Sociopath Community

Xena said: 

lol you're hilarious. I've been discussing the cp situation privately, too.

And yet you sound like you don't know the stories, instead aiming towards general themes you'll otherwise embellish on the dramatic tones of in lieu of actual detailed facts. 

But people who sincerely hate pedos don't want to be here with Jim.

Who's Jim keeping off of this site? 

I've heard people talk shit and make excuses for fleeing this place, but they usually find themselves back here. 

I've often wondered why the ppl here defend that piece of shit. I suspect it has smthg to do with the money he lies about and/ or steals.

If you paid more attention, you might notice why. 

I understand not bothering to dig, but you can't pretend to be a know-it-all about the site if you don't know much about it. 

Like how can a hideous freak like him brag so much about paying trannies with the money he stole from the other trannies he's robbed?

Any idiot could go out and rob prostitutes and make tens of thousands of dollars. I certainly could if I wasn't disgusted enough by narcissistic douchebags to not want to be one, myself.

I don't know about you, but I couldn't do it. 

I mean, there's this little thing called a moral compass. The ppl who defend Jim don't have one.

And the people who do have one don't want to be around people who defend the likes of a scumbag like Jim.

You're showing how prone you are to "camps" with this sort of logic. 

A terrible person could be polite and fake enough to have polite and fake friends, while someone could be a good person who otherwise keeps questionable company. It's a matter of priorities and principals, and not all of it's so black and white when it comes to one's morals. Much like intelligence, there's more than one kind of it and many expressions from it therein. 

Just because some people hang around or otherwise humor Jim doesn't mean that they are just like him, that's nuts. Should we assume you're just like Luna based on your willingness to be seen on her website? 

I thought not. 

Even the lowest, most violent criminals have a code. Kill child molestors on sight.

Would they be "the lowest" if they aren't molesting kids though? 

It's not enough to just get rid of the cp.

This forum will never bounce back as long as he's here and the lowest common denominator are running the place.

That's a mean thing to say about our mod team. I get your issues with me (more so I see that it exists), but this site has others at the controls now too. 

Did you not notice when you were sitting there acting like I'm the sole representative of this website, as opposed to it's wacky dancing mascot? 

And again, you have about 10 intelligent, interesting posters left. You need double that number for anybody to give any actual fucks about this hole.

Even Ed (who is a heavy hitter in terms of overall popularity, whether you like it or not  :P)

Even Ed couldn't pull that many smart, interesting old SCers out of lurk mode.

His disappearance has added some novelty and nostalgia to the guy, his coming back could drum up some temporary traffic, even if it's simply to have a go at him before he disappears again. 

The fuck? Yes I believe haart left bc she was worried that her rl friends and colleagues would put her under investigation and strip her of her credentials if she were to be found associating with you lot.

With your background, you should understand these things. And yet you don't. That's why I say there's no fucking way you could become a research psychologist.

You take so much at face value... and it's not even necessarily always reality's face. 

How well did you get to know her beyond her narratives? 

Xena said: 

Dying of liver failure while he pisses the bed is making Tryp more humble?

lol k

Why wouldn't it be? 

I chatted with haart over email, too.

I wanted to interview her for my book, as well.

And yeah, you're the mod who's here all the time.

Dancing? You're not referring to Cain, are you?

He hates child molestors.

Xena said: 

I chatted with haart over email, too.

I wanted to interview her for my book, as well.

She was also on one of your other forums, so it'd make sense for you to know more of her baser nature...

It's weird that you take her so honestly. I'm starting to think you take surface value as sole value for most people... for a combination of reasons, and that as a result anyone who's nice to your face will be someone you end up respecting. 

In other words, you only like me less because of being less fake with you. 

And yeah, you're the mod who's here all the time.

So it's my fault... for having good attendance and quick response times? 

Dancing? You're not referring to Cain, are you?

He hates child molestors.

No, I called myself a dancing mascot. 

Are my words unclear to you? 

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

I chatted with haart over email, too.

I wanted to interview her for my book, as well.

She was also on one of your other forums, so it'd make sense for you to know more of her baser nature...

It's weird that you take her so honestly. I'm starting to think you take surface value as sole value for most people... for a combination of reasons, and that as a result anyone who's nice to your face will be someone you end up respecting. 

That's a whole lot of assuming you just did, there. You almost seem to be hinting that haart was not nice behind my back.

Kinda like when you said Cricket only got up in my email bc she was looking for smthg to mock me with.

In other words, you only like me less because of being less fake with you. 

Um, no. I told you already. Your personality reminds me of Grima Wormtongue.

You're honest at all the wrong times, and you leave trails of logical inconsistencies that set my bullshit detectors off at least 5 times in every convo I have with you. You don't appear 'less fake' at all. Much of what you say sounds like sleazy bullshit designed as an attempt at manipulating and baiting ppl.

 I do know that haart told a lot of wild stories. And I spent enough time chatting with her to get a decent sense of when she was bullshitting and when she wasn't.

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

 

No, I called myself a dancing mascot. 

Are my words unclear to you? 

 Um... yeah. That prepositional phrase at the end of that long winded contrivance of a sentence was awkward af   :P

Xena said: 

No, I called myself a dancing mascot. 

Are my words unclear to you? 

 Um... yeah. That prepositional phrase at the end of that long winded contrivance of a sentence was awkward af   :P

It was me saying I'm not the website, I'm just it's mascot. 

Doesn't seem like it'd take much ability to glean that from what I'd typed, but I dunno I make a habit of giving people too much credit. 

Xena said: 

Turncoat said: 

Xena said: 

I chatted with haart over email, too.

I wanted to interview her for my book, as well.

She was also on one of your other forums, so it'd make sense for you to know more of her baser nature...

It's weird that you take her so honestly. I'm starting to think you take surface value as sole value for most people... for a combination of reasons, and that as a result anyone who's nice to your face will be someone you end up respecting. 

That's a whole lot of assuming you just did, there. You almost seem to be hinting that haart was not nice behind my back.

Not even "behind your back" as if to imply that she had ill will towards you in particular. 

I'm making character statements about her independent of you. It's not all about you even if you are otherwise the focal point right now. 

Kinda like when you said Cricket only got up in my email bc she was looking for smthg to mock me with.

What?

In other words, you only like me less because of being less fake with you. 

Um, no. I told you already. Your personality reminds me of Grima Wormtongue.

Only because you want it to, because when you look at me you think of this website and some weird ideas you have over me. 

Every time you've been pressed to give reasons, they've been sloppy for what few times it's even been related to me. 

You're honest at all the wrong times

I think you think I'm being dishonest at times that I'm not to support your prior views. You ought to try to see how many of your opinions are anchored baselessly. 

Honesty to me is less complicated and still gets more than enough done, while dishonesty has a way of forming causal webs with the only rewards being short term gains. If I were aiming to be dishonest with you, I'd be trying to flatter and butter you up like some kinda user instead of stating things plainly like this (while watching you continue to not get it). 

Basically, if I were being dishonest with you, I'd be appealing to you with fake pleasantries and bullshit instead of just being me, using how confused you can get over another person's meaning against you instead of putting pressure against a stonewall. 

and you leave trails of logical inconsistencies that set my bullshit detectors off at least 5 times in every convo I have with you.

I feel like the "bullshit detector" is pure presumption, prone to tons of false positives in cases where I'm not even aiming to bullshit you. This if anything is more justification so that you can remain anchored in your roughly structured beliefs. 

I don't think you know me at all, and your reluctance to do so otherwise being based off of a series of sloppy excuses has me question to what degree you even have a beef with me instead of an illusory one. Even your trying to allude to talking to other people could just as easily be expressing how quickly you fall prey to the rumor mill, one without much of a sense of timestamps to boot. 

I don't even have a problem with you, I just find you funny sometimes. Most of the conflicts you refer to this place as being terrible towards you about I didn't even participate in, yet you keep lumping me in like I did all of it. 

You don't appear 'less fake' at all. Much of what you say sounds like sleazy bullshit designed as an attempt at manipulating and baiting ppl.

...yet more of the above, you wanting to see what you'd presume to see before even reading anything. 

I do know that haart told a lot of wild stories. And I spent enough time chatting with her to get a decent sense of when she was bullshitting and when she wasn't.

What triggered your "bullshit detector" in her case? 

And you just did it again lol

You cherrypicked the discussion and split hairs and reworked meanings word by word until we're not even looking at the same statements we were looking at one page ago.

And then you accuse me of 'wanting to see you as the bad guy' or w/e.

Every convo with you degenerates into you spewing 10 and 20 pages of sophistry, and then having the gall to ask me why I don't like you.

You shred discussions like rabies shreds animals' nervous systems, and by the time you're done, the entire thing is meaningless, pointless and going nowhere.

Then it dies on the page.

If I say "good morning TC, how are you?" you flip it around into "bad evening Xena, you suck."

Then you ask me over and over again to repeat myself.

Then we reach the end of another day, and we're back to "fuck you I have a life and it doesn't include arguing with you for days on end" lol

Do you have some scripted tv show in your head or smthg, where one character has a hunch about the other and he pesters and pesters until the other fesses up and confirms his suspicions...

"OK I ADMIT IT. I ATE YOUR DOG WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING" or w/e and we have our big reveal and then everybody can group hug and move on to the next step in their little 12-step program?

Cuz dude... we're both getting more and more confused. We're not on the same page at all, and I really don't have time to sit here trying to decipher this rosetta stone of bullshit you've just graffiti'd all over this thread.

You'd sound like MrOmega if you were a little happier and less slimy.

You bore me half to death. So go find a nice shrink.

I have things to do. kthxbai

And my difficulty translating that awkward sentence about you being a dancing monkey or w/e is on you, not me.

Maybe use fewer commas and make your segues clearer.

Better definition around the pronouns would also be helpful  :P

Just think about it from my position for a second. 

How is actual conversation possible when you're stuck both blaming me for and treating me as if I were your negative experiences with the forum, alongside some weird presumptions, warped rumor mill fragments, and cartoonish caricatures of a believed idea of me? 


You claim I'm the one interrupting the train of thought through repetition of theme? Every time I've tried to make points with you you just descend into insults, self-directing tangents, and clear signs of confusion that you try to veil through weird excuses that'd imply you know what's going on. How am I supposed to talk with you if all you can do is ad hom, externalize, and narc out over some messy idea of the story? 

You're essentially asking me to roleplay as if I were whatever you cooked me up to be in your head, and that to not be doing that is your "bullshit detector" going off. I shouldn't have to defend a me that I'm not for you to have a conversation with me (and even if I did you'd just do more jabs). 

Are we going to be able to have a conversation eventually, or are you just going to keep behaving like this? 

Xena said: 

You shred discussions like rabies shreds animals' nervous systems, and by the time you're done, the entire thing is meaningless, pointless and going nowhere.

Then it dies on the page.

---

Cuz dude... we're both getting more and more confused. We're not on the same page at all, and I really don't have time to sit here trying to decipher this rosetta stone of bullshit you've just graffiti'd all over this thread.

Why do you figure some others are able to follow it while you can't?

If I say "good morning TC, how are you?" you flip it around into "bad evening Xena, you suck."

But you wouldn't say "Good morning TC how are you", you'd say some insult and then act surprised that I'd mention that you're not so great yourself.

Beyond that I mostly ask questions incessantly. 

Then you ask me over and over again to repeat myself.

You aren't repeating yourself though, I am. You meanwhile are floundering all over the place trying to make a point out of weird fragments.