Sociopath Community

natasha87 said: 

Bossroach said: 

Good said: 

Someone that cares has every right to be angry.

And if someone cuts you off because they hurt you, aka (failed, since they can't cut you off otherwise) suicide, then you are better off without them.
Imagine the burden you will lose, once you get over it and if they cut you off like this, it is because you have feelings too, so it is clearly not worth carrying.

---

'It is not selfishness'

'It is how you felt'

🤔

 Someone who cares will understand you've been going thru too much pain and need relief, they would be sad but ultimately happy that you have found relief.

A leech who was using you for emotional support or w.e on the other hand, will be angry because you are not providing them whatever emotional need you were fulfilling at that time.

 i love you skank but this is a load of bullshit. no one is happy when someone they care about commits suicide. in fact, the probability of someone close to that person also killing themselves is like 100 times more likely

 I am not saying that they would only be happy you killed yourself, I am saying that they would be destroyed but ultimately understand you had a big load of pain that youcouldnt cope with and a tinge of happiness that you found peace.

Versus the anger of 'HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO ME? TO ESCAPE YOUR PAIN WHEN I NEED MY INTERNET EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AND ATTENTION? WHATABOUTMEMEMEMEMEME"

that I see displayed from certain people.

You know Jim, when you were threatening suicide, I never had any sympathy. I was actually a bit entertained for 2 reasons.

1. You've proven to be a lost cause. I had already let you know that I was disappointed in you.

2. Your death will improve the living conditions of the world. Children will be safer and cryptocurrency will have less shady stories. 

.

.

.

As for the suicidal. I'm not looking to invest my time and energy into them. Call that selfish if you want, and when they off themselves you won't find me brokenhearted.

Spatial Mind said: 

You know Jim, when you were threatening suicide, I never had any sympathy. I was actually a bit entertained for 2 reasons.

1. You've proven to be a lost cause. I had already let you know that I was disappointed in you.

2. Your death will improve the living conditions of the world. Children will be safer and cryptocurrency will have less shady stories. 

.

.

.

As for the suicidal. I'm not looking to invest my time and energy into them. Call that selfish if you want, and when they off themselves you won't find me brokenhearted.

 Its really sad to watch you keep trying to convince yourself that you matter to anyone and keep your self esteem up with constant self affirmation. All the spirituality you learned and you still haven't reached any spiritual enhancement.

Its one to not care about people killing themselves, but its other to sperg out at someone for doing it because you can't make IRL friends and you need them to keep you company online.

At some point, you will have to move beyond deferred achievements, abstract titles and self aggrandizement and accomplish something tangible and real in life and have something other than making 5 dollars in shitcoins to brag about. It wasn't hard for Ed to clown you due to this exact reason.

Spatial Mind said: 

You know Jim, when you were threatening suicide, I never had any sympathy. I was actually a bit entertained for 2 reasons.

Believe me I know, you started linking family in the chat. 

If you ever went suicidal though, I'd still sympathize for you even though you are of the type that, to me, doesn't usually deserve it. 

1. You've proven to be a lost cause. I had already let you know that I was disappointed in you.

So you enjoy watching lost causes flounder around? 

Another point in favor of your social sadism. 

2. Your death will improve the living conditions of the world. Children will be safer and cryptocurrency will have less shady stories. 

Less people will be learning valuable lessons, and a lot who fell prey to him only lost a few dollars. 

There's people who are loads worse out there doing just fine, and in Jim's death there'd be others of similar capacity who'd eventually take his place. 

His death by the standards of "the world" isn't really a thing unless he scams something posthistorical. 

As for the suicidal. I'm not looking to invest my time and energy into them. Call that selfish if you want, and when they off themselves you won't find me brokenhearted.

Yeah, I bet even if you were to blame for it you'd find some way to shake off having to deal with it. I understand having feelings over it, but how you are towards the suicidal's a bit different than other demographics. 

You're cold here dude, when you normally try to promote a shallow sense of warmth. 

Imagine being such a simp that you cheer the death of the guy who fucked ur crush KEK

On the contrary Nate, you're one to link family in the chat, and you did it for several weeks while pretending to be Jim cause you just couldn't be yourself in Luna's.

Why couldn't you be yoursrlf in Luna's  ? Probably because you wanted to maintain the appearance of resentment. If you offed yourself you'd surely want others to suffer, which is why an indifferent outlook on suicide triggers you so much.

Spatial Mind said: 

On the contrary Nate, you're one to link family in the chat, and you did it for several weeks while pretending to be Jim cause you just couldn't be yourself in Luna's. Why couldn't you be yoursrlf in Luna's? Probably because you wanted to maintain the appearance of resentment.

I've already explained this to you multiple times, I'm not derailing another thread on it. You can look it up on the search here if you actually care to see the true story. 

On topic: 

If you offed yourself you'd surely want others to suffer,

If that were the case, people here'd be more aware of how "at-risk" I am, but no, if you haven't noticed I usually prefer to keep it about other people, or past stories, or something about Pop Culture or Art. It was never for the attention, and I've long faded out of most of my past company's lives. I can say that I'd only be missed lightly beyond a few people, and that to me feels like "progress". 

People usually only hear about this stuff from people during "Cry For Help" stages of it. Many never even discuss the things they do to themselves, or want to do to themselves, unless they get really close with someone. It's a very naked topic, and typically harder to talk about without the right context. 

Death is one of those things that you only get to do once, it has a sense of permanence over that and over what's being let go of (life). When it feels like it's 'my turn', it's been for me, and it's a little too sacred or personal or whatever to cheapen by demonstrating it to other people beyond some more youthful "Cry for Help" behaviors. It's not for them, despite your claims of the contrary, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who keeps these kinds of moments to themselves. 

I'd rather they not suffer, but like I said earlier in the topic... it's a matter of priorities. The real challenge in that case is trying to find ways to make others care less. To claim that it's a ploy of attention that leads to their doom misses the entire point. 

which is why an indifferent outlook on suicide triggers you so much.

Anger and disgust are not "indifference". 

I already mentioned earlier that I strive to become indifferent toward them until I achieve it. And I do, and if i must i will again. It would even be considerate for the suicidal to wish my practice on those who care about them.

I'm not motivated to read your longwinded replys either cause it's alway comprised of hot air.

Plain and simple, it's only worth it for you to go around in circles, cause its the least you can do in your conquest to paint pictures of me.

Spatial Mind said: 

I'm not motivated to read your longwinded replys either cause it's alway comprised of hot air.

This is why you'll always repeat the same misinformation and otherwise only relate towards those who give you compliments. 

Plain and simple, it's only worth it for you to go around in circles, cause its the least you can do in your conquest to paint pictures of me.

...how do you even know what's going on if you won't read it? 

It's no mystery how you can be this insulting towards those in pain, even with three losses in your life around it. For most people that likely would have humbled them instead, but you continue to seek ways to make it only about yourself, blaming the people hurting. 

What misinformation  ?

Nate the same members in here, were over there when you were doxing up my family for several weeks while pretending to be Jim.

Jim was the only one banned at Luna's for posting child pornography. You played Jim, you got banned.

"You were not banned for posting my business, you were banned cause you were posing as Jim." 

You'd rather create a new email to join SC only to get banned, because of pride.

You later apologized to me about your episode yourself. Now you have the audacity to say I post links to people's family, which is what brought this up After several weeks of you posing as Jim, I totally posted a link to his sister's facebook, who by the way was doxxed long ago.

You owe Jim an apology, and you're using Alena's episode to suit your conquest to turn people against me.

I don't respect people who kill themselves = You start calling me out as if i should be subservient to them, the way you would want if you jumped infront of a car that day.