lolwut?
I didn't post that wahoo thread.
I posted some goofy pics of fat ginger drag queens on it, about halfway down the first page.
Wooster demanded on open forum that Turncoat take the dox down and he did, even tho wahoo said he didn't care.
Funny how Turncoat never dragged the wahoo dox out of the crypt, even tho it was wooster and not wahoo who requested the deletion.
"You're still avoiding the point"
No I'm not.
I told Turn I wanted to wait and see if anybody else who was here in 2014 sees the inconsistencies in his story.
You're avoiding MY point.
I said I'd come back to this thread later and that's what I'm going to do.
It's been here for nearly 2 years. It will be here at least 2 more.
So deal with it.
Xena stated: source post
So when you repeat a certain line of crap over and over again, it's bc I have a character flaw. And then when I correct your line of crap over and over again it's also bc I have a character flaw?
I like your version.
This time however is more interesting from Ed's potential to be like "wait, what?" alongside the rest of us.
Not Macaria's. It was Wahoo's doxx - which Xena posted-, Xena ordered you in PM to remove. The doxx was in the title / 1st post, so deleting the dox made the whole thread vanish.
Xena wanted that thread deleted because it contained the address and streetview pic of what she insists is totally not her sister's house. But since it's totally NOT her sister's house, she couldn't use it as a valid reason to get the thread removed, rite? So she had to use her own doxxing of Wahoo instead.
Macaria's doxx was deleted by Luna, per Macaria's request. 3 times, as Xena kept re-posting her info.
And I was referring to the pm I sent TC about this thread. The rape thread. 2 summers ago.
The bickering about who's allowed to ask for a dox to be removed didn't happen till TK was demodded and TC replaced her. November or December that year. 6 or 7 months later.
TheCrowOnTheFence stated: source post
Edvard stated: source post
You and Turncoat were already wrong when you mistook MissB's displays of affection as ironic. Now you assume a lack of genuine emotion again. I think you have to stop overcomplicating things and reading too much into people. Sometimes what you see is what you get.
Were we wrong? I saw no proof. Sometimes what you see is what you get and sometimes it's not. Usually the latter in a place like this. I don't see what's so unreasonable about suspecting that of being the case here, as it has been so many times before.
You misread someone. You were surprised when I mentioned this happens in the Voice thread. Accept that it happens sometimes, you've done that to me and others plenty of times here as well.
I have to add though, almost all your role and participation here was reduced to you taking whichever side TC is on in various arguments. You have grown empty of content and from a valuable member you have turned into a one dimensional side-kick, which I think it's a pity.
Even before he and I were together, before we knew eachother at all, we agreed on almost everything. Go back and look at any thread we both posted on, from before we were a couple. Similar if not the same points being made. That's why we're together. We're compatible. We think alike. It never bothered you, until we started arguing with you. Do you really think this is about us? Because from where I stand, this looks like a petty excuse for you to invalidate the things I say that you don't care for.
I've heard the "Turncoat and I agree to everything" excuse before, I wasn't commenting on that. You didn't use to care and get this involved into drama and targeting members Turn was sparring with before and I'm not blind to miss how this became personal to you. Your content lately has shifted 90% to taking his side, protecting Turn like a baby even when he doesn't need it, as if it's your responsibility and feel personally targeted and moved to act. I have no issue with that if you make other contributions too, the way you used to. Just don't limit yourself to just being a side-kick.
PF type 1 stated: source post
Not Macaria's. It was Wahoo's doxx - which Xena posted-, Xena ordered you in PM to remove. The doxx was in the title / 1st post, so deleting the dox made the whole thread vanish.
Xena wanted that thread deleted because it contained the address and streetview pic of what she insists is totally not her sister's house. But since it's totally NOT her sister's house, she couldn't use it as a valid reason to het the thread removed, rite? So she had to use her own doxxing of Wahoo instead.
I don't get it. The rule has always been for Turn to only delete dox at the request of the victim. How did Xena (or Wooster? wow this is confusing) get Turncoat to delete Wahoo's dox? "Ordered" even, lmao.
PF type 1 stated: source post
Listerinefresh was the OP. Who's saying it wasn't you, you? Ok....
Wooster did not request the deletion. You were bossing about TC in PM, until he got sick and tired of the noise.
Also see my edit:
"Xena wanted that thread deleted because it contained the address and streetview pic of what she insists is totally not her sister's house. But since it's totally NOT her sister's house, she couldn't use it as a valid reason to het the thread removed, rite? So she had to use her own doxxing of Wahoo instead."
Oh hi wooster. You know your syntax becomes more familiar, the more you stalk me with puppets. lol
That's not my sister's house.
And the macaria dox I posted on the xena thread was on the second page.
Xena thread. Not wahoo thread.
YOU were the one making demands on Turncoat to have WAHOO's dox deleted. And you're still lying through your teeth about who the OP was. You people are always bragging about how you have my IP address. So whip it out and compare it to listerinefresh.
Oh right... you can't do that. It would ruin your lie. lol