Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 4552
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

Any retard who doesn't understand that capitalism is about satisfying your client despite your own views should not be allowed to participate in it is my view

It's about exchanging things of value. People shouldn't be forced into transactions in their own business.

Posts: 1076
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

So what was it like to be a Satanist?

 

 Well it was before I joined SC even the first time. I'll tell you one thing. Joining God is much better. Being with God is more than just following a bunch of rules. It's a relationship between the divine triune God and yourself. God shares Himself with you. When you love someone you don't want to make them miserable or do anything that put them on a cross. 

Being a Satanist is not what it's cracked up to be. It's just misery and desperation. You aren't enjoying a full course meal with God. You are eating the crumbs of what this world offers in exchange for eternity. The devil wants you to be a slave too but slave to evil. He wants to bring you to greater depths of sin that you'd never have gone to on your own. I think I even saw a demon once. 

Maybe I have one song to describe Satanism (profanity in lyrics and sinful content warning).

Another song to describe life with Christ. 

last edit on 6/9/2019 3:35:36 AM
Posts: 833
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

Conservatives and Liberals can differ on social issues, whether one wants welfare or not, but to me, both are not that far off in what they do. Both are warmongers and seek to expand capital. So, both are a plague, if I had to pick which one I have to hate more, it'd be liberals, because they pose as a force of good to the working people, but really are snakes. 

I'm mostly referring to the sphere of America Politics, but Europe is barely any different. 


I'll admit though, I do hate when both sides use the term "Socialist" to describe a Liberal, it's broad but I prefer it's application to the Soviet Model. However, due to this, I find idiots that compare Communism, to Nazism, to Bernie Sanders.

Just because all three have a title that is similar, does not make their systems and policies the same. 

National Socialism in it's originality wasn't what Hitler made it out to be, before Hitler joined the party there were the Strasser brothers who were more left leaning, and Otto Strasser even wanted to befriend the Soviet Union, although, I'd argue their economic system was still different from that of the Soviet model is sounds a lot like the utopian socialists that wanted a system like feudalism, (which marx critiqued). Hitler came in and befriended corporations and wanted to work with them, that isn't something a communist would want.

Socialism in the Soviet economics, and bare with me, because Communism uses the term "Socialist" as it's transitional period, not for communism itself. Communism seeks to abolish the State in the long run. 

Soviet Socialism is where there exists no private sector, and the economy is state owned. 


Now, to Bernie Sanders and the "glorious" scandinavian model, it seeks to bring in social programs and have a mixed economy. It is NOT something that would lead to Soviet Socialism, nor is it friendly to Soviet Socialism.

Welfarism is a means to pacify the worker and prevent communist revolution. It's exactly what Otto Von Bismarck used in his anti-socialist policies. It's a means to buy out the people, so that revolution won't happen. 

I guess the two that are the closest would be Hitler's National Socialism and Bernie's Socialism, in terms of economics. Hitler used Keysnesian economics in the beginning, but in the long run, if it had survived longer, I'm sure he would have been more loose in regards to how the markets run. 

gone
Posts: 33380
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

So what was it like to be a Satanist?

Well it was before I joined SC even the first time.

So were you actually calling yourself a Satanist back then, or do you just call your former practices 'of Satanism' from it not being of God? 

Being a Satanist is not what it's cracked up to be. It's just misery and desperation.

Why'd you pick that faith originally? 

I think I even saw a demon once. 

Wait what? 

How'd that go? 
 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 6/9/2019 4:00:04 AM
Posts: 738
1 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

who gives a shit about feminism invasion, this is just the odd witchhunts and superstitions that used to go on 400 years back turned on its head, ppl will act like ppl just under the guise of different ideologies, fuck it

Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals
TPG said: 

who gives a shit about feminism invasion, this is just the odd witchhunts and superstitions that used to go on 400 years back turned on its head, ppl will act like ppl just under the guise of different ideologies, fuck it

 Introduce 3rd wave feminism on another planet, and you'll be considered a destroyer of world's. 

Even the first and 2nd wave are shaking their heads at what it's become.

Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals
TPG said: 

who gives a shit about feminism invasion, this is just the odd witchhunts and superstitions that used to go on 400 years back turned on its head, ppl will act like ppl just under the guise of different ideologies, fuck it

Nothing fixes by itself, you have to give a fuck about it, regardless.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

1st and 2nd wave feminism are a-okay in my book. 

Posts: 738
1 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals

"Nothing fixes by itself, you have to give a fuck about it, regardless."

 

the point is, when has bilateral dialogue between two different ideologies solved anything?

Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Conservatives vs Liberals
TPG said: 

"Nothing fixes by itself, you have to give a fuck about it, regardless."

 

the point is, when has bilateral dialogue between two different ideologies solved anything?

At best it can reach a compromise. In fact that's what the entire point of such talks are.

But in other cases where one side is extremists(such as witch hunts), like the political correct left, you can persuade people to not be extremists. They are usually extremists thanks to propaganda vilifying the 'enemy'. But once the enemy appears as a normal human being to them, they get to have a much harder time being so extremists, suddenly they can see their point of view and etc. Ofc it does not always work, because the extreme person has to have the balls to change their world view and admit they were wrong and manipulated. But if it even saves a few it is not a pointless exercise.

 

But if you meant something like this forum scrimmage, then it is nearly pointless. I wouldn't even post if understood you correctly.
But it can still change someones opinion if they are shown to be wrong. Depends on the person and the presented arguments. In any case, it is always beneficial to think about your own ideas from different angles and such conversations can bring that out.

And i think the point of some here is just to argue and explore the other persons mindset, not really connected to politics/religion.

Cheery bye!
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.