man you guys are just at each other
lol he's not chill either. He's pretty pissed in this video about Mars.
Passive aggressive people can be some of the least chill, and being tranquilized doesn't mean there aren't things underneath there.
So he could be violent?
Are you even reading what I'm saying?
My point is about a lack of proof.Seriously, isn't this the same type of argument people use against you when you say you were raped by a fat chick?
No?
You said you feel like if he tried to strike her she would have three minutes to dodge a hit, ya?
I was making fun of his physique, do you take everything I say as serious? Do you think I actually mean his punch would take three minutes to accomplish?
Seriously girl your sense of humor needs a workout.
Nice deflection. I'm not being literal, I'm using your own words to show your logic is weak.
There's obviously no "proof" he hit her. Duh, no one filmed it. But the evidence that is available shows a pattern of prolonged abuse and obsession that makes it plausible he did.
Imo, the actual 'hit' is irrelevant anyhow compared to how he psychologically abused her for years.
I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.
man you guys are just at each other
It's how we bond.
I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.
I'm currently determining the minimum pressure and intensity required for an acoustic wave in a real atmosphere to kill a single human being.
Inspiration:
Vladimar Gavreau explored the biological effects of infrasound.
A patent for one of his ulta-sound generator.
A forum exploring one of his concepts, the Infrasonic horn/whistle
In developing a military weapon, scientists intend to revert to a policeman's whistle form, perhaps as big as eighteen feet across, mount it on a truck and blow it with a fan turned by a small airplane engine. This weapon, they say, will give forth an all-destroying 10,000 acoustic watts. It could kill a man five miles away. There is one snag: at present, the machine is as dangerous to its operators as to the enemy. The team is working on a way to focus it. Various systems of baffles have been tried, but the most promising method appears to be propagation of a different and complementary sound a wave length backward from the machine. This changes the frequency of airwave length moving in that direction, thus protecting anyone to the rear. There is, of course, a much simpler means of protection: turn the machine on from a safe distance. This summary of Professor Vladimir Gavreau's experiments with infrasound is based on the Sunday Times article.[2] A much more comprehensive article has appeared in an American periodical, The National Enquirer, Vol.42, No. 27, March 10, 1968. Professor Gavreau's discovery has been patented, and anybody can obtain the plans and full description from the French patent office upon payment of two francs."
I'm currently determining the minimum pressure and intensity required for an acoustic wave in a real atmosphere to kill a single human being.
Inspiration:
Vladimar Gavreau explored the biological effects of infrasound.
A patent for one of his ulta-sound generator.
A forum exploring one of his concepts, the Infrasonic horn/whistle
In developing a military weapon, scientists intend to revert to a policeman's whistle form, perhaps as big as eighteen feet across, mount it on a truck and blow it with a fan turned by a small airplane engine. This weapon, they say, will give forth an all-destroying 10,000 acoustic watts. It could kill a man five miles away. There is one snag: at present, the machine is as dangerous to its operators as to the enemy. The team is working on a way to focus it. Various systems of baffles have been tried, but the most promising method appears to be propagation of a different and complementary sound a wave length backward from the machine. This changes the frequency of airwave length moving in that direction, thus protecting anyone to the rear. There is, of course, a much simpler means of protection: turn the machine on from a safe distance. This summary of Professor Vladimir Gavreau's experiments with infrasound is based on the Sunday Times article.[2] A much more comprehensive article has appeared in an American periodical, The National Enquirer, Vol.42, No. 27, March 10, 1968. Professor Gavreau's discovery has been patented, and anybody can obtain the plans and full description from the French patent office upon payment of two francs."
carburetor and a pump hmmm. bullets must have turned out a better killer
lol he's not chill either. He's pretty pissed in this video about Mars.
Passive aggressive people can be some of the least chill, and being tranquilized doesn't mean there aren't things underneath there.
So he could be violent?
Are you even reading what I'm saying?
My point is about a lack of proof.Seriously, isn't this the same type of argument people use against you when you say you were raped by a fat chick?
No?
You said you feel like if he tried to strike her she would have three minutes to dodge a hit, ya?
I was making fun of his physique, do you take everything I say as serious? Do you think I actually mean his punch would take three minutes to accomplish?
Seriously girl your sense of humor needs a workout.Nice deflection. I'm not being literal, I'm using your own words to show your logic is weak.
I think you just want an excuse to jab about the rape thing, as it's not really related at all.
There's obviously no "proof" he hit her. Duh, no one filmed it. But the evidence that is available shows a pattern of prolonged abuse and obsession that makes it plausible he did.
There's more than running security cameras that can prove violence occurred in a notable way.
I otherwise don't really see a case in it thus far.
Imo, the actual 'hit' is irrelevant anyhow compared to how he psychologically abused her for years.
The emotional damages were not the original discussion really.
Still, for the sake of a new discussion, what would you say this abuse was?
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
10/3/2019 5:22:51 AM
carburetor and a pump hmmm. bullets must have turned out a better killer
The fundamental issue with this type of weapon system is that it's extremely difficult to to direct and it needs to be set up near it's target, hence it has a high friendly casualty potential and very little practicality in a hot-war between two states.
Having said that, with urban-guerilla warfare and terrorism being the norm this becomes far more feasible. Essentially, terrorists don't expect to survive a suicide bombing and they already need to be uncomfortably close to their target.
Such technology is becoming more and more standard:
US Diplomats in Cuba and China have shown symptoms of brain injuries
last edit on
10/3/2019 5:18:36 AM
lol he's not chill either. He's pretty pissed in this video about Mars.
Passive aggressive people can be some of the least chill, and being tranquilized doesn't mean there aren't things underneath there.
So he could be violent?
Are you even reading what I'm saying?
My point is about a lack of proof.Seriously, isn't this the same type of argument people use against you when you say you were raped by a fat chick?
No?
You said you feel like if he tried to strike her she would have three minutes to dodge a hit, ya?
I was making fun of his physique, do you take everything I say as serious? Do you think I actually mean his punch would take three minutes to accomplish?
Seriously girl your sense of humor needs a workout.Nice deflection. I'm not being literal, I'm using your own words to show your logic is weak.
I think you just want an excuse to jab about the rape thing, as it's not really related at all.
I'm not jabbing at your rape. I didn't even remember it but you brought it up the other day. And, I've never attacked you about that, btw.
Your point was essentially that Titanic was too scrawny to hit her and even if he tried she could dodge it. And I remember people saying you were full of shit cause a girl wouldnt have the physicallity to rape a dude. Do you see how that is the same argument? I'm trying to help you connect the dots here but I guess it's too abstract for you to manage. ~
There's obviously no "proof" he hit her. Duh, no one filmed it. But the evidence that is available shows a pattern of prolonged abuse and obsession that makes it plausible he did.
There's more than running security cameras that can prove violence occurred in a notable way.
Imo, the actual 'hit' is irrelevant anyhow compared to how he psychologically abused her for years.
The emotional damages were not the discussion really.
My original point always focused on the other abuse. I initially said I lost respect for Titanic when I "found out what he did to Mars." You went directly to the 'hit'. Which I said I believed based on the prolonged emotional abuse, which I think was more significant in damaging her.
Since you're the one having trouble reading, here's what I said:
"Yap, I do think he hit her but that was the smallest and most insignificant part of the abuse. The stalking, harassment and cloning was so weird. Do you know much about their story?"
I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.
last edit on
10/3/2019 5:55:37 AM
lol he's not chill either. He's pretty pissed in this video about Mars.
Passive aggressive people can be some of the least chill, and being tranquilized doesn't mean there aren't things underneath there.
So he could be violent?
Are you even reading what I'm saying?
My point is about a lack of proof.Seriously, isn't this the same type of argument people use against you when you say you were raped by a fat chick?
No?
You said you feel like if he tried to strike her she would have three minutes to dodge a hit, ya?
I was making fun of his physique, do you take everything I say as serious? Do you think I actually mean his punch would take three minutes to accomplish?
Seriously girl your sense of humor needs a workout.Nice deflection. I'm not being literal, I'm using your own words to show your logic is weak.
I think you just want an excuse to jab about the rape thing, as it's not really related at all.
I'm not jabbing at your rape. I didn't even remember it but you brought it up the other day. And, I've never attacked you about that, btw.
Your point was essentially that Titanic was too scrawny to hit her and even if he tried she could dodge it. And I remember people saying you were full of shit cause a girl wouldnt have the physicallity to rape a dude. Do you see how that is the same argument? I'm trying to help you connect the dots here but I guess it's too abstract for you to manage. ~
You're extrapolating this comparison out of a joke about how weak he is, and arguing with a strawman scenario of a world where I seriously meant that.
There's obviously no "proof" he hit her. Duh, no one filmed it. But the evidence that is available shows a pattern of prolonged abuse and obsession that makes it plausible he did.
There's more than running security cameras that can prove violence occurred in a notable way.
Imo, the actual 'hit' is irrelevant anyhow compared to how he psychologically abused her for years.
The emotional damages were not the discussion really.
My original point always focused on the other abuse. I initially said lost respect for Titanic when I "found out what he did to Mars." You went directly to the 'hit'. Which I said I believed based on the prolonged emotional abuse, which I think was more significant in damaging her.
Since you're the one having trouble reading, here's what I said:
"Yap, I do think he hit her but that was the smallest and most insignificant part of the abuse. The stalking, harassment and cloning was so weird. Do you know much about their story?"
So lets go on since the physical violence tangent is basically done now.
What things would you say either of them did to the other that would constitute abuse? For Titanic anyway the stalking's pretty... legit, I'd say the cloning's being dramatic, and the harassment's a case by case thing.
Anything else?
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
10/3/2019 5:48:32 AM
lol he's not chill either. He's pretty pissed in this video about Mars.
Passive aggressive people can be some of the least chill, and being tranquilized doesn't mean there aren't things underneath there.
So he could be violent?
Are you even reading what I'm saying?
My point is about a lack of proof.Seriously, isn't this the same type of argument people use against you when you say you were raped by a fat chick?
No?
You said you feel like if he tried to strike her she would have three minutes to dodge a hit, ya?
I was making fun of his physique, do you take everything I say as serious? Do you think I actually mean his punch would take three minutes to accomplish?
Seriously girl your sense of humor needs a workout.Nice deflection. I'm not being literal, I'm using your own words to show your logic is weak.
I think you just want an excuse to jab about the rape thing, as it's not really related at all.
I'm not jabbing at your rape. I didn't even remember it but you brought it up the other day. And, I've never attacked you about that, btw.
Your point was essentially that Titanic was too scrawny to hit her and even if he tried she could dodge it. And I remember people saying you were full of shit cause a girl wouldnt have the physicallity to rape a dude. Do you see how that is the same argument? I'm trying to help you connect the dots here but I guess it's too abstract for you to manage. ~
You're extrapolating this comparison out of a joke about how weak he is, and arguing with a strawman scenario of a world where I seriously meant that.
Ah! So your counter point was a joke. Nice out. :)
Anything else?
Ya, do you have an off switch?
I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.