Yes. ^ this.
If someone chooses to put intimate details of their life on public display, does one really need a motive for asking follow up questions?
For all your talk about sexism, don't you agree that if a fella came on here saying 'my suicidal gf is about to walk into traffic LOL' he'd be absolutely crucified by almost everybody here. And yet you're expecting to get away with it without even the gentlest of questioning? Really?
Normally no, but I'd expect as much from Sugar. And she gave me reason to think so, with the way she responded to me previously. Which is why I insisted upon knowing. Something that, once again, you would know if you read what you are responding to.
I'm not expecting to "get away" with anything. You're talking like I robbed a bank. XD
I have no idea why you're bringing sexism into a completely unrelated topic, but sure, we'll go with this. If a man did what I did, I expect he'd get about as much flak as I will, on this site. Probably less, because he's not dating the moderator. : P Other places you'd be right, but not here.
On the "Believed Alignment" thread of course. Stating that you believe I'm CE (or that you believe that I believe I'm CE) is the same as calling me crazy.
You're also constantly comparing me to TK. That woman is batshit. That doesn't make her unlikeable, but she's a bona fide diagnosed whackjob who couldn't function in society if she wanted to. She's the first to admit it. At least she's honest about her preference for the gvt.checks over the world of work.
^ And yeah, I said I don't call somebody crazy lightly. She's discussed her dx at great length, so it's a fair assumption in her case.
I guess you didn't make an explicit claim. You do appear to function a little better than she does tho, despite your long list of... w/e you call it.
"... you already admitted on this account to being Xena, a while back."
No shit, Sherlock.
No clinging. Just observing. What can I say? Contradictions are just one of the things that get my attention. I could quote some psych research pointing to how normal people remember incongruities in written/ spoken/ behavioural patterns if I had more time. But I don't :P
So I'll explain my reasoning with the old Sesame Street song. That's more fitting for this forum, anyway.
Ah... you're using wooster's trick of misquoting the wrong side of the prepositional phrase to try to prove your argument for 'crazy'
That's slightly more clever misdirection than you've come up with so far this evening, but not quite good enough, m'dear.
I'll redirect the readers back to the previous page in this thread if they actually care to examine your deflection techniques. I'm not typing it all out again.
Sugargirl will be back in a few hours and this page will likely get buried anyway.
If I'm lucky I will thoroughly enjoy the exchange you'll have with Edvard this afternoon when I wake up. XD