuse to do part 2?
Apart from whining about the debate there's very little substance in anything you say. It's just a lazy, baseless tirade. I do find it funny to see you call other people "dreary trolls" and that they "nauseatingly mirror and echo other people" though. Is it too presumptuous of me to assume this is not meant as self irony?
Inquirer to the rescue, as usual. Why is it that you think MissComm is incapable of defending herself?
Why do you dislike inquirer defending her? They've been friends for a long time, is that not a normal response for a friend to have?
It'd be more warranted if her responses actually had substance, and the emotional language seems otherwise unbefitting of his usual behavior.
To go beyond that is to simply defend someone because you like them, which is a pretty empty reason when left on it's own.His response is perfectly reasonable, leggas is using the same sort of emotional language
So in other words, Legga's response is perfectly reasonable?
Sure! Let's go that route: leggas response to missC's teasing him in that thread has turned into this emotional outburst in this thread. If you're going to call out Inq emotional language but not leggas continued tantrum, that's a lil unfair and has you seeming like your just trying to get a foot in on being a bitch.
His only real view of her has been through his interaction with inq.
Read the debate topic that was otherwise meant to be between Inq and Legga, the two address eachother directly before he began building a case on her otherwise. Multiple people who've read her affect on that topic began seeing her as less intelligent than prior, it's a revealing read.
Just because Misscomm's bad at direct communication doesn't mean the two otherwise never have.
There was plenty of other people commenting in that thread, who are the multiple other people who have begun to see her as less intelligent? Could you name them?
I don't think she's bad at direct communication, why do you feel this way?
He hasn't taken the time to get to know her at all. You and crow however seem to immediately try to jump on an opportunity where you can talk down on her
You say this like it's otherwise weird to get on her case. I talk down to people I see as otherwise without intelligence and/or substance like this fairly often, and I don't see what makes her otherwise an exception.
Nothing about her has otherwise inspired the dig, save for the days she's otherwise imbalanced.
It's weird how much you seem to be trying to make her believe she isn't actually liked. It's a little cringe tbh.
what i have gleaned from this topic is that, people have inadvertently reinforced leggas point, when people are recalling MissCs qualities, none of them go farther than to say "she is nice" and "she is easy to talk to" (tryptamines response has been an exception), which is merely a convenient manner to express "you are inoffensive and are polite when in conversation with me, besides that i really have nothing else to say of you"
members on sc have a certain essentia that defines them, jim is overwhelmingly charismatic, alice is a genius etc etc, but MissCs essence (by the looks of it) seems to be "nice and easy to talk to", and if that really is all there is to her then legga is absolutely correct
This is pretty pathetic. Did it hurt you this much to get teased by MissC and others during the debate? Is that why you refuse to do part 2?
Apart from whining about the debate there's very little substance in anything you say. It's just a lazy, baseless tirade. I do find it funny to see you call other people "dreary trolls" and that they "nauseatingly mirror and echo other people" though. Is it too presumptuous of me to assume this is not meant as self irony?
Inquirer to the rescue, as usual. Why is it that you think MissComm is incapable of defending herself?
Why do you dislike inquirer defending her? They've been friends for a long time, is that not a normal response for a friend to have?
It'd be more warranted if her responses actually had substance, and the emotional language seems otherwise unbefitting of his usual behavior.
To go beyond that is to simply defend someone because you like them, which is a pretty empty reason when left on it's own.His response is perfectly reasonable, leggas is using the same sort of emotional language
So in other words, Legga's response is perfectly reasonable?
Sure! Let's go that route: leggas response to missC's teasing him in that thread has turned into this emotional outburst in this thread. If you're going to call out Inq emotional language but not leggas continued tantrum, that's a lil unfair
Should I just be getting on everyone's case who happens to show a little leg emotion?
Getting on Legga's case is largely redundant and he's otherwise not the bandwagon lip service we're seeing here. Someone needs to represent the underdog, and in this case he happens to be mostly correct.
your just trying to get a foot in on being a bitch.
It could be said that your barging in here and being a contrarian towards those that you know can handle it in here is the same thing.
I can't help but notice how you feel more comfortable going after stronger people, and that your choice of who's worth defending tends to err towards "protecting the weak". You seem to respect those you can have a critical discussion with more, but in an adversarial style, while those who otherwise can't keep up with you you see as childish and pure, in need of your protection.
Do you figure Misscomm can't defend herself, because I'm otherwise inclined to agree with you, and clearly so is Inquirer based on his rushing to her defense so chronically.
His only real view of her has been through his interaction with inq.
Read the debate topic that was otherwise meant to be between Inq and Legga, the two address eachother directly before he began building a case on her otherwise. Multiple people who've read her affect on that topic began seeing her as less intelligent than prior, it's a revealing read.
Just because Misscomm's bad at direct communication doesn't mean the two otherwise never have.There was plenty of other people commenting in that thread, who are the multiple other people who have begun to see her as less intelligent? Could you name them?
Xadem got on her case more than a fair deal after she demonstrated her... capacity, Alice has mocked her on and off since then, and otherwise the social climate for the most part has accepted the canon that she's blatantly a ditz.
I don't think she's bad at direct communication, why do you feel this way?
This must be a "for the sake of argument" point you're posing, erring towards your usual "girl power" error from assuming women need more defending than men.
She's very blatantly been superficially withholding, and when she tries to get her points across without it being just feel-good nonsense she struggles to make it sound convincing. If someone believes her words for more than the merit of being friendly with her, there must be some serious faculties missing if not a blind spot otherwise as she's dull and slower than most others here, even by comparison to some of the more mentally handicapped that attend this place.
He hasn't taken the time to get to know her at all. You and crow however seem to immediately try to jump on an opportunity where you can talk down on her
You say this like it's otherwise weird to get on her case. I talk down to people I see as otherwise without intelligence and/or substance like this fairly often, and I don't see what makes her otherwise an exception.
Nothing about her has otherwise inspired the dig, save for the days she's otherwise imbalanced.It's weird how much you seem to be trying to make her believe she isn't actually liked. It's a little cringe tbh.
It's weirder how much people are willing to support someone who gives them empty backpats.
Seriously, it's not that far from Fae and Scarlett's angle, the only difference is that MC ditziness is more legitimate.
When you think sc members missc is usually one that's thought of almost immediately with ed, inq, sug, tc, tryp and luna.
He says in the way that she trash talks someone she doesn't know- but we all know legga- he just tends to hyper focus on Ed, inq and sensy, hyper focus enough that it leads to thoughts of paranoia where he assumes that anyone that agrees with with those he disagrees with must be an alt and/or completely fails to notice others properly. If this whole thread is leggas way of simply dismissing her entirely based on what people here can or cannot put into words then I guess tc is helping along with that, instead of having an actual conversation with the person.
The best bit tho is that he'll probably continue because he sees her teasing as being malicious and that hurts him while missc will probably continue to ignore him, tc continues to show his dislike while using the "others" wording to reinforce the bullshit he's peddling and crows slight spill out from last topic and now in this one is just a simmer.
