Sociopath Community

He did it for me more than Cawk XD

natasha87 said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Nah, it's your standard play, TC. Cause you hate the rules and enforcing them.

This is far from my reasoning behind it. He's displayed that he cannot stop spamming CP, so there's nothing to even barter with for terms. 

You ought to actually read what's being said instead of just making up stories, it's been a pretty open setup for what's going on. 

When pedos get banned you make sure they still have a voice on this platform by posting their crap for them and giving them attention. 

Do I now? You see mocking people as giving them a platform? 

Does this also mean Luna and Boh are pedos now? 

Didn't you and turquie say you're working on a new forum so cawk can come back? lol You should just work with him like you did before wth EC.

What's your beef with me?

All I'd said is I want a backup in case this place bombs again, seeing as he decided to shut the place down while Cawk's content was as far back as page three. 

If you're the advisor on Meta's shoulder, we ought to watch out, as you never know the entire story. 

For real though, you have had weird issues with me ever since I started hitting on Inq and implying we know each other more than you know about, even down to you interrogating me over if I find him attractive. Is there something you want to share with the rest of the class? 

You fought so long to keep him here and now you are posting his stuff on the daily it seems odd. Obsessed much?

What do you think would happen to cawk if you didn't keep posting his stuff here? 

Luna and Bo weren't banned so that's a false equivalency. What I'm curious about is whether you miss cawk or if you're just pissed he went back to Luna's site. Your ultimate betrayal. lol

edit: actually maybe you just miss luna's forum

 the primary obsession seems to be with luna (and anyone she modded) but i think the fact that cawk wasn't so easily manipulated means tc feels the need to keep punishing him forever. he really can't let anything go.

 Agree about Luna and her mods. But Cawk surprised me, tbh. A few of the observations he's made have been spot on. 
 

Luna's forum will evolve into a place with new members, and those members will despise SC and it's members.

wow missc, what a well constructed and patient arguement you have made

MissCommunication said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechatta said:

But knowing you I'm never going to be able to change your mind so meh

---

Wow you're getting sloppy

Both of these are just ad homs that let you avoid the discussion. 

If you say so~

TC’s retorts now are generally a variation of one of these:

-          You obviously didn’t read what’s going on./If you bothered to read you’d know what’s going on.

This one's honestly like 90% you. You're always behind and piece stuff together from a mix of messy gabbing and outdated information out of miles of TLDR. 

It's not like I'm going to reward you for your laziness and aims to defame one's character when it's process was done wrong. 

-          Ad hominem! <maybe insert tl;dr ad hominem graphic> 

I mean this gets in the way of actually getting deeper in a discussion. 

Mud slinging by itself doesn't accomplish actual answers, it just feels good. 

-          Bandwagon/group think/

It's significantly less often overall from people these days, thankfully, just a few like yourself remain in this. 

parrot/you're being steered

Are we just supposed to ignore when this happens? 

This is one way to pigeonhole someone, I can see why you'd go there. 

You forgot "Projection" by the way, probably because it's not used on you as much~

But Cawk surprised me, tbh. A few of the observations he's made have been spot on. 

Like which? 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

aubrieta said: 

he wants to work with us TC, i'll dm you

Working with him is a bad idea, as I already discussed with you in DMs. 

If you thought getting people to join NodeBB with Jim on board was already rough from how dubious that'd look, having Cawk there is even worse. He's too inconsistent, can't be trusted even to believe the same things the next day. 

It's russian roulette with a pedo-rifle. 

 that you have to say this doesn't bode well. Will you let him back in?

I attack him and now you say that doesn't bode well? 

Do you even know what you're talking about anymore, as it seems more like you just want to make an okay presentation despite seeing your error at this point; "Saving Face". 

So what is this really about, Misscomm? 

 I gotta go to work so I'll reply more later. 

But you never answered the question TC - would you let him on your new forum?

 TC, you’re deflecting so much. I don't have a problem with you other than you annoyed me because you stood in the way of getting rid of pedo content. And it ended up in the forum being shut down. In the past you fought removing the same content from luna’s and we lost most of our users. And then when CP posters were banned, you fought that too.  

For real though, what's this really about? 

We're past this now. 

How'd we get past this when I just replied? lol 

You're arguing about things from completely different cases across years like they're all connected while missing a ton of factors to suit an agenda that aims to make me seem pro-pedo, it's weird. 

I've made it more than clear that it's about Freedom of Speech, and as you keep ignoring, what about Jim? 

My point was that you keep giving cawk attention and bringing him up, which is curious/funny to me.

Yet it's not when I've laughed at others? 

What others? No one that you fought to keep has been banned before except for Jim. 

This is a bold faced lie, I've been defending against tons of bans since year one and otherwise defend the merits of some posters that are generally shat on or ignored. 

I mean even outside of Luna's typical banning fare I'd defend against, do you not remember me defending people like Dynastia? 

I think you're trying to find things where they aren't. 

I  just made an observation that you and turq are the only ones giving cawk attn. If you say there's nothing there, then ok.  

Except we aren't the only ones, at most "I made it into funny clickbait". 

You can find him funny if you want, that's fine, but don't pretend it's unnatural for me to wonder about it since you're the only one bringing him up and you were the only one defending him when he was posting pro-diddle content.

It's only unnatural because of how you're aiming to frame it. 

 I'm not framing anything.

Yes, you are. You're taking the situation as it is and are refusing to take in new data/ignoring other portions, then continue to try to shape it as if I'm "pro-diddler" because... why? 

Because someone "stood in your way", as you put it? 

I'm just noting that you’re making threads about cawk.

That wasn't how you started it, it landed here eventually. 

You were originally peddling that my making threads about Cawk was "bad" because it meant "we were on the same side" or some nonsense. 

And turquie is making threads about how you and her are building a new forum where cawk wont be banned. In this very thread she even said she wanted cawk to work on it. lol It's just what you're doing. 

No, this is how you're aiming to frame it. 

How much work have I put into a "new forum"? 

so what you're saying is we should organise sc like a society of lobsters?? 

Spatial Mind said: 

Luna's forum will evolve into a place with new members, and those members will despise SC and it's members.

Honestly I'd see it as good advertising to have them keep rattling on about us. 

It's like when we had articles made to shit on our forum, it was actually to our benefit as it still brought traffic at all. It's not like how Discord did us dirty from our own forum's animosity lashing at the forum itself on that platform in an effort to keep themselves away. 

organize SC like a mass grave